
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
1
Based on the insights from our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale, it's generally more effective for a niche SaaS product to emphasize your unique value rather than merely undercutting competitors’ prices. Here's why:
• Focus on Differentiation:
Our book highlights that pricing should reflect the balance between the number of customers willing to buy and the price they’re willing to pay. In a niche market, your unique features and specialized use cases often justify a premium price. Undercutting competitors can dilute the perceived value of your solution and lead to downward pricing pressures.
• Tailored Strategy for Niche Markets:
As emphasized in Price to Scale, while mass-market SaaS companies might optimize for market share with lower price points, niche products benefit more from a margin-maximizing approach. This strategy supports sustainable revenue growth and aligns with the specific needs of your target audience.
• Long-Term Impact:
Undercutting competitors might yield short-term wins, but it can also invite increased price sensitivity among customers over time. In contrast, demonstrating and pricing for unique value builds customer loyalty and solidifies your market position.
In summary, for a niche SaaS product, it is advisable to concentrate on your unique value proposition and price your product to reflect that value, rather than simply trying to win on price. This approach not only supports stronger margins but also reinforces your product’s unique benefits in the long run.
1
Based on our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, SaaS companies should treat pricing as a dynamic element that needs regular review. Here are the key takeaways:
• Regular Evaluation: Pricing models are only optimal for a particular stage. As the market conditions and product features evolve, it’s critical to revisit and adjust your pricing strategy in order to continue capturing value. Regular evaluations—whether yearly or sooner depending on market signals—ensure your pricing remains competitive and aligned with both customer needs and product developments.
• Experiment Early—with Caution: Our book advocates for a strategic, flexible approach from the outset. Experimenting with pricing early on can provide valuable insights and help you gather customer feedback, allowing you to find the most effective pricing structure more quickly. However, as emphasized in our book, avoid making sweeping changes without having a representative sample of user data. Early experiments should be designed carefully and be scalable, so you can pivot without disrupting customer trust.
In summary, Price to Scale advises that while it’s important to experiment with pricing early to learn and iterate, you should maintain a regular cadence of review and adjustment to adapt as your company and market mature. This approach ensures that your pricing remains both competitive and aligned with your evolving value proposition.
1
Below is a summary answer based on the discussion in our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale:
One-Size-Fits-All Pricing
• Simplicity & Clarity
– A single plan is easy for prospects to understand and can lower the friction for early adoption, especially when the product is new.
– It simplifies internal alignment (sales, support, marketing) by having one clear offer.
• Limited Segmentation & Revenue Capture
– A uniform pricing approach doesn’t allow you to differentiate based on varying customer needs or willingness to pay.
– You miss opportunities for upselling or capturing higher revenue from customers who might value more advanced features.
Multiple Tiered Pricing (e.g., Good – Better – Best)
• Enhanced Market Segmentation
– As outlined in Price to Scale, a tiered structure lets you target different market segments, such as SMBs and mid-market players, by aligning features with each segment’s primary use cases.
– It accommodates variations in customer size, use case complexity, and willingness to pay.
• Greater Upsell & Predictability
– With multiple tiers, there is an opportunity to guide customers to higher-value plans over time, leading to more predictable revenue streams.
– This structure supports a deliberate customer journey where clients can start at a lower tier and graduate to more comprehensive offerings as their needs grow.
• Increased Complexity
– Designing and maintaining distinct bundles requires careful planning and clear differentiation between packages.
– There is potential for confusion among prospects if the tier benefits are not communicated effectively, and it necessitates more robust sales and support frameworks.
Key Takeaway
Choosing between a one-size-fits-all plan and a multi-tiered structure depends on your product maturity, target market, and overall business strategy. As noted in our SaaS pricing book, Price to Scale, a simpler model might best suit early-stage or simpler products aiming to drive rapid adoption. By contrast, if you’re looking to capture value from distinct customer segments and drive higher average deal sizes, a tiered approach such as the Good–Better–Best framework offers significant advantages despite its complexity.
In summary, the decision should balance ease of adoption (favoring one-price models) with revenue optimization and segmentation (favoring tiered pricing).
1
Based on our Price to Scale book, here’s how to think about incorporating set-up or onboarding fees into your SaaS pricing:
• Direct Value Proposition: Our book explains that when you start charging fees for implementation, onboarding, and training—services that were once offered for free—customers generally accept them because they’ve come to expect these additional charges. It’s essential that you clearly articulate the value these services add.
• Transparent Communication: Communicate upfront what the fees cover. Customers are more receptive when they see that the fee is tied to tangible benefits like expert onboarding, faster time to value, or dedicated training sessions.
• Revenue Stream Opportunity: Instead of viewing these fees as potential obstacles, our book suggests considering them as a separate, valuable revenue stream. This strategy helps in covering the actual costs of implementation while elevating the perceived value of your offering.
• Internal Alignment: While there might be some internal reservations (e.g., from the sales team), our experience in the book shows that once this pricing change is implemented and clearly explained to customers, backlashes are minimal. Most clients expect to pay for these additional services—once you set the right benchmark, customer pushback typically diminishes.
In summary, incorporate set-up and onboarding fees as distinct line items that add specific value, communicate their benefits transparently to your customers, and consider them as an important revenue stream. As discussed in our Price to Scale book, this approach helps align both the internal teams and customer expectations, leading to an effective pricing strategy with minimal resistance.
1
Based on our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, there isn’t a one‐size‐fits-all answer – it really depends on your product, target market, and sales process. Here are some key takeaways from our book:
• There are multiple approaches: You can opt to publish your pricing and packaging in full, share a starting point or summary, or simply use “Contact Us” for complex enterprise plans. Each option has benefits based on how much standardization versus customization your product or service requires.
• For high-end, enterprise pricing, many companies choose to keep details under “Contact Us.” This allows you to tailor solutions and pricing to each customer’s unique needs without locking you into rigid public price points that might not capture maximum value. It also helps your sales team to qualify leads and communicate additional value—a strategy we discuss in our case studies.
• On the other hand, if you can design a pricing model that is transparent even at the upper end of the market, there’s merit in publishing as much as possible. This can build trust and reduce friction for potential customers. However, be mindful that with truly enterprise solutions, complexity often calls for a more consultative sales process.
In summary, our book recommends that if your enterprise pricing is truly custom or involves significant negotiation and value demonstration, it’s usually best to steer customers toward the “Contact Us” approach. This ensures you’re not forced into one-size-fits-all pricing at a point where personalization is key to maximizing revenue.
1
Below is how you might assess whether your SaaS is priced too low or too high:
Directly compare your pricing against your costs:
• Our book, Price to Scale, emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between average and marginal costs. While the average cost gives you a broad view of your spend across all users, the marginal cost—what it costs to serve one more customer—is typically much lower. If you’re pricing based on your higher average costs, you might be setting prices too high and missing opportunities to drive additional volume. Conversely, if your prices are so low that you aren’t covering even your marginal costs effectively, you could be underpricing.
Evaluate customer acquisition cost (CAC) and implementation expenses:
• As discussed in our SaaS pricing book, take a real-world scenario where the cost to onboard a mid-sized customer may run around $3,000 but competitive pressures in a fast-paced SMB environment might drive deal sizes lower. If the CAC is nearly as high (or higher) than your deal size, it is a strong sign that your pricing might not be viable. Look for alignment between your CAC, deal sizes, and the profitability metrics you target.
Monitor customer behavior and market comparisons:
• Our book advises keeping an eye on key indicators like churn rates, conversion metrics (especially for lower-cost or freemium offerings), and customer feedback. For example, if you notice resistance from customers when introducing lower-cost tiers or if freemium users rarely convert at anticipated rates, this may indicate your current pricing is out of sync with customer expectations or market value.
• Additionally, benchmarking your pricing against similar products (such as how a Salesforce app might be compared to Salesforce’s base pricing) helps you determine if your pricing is competitive.
Adapt to broader economic factors:
• The book also points out that macro factors like cost of capital and economic regime changes (e.g., changes in interest rates) can influence both customer behavior and the broader SaaS landscape. Consider how shifts in these external metrics might pressure you to adjust your pricing model.
In summary, assess if your pricing is too low or too high by aligning your pricing with the marginal cost of serving new customers, ensuring your CAC is sustainable relative to deal sizes, monitoring customer conversion and churn on various pricing tiers, and keeping a close watch on broader market and economic conditions. This balanced approach, as laid out in Price to Scale, is key to making an informed pricing decision.
1
Based on our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, there isn’t a one-size-fits-all answer – it really depends on your product’s value proposition, how your costs scale with usage, and customer expectations. Here are some key points to consider:
• Bundled vs. Unbundled Services:
In many early-stage setups, companies bundle support and customer success (along with implementation, onboarding, and training) as a way to ease adoption and reduce friction for customers. However, as your business matures and these services become more resource intensive, there’s a growing trend to unbundle these components and charge for them separately. This not only helps cover increased costs but also clearly communicates the value added by these services.
• Cost and Value Considerations:
If robust support or customer success services represent a significant cost or if they tangibly boost the customer's success with your product, charging for them can be a justified revenue stream. Our book discusses scenarios where what used to be “free” is later monetized because customers expect to pay for these services once they see the value.
• Market Expectations and Strategic Evolution:
As platforms mature and customer touchpoints (like customer success) become a larger portion of the revenue, the market also evolves. Customers come to expect that premium support comes at a premium price, and clearly itemizing these costs can help manage customer expectations while ensuring sustainability.
In summary, our book Price to Scale suggests weighing both internal cost structures and customer expectations. If your support or customer success offerings are a major contributor to your value and require significant ongoing investment, it can be effective to charge a fee. If you’re still building early traction, bundling might be more appropriate to minimize friction and encourage adoption. Always align your pricing model with your broader growth objectives and value delivery.
1
Based on the strategies outlined in our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale, there isn’t a one-size-fits-all answer—instead, it depends on your customer segments, market positioning, and overall pricing objectives. Here are some key takeaways:
• Strategic Discounting:
Our book advises that offering a discount (such as “two months free”) can be an effective tactic to secure longer-term commitment and improve revenue predictability, particularly when you’re targeting customers who value stability and are willing to commit longer. However, such discounts should come with “strings”—for example, additional commitment or tie-ins with add-ons rather than a unilateral price cut—to maintain product value and profitability.
• Customer Segmentation:
The book emphasizes the importance of segmenting your customer base. Some segments might be driven by the incentive of an upfront discount, while others may prefer consistency in pricing. A tailored approach helps in maximizing revenue capture, so aligning the annual discount with specific customer needs or behaviors can be more effective than a blanket discount.
• Maintaining Value Perception:
There is also a consideration of how discounting can impact the perceived value of your product. If annual and monthly plans have the same effective rate, the simplicity can appeal to customers who don’t want to overthink the pricing structure. On the other hand, a modest discount for annual commitment can encourage longer-term engagement without undermining the product’s inherent value—provided it’s managed carefully to avoid “price erosion” in the eyes of the market.
In summary, our book suggests that if you choose to offer an annual discount, it should be part of a broader strategy that considers customer segmentation, commitment level, and overall product value. A well-designed discount can enhance retention and revenue predictability, so long as it’s implemented with clear terms and a strategic intent.
1
Based on our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, you want to strike a careful balance between offering enough value in your lower tier to make it attractive while holding back enough premium features in higher tiers to drive upgrades. Here are several key strategies discussed in Price to Scale to help you navigate this challenge:
• Segment Your Customer Base:
Understand that your users have varying frequencies and use cases. Segment your customer base—such as heavy versus light users—and tailor feature sets to meet each group's core needs. As discussed on page 245, different cohorts might need different packages depending on how they use the product or the deal terms they originally negotiated.
• Good–Better–Best (or Tiered) Packaging:
One common method is to create a graduated package structure (Good, Better, Best) where each tier is designed to solve the primary needs of its target segment. In this setup, although the lower tier (often the “Good”) is valuable by itself, the higher tiers (“Better” and “Best”) include advanced features that deliver additional value and justify the higher price point. (See page 29 for a discussion on how this approach caters particularly well to segments like SMB and Mid-Market.)
• Modular Approach:
Instead of simply stacking up the same features with small variations, consider a modular approach. This involves attributing value to distinct modules, which can then be bundled into different plans. This method allows you to highlight critical value-add features exclusively in the upgrade tiers while keeping the base package lean yet effective. This differentiation helps customers recognize a clear, compelling incentive to move to a higher tier.
• Naming and Positioning:
Even small tweaks in how you name and market tiers can make a difference. Instead of using labels that suggest just slight upgrades, consider more distinct names (for example, “Premium” vs. “Advanced”) and adjust the feature set accordingly so that the higher tiers feel significantly more valuable. As noted in the book, using alternative line-ups rather than simple discount variations minimizes easy comparisons that might otherwise undercut the incentive to upgrade.
• Practical Trade-Offs and Testing:
Always be ready to adjust. Use real-world data and customer feedback to test whether the lower tier is giving away too much. If you notice that most users are not transitioning to higher tiers, it might be time to reassess the features included in the base offering or introduce add-on options, as described by our book’s recommendations.
In summary, Price to Scale advises that determining which features go into each tier involves a combination of thoughtful segmentation, a graded value structure (either via Good–Better–Best or a modular approach), and strategic naming/positioning. By delivering just enough value in the lower tier to engage users while reserving high-demand features for premium packages, you can effectively drive upgrades while catering to diverse customer needs.
1
Based on our SaaS pricing book, Price to Scale, there are two primary approaches to splitting a single SaaS product into Basic/Pro/Enterprise tiers:
Concept:
This method groups features into three (or sometimes two or more) distinct packages. Each package targets a different customer segment based on the features that best solve their main use cases.
Criteria for Differentiation:
Feature Set: The basic version includes essential features needed for immediate value; the pro or better version offers additional functionalities that address more complex or specialized needs, while the enterprise tier includes advanced capabilities.
Customer Segmentation: Typically, the basic package is aimed at clients with less variance in willingness to pay (often SMBs), ensuring high deal velocity—whereas higher tiers target users who are willing to invest more for additional value.
Pricing Sensitivity: By aligning price points to the feature set, you capture revenue from each segment efficiently without overwhelming customers with a one-size-fits-all offer.
Concept:
This strategy involves breaking down the product’s capabilities into distinct modules. Each module is assigned its own value, allowing customers to build a configuration that meets their unique requirements.
Criteria for Differentiation:
Value Attribution: Each module or feature component is valued independently, and customers can select add-ons based on their specific needs.
Customization and Flexibility: Customers with advanced requirements (often enterprise clients) can choose additional functionalities as needed, rather than being forced into a one-size-fits-all package.
Market Positioning: This flexibility helps in catering to a varied customer base, from those who need just the basics to those who require a highly specialized suite of features.
Our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale, highlights that the decision between a Good-Better-Best versus a Modular approach should be based on:
Ultimately, choose your differentiation criteria based on the specific value your product delivers to each customer segment, ensuring every tier is clearly matched with customer needs and willingness to pay.
1
Based on our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, there isn’t a one-size-fits-all answer. Instead, the book recommends a thoughtful, segmented approach. Here are some key takeaways:
• When rolling out new features or feature updates, one primary goal is often to capture greater value—usually by pushing customers toward higher-tier packages. This approach can help boost the Average Selling Price (ASP) and maintain an upward revenue trajectory. However, it can also create friction for existing customers who paid a lower price for a broader functionality set.
• It’s important to recognize that if you simply lock new features behind a higher tier, you may risk alienating or frustrating your current customers, particularly when they face renewal decisions later on. The book discusses this tension—especially when the list price of a premium plan may be two to three times higher than what legacy customers are paying.
