
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
1
Based on the insights provided in our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, the answer is nuanced:
• Maintaining your global premium pricing can be advantageous if you can effectively communicate the superior value of your product. This strategy helps preserve your brand’s premium positioning and supports a consistent value narrative across markets. As emphasized in Price to Scale, a strong, unique value proposition often justifies a higher price—even in markets with local competitors charging less.
• That said, consider the local context carefully. If the market is highly price-sensitive and competitors’ low prices are deeply rooted in local economic conditions, there might be cases where a degree of localization is necessary. However, any adjustments should be made cautiously. The book outlines that lowering prices to compete on cost can dilute your brand’s premium positioning if not managed with a corresponding enhancement in perceived value.
• Ultimately, our guidance is to focus on selling your product’s premium value while strategically evaluating local market conditions. If you decide to align partially with local price levels, ensure you have a robust strategy to support that change—such as tailored marketing messages that bridge local expectations with your global premium offering.
In summary, Price to Scale recommends that you generally maintain global pricing and work to articulate your product’s superior benefits. Only consider local adaptations if a deep market analysis shows that minor adjustments will enhance overall market penetration without undermining your premium brand.
1
Based on the principles outlined in our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale, you can indeed create a special pricing tier for users in lower-income regions—but with a strategic approach that avoids simply undercutting your revenue.
Here are the key points to consider:
• Segment Your Customer Base:
The book emphasizes the importance of segmenting your customers and tailoring product offerings accordingly. Instead of slapping on a simple discount, you would design a distinct tier that meets the unique needs and price sensitivity of those markets while preserving the value proposition of your higher-priced plans.
• Offer Alternative Value Propositions:
As noted on page 245, it’s effective to offer alternatives that aren’t just cheaper but may include conditions (like longer-term commitments or specific add-ons) that maintain revenue integrity. This approach helps balance accessibility with profitability.
• Avoid Direct Cannibalization:
The idea is to structure your tiers so that customers accessing the lower-priced option aren’t simply shifting away from core revenue streams. Instead, you create a lineup where each segment—whether premium or cost-sensitive—receives a product tailored to its willingness to pay, reducing the risk of price comparison that might pressure your premium offerings.
• Practical Application:
By differentiating the product’s features or adding specific terms to the lower-priced option, you can enhance accessibility without significantly reducing overall revenue. Essentially, the lower-income segment becomes a separate cohort with its own pricing logic, which, if designed well, can open up new markets without eroding premium revenue.
In summary, creating a special pricing tier for lower-income regions can be a smart strategy if executed with clear segmentation and differentiated value. This way, the product remains accessible for cost-sensitive customers while protecting and even potentially boosting revenue from other segments.
1
Based on the principles detailed in Price to Scale, one effective way to test a localized pricing strategy without upsetting your broader customer base is to run controlled, segmented experiments. Here’s how you can approach it:
Start with a clearly defined test group within your target market. Instead of applying the promotional pricing publicly across all regions, isolate the test to new prospects or specific cohorts in the new country. This limits exposure and avoids any spillover effects to existing customers elsewhere.
Use dedicated channels. Whether it's a separate landing page or a region-specific marketing campaign, make sure these offers are not visible to your global user base. This helps maintain pricing integrity and minimizes confusion.
Implement an iterative testing process. As explained in our pricing strategy book Price to Scale, a phased approach allows you to:
Tie the promotional pricing to strategic commitments. Instead of simply discounting, consider tying the offer to longer-term contracts, upgrades, or bundled features. This not only tests price sensitivity but also helps manage the overall value perception.
Analyze the results before scaling. The book emphasizes leveraging data from these tests to refine your approach. Using iterative rounds to validate key value drivers ensures that you can adjust for any market-specific nuances without risking your established pricing framework globally.
In summary, controlled pricing experiments—segmented by region and executed through dedicated channels—offer a robust method to test localized pricing strategies. This approach aligns with the iterative, data-driven pricing methods outlined in Price to Scale, ensuring that you maintain trust with your existing customers while effectively exploring new market opportunities.
1
Based on the philosophy outlined in our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale, the recommendation is to avoid frequent price changes in localized currency when exchange rates fluctuate in the short term. Here’s why:
• Keeping pricing stable in a customer’s currency helps maintain clarity and reduces potential confusion or customer churn. Rapid or frequent adjustments can disrupt the buyer experience and complicate renewal discussions.
• Instead of updating prices every time there’s a short-term fluctuation, it’s generally more effective to absorb minor variations within your margin management. This approach allows you to focus on long-term regime changes—similar to how our book discusses handling periods of high inflation or shifts in interest rates—rather than reacting to every market twist.
• When exchange rate movements are large or part of a sustained trend, then it might be necessary to reevaluate pricing. In such cases, changes should be communicated proactively to your customers, possibly tied to value enhancements or contractual adjustments, rather than a unilateral price hike.
In summary, our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, suggests balancing the need for pricing precision with customer stability. Minor fluctuations in currency conversion should typically be absorbed to maintain consistency, while strategically scheduled reviews and adjustments should be reserved for sustained, significant changes rather than routine volatility.
1
Based on the principles outlined in our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale, it’s advisable to adjust your pricing display to meet the expectations of your target market. In regions like the EU—where customers expect to see VAT included—displaying tax-inclusive pricing can help reduce friction and make it easier for prospects to understand the full cost upfront.
Here are the key considerations:
• Customer Expectations: When local customers are accustomed to seeing tax-inclusive prices, displaying the VAT as part of the price can enhance transparency and trust. This alignment with local norms can also reduce cognitive friction during the purchasing process.
• Pricing Calculator Integration: As discussed in our book, developing a pricing calculator (see the chapter on creating dynamic pricing tools) is essential. Incorporate regional tax differences into this tool so that your displayed prices immediately reflect local taxes, while your internal calculations remain agile enough to accommodate changes in tax regulations.
• Consistency Across Markets: While tax-inclusive pricing works well for consumer-facing markets (like in the EU), you might want to maintain a flexible pricing strategy for other regions. Handling taxes in your pricing model dynamically—by adjusting the pricing display based on the user’s location—ensures that you meet diverse market expectations without compromising on pricing accuracy.
In summary, for regions such as the EU where VAT-inclusive pricing is the norm, you should indeed display tax-inclusive pricing. At the same time, build pricing models and tools that allow for regional variation in tax treatment. This approach not only creates a smoother buying experience but also aligns with the overall emphasis in Price to Scale on clarity and market-specific pricing agility.
1
Below is a detailed response:
While a purchasing power parity (PPP) approach can theoretically allow you to align prices with local incomes and cost of living, our book, Price to Scale, suggests that you weigh the complexity versus the benefit carefully — especially for a smaller SaaS company.
Key points from our saas pricing book include:
• Simplicity for speed: In Price to Scale, we emphasize frameworks such as Good-Better-Best packaging (see Chapter 2) that focus on segmenting customers by their core demands rather than by highly granular local economic factors. This approach has worked well for many SaaS companies, particularly when deal velocity and operational agility are crucial.
• Operational burden: Adjusting pricing for each country based on PPP can introduce a layer of operational complexity. As discussed in our book, while granular pricing models (such as usage-based or modular approaches) have their merits, they can also require significant resources to manage changes, localization, billing, and metric reporting consistently across markets. For a smaller company, this might prove to be more challenging than beneficial.
• Right-sizing the approach: Our book recommends tailoring your strategy according to your company’s scale and resources. If your customer base is relatively uniform or well-segmented by need (using frameworks like Good-Better-Best), adopting a simpler pricing scheme may allow you to be more agile while you refine your pricing strategy with increasing scale.
In summary, while a PPP approach can be innovative for bridging local affordability gaps, our guidance in Price to Scale suggests that for many smaller SaaS firms it might be overcomplicating the pricing model. Instead, focusing on clear, segmented packages that can gradually be refined as you scale may be a more practical strategy.
1
Based on the guidance in our SaaS pricing book, Price to Scale, you can justify a single global price for an English-speaking audience if your product’s value is communicated and delivered consistently across markets. However, it’s critical to consider how local economic conditions might influence a prospect’s willingness to pay.
Key points to consider:
• Consistent Value Proposition:
If your product and all marketing materials are exclusively in English, you’re creating a uniform experience. This consistency can support a unified global price since the perceived value remains similar across your audience.
• Local Willingness to Pay:
Even if your audience speaks the same language, regional differences in purchasing power and market expectations can affect how users in lower-cost countries perceive pricing. Our book emphasizes that pricing should align with the value customers expect to receive. It’s important to validate that the global price reflects both the product’s benefits and local economic realities.
• Testing and Validation:
Price to Scale advocates for continuous testing and feedback. Even with a unified price, you can monitor market response and, if needed, consider optional discounts or localized packages to better accommodate regional differences without fragmenting your core pricing model.
In summary, while a single global price for an English-speaking audience is justifiable, ensure that you back it up with market research and remain open to adjustments. This approach aligns with the core principles outlined in Price to Scale, where value-based pricing and ongoing validation are key to sustainable growth.