• A recommended approach is to segment your customer base. For example, if some customers use only lightweight features, they might be best served by keeping those features accessible in their current plan or through an add-on option. Conversely, customers who need the latest, most advanced features might be nudged toward a premium tier that reflects that enhanced value.
• The book also suggests creative solutions, such as offering upsell menus or special incentives (like discounts or deferred payments) for moving to the new premium plans. If the pricing change requires a company-wide migration, it should be treated as a dedicated project rather than a simple update.
In summary, our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale, advises balancing the drive to increase product value with fairness to existing customers. Instead of a blanket decision to push new features exclusively into higher tiers, consider a segmented, flexible approach that offers options like targeted upsells and alternative add-ons. This strategy ensures that the rollout of new functionalities is strategically aligned with customer segments while mitigating potential friction during renewals.
1
Based on the principles laid out in Price to Scale, it is generally more effective to limit features rather than impose usage quotas in your lower-tier plan to drive upgrades.
Key points from our book include:
• When you limit features in a lower-tier plan, you clearly delineate the value proposition between tiers. Customers on the lite plan quickly see what additional functionality is available in higher tiers, making the upgrade decision more compelling.
• Usage-based restrictions can be trickier. As discussed in our book, usage quotas work best when your usage metric is predictable and measurable. However, if the measurement isn’t as clear—or if customers feel penalized by arbitrary limits—it can create friction rather than a seamless incentive to upgrade.
• The approach of limiting features allows you to maintain a clear differentiation between plans. Customers who begin with a simplified set of functionalities are often motivated to move to higher tiers once they see the added value that comes with extra features, a dynamic the book emphasizes when discussing packaging strategies.
In summary, our SaaS pricing book "Price to Scale" suggests that restricting features in a lower-tier plan is generally a more effective driver for upgrades compared to imposing usage quotas. This strategy clarifies the value gap between tiers and makes the benefits of upgrading much more tangible for your customers.
1
Based on the insights shared in our SaaS pricing book, Price to Scale, introducing a cheaper, limited tier can be a strategic move—but it comes with important considerations:
Benefits of a Cheaper Tier
• A well-designed “lite” package can capture a broader segment of price-sensitive customers who might be hesitant to commit to a single, all-encompassing plan.
• It may serve as a defensive maneuver against churn by providing a more accessible option for users who might otherwise leave when they find lower-cost alternatives.
• When done correctly, lower-cost tiers can boost user acquisition and contribute to long-term revenue growth by addressing the needs of less demanding customers.
Risks and How to Mitigate Them
• There is a risk that customers might choose the cheaper option over your main plan, potentially eroding your premium revenue. As discussed in the book (see Chapter on Packaging Strategies), price-sensitive users may place increasing emphasis on cost, particularly as competitors provide lower-priced alternatives.
• To mitigate cannibalization, design the tiers so the limited plan only includes core functionalities, while your main plan offers advanced features and additional value. This clear differentiation helps maintain the integrity and perceived value of the premium offering.
Practical Recommendations
1. Clearly segment features: Ensure that the cheaper tier addresses basic needs while leaving sufficient premium value—such as advanced functionalities, dedicated support, or enhanced performance—for your main plan.
2. Monitor your market: As highlighted in Price to Scale, balancing acquisition with long-term revenue requires ongoing analysis of customer behavior and market response.
3. Use feature gating strategically: Encourage users who start with the cheaper tier to upgrade once their needs outgrow the basics by communicating clear upgrade paths and benefits.
Summary
A cheaper limited tier can be beneficial if it is carefully crafted to meet the needs of a specific customer segment without undermining your flagship offering. By maintaining clear differentiation between the plans, you can capture additional users while protecting your main plan’s value. For a deeper dive, consider reviewing the sections on market segmentation and packaging strategies in Price to Scale.
1
Based on our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale, one of the best ways to package a complex set of features is to simplify your pricing page presentation while still offering clear, segmented value propositions. Here are some key recommendations from the book:
• Use a “Good-Better-Best” Model
– Group your features into two or three distinct packages that correspond to different customer segments.
– Each tier should provide a coherent set of capabilities that solve your customer’s most important needs without overwhelming them with every single feature.
• Focus on Positioning and Value
– Packaging is more than just bundling features together—it’s about designing offers that resonate with each market segment’s main use cases.
– Be sure to clearly articulate the value delivered in each package, so even if your product’s overall proposition is complex, each tier feels focused and actionable.
• Keep the Pricing Page Simple
– Consider summarizing your pricing details (like “starting from $X”) rather than listing every detail.
– For highly complex packages, allow more detailed discussions to take place during sales calls. This avoids cluttering the pricing page and confusing users.
Ultimately, the key takeaway is to balance clarity with comprehensiveness. Simplify your packaging by defining clear, tiered offers that directly map to your customers' needs, and then dive deeper into complexities through targeted conversations if necessary. This strategy ensures that your users get the value they need without being overwhelmed by the details on the pricing page.
1
Below is a summary of our insights from Price to Scale regarding pricing tier names and their impact on conversion rates:
• Direct answer:
Pricing tier names are more than just labels—they are a marketing tool that helps set customer expectations and communicates the value of each offering. The names should be chosen to clearly differentiate the tiers, convey the value proposition, and ideally, reduce customer confusion. Simple, distinct, and evocative names (such as Starter, Growth, Enterprise, or alternatives like Premium and Advanced) can positively impact conversion rates by making the pricing structure easier to understand and more appealing.
• Supporting insights from the book:
As discussed in our pricing strategy book Price to Scale, even small changes like renaming “Pro” and “Elite” to “Premium” and “Advanced” can help customers quickly grasp the differences between plans. The book emphasizes that too many tiers or overly complex naming can lead to analysis paralysis. Simplifying the options and clearly labeling them aligns with better conversion rates, as customers feel more confident in selecting the tier that fits their needs.
• Practical application:
When deciding on names for your tiers, consider:
• Summary:
In Price to Scale, we highlight that while the specific names of your pricing tiers aren’t the only factor in driving conversions, they play a critical role in how customers perceive and choose between the packages. Clear, simple, and value-driven tier names not only prevent confusion but are an important element in a successful pricing strategy.
This approach underscores our overall philosophy that simplicity and clarity in pricing helps drive better customer engagement and conversion rates.
1
Below is the answer based on insights from our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale:
• The book emphasizes that tiered pricing should be aligned with specific customer needs. Including perks such as priority support or a dedicated account manager in the top tier can be effective if these benefits are especially valued by your highest-value or most demanding customers.
• In our book we explain that for a successful pricing upgrade, it’s crucial to segment your customer base. Not every customer will value high-touch support equally. For some, these extras are a significant reason to upgrade; for others, the cost may outweigh the perceived benefit.
• The strategy should involve a detailed analysis of how much value your top-tier customers attach to these services. In some cases, offering such benefits exclusively in the highest tier helps clearly differentiate the package and drives meaningful upgrades. However, the book also warns that overly expensive add-on models can sometimes preclude the upsell if customers do not see a proportional benefit.
• A practical takeaway is to experiment with a structured upsell menu—one that clearly shows the added value (like priority support or an account manager) and is tailored to meet the needs of those customers who require more hands-on service. This could involve piloting the exclusive top-tier benefits or even offering them as optional add-ons, depending on direct customer feedback.
In summary, our book Price to Scale advises that placing such perks in the top tier can indeed entice a meaningful number of upgrades if executed thoughtfully through customer segmentation and clear value demonstration.
1
Below is a summary of what our SaaS pricing book Price to Scale explains about a “build your own plan” or modular approach:
• Direct Answer
Yes, several companies have experimented with a build-your-own-plan or modular approach where customers select and pay for individual add-on features instead of choosing from a few fixed tiers.
• How It Works (Based on Modular Packaging)
Our book explains this strategy under the concept of modular packaging (see page 37 of Price to Scale). In this model, you start by listing all notable features and mapping them to the specific use cases they address. This helps you avoid the one-size-fits-all pitfall of fixed tiers and allows you to craft bespoke offerings that match customer needs more precisely.
• Pros
• Cons
• Practical Takeaway
While the modular approach can help tailor offerings closely to customer needs and unlock higher revenue per use case, it demands robust internal processes and systems to manage the added complexity in pricing, sales, and forecasting. This trade-off—as outlined in Price to Scale—should be carefully weighed based on your market segment and operational capabilities.
In summary, the build-your-own-plan approach offers significant benefits in terms of flexibility and value capture but introduces complexity that must be managed effectively for it to succeed.
1
Direct Answer:
You decide to split a product into separate SKUs or modules when your product’s capabilities naturally segment into distinct value offerings that address different customer needs and justify separate pricing—and when testing confirms that these segments resonate with different buyer segments.
Supporting Details from Our Book, Price to Scale:
• In our book, we discuss two primary approaches to packaging your product: the Good-Better-Best model and a modular approach.
• The modular approach is particularly relevant when certain features or functions of your product represent high-value, expensive-to-deliver point products. If these individual modules provide added or differentiated value compared to the core product, it may make sense to price them separately.
• As mentioned around the discussion on modular packaging, the decision to split should be driven by a clear mapping between distinct feature sets and customer segments’ primary use cases and willingness-to-pay. Testing your initial packaging hypothesis against specific segments is crucial to ensure that the separate modules have true package-to-segment fit.
Context and Practical Application:
• Evaluate your product’s feature set: Identify whether there are capabilities that can be isolated into high-value offerings.
• Consider delivery costs and value perception: If certain features are costly to deliver and add significant value, they may justify a separate SKU with a premium price.
• Conduct market testing: Validate whether different customer segments respond better to a modular pricing strategy versus a unified offering.
• Look at competitive dynamics: Understand if publishing separate prices can enhance transparency and align your offerings with specific market needs.
Summary:
In short, split your product into separate SKUs or modules when distinct and high-value functionalities emerge, confirmed through customer research and testing, ensuring that each module aligns with a specific customer segment’s needs and price tolerance. This strategic modular approach, as outlined in our SaaS pricing book, Price to Scale, helps you capture maximum revenue while clearly communicating your product’s value.
1
Based on our saas pricing book Price to Scale, included seat counts can work in practice if implemented with complete transparency and clear measurement. The book explains that in the “old world,” vague licensing language and opaque seat‐based models often left customers confused and complicated internal tracking. Today, with cloud-based measurement and reporting, it's essential to clearly communicate exactly how usage (and the limitations of “up to 5 users” or similar) is tracked, billed, and when the upgrade thresholds are reached.
Key takeaways include:
• Transparent tracking and clear usage metrics: Our book emphasizes that customers need to understand the underlying measurements. If the seat count is easy to track (as is possible with modern cloud tools), it can serve as a natural trigger for upsell when customers exceed the allotted seats.
• Driving upgrades versus added complexity: When implemented well, such limits can drive upgrades by encouraging customers to add seats as they grow. However, if the messaging or the tracking isn’t transparent, it might lead to customer hesitance and even additional support burdens.
• Segmentation and tailored approaches: The book advocates for segmenting your customer base and offering alternatives—such as volume-based discounts or add-on features—to avoid one-size-fits-all complications.
In summary, included seat counts can both drive upgrades and risk complicating matters. The key is to design the pricing structure with clear measurement and transparency, ensuring that customers know when and why they’re prompted to upgrade.
1
Below is a concise answer from our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale:
• Yes, there is a risk in offering too many plan options. When you have too many tiers, you risk confusing your customers and diluting the clarity of your value proposition. Customers might have difficulty choosing the plan that best fits their needs, which can lead to suboptimal decisions—like opting for a package that isn’t a great fit or pressuring you to discount features to close the sale.
• Similarly, having too few tiers can be problematic if your segments’ diverse needs aren’t adequately met. With too few options, you might miss out on capturing additional revenue opportunities from different customer segments or prevent natural upsell paths.
• How do you know if you have too few or too many tiers? Look at several key signals:
– Are your customers clear about what each tier offers? If feedback or user behavior suggests confusion or frequent questions about “what’s the difference” between plans, it might indicate too many options.
– Is there evidence of “shelfware” or buyers being locked into a plan that doesn’t evolve with their needs? That could point to having either too few or misaligned features per tier.
– Monitor your churn and upgrade/downgrade conversations. If you often find customers downgrading out of necessity because the tier allocations don’t match their evolving usage, it’s a sign that the segmentation might not be optimal.
– Analyze usage data and sales performance for each tier; significant gaps or overlaps can indicate that you’re either overcomplicating your offers or not fully addressing potential revenue segments.
In our book we discuss the “good–better–best” approach as an example of a simple structure. However, without a deep understanding of each customer segment’s true needs, even this simple framework can backfire. The key takeaway is to align your plan structure with clear, differentiated value for each segment—ensuring cognitive clarity for your customers while capturing maximum revenue opportunities.
Remember: the optimal number of tiers is one that clearly maps to your customer segments without overwhelming them, while still leaving room for upsell and flexibility as customer needs evolve.
1
Based on the insights in our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale, it's clear that changing what's included in each tier after launch is something that many companies face—but the key is to handle it proactively and transparently to keep existing customers feeling valued. Here are some of the approaches highlighted in the book:
• When you need to adjust tier contents, especially if you’re aiming to increase your Average Selling Price (ASP) for future customers, consider segmenting your existing customer base. Different cohorts (for example, heavy users versus those who signed up with a deep discount) may require different treatment.
• Communication should be upfront. Instead of imposing changes abruptly during renewal, proactively reach out to your customers. Explain clearly why the changes are happening, whether it's to introduce new functionality or to better align the product with market value. Outlining the value they receive—possibly through an upgrade option or a discount with a commitment—can help ease the transition.
• Rather than simply discounting or rehashing the old tiers, create a new and distinct lineup. By doing this, you avoid direct comparisons that might leave existing customers feeling short-changed.
• Engage internal teams (such as Sales and Customer Care) early in the process to anticipate concerns and fully prepare support plans. This internal alignment helps ensure that messaging is consistent and that customer concerns are addressed promptly.
In summary, our book emphasizes the importance of customer segmentation, clear and proactive communication, and value-based offerings when making post-launch adjustments to tier structures. This approach not only maintains trust but also positions your product for increased market value moving forward.
1
Based on our book Price to Scale, the best way to identify the right usage metric for a usage-based pricing model is to follow a structured evaluation process that ensures your chosen metric aligns with both the value your customers receive and the underlying costs you incur. Here’s how you can approach it:
Determine Your Overall Pricing Model
• As discussed in our book, start by deciding whether your product fits a consumption-based model (usage-driven) or a capability-based model (fixed, lump-sum pricing). For a usage-based approach, you’re in the consumption realm.
Generate and Evaluate Candidate Metrics
• List a few potential usage metrics (for example, API calls, GB of data processed, etc.)
• Evaluate each based on its ability to directly reflect the value delivered to the customer. In our book, we emphasize that the metric should be something your customers inherently understand and appreciate – it should be closely tied to how they benefit from the service.
Align the Metric with Cost Drivers and Customer Perception
• Choose a metric that not only matches customer value perception but also mirrors your internal cost structure. For example, if data processing costs are a significant part of your expenses, charging per GB might better correlate with your infrastructure costs. Conversely, if each API call represents a core value-adding process, then that might be the better metric.
Practical Testing and Validation
• Implement pilots or tests with different metrics if possible. Analyze which metric better supports straightforward pricing conversations and adoption among your customers.
• Use feedback as a part of the continual refinement process, ensuring that the usage metric remains relevant as your product and market evolve.
In summary, the book recommends that you begin with a clear identification of your pricing model, generate several candidate usage metrics, and then select the one that best aligns with the customer’s value perception and your internal cost dynamics. This systematic approach, as detailed in Price to Scale, helps ensure that your pricing model is both competitive and scalable.
1
Based on insights from our SaaS pricing book, Price to Scale, a hybrid model—one that includes both a base subscription fee and usage fees—often provides more predictable recurring revenue compared to a pure usage-based model.
Key points include:
• A fixed base fee guarantees that you have a recurring revenue baseline, offering stability and predictability. As noted in our book, this is particularly beneficial when you want to smooth out revenue fluctuations and boost long-term financial visibility.
• The usage fee element still allows you to capture additional value as customers increase their service consumption. This flexibility aligns with the concept of consumption-based pricing discussed in Price to Scale, where pricing models are chosen based on the measurable value delivered to the customer.
• However, our book also explains that if your product is new to the market, clients might initially prefer a simpler, linear (pure usage-based) model because of lower initial costs and fewer commitments. This means that the optimal choice depends on your market maturity and customer adoption rates.
In summary, while a hybrid pricing model typically offers the advantage of ensuring a stable floor of recurring revenue and adjusting to customer growth, its suitability should be evaluated against your product's stage and market dynamics. As our book emphasizes, regularly reassessing and adapting your pricing structure is key to staying competitive in a changing market.
1
Below is our answer based on the concepts outlined in our SaaS pricing book, Price to Scale.
Yes, preventing bill shock is a key concern in any usage-based model—and our approach as detailed in Price to Scale emphasizes predictability and transparency to keep your customers comfortable. Here are some proven strategies to mitigate bill shock:
• Focus on Predictability:
In Price to Scale we stress that customers value bills they can predict month-on-month. The book explains that by ensuring your usage metric is both measurable and predictable, you help customers avoid surprises. This means designing your pricing so that increases are incremental and expected—not a dramatic jump.
• Implement Usage Caps:
One effective method is to set explicit usage caps. By letting customers know beforehand that there is an upper limit to their billing, not only are you protecting them from runaway charges, but you also create a framework where they can better plan and manage costs. Usage caps can also work as a safeguard in the event of unexpected surges.
• Introduce Alert Notifications:
Building in automated alerts when customers approach key usage thresholds is another layer of protection. These notifications ensure that customers have a chance to review or adjust their consumption before reaching their limit. As discussed in Price to Scale, clear communication and proactive notifications contribute to better customer satisfaction and help maintain trust.
In summary, by combining a focus on predictable billing with practical measures like usage caps and alert notifications, you can effectively manage customer expectations and avoid bill shock. This approach not only helps your customers feel more secure in their spending but also contributes to more consistent revenue forecasting for your business.
1
Below is a concise answer based on the principles and advice in our SaaS pricing book, Price to Scale:
Direct Answer
When discussing a usage-based pricing model with customers accustomed to flat monthly fees, it’s important to acknowledge their current expectations while clearly demonstrating the additional value and flexibility that a usage-based system can offer. Here are some tips based on our book’s approach:
Key Tips for Conveying Value
• Acknowledge Existing Norms:
Begin by recognizing that your customers are familiar with flat fees. As we discuss in our book, it’s essential to start with what customers already know. This helps build trust and eases the transition to a new pricing model.
• Rebrand the Offerings:
To avoid direct comparisons with flat-fee tiers (like ‘Pro’ or ‘Elite’), consider rebranding your packages with different names, such as ‘Premium’ and ‘Advanced’. This subtle shift in language can reposition the model as a distinct and beneficial alternative.
• Emphasize Flexibility and Alignment with Value:
Illustrate that a usage-based model aligns costs directly with value received. Explain that instead of paying a fixed fee regardless of use, customers only pay for what they actually consume. This means potential savings during low usage periods and immediate scalability when their business grows, which can be a strong selling point.
• Highlight Success Stories:
According to our guidance, leveraging internal success stories and testimonials from sales teams who have effectively adopted and sold the usage-based model can be very persuasive. Real-world examples help customers see the model’s benefits in action.
• Discuss the Customer-Centric Benefits:
Clearly outline what’s in it for the customer. As mentioned in Price to Scale, the goal is to make it clear that the usage-based approach isn’t about a mere shift in accounting—it’s about creating a pricing model that mirrors the customer's operational reality and growth. This customer-centric focus can help overcome initial hesitations.
Conclusion
In summary, when conveying the value of a usage-based pricing model, start by recognizing the flat fee mindset, rebrand and differentiate your service offerings, and clearly articulate the benefits of paying for usage—namely, flexibility, scalability, and alignment with actual value. This step-by-step approach, as detailed in our pricing strategy book Price to Scale, can help customers understand and appreciate the rationale behind moving to a usage-based system.
1
Below is a concise approach based on the framework in our SaaS pricing book, Price to Scale:
Directly tie price to measurable value by selecting a usage metric that is both predictable and scalable. As described in Chapter 3 of Price to Scale, if the metric is predictable, you can make your pricing granular to match different usage levels.
Use a modular or block-based system. Our book highlights models like the cell-phone plan—where customers purchase blocks of usage with built-in volume discounts—as an effective way to incentivize higher consumption while ensuring revenue scales with each increment. Higher tiers offer lower per-unit rates, rewarding larger customers while still charging for additional usage.
Design clear tiers with defined thresholds. The tiered pricing structure should:
In summary, to design tiered usage pricing where bigger customers receive volume discounts and revenue scales up with usage, identify a predictable and measurable usage metric, adopt a block or modular approach, set clear tier thresholds, and model your pricing to balance incentives with revenue capture. This ensures a scalable pricing model that benefits both your customers and your bottom line.
1
Based on our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, the answer is that you typically don’t want to pass on 100% of the additional costs incurred by heavy usage. Instead, you should design your pricing model to balance and match the underlying cost structure.
Here are the key points to consider:
• Marginal Versus Average Cost:
As explained in our book, the marginal cost (the cost of serving one additional unit of usage) is usually much lower than the average cost because many costs (like development, customer support, etc.) are fixed. This means that while one customer’s heavy usage can affect average costs, the cost to serve incremental usage is often lower.
• Granular Pricing Structures:
The book recommends using granular usage metrics so that you can more closely align pricing with the actual costs incurred on a per-unit basis—especially when hard costs (such as compute power or storage) are directly tied to usage. If a customer’s heavy usage is driving up these specific costs, then it might be appropriate to build in a cost pass-through component for that excess usage.
• Balancing Risk and Growth:
If you pass on all additional costs, you might risk discouraging product adoption or causing negative customer sentiment. Conversely, absorbing all costs could jeopardize your margins if your costs scale unexpectedly. Therefore, the ideal approach often involves sharing some of the cost risk: you might absorb a portion of the cost increase to maintain customer satisfaction while passing on the remainder to protect your margins.
In summary, our book suggests that for usage-based SaaS pricing, a balanced approach is required. You should design your pricing to pass through enough of the variable, incremental costs (especially when they are directly tied to usage), while absorbing a portion of the fixed or marginal costs to continue incentivizing customers to drive usage growth. This nuanced approach ensures sustainability without sacrificing market competitiveness.
1
Below is a direct answer to your question with key takeaways from our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale:
In summary, use a dual approach: implement a technically rigorous usage tracking system and pair it with a proven billing platform while always ensuring rev rec and contract terms are meticulously integrated. This comprehensive method ensures your invoicing is both accurate and customer-friendly, as detailed throughout Price to Scale.
1
Based on our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, customers tend to value predictability in their bills, but there isn’t a one‐size‐fits-all answer. Here’s a breakdown:
• Direct Answer:
Many customers appreciate a flat-rate, predictable pricing structure because it allows them to forecast their costs, making budgeting simpler. However, if your usage metrics are highly predictable and measurable, a carefully designed usage-based model can also work well—provided you clearly communicate how usage translates into costs.
• Supporting Book Insights:
Our book explains that one of the key criteria for selecting a pricing model is “Predictability” (see our section on the five metric criteria). Customers prefer consistency in what they are billed because unpredictable, fluctuating charges can make budgeting difficult for them and revenue forecasting challenging for you. However, if you have a hard metric that customers can understand (like a t-shirt sizing approach with clear boundaries), then a model with usage-based variability can be both acceptable and appealing.
• Gauging Potential Concerns:
To determine whether a usage-based model might scare off potential users, the book recommends:
• Practical Application:
Assess your product’s usage patterns. If the metric is reliably measurable (like blocks of usage, similar to many cell-phone plans discussed in Price to Scale), you can structure your tiers with a “generous buffer” to mitigate concerns about unexpected costs. Conversely, if usage is less predictable, sticking with a flat rate or bundling usage into larger, less granular buckets might be preferable.
• Summary:
In essence, while predictable flat-rate pricing is often favored by customers for its stability, a usage-based model can work effectively if designed around a clear, measurable, and predictable metric. Testing the pricing structure through customer interactions and sales feedback is key to ensuring that customers won’t be scared off by variability.
This balanced approach, as outlined in Price to Scale, helps you align your pricing strategy with both operational forecasting and customer comfort.
1
Based on our pricing strategy book Price to Scale, yes—there have been instances where companies shifted between pricing models, and doing so can positively influence customer retention and overall growth.
• One example discussed in our book involves a transition where a company moved from a seat-based licensing model to a usage-based “events” model. Initially, the change was introduced as an opt-in transition. This pilot helped identify customers who were struggling under the previous model and who were at risk of churning.
• During the rollout, customers who had concerns about the higher costs under a per-seat (or per-employee) licensing model and were negatively impacted by that structure found the new model more aligned with their actual usage. As a result, many customers who might have otherwise churned opted into the new plan, leading to improved retention rates and supporting growth.
• The book emphasizes that the key to a successful switch is transparency, clear communication, and ensuring that customers understand exactly how usage is measured. This clarity on measurement and billing was crucial to build trust and demonstrate value, ultimately making the change beneficial both from a growth and a churn-reduction perspective.
In summary, our book Price to Scale shows that strategically shifting from one pricing model to another—even from a per-user to a usage-based model—can reduce churn and boost growth when executed thoughtfully and with a pilot-driven, customer-focused approach.
1
Below is an approach that aligns with the principles shared in our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale:
Directly Address the Usage Paradox
It’s important to design your free tier so users can value the service without fully consuming its primary utility. This balance is achieved by providing enough free credits or usage to demonstrate value, while setting clear limits that encourage users to upgrade once they hit thresholds.
Use Thoughtful Caps and Tiers
• Define clear usage limits: Set a monthly or time-based credit cap that’s generous enough for evaluation but prevents heavy usage.
• Introduce gradual thresholds: As outlined in our book, create checkpoints or “value crescendo” moments where users naturally encounter the need for more capacity.
• Consider feature gating: Offer core functionality for free and reserve advanced features or higher usage limits for paid tiers.
Highlight the Transition Value
Emphasize benefits that go beyond the free credits. For instance, show how paying customers gain additional value in terms of higher reliability, support, analytics, or other premium features that free users miss out on. This ensures that the free tier acts as a taste of the service rather than a complete solution.
Monitor and Iterate
As recommended in Price to Scale, establish tracking on free tier engagement. This data will inform how many users convert, what usage patterns indicate readiness to upgrade, and whether the free credits provided are triggering the right behavior. Adjust limits or incentives accordingly, ensuring that the free tier remains a stepping stone—rather than a substitute—to the paid experience.
In summary, a balanced free tier or credit plan should allow potential customers to experience the service without undercutting the incentive to transition to a paid plan. By strategically setting usage limits, feature distinctions, and clear upgrade triggers, you can let users trial your usage-based service effectively while maintaining a strong revenue model.
1
Below is a concise answer based on our saas pricing book, Price to Scale:
• When it comes to billing frequency in a usage-based model, many companies bill on a regular cycle (for example, monthly) for the prior period’s usage. This approach aggregates your customers’ activities and helps both your customers and your finance team manage expectations. (Of course, if your product naturally lends itself to real-time tracking and billing—as can be ideal for certain high-frequency scenarios—you might consider that option. The key is to align the billing cycle with how your customers perceive value and use the product.)
• Regarding overages, our book illustrates the “cell phone plan model” (a form of the 3-part tariff) as a popular approach. In this model, you set a base amount of usage for a fixed fee and then charge a transparent overage fee for any additional usage. This way, rather than automatically upgrading customers (which can sometimes cause disruption or surprise costs), you give them a clear view of when they’ve exceeded their plan, along with a known cost for that extra usage. This maintains both predictability and flexibility in the customer experience.
To sum up, our pricing strategy recommends:
• Using a regular billing cycle (commonly monthly) that reflects previous usage.
• Charging clear, pre-defined overage fees instead of auto-upgrading customers, unless your usage pattern and customer experience warrant real-time adjustments.
This approach ensures that your pricing remains transparent, predictable, and closely aligned with customer value—key themes in Price to Scale.
1
Our book, Price to Scale, emphasizes the importance of a transparent and granular usage-based pricing model that ties costs closely to value and underlying expenses. While the book does not prescribe an absolute rule that every usage-based pricing model must have an upper cap, it does discuss the need for careful consideration of usage growth rates and the potential pressures this growth can exert on both cost and customer perception.
Key points to consider include:
• Transparency and Predictability:
The book stresses that customers should clearly understand how their charges will scale with usage. If customers feel uncertain about how costs will escalate, it may affect adoption or retention. An upper cap might serve as a useful tool to provide predictability and alleviate fear of runaway costs.
• Granular Pricing and Cost Alignment:
As discussed in our book (see the section on Usage Growth Rates), the pricing model should be granular enough to reflect true cost drivers. For services with rapidly increasing usage (or for customers whose consumption can spike quickly), not having a cap could lead to unexpectedly high fees, potentially straining the customer relationship.
• Balancing Value Capture with Customer Comfort:
On one hand, allowing costs to scale indefinitely can ensure that you capture increasing value as customers grow. On the other, imposing a maximum monthly charge can mitigate concerns and create a sense of fairness, helping to ease customers' worries about unpredictable bills.
In summary, while it is acceptable to design a usage-based pricing model with costs that scale indefinitely—as long as the model is clear and justified by underlying costs—many companies find that implementing an upper cap can help prevent customer apprehension. The decision should be based on balancing your cost structure and the ability to communicate the model effectively, ensuring that the pricing feels fair and predictable.
1
Below is a concise summary based on our pricing strategy discussions in Price to Scale:
Direct Answer:
When deciding the increment or unit for usage pricing, start by selecting a metric that aligns with how your customers actually use the product. This could be per GB, per 1,000 transactions, or another measure that reflects real consumption. However, if the usage data is less predictable or if granular data might confuse customers, choose larger, more aggregated buckets rather than very fine increments.
Supporting Insights from Price to Scale:
Predictability and Measurability:
As described in our book, “the more predictable and measurable the metric is, the more granular you can make your units and tiers.” If your metric is consistent and easily trackable (like data usage or a specific number of transactions), it makes sense to use smaller increments. Conversely, if the metric is less clear-cut, consider larger increments to maintain billing simplicity.
Consumption vs. Capability Model:
Our book outlines a checklist that starts by asking whether you’re using a consumption-based or capability-based pricing model. For consumption-based models, choose a key usage metric that reflects how your customers run their business – for example, a per-transaction basis, but possibly bundled into blocks (e.g., per 1,000 or 10,000 transactions) to avoid overwhelming granularity.
Ease-of-Use and Transparency:
Another key tip is to ensure that the pricing remains transparent and easy to understand. By opting for larger increments when the measurement isn’t straightforward, you reduce the risk of confusing your customers with overly complex billing structures.
In summary, choose your pricing unit based on the predictability and measurability of customer usage. Larger, intuitive increments often help avoid confusion, ensuring clear, transparent billing while staying aligned with the value your service delivers.
1
Below is a summary answer informed by our saas pricing book, Price to Scale:
• You should be transparent with your usage‐based pricing, providing clear, predictable rates for most customers. In our book, we stress that customers need to understand how their usage translates into costs. Having straightforward metrics published on your site (or via an online calculator) helps build trust and makes it easier for customers to forecast their expenses.
• For high-volume or complex usage scenarios, however, it’s common practice to invite those customers into a conversation with your sales team. Our book explains that while baseline pricing should be public, when it comes to large accounts, there are often nuances like discounts for volume or variable cost structures that benefit from a personalized discussion.
• In cases involving complex usage fees, strive to be as transparent as possible about how fees are computed—even if that means outlining the key components or guiding customers to a support resource. This transparency limits surprises and ensures customers know what to expect, even if the final pricing may be subject to negotiation.
In summary, our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale, recommends publishing clear, standard usage-based rates for general customers while engaging directly with high-volume clients to address more intricate or custom pricing needs. This balanced approach creates clarity and trust while allowing the necessary flexibility for exceptional cases.
1
Based on our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, the decision to offer a freemium rather than a free trial was carefully considered and ultimately proved to be the right call for our approach. Here’s a breakdown of our rationale and outcomes:
• Direct Answer:
We opted for a freemium model because it allowed us to build a larger user base and implicitly showcase value over a longer time period. We did not end up regretting this choice—on the contrary, it helped shape our product development and revenue strategy in a positive way.
• Key Considerations from Price to Scale:
• Practical Application and Outcome:
• Summary Takeaway:
Our experience, as detailed in Price to Scale, demonstrates that a well-thought-out freemium model can be more effective than a temporary free trial in driving long-term engagement and revenue growth. The key is to design the free tier carefully and balance it with compelling premium features. Ultimately, this approach aligned with our overall pricing and product strategy, and we consider it the right call for our SaaS business.
1
Below is our response based on the insights from Price to Scale:
• Direct Answer:
There isn’t a universal “one-size-fits-all” answer. While some B2B customers may appreciate a longer, 30‑day trial because of longer sales cycles and implementation learning curves, in many cases a 14‑day trial can be effective—especially if your product is designed so that users can experience its core value quickly. Ultimately, the optimal trial length should be determined by understanding how long it takes your target customers to see meaningful value from your product.
• Insights From Our Book:
Our SaaS pricing book, Price to Scale, emphasizes evaluating key factors when designing your trial strategy:
• How to Determine The Optimal Trial Length for Your User Base:
• Summary:
Our book Price to Scale underscores that your trial period should be closely aligned with your product’s time-to-value. Whether you choose 14 or 30 days ultimately depends on testing, customer feedback, and your market’s unique dynamics. The key takeaway is to iterate based on real usage data and to ensure that your trial effectively balances accessibility with conversion efficiency.
By applying these principles, you can more confidently determine the optimal trial length that meets both your strategic objectives and your customers’ needs.
1
Based on our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, requiring a credit card or even charging a nominal fee during a free trial can be an effective way to signal that you’re attracting more serious prospects. Here are the key points:
• Requiring a credit card helps weed out non-serious users. As discussed in our book, companies like Aftership have adopted a trial fee (or require credit card details) because it boosts conversion rates. It does so by ensuring that trial sign-ups represent prospects who are more engaged and willing to invest, even minimally.
• Free trials with no credit card can indeed maximize the sheer number of sign-ups. However, the trade-off is that conversion rates (the percentage of trial users who become paying customers) are historically low, often between 2% to 6%. This means that while you might see more interest on the front end, not all of these users will be serious buyers.
• Ultimately, the decision depends on your target market and overall strategy. If your goal is to ensure that the users entering your trial are already primed to value your product, having a barrier like requiring a credit card can be beneficial. On the other hand, if you’re focused on rapid user acquisition and can nurture leads effectively post-signup, a frictionless sign-up may be preferable.
In summary, our book leans toward using tools that filter for quality—like requiring a credit card—to improve trial conversion rates, while also noting that each approach must be aligned with the company’s broader growth and acquisition goals.
1
Below is a concise answer based on the insights from our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale:
Direct your product development roadmap so that the free version is valuable enough to attract users while the premium tier contains must-have features that truly drive additional value. As noted in Price to Scale (see page 137), the freemium model influenced the product development focus by encouraging teams to create features that entice free users to upgrade.
Create a clear functional split: ensure that the free plan satisfies basic needs, but reserve high-value or advanced functionalities exclusively for paid tiers. This helps maintain a user experience that is compelling enough to nudge users over the conversion threshold.
Consider adding incremental friction (or limits) on the free plan once users hit a certain level of usage, while simultaneously highlighting the benefits of your premium offerings. This strategy—when paired with continued enhancement of premium features—helps balance the number of free users and paid users.
In summary, to prevent too many users from remaining on the free plan indefinitely, Price to Scale recommends a dual approach: design your free offering to attract users and then deliberately develop premium features that create a compelling case for conversion.
1
Based on our experience as described in our SaaS pricing book, Price to Scale, free trial conversion rates typically range from about 2% to 6%. This relatively low range is something many companies see if they offer trials completely for free.
Some effective strategies we’ve implemented to improve these conversion rates include:
• Introducing a nominal fee for the trial (for example, Aftership charges around $7). This small charge helps filter out non-serious users, ensuring that those who do sign up are genuinely interested in the product.
• Enhancing the onboarding and communication process so that trial users fully understand the value of the product and how it addresses their needs right from the start.
By tweaking the trial structure and focusing on clear, value-driven communication, we can effectively target more committed users and ultimately drive higher conversion rates from trial to paid customers.
In summary, while free trial conversion rates usually fall in the 2-6% range, minor adjustments like introducing a nominal fee and improving onboarding can significantly enhance conversion and contribute to a more predictable pathway to revenue.
1
Below is a concise answer grounded in our saas pricing book, Price to Scale:
Direct Answer
When designing a freemium offering, include the absolute core functionality that lets users immediately solve a problem or experience the primary benefit of your product. However, reserve advanced features, higher usage limits, integrations, analytics, or customization options for the paid tiers. This balance gives free users enough value to adopt the product while preserving compelling reasons to upgrade.
Insights from Price to Scale
• As discussed in our book, the freemium model is effective when it focuses on the essentials—the critical features that solve the customers’ core problem—while incentivizing users to move to paid plans through premium features and extras.
• Our pricing strategy emphasizes not “giving away the farm.” By providing a robust free experience that demonstrates your product’s potential, you create a natural pathway where the premium elements (advanced functionality, deeper integrations, and higher limits) become clearly desirable upgrades.
Practical Application
In practice, you might:
By following these guidelines from our pricing strategy book, you can ensure that your freemium model effectively converts engaged users into paying customers.
1
Below is our answer based on insights from Price to Scale:
• Yes, companies using freemium models have successfully converted users to paid plans through well-designed in-app prompts and upsell messages. Our book highlights that when you integrate upsell messaging naturally into your product experience, it can drive upgrades without irritating your users.
• One key approach is to design your product roadmap so that the free tier provides enough value to attract users but also teases premium features. As noted in our book (see Page 137), the product team should balance maintaining the free offering with rolling out premium features that create a natural incentive to upgrade.
• For in-app prompts and upsell tactics, the book advises:
• The emphasis is on a seamless upgrade process. Instead of pushing aggressive upsell messages, the focus should be on offering incentives (like additional features or special discounts for long-term commitments) and ensuring that any prompts are integrated into your overall user experience in a friendly, non-intrusive manner.
In summary, success in converting freemium users to paid plans hinges on designing in-app prompts and upsell strategies that are context-aware, value-driven, and minimally disruptive. Our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, supports a strategy that balances growth with a positive user experience.
1
Below is our recommended approach from Price to Scale for managing support for free users in a freemium model without overwhelming your team:
• Direct your support resources toward self-service: Rather than handling every inquiry manually, invest in comprehensive FAQs, online knowledge bases, and step-by-step guides. Our book emphasizes that well-developed self-help tools can empower freemium users to find answers on their own, reducing the volume of individual support requests.
• Prioritize support based on customer segments: As detailed in Price to Scale, consider differentiating between the support needs of free and paid users. This can involve routing more complex or critical issues from paying customers to live support while using automated support channels for freemium users. This tiered approach helps ensure that your support team stays focused on high-value customers while still addressing the essential needs of free users.
• Leverage automation and community resources: Automation (such as chatbots) can handle common queries, and community forums or user groups can serve as additional support layers. This strategy offloads routine issues from your support agents and builds a community where users help each other, as highlighted in our SaaS pricing strategies.
In summary, Price to Scale advises building a robust self-service ecosystem and a clear, tiered support system. This ensures that free users have access to the help they need without depleting your valuable support resources, while paid customers continue to receive the high-quality assistance that justifies their investment.
1
Based on the guidance in our pricing strategy book Price to Scale, if you offer a free plan then automatically downgrading your free trial users into that plan is generally the better approach rather than locking them out. Here’s why:
• Keeping users engaged – By automatically transitioning trial users into a free tier, you continue to offer them value and maintain engagement with your product. This ongoing interaction not only helps retain them but also opens the door for future upsells as they become more familiar with your platform.
• Smoother customer experience – For many customers, being locked out after a trial can be frustrating and may make them less willing to reengage later on. A free plan, even if limited, offers a lower barrier to return and build trust over time.
• Conversion opportunities – Our book illustrates how companies using a freemium model have seen that the steady conversion of free users to paid subscription tiers can offset short-term revenue dips, as more users have the chance to experience the product and eventually upgrade.
In summary, as outlined in Price to Scale, an automatic downgrade to a free plan tends to be the customer-friendly choice that reinforces ongoing engagement, reduces friction, and creates a pipeline for converting users into paying customers over time.
1
Based on the discussion in our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, there are a few insights on trial strategies that can help guide your decision:
• Some companies have experimented with both limited-feature free trials and full-feature, time-limited trials. One notable observation (discussed in our book) is that free trial conversion rates tend to be low—historically, only around 2–6%. This shows that a free trial, even if it offers limited features, might not be enough to convert a significant number of users.
• An alternative approach is to charge a nominal fee (for example, $7) during the trial period. As our book explains, putting a small price on the trial helps filter out non-serious users and generally leads to a higher quality of trial users. The idea is that when someone pays even a modest amount, they’re more likely to fully engage with the product and thereby convert at a higher rate.
• While the book doesn’t provide a one-size-fits-all answer, the trend observed in several case studies is that a full-feature trial (paired with either a time limit or a nominal fee) can often lead to better conversion numbers than a limited-feature free trial—precisely because prospects get to experience the full value of the product, and the nominal fee helps ensure only serious buyers test the product.
In summary, our pricing strategy book Price to Scale suggests that while both trial methods have been tried, offering a full-feature trial with a nominal fee tends to result in higher conversion rates than a limited-feature free trial. As always, the best approach depends on your product and target market, so it’s recommended to test the options to see which works best for your situation.
1
Based on the principles outlined in our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale, the decision to end a free trial early versus letting it run its full period should be driven by how well you understand and measure user engagement against the core value your product delivers. Here are some key considerations:
• Directly tie trial duration to user activity. If your product’s value is realized through active usage and there are clear milestones that indicate success (or potential success), then a usage-based trial makes sense. This approach lets you measure whether a user has truly experienced that critical value during the trial.
• If a user isn’t active, ending their trial early can help you avoid “wasting” a trial period on disengaged users. However, it’s important to balance this with the risk that some users may need more time or guidance to reach key milestones. An early termination might also be used as a signal for your customer success team to intervene and assist in engagement.
• On the other hand, a fixed-period trial ensures every user gets a uniform chance to explore the product—but it may delay the identification of non-engagement. In our book, we emphasize that regardless of the method chosen, it’s essential that your trial model (whether fixed or milestone-triggered) aligns closely with the outcomes that define value for your customers.
In summary, our book recommends that you:
Ultimately, aligning your free trial approach with the core value metrics of your offering is crucial to both maximizing conversion and ensuring that early disengagement is addressed appropriately.
1
Based on the discussion in our SaaS pricing book, Price to Scale, our approach is to proactively follow up with targeted, tailored offers rather than simply letting users churn. Here are the key points:
• Tailored Follow-Up Offers:
Instead of treating all churn identically, we use metrics (like the churn propensity score discussed in Chapter 11) to identify segments of users who may still be a good fit. For these users, we consider strategic offers such as discounts or extended trials.
• Segmentation Is Key:
As highlighted on page 245 and 287, the idea is to segment your customer base. Not every non-converter needs the same treatment; by understanding their behavior and usage during the trial, you can craft offers that specifically address their needs. For instance, offering a modest discount (ranging from 10% to 30% as our book outlines) can work if paired with a commitment to longer contracts or further engagement.
• Strategic Communication:
It's not just about making an offer. Effective communication ensures the customer understands the added value. This could involve presenting the offer as a gesture of appreciation while also demonstrating continued value and potential improvements in the product or service, as mentioned in the communication strategy updates in our book.
In summary, our pricing strategy recommends not giving up on every non-converter but rather leveraging data-driven segmentation to selectively offer incentives. This balanced approach helps to recapture valuable users without compromising the overall pricing integrity.
1
Below is a summary of the approach recommended in Price to Scale for freemium models regarding when to prompt users to upgrade and how to do it gracefully:
Directly answer the question
• The ideal time to suggest an upgrade is when natural usage thresholds are reached – for example, when a free user or team has outgrown the limitations of the free tier (e.g., growing team size, increased usage, or the need for more advanced features).
• The shift from using a free tier to needing additional functionality should feel like a logical next step rather than a forced step-up.
Insights from our book, Price to Scale
• In our book we note that the freemium model should shape product development so that free users are naturally enticed to upgrade. This means designing the product in a way that premium features gradually provide more value as the user's business scales.
• Our pricing strategy emphasizes creating tiers that allow for a natural and gradual progression rather than pushing upgrades through overt pressure. As we explain, “you can't force people to upgrade. You can only create tiers that allow for natural growth in their business.”
• Instead of abrupt nudges, the messaging should focus on highlighting added value and benefits associated with upgrading without insinuating that the free version is inferior or “limiting” their success.
How to message the upgrade: Practical messaging tips
• Use data-driven insights: For example, if a team has expanded significantly or is using the product heavily, a non-intrusive message can mention that as organizations scale, many find that premium features help manage complexity or unlock further efficiencies.
• Frame the upgrade as an enhancement rather than an interruption: Instead of “pressuring” users to move up tiers, offer clear explanations of what additional capabilities or support they stand to gain (e.g., better collaboration tools or tailored support).
• Be transparent: Clearly inform users when their usage or team size is approaching the limits of the free tier, and provide alternatives like a discounted upgrade or short-term commitment options that can make the transition smoother.
Key takeaway
• The timing should be organically tied to usage metrics and team growth, ensuring that as a user’s needs become more complex, the upgrade feels like a natural solution.
• Messaging should always remain empathetic and solution-based, avoiding any implication of “penalty” for staying on the free plan while promoting the tangible benefits of upgrading.
In summary, our approach in Price to Scale is to let the product’s design and the natural evolution of customer needs guide the upgrade prompt, coupling it with clear, value-based messaging that resonates with users without alienating them.
1
Based on the guidance in our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, the approach to handling discount requests involves a structured, segmented strategy rather than relying solely on a case-by-case basis. Here are the key takeaways:
• Segmented Discount Ranges:
Our framework recommends defining standard discount ranges by customer segment. For example, the book suggests:
• Standardized Policies with Flexibility:
While these ranges offer a consistent baseline, they are meant to be adjusted based on deal specifics such as volume, contract terms, or bundled offerings. This approach provides sales teams with a predefined pricing buffer while still allowing room to creatively tailor offers (as discussed in Chapter 4 and illustrated in the discounting matrix).
• Defined Sales Authority:
The book also emphasizes limiting discounting authority through a tiered approval process. This not only helps maintain consistency but also creates a valuable sales tool that prevents unilateral concessions, ensuring that higher-level discounts are approved only when truly justified.
In summary, our methodology combines standard discount policies with strategic flexibility. By segmenting your customer base and establishing clear discount ranges and approval processes, you can handle inbound discount requests in a balanced and effective manner.
1
Based on the insights in our book Price to Scale, there isn’t a one‐size‐fits-all answer. Here are some key takeaways to consider:
• 2 months free on an annual plan (about a 16% discount) has been a common practice. It creates clear upfront value for customers while encouraging longer-term commitment. However, the pricing landscape is evolving.
• Our book emphasizes that discounting strategies should be aligned to your customer segmentation and value proposition. For example, while some SaaS companies still effectively use the 16% discount to entice mid-market customers, others—particularly as they mature in their pricing strategies—are experimenting with smaller discounts (or, in some cases, choosing not to offer annual discounts) in order to maximize revenue capture.
• The rationale behind shifting from a “2 months free” model might include:
In summary, our pricing strategy book Price to Scale suggests that while “2 months free” has been widely used, the optimal approach depends on your market, customer behavior, and competitive positioning. Whether you choose a 16% discount, a smaller discount like 10%, or no discount at all, it should reflect a well-thought-out pricing philosophy that drives long-term value for both your customers and your business.
1
Below is a recommended approach based on the strategic principles outlined in our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale:
Direct Answer
– For educational institutions or nonprofits, it’s common to offer a discount in the 20–40% range. However, the exact discount should be determined by your overall pricing structure, margin requirements, and the role these customers play in your strategy (for example, whether you view them primarily as user acquisition or brand advocates).
Building on Book Concepts
– In Price to Scale, we discuss discount ranges for different segments (e.g., commercial deals around 10–30% and mid-sized deals at 20–50%). While the book doesn’t provide a specific number for educational or nonprofit segments, you can use these guidelines as a starting point and adjust based on the value and strategic importance of these customers.
– The idea is to reserve room in your list price so that discounting can feel like a concession rather than a cut in revenue. For special segments such as educational institutions—which often require a slightly different treatment—you might opt for a structured discount that rewards genuine eligibility without undermining your pricing integrity.
Verifying Eligibility to Prevent Abuse
– As suggested by our chapter on segmentation and discounting strategies, it’s critically important to clearly verify the status of discounted customers. To do so, you should:
Practical Applications
– Implementing these measures not only helps prevent abuse but also protects your profit margins by ensuring that discounts are granted only to verified, qualifying organizations.
– Furthermore, by keeping a clear record of the verification process and the associated discount approval, you can later evaluate the effectiveness of this pricing strategy as part of your broader SaaS pricing strategy.
Summary Takeaway
In summary, offering a discount of approximately 20–40% to educational institutions and nonprofits can be appropriate if it aligns with your channel strategy and overall pricing framework. Always pair any discount allocation with strict verification procedures—through domain checks, official documentation, and internal approval workflows—to ensure that the privilege is extended to bona fide institutions and to protect against discount abuse.
For more detailed discussion on discounting ranges and the role of segmented pricing approaches, please refer to the relevant sections in Price to Scale.
1
Below is a direct answer based on the principles and insights from our saas pricing book, Price to Scale:
• Direct Answer
Yes, some companies have experimented with lifetime deals—often offered on platforms like AppSumo—but the outcome can vary widely. These deals sometimes generate an initial burst of users; however, if not carefully structured, they risk attracting customers who place a disproportionate load on support resources while offering little recurring revenue.
• Insights from Price to Scale
Our book emphasizes the importance of aligning pricing strategies with long-term growth. In areas where we discuss lower-cost tiers and customer segmentation (see Chapter 3 on pricing for user acquisition), we note that pricing decisions must balance immediate customer acquisition benefits against lifetime revenue potential. A lifetime deal typically converts a one-off payment into a customer relationship that lacks the recurring revenue stream vital for sustainable scale. If a lifetime offer isn’t well-segmented and managed, it can lead to a support burden that isn’t justified by ongoing revenue, as these customers often remain price-sensitive and may not convert to higher-value offerings.
• Practical Considerations
• Summary
In Price to Scale, we advocate for pricing strategies that create a balance between user acquisition and long-term revenue stability. Lifetime deals can be effective for rapid growth if their drawbacks—like potential support burdens from low-revenue customers—are carefully managed through segmentation and metrics tracking. The key takeaway is to test these offers, measure their long-term impact, and ensure they’re aligned with your broader SaaS growth objectives.
1
Based on our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, you can handle introductory or beta pricing and later price increases by taking a structured, segmented approach:
• Be transparent and segment your early adopters
Early adopters who signed up with a lower rate should be recognized as a distinct cohort. As noted in the book, it’s key to segment your customer base so that you treat early adopters differently from later ones. This means laying out clear terms at sign-up and being upfront that special pricing comes with specific conditions.
• Offer tailored alternatives and upgrades
Instead of simply “raising prices,” offer early customers alternatives. For example, provide them with a better option—such as an upgrade—to match the new pricing, or introduce discounts that require commitments like longer contract terms or add-on services. This proactive strategy, mentioned in Price to Scale, avoids alienating your initial cohort by giving them a choice rather than a unilateral price increase.
• Differentiate new pricing from initial offers
One effective approach is to create a new lineup of pricing tiers that clearly distinguishes between the original discounted plan and your full-featured, updated offerings. As recommended in our book, taking the same tiers and applying discounts only makes later comparisons too simple. Instead, a fresh configuration helps manage expectations and showcases added value, making the transition smoother for your existing users.
In summary, by clearly communicating the terms of your introductory offer, segmenting early adopters, and proactively offering upgrade paths or alternative pricing options, you can introduce future price increases with minimal customer upset while evolving your pricing strategy in line with your market growth.
1
Below is a concise answer based on our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale:
Direct Answer
For a limited-time promotional discount, consider using a modest, customer-segment specific discount—say, around 10-30% for commercial customers as a starting point—and structure the promotion so it adds value (for example, by linking the discount to a longer-term commitment or bundle rather than a straight price cut). This approach helps drive urgency while protecting the product's perceived value.
Detailed Insights from Price to Scale
In summary, our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, suggests that when offering time-bound discounts, it’s crucial to balance the need for an attractive incentive with a strategy that preserves the overall value of your product. By leveraging customer segmentation and adding value through bundled terms or upgrades, you can run effective promotions without devaluing your SaaS.
1
Based on the guidance in our pricing strategy book Price to Scale, the answer is that while sales reps generally do have some flexibility to offer discounts to close deals, that flexibility is typically structured by customer segment and paired with clear guardrails to protect margins.
Below are key points drawn from our book:
• For different customer segments the book suggests specific discount ranges:
– Commercial deals may see discounts in the range of 10–30%
– Mid-sized deals might be discounted between 20–50%
– Enterprise deals could have discounts of 30–70%
• To ensure margin protection, it’s important to integrate these discount ranges into a pricing model that includes built-in price buffers. Essentially, you adjust list prices upward to create a “positive discounting range” for smaller deals before any discount is applied.
• Additionally, our book recommends instating a tiered or escalating approval process for discounting. Rather than giving ultimate discretion to all sales reps, you set defined approval limits that move up to sales managers and leadership as the discount depth increases. This ensures that the ability to offer deeper discounts is carefully controlled and justified within an established framework.
In summary, while your sales team does have the flexibility to offer discounts, those discounts should be predetermined by customer size/segment and protected by escalation protocols and price buffering strategies to ensure both competitiveness and healthy margins. This structured approach not only provides the reps with clear guidelines but also safeguards your revenue goals.
1
Below is a concise answer based on the insights in our SaaS pricing book, Price to Scale:
In summary, calculating the impact of discounts involves a careful measurement of LTV differences, churn changes, and shifts in ASP while keeping an eye on brand perception. By segmenting your customer base, structuring discount strategies carefully, and continuously monitoring performance, you minimize the risk of devaluing your offering and training customers to wait for sales.
1
Based on the insights from our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, a differentiated offering for startups or early-stage companies can be beneficial—but only when executed with a strategic segmentation approach.
Key takeaways include:
• Segment Your Customer Base: Instead of having a single pricing scheme for all, our book advocates for segmenting customers based on their usage, size, or stage. By doing this, you can tailor offerings to each group’s needs rather than forcing everyone into one rule.
• Offer Alternatives, Not Just Discounts: The book emphasizes that discounts should come with conditions—such as longer commitment periods or add-ons—to prevent leaving money on the table. A discounted starter plan might work if it’s part of a new, clearly differentiated lineup rather than a unilateral concession.
• Preventing Comparison Paradox: Simply discounting the starter plan in an otherwise uniform pricing strategy can lead customers to compare it directly with higher tiers. Instead, it's more effective to create a distinct tier with thoughtful benefits designed specifically for startups without complicating your overall pricing structure.
In summary, while a discounted starter plan for early-stage companies can help in acquiring and retaining these customers, it is essential to structure it as a well-thought-out segment strategy. This approach ensures that the discount contributes to customer acquisition without undermining the perceived value or simplicity of your pricing model.
1
Based on the content in our SaaS pricing book, Price to Scale, we don’t see a direct reference to running a “give $X, get $X” referral incentive program or a head-to-head test of its impact versus traditional discount promotions. Here’s what we do know from the book:
• The focus in Price to Scale has been on using discounting levers—such as volume-based discounts, early payment incentives, and bundling discounts—to close deals. These methods are crafted to balance customer acquisition while protecting long-term pricing integrity.
• Our approach in the book emphasizes personalized pricing reductions and segmenting existing customers. The strategy revolves around tailoring discount offers based on customer behavior and contract commitments. This level of tailoring has proven effective for sustaining revenue and fostering growth.
• While a referral incentive program can be a useful tactic by leveraging word-of-mouth and network effects, Price to Scale primarily evaluates discounting and pricing adjustments that create immediate deal momentum and longer-term customer commitment (for example, through contract term extensions).
In summary, although referral incentive programs (like offering credits or discounts in a “give $X, get $X” model) can theoretically drive growth, our pricing strategy in Price to Scale does not specifically provide a case study or direct comparison showing that such programs outperform traditional discount promotions. Instead, we recommend focusing on highly targeted, segment-based discount strategies that have been validated to drive both acquisition and retention.
1
Based on our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale, the general consensus is that discounting—whether through structured deal discounting or targeted promotions like coupon codes—needs careful handling.
Here are some key takeaways:
• Targeted Promotions vs. Broad Discounting
– Coupon codes, when used as a targeted promotion (for example, to track campaigns or incentivize specific customer segments), can be quite effective.
– However, if coupon codes are too widely available or applied indiscriminately, they risk making your product appear “cheaper” and may erode its premium positioning.
• Context of Discounting in B2B SaaS
– Our book emphasizes that discounting is a common part of the B2B SaaS landscape, with commercial deals generally seeing discounts up to 20% and enterprise deals even higher. This highlights that discounting isn’t inherently negative but must be framed within your pricing structure.
– It’s important to set your list prices at a level that allows controlled discounting to appear as a strategic, rather than a standard, pricing practice.
• Practical Application
– Use coupon codes sparingly and strategically: apply them to well-defined segments or specific campaigns, ensuring that they support your overall pricing strategy while keeping the core value proposition intact.
– Monitor the impact of these promotions to ensure they drive the desired behavior without compromising the perceived value of your product.
In summary, our book Price to Scale suggests that coupon codes can be a powerful tool for targeted promotions and tracking if used judiciously. The key is to avoid indiscriminate discounting that might signal a lower quality product and instead align coupon use with a well-thought-out, segmented pricing strategy.
1
Based on the guidance in our SaaS pricing book, Price to Scale, it's best not to simply grandfather long-time customers on their old, lower pricing indefinitely. Instead, you should consider segmenting your existing customer base and offering tailored migration options rather than a blanket policy. Here are the key points:
• Segment Your Customers:
Our book emphasizes the importance of recognizing that different customers use your product in different ways. Instead of one-size-fits-all, you can identify cohorts based on how much they value the product or the discount they originally negotiated. This way, you can decide which customers might be appropriate for migration and which ones might warrant continued legacy pricing.
• Offer Tailored Alternatives:
As discussed in Price to Scale, consider offering a migration path that might involve a discount on the new pricing model—but with specific conditions (for example, a commitment to a longer-term contract or additional add-ons). This proactive approach helps you avoid simply undercutting yourself from an operational standpoint while ensuring customers see the value in moving to your upgraded offering.
• Avoid Blatant Price Comparisons:
The book advises refraining from simply discounting the same tiers, as it makes the comparison too easy for customers. Instead, think about refreshing your packages so that the new tiers look and feel different from the legacy options. This approach reduces friction and helps customers understand the added value in the new pricing model.
In summary, our pricing strategy in Price to Scale recommends migrating customers with carefully designed incentives rather than perpetually grandfathering old rates. This not only aligns with maintaining fair value across your customer base but also supports a more sustainable, competitive pricing structure.
1
Based on the guidelines in our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale, a few key points can help you determine a reasonable discount when negotiating enterprise deals with multi-year commitments or large user counts:
• For enterprise deals, it's common to see discounting in the range of 30% to 70%. In some cases, when dealing with very large contracts, discounting might even reach up to 80%.
• A multi-year commitment or volume-based pricing break is often structured as a trade-off: you reduce the unit price notably for larger commitments (for example, larger deals might see a unit price reduction from around $2.10 down to approximately $0.60).
• The exact percentage will depend on various factors such as the size of the contract, the level of risk, and the overall strategic objectives (e.g., promoting larger orders or securing long-term revenue).
In practice, using these discount ranges helps you balance between being competitive in your pricing and preserving the value of your product. Always consider tailoring the discount based on your customer segmentation and deal specifics, ensuring you provide a compelling offer while maintaining profitable pricing.
In summary, for enterprise deals with multi-year contracts or large volumes, a discount in the 30%–70% range is typical—with adjustments made based on specific deal dynamics and strategic considerations.
1
Based on our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, the decision to publish volume or multi-year discount structures openly versus handling them privately really depends on your market and customer segments.
• If you serve a large and relatively homogeneous market, openly publishing the complete pricing structure—including discounts—can help scale your sales engine. This transparency lets prospects easily compare packages and can accelerate the sales cycle.
• However, if you’re targeting a more limited or heterogeneous market (such as enterprise-level customers with varied requirements), keeping these discount negotiations private allows your sales team the flexibility to tailor offers. This approach can enable you to extract the maximum value from each deal without being constrained by a one-size-fits-all published discount.
In summary, as discussed in Price to Scale, being transparent with discounts can help when your market supports it and scalability is the goal, but for enterprise deals where unique value extraction is key, a more private negotiation process may be more effective.
1
Based on our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, seasonal deals like Black Friday or Cyber Monday are not typically a core tactic in B2B SaaS. Here are some key points to consider:
• Direct Strategic Discounts:
In B2B settings, discounting is usually built into your pricing strategy in a controlled and structured way. Our book discusses how commercial deal discounting for smaller customers might be around 20%, with larger enterprise discounts going even higher. This is generally planned as part of your tiered or volume-based pricing, rather than through time-limited, seasonal promotions.
• Longer Sales Cycles and Negotiation Dynamics:
B2B deals generally involve longer sales cycles, negotiations, and customized contracts, which means the one-off nature of Black Friday or Cyber Monday deals doesn’t quite fit. Instead, discounts are often designed to reflect usage volumes or bespoke contract terms. In contrast, seasonal sales are a hallmark of B2C tactics where immediate, impulse-driven purchases are more common.
• Strategic Pricing Frameworks:
Our book emphasizes getting the pricing structure right—whether it’s through good-better-best packaging or modular pricing—to match customer segments and their specific needs. In many cases, deliberately designed pricing tiers have a more significant impact on scaling effectively than temporary discounts.
In summary, while there may be isolated instances or creative experiments, seasonal sales events are generally not the norm in B2B SaaS. The focus is instead on building a pricing strategy that consistently reflects value propositions and aligns with longer-term customer acquisition and retention strategies.
1
Based on the guidance in our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale, you shouldn’t simply convert your prices based on exchange rates. Instead, you should actively adjust for local purchasing power and market dynamics.
Key points include:
• Local Sensitivity: Rather than using a static exchange rate, the book encourages you to understand the price elasticity and willingness-to-pay in each market. This means assessing factors like local income levels, competition, and regional economic conditions.
• Pricing Agility: As explained in Price to Scale, it’s more important to have a pricing structure that can flex and adapt to different market conditions. This agility means testing and adjusting price points to achieve the "local maxima"—that optimized price that resonates with each market's unique conditions.
• Segmented Adjustments: While the book primarily discusses customer segments (such as Commercial, Mid-sized, and Enterprise) with specific discounting guidance, the underlying approach is the same: tailor your pricing to the value perceptions and constraints of different groups. For international markets, think of local purchasing power as another dimension requiring segmentation and contextual adjustments.
In summary, Price to Scale advises that international pricing should be a thoughtful, dynamic process. Rather than a direct currency conversion, it’s more effective to adjust pricing to align with local market conditions and customer behavior, ensuring that your price is both competitive and optimized for local demand.
1
Based on our SaaS pricing book, Price to Scale, the decision to localize pricing versus using a single global price isn’t a one-size-fits-all answer—it depends on your market segmentation and go-to-market strategy.
Here are some key points to consider:
• Market Segmentation:
If your customer base is highly heterogeneous—such as when selling in emerging markets like India or Brazil versus more mature markets—a localized pricing strategy can help match the regional willingness-to-pay. This allows you to capture market share by aligning prices with local purchasing power.
• Balancing Complexity and Arbitrage Risks:
While adjusting prices can maximize revenue in each region, it also opens up issues like arbitrage (where customers may exploit lower prices in certain markets). To counter this, companies should implement safeguards such as geolocation restrictions, regional licensing terms, or other controls to manage cross-market purchasing.
• Alignment with GTM Strategy:
Our book emphasizes that pricing strategy should always align with your overall go-to-market approach. For instance, if you serve both mid-market and enterprise markets, you may benefit from differentiating pricing in a way that speaks to each group’s value perception. Localizing prices for specific markets can be part of that strategy when the benefits of capturing additional revenue or market share outweigh the risks of arbitrage.
In summary, as discussed in Price to Scale, if your target markets differ significantly in their willingness-to-pay, a localized pricing strategy may be warranted—provided you also implement measures to minimize arbitrage. Conversely, if your market is relatively homogeneous or if you prefer simpler pricing logistics, a single global price might be a better fit for your business.
1
Below is a concise answer based on our saas pricing book, Price to Scale:
• In our book we emphasize that managing currency fluctuations is less about following one hard-and-fast rule (like “lock for a quarter” vs. “update in real time”) and more about aligning your pricing strategy with your cost structure and customer expectations.
• Many SaaS companies choose to update localized prices on a set schedule—often quarterly. This approach allows you to mitigate risk while keeping things predictable for your customers. It avoids the potential disruption of constant real-time changes and ensures that pricing remains competitive relative to local markets.
• At the same time, if you’re operating in market segments with very high currency volatility or if you have systems capable of automated pricing adjustments, real-time updates might make sense. These dynamic adjustments can help capture the true market costs as they evolve.
• The key takeaway from Price to Scale is that the approach must be closely tied to how you manage the risk across your pricing model. Consider factors like customer communication, operational simplicity, and how frequently your exchange rate variations materially affect your cost structure. Transparent conversations with your customers about how and why you adjust prices can also help maintain trust, irrespective of your chosen update frequency.
In summary, our book encourages you to weigh the benefits of quarterly locked rates versus more dynamic adjustments based on your specific market conditions and internal capabilities. There isn’t a one-size-fits-all answer—the right approach is the one that best balances risk management with a seamless customer experience.
1
Below is our answer based on the principles discussed in our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale.
Direct Answer:
For regions like the EU and UK where VAT/GST laws often require tax-inclusive pricing—even for B2C offerings—it is generally best practice to display prices with all applicable taxes included. This approach avoids sticker shock at checkout and helps maintain pricing transparency for international customers.
Key Points from Price to Scale:
• Transparency Drives Trust:
Our book emphasizes that clarity is critical. Whether you’re including taxes in the initial price quote or adding them at checkout, transparency is the key. When prices are clearly labeled—such as “VAT included” or “plus VAT”—customers know exactly what to expect. This becomes even more important in markets with stringent regulatory requirements (e.g., EU consumer law).
• Localizing Your Approach:
For consumer-targeted (B2C) channels in the EU/UK, legal standards and customer expectations typically require tax-inclusive pricing. Including VAT in the displayed price minimizes confusion and aligns with local practices. In contrast, in some B2B scenarios, prices might be displayed net of VAT, with the tax cost added later. However, even in this case, it is helpful to clearly indicate this breakdown on your pricing page.
• Practical Recommendations:
Summary:
In Price to Scale, we advocate for a transparent, localized pricing approach. For regions like the EU and UK, the best practice is to include VAT in displayed prices for B2C offerings (with clear labeling), while for B2B you may display net pricing if appropriate—but always with clear communications. This helps avoid confusion, builds trust, and keeps you aligned with regional requirements.
This approach underscores our core philosophy in the book: clear communication and transparency are critical for effective pricing strategies.
1
Below is an overview of how our book, Price to Scale, advises handling customer concerns around regional pricing differences and perceptions of fairness:
Direct Acknowledgment of the Issue
Yes, it’s not uncommon for customers to become upset if they discover that they’re paying more than others in different regions. The reaction often stems from a perception that pricing is arbitrary rather than reflecting value differences.
Segmenting and Tailoring Strategies
Our book emphasizes the importance of segmenting your customer base. Not all customers are equivalent—some use your product heavily, some negotiated unique terms, and some might have received introductory discounts. Similarly, regional differences in pricing typically reflect local market conditions, purchasing power, and competitive dynamics. By segmenting your customers (or regions), you can offer tailored value propositions rather than a one-size-fits-all price. This helps maintain fairness because each price point is built to match local context and value received.
Proactive Communication and Alternative Solutions
To manage perceptions of fairness:
In summary, while regional pricing differences can provoke concerns about fairness, our saas pricing book Price to Scale advises that a combination of careful segmentation, proactive communication, and tailored alternative offerings can help manage—and even leverage—these differences to better align with the needs of various customer cohorts.
1
Based on our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, it’s clear that every detail in a pricing presentation—from the currency to the way prices are formatted—plays a role in shaping customer perceptions and ultimately affecting conversion. While our book doesn’t devote extensive sections solely to the minutiae of price-ending localization, it provides important guiding principles on how even small details can influence perceived value.
Here are some key takeaways:
• Customer Perception Matters:
Our book emphasizes that pricing isn’t just about numbers—it’s about crafting a presentation that feels intuitive and trustworthy to your target audience. This means that using local conventions (such as familiar price endings and correct numeric delimiters) can help reduce friction and make the price more relatable and honest at a glance.
• Anchoring and Familiarity:
In Price to Scale, we explain that pricing strategies benefit from properly set anchors in customers’ minds. Using local currency symbols, the right number formats, and conventional price deployments (like $99 vs. ¥9,900) can reinforce these anchors by ensuring that prices meet your customers’ expectations. When customers see a price that aligns with local shopping habits, it feels less foreign or odd, potentially increasing conversion.
• Cultural Nuances Affect Conversion:
Even if the conversion impact from tweaking price endings might be modest in isolation, these elements contribute to a broader, culturally attuned pricing strategy. When combined with other optimizations outlined in our book, these localizations help build a coherent and effective pricing approach. In many markets, these local details have been shown to enhance trust and responsiveness.
• Testing and Continuous Improvement:
As recommended in our book, real-world A/B testing is essential. Even if local conventions appear to be a minor detail on their own, experimentation can reveal measurable differences in conversion rates. It’s always worthwhile to test versions of your pricing display to see how well it resonates with local audiences.
In summary, Price to Scale suggests that localizing not only the currency but also the ending digits and number formatting is important because these details help anchor your pricing strategy in a way that feels familiar and credible to local customers. Even small adjustments can have a measurable impact, especially when integrated into a larger, data-driven pricing strategy.
1
Based on the guidance in our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, there isn’t a one‐size‐fits-all answer—your choice depends on your overall GTM strategy and how much regional nuance exists in your pricing and packaging.
Here are a few points to consider:
• If your pricing varies significantly by region (for example, if localized adjustments or region-specific constraints play a big role), it can be advantageous to maintain separate pricing pages. This approach allows you to clearly tailor the messaging, packages, or features to the unique requirements of each region.
• If the differences are mostly in currency or minor adjustments, a single pricing page equipped with a currency selector or geo-detection might suffice. The key here is maintaining clarity and ensuring that users immediately see the information relevant to their region—just as our book emphasizes the importance of clear, unambiguous pricing information.
• Consider your target customer segments. Our book discusses scenarios ranging from mid-market companies—where a streamlined, one-page approach might improve selling efficiency—to those selling primarily to large enterprises, where details might be better handled in sales conversations rather than a fully published online dashboard.
In summary, your decision should align with your GTM strategy and the degree of regional differentiation in your pricing model. Whether you use separate pages or a consolidated approach, the ultimate goal is clarity and consistency in your pricing communication.
1
Based on the themes and methodologies outlined in our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale, there is an expectation that charging the same numeric value across different currencies without adjustments can indeed lead to challenges.
Here’s why that can be an issue and how our book’s framework advises handling it:
• Direct Impact on Local Price Perception
• Importance of Localized Pricing
• Pricing Agility
In summary, while our book may not provide a dedicated section solely on the challenges of using the same numeric values in different currencies, it reinforces that a one-size-fits-all approach rarely works in pricing. The recommended practice is to analyze regional market dynamics and adjust pricing accordingly to avoid unintended disparities and customer pushback.
1
Based on the principles discussed in our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale, it is possible to A/B test different price points in distinct regions—such as a lower price in Asia versus a higher one in North America—but it requires careful planning to avoid customer confusion or market backlash. Here are some key takeaways and recommendations from our book’s approach:
• Isolate market segments:
To prevent overlap between test groups, make sure that the different pricing strategies are clearly segmented by region. Avoid scenarios where customers in one region could easily compare prices with those in another. This helps maintain the integrity of the experiment and prevents spillover effects that could lead to customer dissatisfaction.
• Control communication and marketing channels:
When testing different price points, ensure that your messaging and channels are tailored for each region’s specific context. For instance, if customers in North America could see promotions meant for Asia (or vice versa), confusion or backlash is more likely. The book emphasizes the importance of controlling who sees the test and ensuring that the experiment remains isolated within the intended audience.
• Measure broad customer impact:
A/B tests should be designed to capture not only the behavior of existing customers but also the broader signal from potential new customers. As noted in Price to Scale (see the discussion on data simplicity and testing in Chapter 243), focusing only on visitors already familiar with your product can skew results. Make sure your test design accounts for the unique market dynamics and price sensitivity differences across regions.
• Monitor and adapt:
Given that regional markets can have distinct competitive landscapes and customer expectations, continuously monitor your experiments. Look for not just conversion rates but also for any unexpected behavior such as customer complaints or increased scrutiny. The ability to adjust quickly is a key part of our agile pricing philosophy.
In summary, while testing different price points in separate regions can reveal valuable insights about price elasticity, it is crucial to execute these tests with a controlled, region-specific approach. This minimizes the risk of confusion or backlash and ensures that each market’s feedback is as reliable and actionable as possible.
By carefully segmenting your tests, controlling messaging, and ensuring a comprehensive measurement framework, you can safely explore regional pricing differences and refine your pricing strategy accordingly.
1
Based on the insights in our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale, there is evidence that offering prices in local currencies can create a notable positive impact on global sales. Here’s a breakdown of the rationale:
• Direct Connection with Buyers:
When you list prices in native currency, you reduce the cognitive friction for international buyers. Instead of having to calculate or mentally adjust for exchange rates, customers see a price that directly relates to their local economic context. This alignment often builds trust and helps prospects make quicker decisions.
• Increased Conversion and Engagement:
The book underlines that addressing local market dynamics can boost user acquisition—even if marginally at first—as buyers are more comfortable and confident when they see familiar monetary figures. This can lead to higher conversion rates and less abandonment during the pricing consideration phase.
• Strategic Global Positioning:
While it might seem acceptable to use USD as a default, the competitive advantage of local currency pricing is its potential to tap into market-specific sensitivities, which our book shows through various case studies and market analyses. Essentially, local pricing is part of the broader strategy of adapting your go-to-market approach to align with regional pricing expectations.
In summary, while there’s nothing inherently wrong with defaulting to USD, our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, suggests that you’re likely to see an uptick in local sales by integrating native currency pricing. This strategy can refine your global perception, reduce barriers to purchase, and ultimately support sustainable growth in diverse markets.
1
Based on our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, the recommended approach is to segment your customer base rather than relying on a one-size-fits-all or ad-hoc discount strategy. Here’s how you might think about it:
• Define clear customer segments: Rather than quietly offering discounts when asked, consider establishing formal pricing tiers or packages for different market segments. This can help you align prices with the customers’ value perception and willingness to pay in lower GDP or income areas.
• Leverage structured discounting: As discussed in our book (see pages 115 and 245), different customer segments can be managed by strategic discounting within predetermined ranges. This means planning structured discounts that may be built into a formal emerging-market pricing strategy rather than doing unplanned concessions. This adds transparency and protects your overall pricing integrity.
• Consider a tiered or modular approach: Using models like the Good-Better-Best framework can allow you to tailor offerings to different markets. This way, you can create a product lineup where the lower-priced option is specifically designed for emerging markets, ensuring that the product’s perceived value remains intact without compromising pricing consistency.
In summary, our pricing strategy book recommends moving away from reactive or stealth discounting and instead proactively establishing pricing structures (such as segmented emerging market tiers or clearly defined discount tiers) that reflect both local conditions and your value proposition. This approach maintains clarity and fairness for all customers while ensuring that variations in local purchasing power are appropriately addressed.
1
Based on our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, the answer is to strike a balance between global consistency and local market optimization. Here’s how to approach it:
• Local Market Nuances: Our book explains that each market has its own price elasticity—the very concept of a “price-optimized local maxima” allows you to account for different regional behaviors. Allowing resellers some flexibility to adjust prices locally can help them better attract and retain customers in their specific markets.
• Structured Discount Guidelines: While local autonomy is important, a centrally managed pricing strategy is essential. Price to Scale recommends establishing a discounting matrix (as seen in our discussion on discount ranges and approval hierarchies) that sets clear parameters and boundaries. This ensures that while international partners might tweak pricing to suit their markets, they remain within predefined ranges (for example, discount ranges for different customer segments).
• Central Oversight: It’s critical to maintain centralized oversight—either through a dedicated Pricing and Monetization team or a pricing calculator tool—to ensure that any local adjustments align with overall strategic objectives. This balance helps maintain brand integrity and prevents extreme variances that could weaken global pricing power.
In summary, our pricing strategy book advocates for giving your international resellers some latitude to adapt prices locally, provided they operate within a centrally defined framework. This approach harnesses the benefits of local market expertise while keeping your global pricing strategy aligned.
1
Based on the principles outlined in our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale, the best approach is to combine both methods for a smooth international user experience:
• First, use auto-detection to initially display the most likely relevant currency based on location. This offers convenience and reduces the initial friction as users see familiar pricing immediately.
• However, always include a clear, accessible toggle or dropdown so users can manually select their preferred currency. Auto-detection isn’t foolproof—users might be traveling, using a VPN, or simply prefer a different currency for budgeting reasons.
This dual approach minimizes friction by providing a tailored experience while retaining control for the user. Our book emphasizes the importance of clarity and user empowerment throughout the pricing page, ensuring that the pricing is transparent and the value proposition is clear for different international markets.
In summary, auto-detection can improve the first-time experience, but it should be complemented with an easily accessible toggle to always cater to user preferences.
1
Below is a summary of the recommended approach based on insights from our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale:
Supporting Details from the Book
• In Price to Scale, we introduce frameworks to build clarity into your pricing strategy, such as the grid that lists features and their availability across geographies. This emphasizes the importance of making regional constraints explicit to limit confusion (as discussed on page 97).
• The book also recognizes that many companies start with a simplified, global pricing model and adjust as they grow, which is why some businesses opt for default pricing while handling challenges case-by-case.
Contextual Considerations
• Geo-blocking can prevent potential support headaches when you’re not set up to serve a particular region. It also helps avoid setting pricing expectations that may require later adjustment.
• However, accepting global sign-ups and dealing with the challenges later can accelerate growth, though you must prepare to make on-the-fly adaptations and acknowledge the complexity introduced in sales and support.
Practical Application
Review your operational readiness and support model:
Summary:
Price to Scale recommends aligning the approach with both your operational capacity and your strategic pricing vision. Whether you choose to geo-block sign-ups or accept them globally with default pricing, clarity in communication (such as with a comprehensive pricing grid) remains central. This clarity helps manage customer expectations and supports consistent pricing evolution as your market matures.
1
Based on the principles laid out in our book Price to Scale, the answer is yes—it’s best to fully localize your pricing page content and accompanying marketing copy for each region. Here’s what that means and why it matters:
• Full translation goes beyond just swapping out words. It involves adapting your pricing page content and messaging to align with local cultural nuances, legal requirements, and customer expectations. When prospects read pricing details in their native language, it builds trust and clarity.
• In addition to language, presenting prices in the local currency can reduce friction. Customers won’t have to perform mental currency conversions or worry about hidden fees, which can greatly smooth the path to conversion.
• While the book doesn’t provide a one-size-fits-all percentage for conversion uplift, our case studies and discussions emphasize that localized pricing — when executed well — can have a sizable impact on conversion rates. Companies that invest in fully localizing both language and currency tend to see better engagement because the pricing appears more personalized and transparent.
• Ultimately, the decision to fully localize should align with your broader go-to-market strategy. If your target region has a significant customer base that might be hesitant about unfamiliar currency or messaging, full localization might be the key to a better customer experience and improved conversion.
In summary, our pricing strategy book Price to Scale advocates for translating and localizing not just the numbers but the entire narrative on your pricing page. This approach can help reduce barriers to purchase and, as supported by various case studies in the book, positively impact conversion rates in those markets.
1
Our book, Price to Scale, emphasizes that while keeping an eye on competitors is important, focusing solely on small price point differences—like $49 versus $50 or $59—is often less critical than aligning your pricing with the value you deliver and your overall growth strategy.
Key points include:
• Reference, Not Dictation: Competitor pricing provides useful context, but it should serve as a guideline rather than the primary directive. Minor tweaks (a dollar less or more) are often just noise unless they clearly reflect a different value proposition.
• Anchoring on Value: As discussed throughout Price to Scale, anchoring your pricing to the specific benefits, cost-to-serve, and customer pain points is more impactful. Customers tend to make purchasing decisions based on perceived value—not just numbers.
• Strategic Experimentation: Instead of simply matching or micro-adjusting competitor prices, our book advises testing your price points. Through customer interviews, trials, and surveys, you can determine if a slight premium or discount makes a real difference in buyer perception and sales conversion.
• Market Positioning Considerations: If you position your product as a premium offering, a slightly higher price can reinforce that perception. Conversely, a lower price might lower expectations of quality if not supported by other value drivers.
In summary, while competitor pricing is a useful benchmark, your pricing strategy should prioritize customer value and market positioning over minor adjustments. Testing your price sensitivity ensures that your chosen price aligns with both the market and your business objectives.
1
Below is a direct answer based on the themes from our saas pricing book, Price to Scale:
In summary, since many competitors hide their exact pricing to focus conversations on value delivery, it is effective to combine careful analysis of their public materials with indirect customer and market feedback. This multidimensional approach not only provides insight into their pricing but also sharpens your own pricing strategy by emphasizing where your product’s value lies.
By using these tactics from our book, Price to Scale, you can build a clearer picture of the competitive landscape without directly contacting their sales teams.
1
Based on our book Price to Scale, your pricing strategy as a new entrant should be closely linked with your overall positioning—it’s not simply a binary choice between undercutting competitors or setting a premium price.
Here are some key takeaways from the book:
• Positioning Drives Pricing:
As highlighted in Price to Scale (see Chapter 2 and the example on positioning around page 21), your pricing must reflect how you position your product in the market. Before deciding on whether to undercut or premium price, you need to have a clearly defined value proposition and target customer in mind.
• Trade-Offs Between Market Share and Margin:
Pricing near the lower end of what customers are willing to pay can help you maximize market share—this is a common strategy for SaaS models aiming for rapid adoption. However, while lower pricing may drive volume, it might also mean thinner margins. Conversely, setting a premium price is effective if your product offers unique features or a superior experience that justifies the extra cost (as discussed on page 93 of Price to Scale).
The choice between the two isn’t about merely undercutting incumbents; it’s about striking a balance that aligns with your business goals.
• Strategic Considerations for New Entrants:
• Practical Application:
Begin by clearly defining your product’s positioning and the specific problems it solves. Once you understand what sets you apart, develop a pricing model that supports that positioning while addressing the market’s willingness to pay. Consider the long-term implications—whether you’re aiming for broad market penetration or carving out a niche with higher margins—and adjust your strategy accordingly.
In summary, the decision should be based on a thorough understanding of your product’s unique value, the market's price sensitivity, and your overall strategic goals. Our book Price to Scale emphasizes that “pricing is intimately connected to positioning,” so your pricing should be a natural extension of the brand and value you aim to communicate.
1
Below is our answer based on the insights from our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale:
• Yes, there are cases where companies have intentionally priced their product above an established competitor—and succeeded. For example, our book highlights how companies (like the one discussed in the Amplitude Pricing Plan Evolution section) recognized that many customers were willing to pay a premium once the product’s unique value was clearly communicated.
• The key to convincing customers that a higher-priced product is worth it is to clearly differentiate your offering:
Enhanced Functionality & Quality: Mitigate direct price comparisons by ensuring that your product offers additional or advanced functionalities that matter to customers. When your product fulfills needs that a competitor’s lower-priced solution doesn’t—be it through innovative features, better performance, or improved support—it justifies the higher cost.
Communicating Value Proposition: Clearly articulate how the premium price translates into tangible benefits (such as increased productivity, better user experience, or long-term cost savings). Customers are more receptive when they understand that the price premium is an investment in superior quality or additional capabilities.
Targeting Willingness-to-Pay: Often a segment of the market is willing to pay more for a more complete solution once the product has been refined and the brand has achieved recognition. Our book suggests that through iterative market learning, as shown by pricing evolution cases, companies discover that many customers value enhanced features and are ready to upgrade to a premium plan.
• The takeaway is that intentionally pricing above competitors works when you have a clear strategy that enhances perceived value. This involves not only product differentiation but also transparent, customer-focused communication that outlines why the higher price is a worthwhile investment.
In summary, as discussed in our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale, success in charging a higher price than an established competitor hinges on demonstrably superior functionality and strategic communication that confirms the enhanced value to potential customers.
1
Based on our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, the recommended approach isn’t to react with a knee-jerk across-the-board price drop but to be strategic and customer-focused. Here are a few key points to consider:
• Segment Your Customer Base
Price to Scale emphasizes the importance of understanding different customer cohorts. Instead of adjusting price uniformly, determine which segments are price-sensitive and might be at risk of churning. Then, tailor promotions or price adjustments only for those specific groups rather than diluting your overall value proposition.
• Offer Targeted Alternatives
Rather than simply lowering prices, be upfront about any reduced pricing and couple this with a value-add—such as an upgrade option or a discount in exchange for a longer commitment. For example, if a competitor’s price drop threatens to pull away more cost-conscious customers, you might offer a specialized package that preserves your brand’s value while addressing their budget concerns.
• Maintain Your Value Proposition
For segments that perceive your product’s higher price as a reflection of its superior value—perhaps due to additional features, support, or integrations—the book advises maintaining your current pricing. This strategy helps in preserving the brand’s premium feel and communicates that your pricing is justified by the value delivered.
In summary, Price to Scale advocates for a balanced, segmented approach. Instead of a reactive price war, focus on proactively offering tailored solutions and stick to your value proposition where it resonates. This method not only helps preserve margin but also ensures long-term customer retention in the face of competitive price fluctuations.
1
Below is a concise answer based on the insights from our SaaS pricing book, Price to Scale:
• Direct Answer
Pricing can act as a powerful signal of both quality and market positioning. Setting a higher price can communicate a premium, enterprise-level product that is rich in features and support. Conversely, a lower price is often used to attract a larger volume of SMBs by emphasizing affordability and ease of adoption.
• Supporting Insights from the Book
• Practical Application
• Summary/Takeaway
In Price to Scale, we emphasize that pricing is not just a number but an integral part of your market positioning strategy. Whether you choose a high price to underline enterprise quality or a lower price to drive broad market adoption, your pricing strategy should be consistent with your product’s value proposition and overall market approach.
1
Below is a concise answer based on the insights from our saas pricing book, Price to Scale:
• Yes, you can use competitors’ pricing in sales conversations—but the key is to use neutral, fact-based comparisons. Rather than badmouthing your competitor, focus on highlighting the hidden costs or limitations they might be subject to. For example, if a competitor’s lower sticker price comes with extra fees, less robust support, or other trade-offs, mention these factors as part of a transparent total cost-of-ownership discussion.
• Our book encourages using these comparisons as a way to pivot the conversation toward the overall value your solution provides. The idea is to help prospects see that while the headline price might look appealing elsewhere, when you break down the complete picture—much like what we describe in Price to Scale—they will understand why your pricing model, which scales value with the customer’s needs, is ultimately more beneficial.
• A smart approach is to:
In summary, bringing up competitors’ pricing can be effective if it is handled with transparency and a focus on the true value delivered to customers. This balanced approach not only reinforces your product’s strengths but also builds trust with your prospects.
1
When helping prospects make an apples-to-apples comparison, it’s essential to break down the bundled features into their underlying value components. In our book Price to Scale, we discuss two key strategies that can be applied here:
• Modular Approach: Rather than looking only at the headline price, decompose each plan into the individual capabilities or modules it offers. By attributing clear, quantifiable value to each module, you enable prospects to compare how much value they get in each category. For example, if your $100 plan includes a superior set of reporting features compared to a competitor’s plan, highlight that difference by assigning a value to those features.
• Good–Better–Best Packaging: This strategy frames your offerings in terms of tiers that match different customer needs. By doing so, you clarify the value components embedded in each tier. When competitors bundle features differently, this model helps prospects understand where your plan fits by clearly differentiating the benefits associated with each package.
In practice, you want to focus on the results or outcomes that each capability delivers rather than simply listing features. Help prospects quantify the return they can expect by comparing not just the cost, but the concrete benefits and targeted use cases. This makes the comparison straightforward even if the bundles differ.
In summary, by breaking down your plan’s features into discrete value drivers and positioning them within a clear tiered framework, you allow prospects to conduct a true apples-to-apples comparison based on the underlying outcomes. This approach, as outlined in Price to Scale, ensures that pricing discussions remain focused on the value delivered rather than just the sticker price.
1
When addressing the difference between your flat-rate model and a competitor’s usage-based model, you want to position your approach around clarity, predictability, and alignment with customer expectations. Here’s how to frame your pricing advantage, drawing on insights from our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale:
• Directly Highlight Predictability and Simplicity:
Customers appreciate knowing exactly what they’ll pay each month without unexpected cost fluctuations. Emphasize that your flat-rate pricing allows for simpler budgeting and easier financial planning—a significant advantage for many organizations.
• Showcase Alignment with Customer Behavior:
As discussed in Price to Scale, a critical starting point is recognizing what your customers are accustomed to. If your market segment values predictable expenses over a variable bill that can spike with usage, underscore that your pricing model directly answers that need.
• Differentiate Through Packaging and Value Metrics:
Avoid direct, side-by-side comparisons by creatively positioning your tiers. Our book advises renaming packages (e.g., transitioning from “Pro” and “Elite” to “Premium” and “Advanced”) and tailoring your feature sets. This not only differentiates your solution but also focuses the conversation on the distinct benefits and higher consistent value delivered, rather than a simple usage metric.
• Emphasize Flexibility and Long-Term Stability:
While pricing models evolve with market dynamics, a flat-rate model can signal long-term stability and clear value, which is particularly appealing in fast-paced environments where ongoing revenue predictability is key. Explain how this pricing strategy supports consistent service delivery and future upgrades without the need for frequent model changes.
In summary, frame your pricing advantage by emphasizing the simplicity, predictability, and tailored value of your approach. By carefully differentiating how you present your packages and aligning them with customer expectations, you can effectively illustrate why a flat-rate model might be the better choice over a usage-based alternative. This strategic approach is a core principle in our book, Price to Scale, and is essential for communicating lasting value to your customers.
1
Big players and industry norms play a significant role in setting price points, often acting as anchors that influence both your pricing strategy and customers' expectations.
Here are some key takeaways from our saas pricing book, Price to Scale:
• When you sell a product that integrates with or competes against industry giants like Salesforce, your pricing naturally comes under comparison. For instance, if Salesforce charges a specific per-user rate, your product’s price is likely to be evaluated in that context. This “anchor pricing” means prospects use the big player's pricing as a benchmark when assessing your offering.
• Customers indeed compare your prices against these benchmarks. If your product offers a subset of functionalities or doesn’t have a marked differentiation, they may push back, expecting a much lower price point corresponding to what they see with larger incumbents.
• The book also emphasizes the importance of conveying a clear value proposition. To deflect pushback, you should ensure that any premium pricing is well-supported by demonstrable advantages. Conversely, if you’re offering limited capabilities relative to a big player, it’s often necessary to justify a proportionally lower price, avoiding what can turn into a “race to the bottom.”
In summary, while industry norms and big players set the tone for pricing benchmarks, the ultimate goal is to clearly communicate your product’s unique value and innovation. This balance helps manage customer expectations and counters potential pricing objections effectively.
1
Based on the insights from our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale, here’s our take:
• Direct website placement versus sales collateral
While a competitor comparison matrix can be a powerful tool to show why your product offers more value—even if it comes at a premium—placing it directly on your pricing page requires careful consideration. When pricing is published on your website, it forces broad comparisons by all visitors (including competitors), which might dilute your value messages if not contextualized properly. For companies with complex, enterprise-focused selling where customization and intricate value propositions are important, it’s often more effective to reserve detailed competitor comparisons for tailored sales collateral. This approach allows your sales team to offer context and address concerns directly, ensuring that prospects understand the nuances behind why your solution commands a higher price.
• Advantages of using it in sales collateral
Including a comparison chart in sales materials offers flexibility. The sales team can dynamically highlight your strengths, discuss unique benefits, and adjust the discussion based on the prospect’s industry or needs. This ensures that your “more value” story is communicated clearly without immediately opening the door to direct online comparisons that can skew perception.
• When it might work on your website
If you operate in a high-velocity, transactional market, where buying decisions are more straightforward, a well-designed and concise competitor matrix on your site can offer clarity by quickly positioning your product’s superior value. Ensure that the matrix is clear, focused, and minimizes potential misinterpretation.
Summary:
Our guidance in Price to Scale emphasizes that a competitor comparison matrix is useful if used in the right context. For nuanced, high-value enterprise deals, keeping it in sales collateral allows for a more contextual and supportive discussion. Conversely, in more transactional environments, a simplified version on your pricing page might work—if you’re confident that it clearly communicates your unique value without diluting your pricing strategy.
In essence, tailor where and how you use such comparisons based on your overall GTM strategy and customer engagement model.
1
Based on our SaaS pricing book, Price to Scale, you can determine if you’re losing deals primarily because of pricing by systematically gathering and analyzing feedback from your customers and sales teams. Here’s how:
• Direct Customer Feedback:
- Conduct structured win/loss interviews. Ask prospects explicitly what factor—pricing, product fit, or features—was decisive when they chose (or declined) your offer.
- Use surveys to capture willingness-to-pay (WTP) data and ask for feedback on your pricing tiers. As discussed in our book, a survey can reveal if the price range aligns with what your target segment is comfortable with.
• Sales Team Insights:
- Leverage detailed sales notes. Sales reps often capture customer objections that can reveal if the price is a dealbreaker.
- Regularly review pricing objections mentioned during the sales process. For example, if you consistently see comments about “negative discount rates” or hesitations about the price, that may indicate that pricing is a key hurdle.
• Analytical Feedback Tools:
- Consider running conjoint analyses to refine your offerings and associated pricing. This method helps map out the relationship between features, packaging, and the price point accepted by the market.
In summary, combining qualitative methods (like in-person or pitch+feedback sessions) with quantitative data (such as surveys and conjoint analysis) can clearly show whether pricing is the primary issue. If multiple channels point to price-based objections rather than product fit or missing features, it’s a strong indication that tweaking your pricing model could help improve win rates. This approach is central to the frameworks laid out in Price to Scale.
1
Based on our saas pricing book Price to Scale, a sound strategy in a market dominated by a freemium or low-cost competitor is to avoid entering a race to the bottom by creating clear value distinctions through a premium tier. Here’s how you can approach it:
• Direct your efforts toward developing robust, premium features that appeal to the more advanced or specialized users. As discussed in Price to Scale (see pages 137 and 267), many SaaS companies facing intense price competition have successfully segmented their market. They do so by offering a basic, cost-effective plan that meets general needs, while simultaneously enhancing their product with advanced functionalities designed for users with more complex or high-value requirements.
• Instead of reducing prices across the board, focus on differentiating through value. By creating a paid tier with premium features, you effectively target a segment willing to invest in additional functionality, support, or usability. This differentiation allows you to maintain healthy margins and reinforces the perception of quality compared to a freemium competitor.
• Emphasize a clear product development shift where your teams work collaboratively to build enticing upgrades. This often involves continuously refining both your free offering and your premium features, ensuring that while the basics remain competitive, the advanced offerings are compelling enough for users to upgrade.
In summary, by focusing on a well-defined premium tier with superior features, you can compete effectively without undercutting your baseline pricing. This strategy leverages differentiation to capture a market segment that values the additional benefits, ensuring your product remains competitive and profitable even in a price-sensitive environment.
1
When creating a new category without direct competitors, our book Price to Scale explains that you need to rely on a combination of customer-centered value insights and alternative market signals rather than established benchmarks. Here are some key strategies and signals recommended in our saas pricing book:
• Directly assess the value delivered
In a blue ocean market—where your product replaces an existing way of doing things—you should focus on the tangible benefits and cost savings your solution offers. Identify how your product transforms a customer’s workflow or improves outcomes, then quantify that value in financial terms.
• Use alternative benchmarks
Even if traditional competitors are absent, you can look at what customers are currently paying for alternative solutions or workarounds. These “replacement costs” become a proxy for forming an initial price anchor, helping you understand what price range might appear attractive while signaling quality.
• Conduct targeted customer research
Our methodologies emphasize designing surveys or interviews that first set the appropriate context for the new category. Rather than directly asking for a price, you can:
• Leverage price elasticity and willingness to pay
In our book, the discussion around blue ocean categories shows that when there’s high price elasticity (for example, customers with a significant ability and willingness to pay), the product can sometimes command a premium—possibly 5-10x what you might expect in a market with direct competitors.
In summary, when benchmarks are scarce, you should anchor your pricing decisions on the value provided, the cost of existing alternatives, and refined customer insights gathered through well-designed, context-setting research. This integrated approach not only helps you set a competitive price but also validates the perceived quality and market fit of your innovative new category.
1
Based on our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, the best value metric for your SaaS should be one that is aligned directly with the value your customers gain from using your product. In other words, the metric you choose—whether it’s per user, per project, or per 1,000 API calls—should meet these three key attributes:
• Simple: It should be easy enough to explain in an elevator pitch. As we discuss in the book, if you can’t convey your pricing in one or two slides, it might be too complex for your market or investors.
• Measurable: You need a metric that you can count or measure accurately. For instance, if charging per user, you should have a reliable way to identify and count unique users (like unique login IDs). This keeps billing transparent and fair across different customer segments.
• Scalable: The metric should allow for more usage (and therefore more revenue) as your customers derive greater value from the product. This ensures that as customers grow, your pricing model grows with them, capturing increasing value over time.
To choose the best metric for your specific SaaS:
Identify the primary use case or value driver of your product. For example, if the value your customers derive is tied to active engagement (like in a communications tool), measuring per user might make sense. However, if your product is more transaction-focused (such as processing API calls), then a metric based on usage volume (e.g., per 1,000 API calls) could be more appropriate.
Evaluate whether the metric is easily measurable with your current data. If the data is hard to track or inconsistently reported, it might lead to billing challenges and customer dissatisfaction.
Consider whether your chosen metric evolves as your customer’s needs grow. If your pricing model does not scale with usage, you might end up undercapturing the value stored in high-growth accounts.
In summary, our pricing strategy in Price to Scale emphasizes finding a metric that is Simple, Measurable, and Scalable—ensuring that your pricing aligns directly with your customers’ perceived value and usage growth. This ensures not only easier customer adoption but also the financial scalability necessary for successful SaaS growth.
1
Based on Price to Scale, when a single usage metric doesn’t capture the full value of your product, many SaaS companies break down the value into multiple measurable components or "pricing units." Here are some common approaches discussed in our SaaS pricing book:
• Segmenting by Value Drivers:
Instead of relying on one metric, companies often map pricing to various value drivers (like volume, platform capabilities, or feature access). For instance, the two-part model in our book shows how you can charge a per-unit fee combined with a fixed platform fee—each addressing different areas of value.
• Capability-Based or Feature-Based Pricing:
As features become commoditized over time, pricing can pivot to focus on the added capabilities. Our book explains that by pricing add-ons based on their unique value (sometimes as a percentage of the base fee or as a fixed fee), you better capture differences in how each feature contributes to overall value.
• Modular or Package Approaches:
Another method is to create tiered or modular packages (like “Good-Better-Best”) where different groups of features, each offering distinct value, are bundled and priced according to the demographics or needs of target customer segments. This structure simplifies decision-making for customers whose usage doesn’t follow a neat linear pattern.
• Dynamic, Multi-Dimensional Models:
Recognizing that SaaS products often deliver value across several dimensions, models like the linear or two-part pricing structures help align fee structures to both low-volume (or entry-level) and high-volume (or enterprise) customers. This dynamic approach allows the price to adjust as customers grow or change their usage patterns across various capabilities.
In summary, if no single usage metric captures the diverse value your product offers, define pricing units by isolating and measuring distinct sources of value—whether that’s through individual feature fees, capability add-ons, or tiered subscription packages. This layered approach not only reflects the multifaceted value your product delivers but also provides flexibility and scalability in your pricing strategy, as detailed in Price to Scale.
1
Based on our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, the answer is nuanced:
• It’s not uncommon for SaaS companies to evolve their pricing metric over time—for instance, shifting from per-user pricing to one more directly tied to the actual value (like usage-based or per-customer). In our book, we discuss how products like marketing automation or customer success modules often benefit from metrics that reflect the real source of value rather than a simple per-user count.
• One example discussed is that companies, including Gainsight, originally relied on per-user metrics but later realized that certain features better align with metrics such as customer count or usage. This change wasn’t just about chasing higher revenue; it was about linking pricing to the true benefits customers received. When customers see that the cost more fairly corresponds with the value they gain (and potentially see their own ROI more clearly), their reaction tends to be more positive even if a change is initially met with some resistance.
• However, a key takeaway is that any change in the pricing metric must be carefully planned and communicated. Customers can be sensitive to changes—especially if the new metric indirectly leads to higher costs that aren’t clearly justified by additional value. The book emphasizes that only after careful analysis of usage patterns and customer value should such a metric change be executed. When done well, the result is a pricing model that grows with the customer, thus reducing churn and reinforcing trust.
In summary, while changes to the primary pricing metric can meet some customer initial apprehension, aligning the metric with the true value they receive usually results in better long-term customer satisfaction and reduced churn. It’s all about ensuring that the pricing evolution makes sense from the customer’s ROI perspective, as detailed in Price to Scale.
1
Based on the discussion in our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale, it is indeed viable to use multiple pricing axes when different customers derive value in different ways. However, there are a few important considerations to keep in mind:
• Clear Value Definitions: When your product provides value in more than one dimension, having multiple pricing axes can help align pricing with the specific benefits each customer segment receives. As detailed in the book, this approach requires a clear identification and articulation of the underlying value drivers so that each pricing element directly relates to the customer’s experience.
• Avoiding Complexity: While multiple pricing metrics can capture the granularity of customer value, it’s crucial to avoid overcomplicating the pricing structure. The book cautions against adding too many axes to the point where it confuses the customer. Simplicity in communication and rationale behind each pricing dimension is key to ensuring customers understand what they’re paying for.
• Segmentation and Alignment: The example of Newco in our book shows that when product lines serve different customer needs—like Networking vs. ITAM—it might make sense to have different metrics for each offering. This segmentation ensures that pricing remains appropriately aligned with the value delivered, rather than forcing a one-size-fits-all model that might not capture each segment's nuances.
• Practical Application: In practice, if you opt for multiple pricing axes, invest in clear documentation and communication. Use examples, case studies, or visual frameworks that elucidate how each axis corresponds to specific customer outcomes. This approach minimizes the risk of confusion, empowering customers to make informed decisions.
To summarize, while multiple pricing axes are a viable strategy for products with diverse value propositions, their success hinges on clarity, simplicity, and proper segmentation. By aligning each pricing metric with distinct value drivers and communicating effectively, you can capture the nuances of different customer needs without overwhelming them.
1
Below is a concise answer based on our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale:
Directly tie your pricing unit to the value delivered by selecting a metric that closely reflects how customers use and benefit from your product. This means choosing a usage measure that aligns with the economic value—for example, measuring active operations, transactions, or customer engagement rather than a generic metric like number of users.
Apply the five key criteria highlighted in Price to Scale when choosing your metric:
In summary, by carefully selecting a pricing unit based on the principles outlined in Price to Scale, you can create a model where the cost scales in tandem with the value delivered. This balanced approach helps ensure heavy users pay their share, while lighter users aren’t burdened with costs that don’t reflect their consumption.
1
Based on our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, there are indeed instances where companies have moved away from flat-rate models and opted for metrics tied directly to customer outcomes—such as a percentage of revenue or on a per-transaction basis. While not every company adopts this approach, a growing number in the SaaS world are using usage-based or revenue-sharing pricing models to align their fees with the value delivered to customers.
Below are some key considerations and frameworks from our book that help structure such pricing fairly:
• Value Alignment:
As discussed in Price to Scale, the primary goal is to ensure that the pricing model reflects the value your product delivers. If your customer’s revenue or transaction volume directly correlates with the benefit they receive from your platform, tying your fee to these metrics can create a win-win situation. When both parties benefit as the customer’s business grows, pricing feels more equitable.
• Transparent Metrics:
A fair model requires clearly defined metrics. Whether you opt for a percentage of revenue or a fee per transaction, it’s crucial to determine upfront how these figures are measured, reported, and audited. Transparency builds trust, ensuring that both the vendor and customer are aligned on what drives costs.
• Hybrid or Tiered Approaches:
Our book explains the utility of approaches such as Good–Better–Best or modular pricing. Many companies combine a base fee with a variable component tied to usage. This means that even if a customer’s revenue or transactional value is low in the early stages, you can cover fixed costs through a base charge, while the variable fee scales with their success.
• Structuring for Fairness:
To keep the model fair, consider:
In summary, while not all SaaS companies price based on their customer’s revenue or end-user usage, several have successfully implemented this model. The key is to design the structure so that it aligns your revenue with the customer’s success—balancing base fees with scalable, performance-based charges as outlined in Price to Scale. This approach not only makes the pricing feel fair but also reinforces a strong value-based partnership with your customers.
1
Based on our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, there are several principles you can apply to keep usage-based pricing transparent and easy for customers to predict:
• Make the model simple and intuitive. One of the key attributes we emphasize is that your pricing model should be explainable in a short conversation or an “elevator pitch.” This means that despite underlying complexities (like usage growth in storage or data), the customer-facing structure must be straightforward.
• Use clear, quantifiable metrics. The book suggests that any usage metric should be:
• Consider tiered or bucketed pricing. Instead of billing by a raw usage rate that could vary unpredictably, use tiers or defined buckets of usage. This approach not only aligns with internal cost structures but also gives customers a clear view of what to expect on their bills, reducing surprises.
• Ensure the alignment of pricing with customer expectations. Price to Scale emphasizes that a logical and easy-to-sell pricing model will also be acceptable to customers. This means avoiding overly granular pricing that might result in constantly fluctuating bills.
In summary, by combining a simple, measurable, and scalable pricing strategy with tiered or bucketed usage metrics, you can ensure that your model is both operationally sound and transparent enough for customers to predict their costs. This approach is discussed in detail across various chapters of Price to Scale, particularly where we cover the predictability of usage growth and the necessity of a simple pricing narrative.
1
Based on the principles outlined in our SaaS pricing book, Price to Scale, the decision isn’t an either/or between factoring in internal costs versus customer-perceived value. Instead, it’s about finding the right balance that aligns your pricing metric with both the value your customers receive and the underlying costs that can scale with usage.
Here’s how our book approaches this:
• Customer-Perceived Value First:
Our pricing strategy emphasizes that the metric you choose should ultimately reflect the value that your customers derive from your product. This alignment makes it easier for prospects to see a clear connection between the cost they incur and the benefit they receive.
• Considering Hard Costs:
However, if your product incurs significant hard costs that scale with usage (such as API calls incurring server or compute expenses), it’s prudent to factor these into your pricing decision. As noted in Price to Scale, usage-based models are especially effective when your costs—like S3 storage or compute power—directly correlate with the consumption of your service.
• The Checklist Process:
In the book, we suggest a decision process where you first determine if your model is based on consumption or capability. If it’s consumption-based, you then choose a usage metric (e.g., price per API call, per ticket processed, or per chat interaction) that best ties the cost to both customer value and scalable costs. This process allows you to prioritize customer value while ensuring that your pricing structure can support your revenue and cost recovery goals.
In summary, while customer-perceived value should drive your pricing unit selection, you should absolutely consider your internal cost dynamics when those costs scale with usage. This dual lens ensures that your pricing not only resonates with your customers but also safeguards the financial health of your business.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.