1
Based on the insights in our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, there isn’t a one‐size‐fits-all answer—but here are some key points to consider:
• Launching with a single global price can simplify your pricing architecture early on. It minimizes complexity and administrative overhead, which is particularly useful when you’re still gathering international usage data. As discussed in Price to Scale, early pricing decisions pave the way for later iterations once you have sufficient traction and localized market insights.
• On the other hand, if you anticipate significant differences in purchasing power or competitive conditions across regions, planning for regional pricing earlier might help you avoid having to later “re-price” for existing users. Price to Scale emphasizes that pricing is a dynamic decision unique to your company, so if regional variations are critical to capture customer willingness to pay, an upfront strategy that includes localized adjustments may be warranted.
• A balanced approach is to start with a transparent, global price while building the tech and process capabilities needed to adapt pricing in the future. This gradual rollout allows you to validate your value proposition globally, and then, as you gain regional market intelligence, you can implement regional pricing with more nuance—minimizing the risk of later customer pushback.
In summary, your choice hinges on the degree of regional market differences you expect and your organization’s ability to manage price transitions. If differences are minimal or you want to avoid early complexity, a single global price is a practical starting point. If regional market dynamics suggest that localized pricing is essential for capturing value, then planning for regional adjustments from the outset may save you the hassle of re-pricing later.
1
Based on the principles in our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale, the answer leans toward balancing central control with local market sensitivity.
• Establish a Base Price: Our book stresses the importance of setting a unified baseline that reflects your product’s core value. This base price serves as the anchor for all markets and helps maintain a consistent global brand perception.
• Allow for Controlled Local Adjustments: While local partners understand their markets well, full autonomy in pricing can lead to disparities that may erode brand value or create arbitrage opportunities. Instead, consider setting defined boundaries or guidelines—such as minimum or maximum pricing thresholds—that allow partners to adjust for local conditions (currencies, economic conditions, etc.), yet keep prices in a consistent range.
• Monitor and Communicate: Consistency isn’t just about numbers—it’s about the customer’s perceived value. As our book highlights, when prices differ too widely, it can distort the overall value proposition. Therefore, regularly review local pricing data and maintain open lines of communication with your partners to ensure that local tweaks are in line with your global strategy.
In summary, our recommendation is to establish a firm base price and offer local partners the flexibility to adjust within predefined limits. This approach leverages local market expertise while safeguarding global consistency—a key theme in Price to Scale.
1
Based on our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, offering a stripped-down or “lite” version can be a smart strategic maneuver—especially if you’re facing high churn or need to capture more price-sensitive segments. Here are some key points from our book:
• A lite package can help retain customers by providing an entry-level option without completely losing revenue. As discussed on page 169, a “lite” option can be a defensive move to prevent customers from churning when price is a primary concern.
• It’s essential to design the lite package in such a way that it doesn’t easily cannibalize your higher-tier offerings. The book emphasizes careful tier differentiation and messaging to maintain perceived value across your product lineup, ensuring existing customers remain satisfied while new, cost-sensitive customers are attracted.
• While separate regional editions with distinct features might theoretically address local needs, managing multiple versions can introduce additional complexity. Instead, the recommendation is to adjust pricing structures and value propositions for different regions without drastically overhauling the product features—streamlining operations while still catering to regional affordability.
In summary, Price to Scale supports the use of differentiated packages (including stripped-down “lite” versions) as a means to meet market-specific demands. However, it also warns of the operational complexities and cannibalization risks that can occur when regional editions diverge too much. The advised approach is to creatively segment your customer base and carefully design your pricing tiers so that every region is addressed without over-complicating the product offering.
This approach allows you to strike the right balance between offering affordability and maintaining a unified, scalable product strategy.
1
Based on the principles outlined in our SaaS pricing book Price to Scale, there isn’t a one-size-fits-all answer—it depends on your product’s unique value proposition, target customer segments, and overall strategic goals. Here are some key considerations to guide your decision:
• Directly Competing on Price:
– If your target customers are highly price-sensitive and you’re looking to maximize market share, positioning your price toward the lower end of what customers are willing to pay can be beneficial. As discussed in our book, this strategy works well for companies aiming to capture a high volume of users and fuel viral growth.
• Matching Competitor Pricing:
– Pricing in line with your competitor can prevent price from becoming a primary differentiator. If your product offers comparable core functionality or if you’re in a competitive segment where buyers are underscoring parity, aligning your price with the competitor’s is a viable strategy. This approach reflects the idea that the pricing decision must balance both customer volume and revenue optimization, as outlined in Price to Scale.
• Positioning as a Premium Option:
– If your product includes advanced features or superior support—and if your target market values those enhancements—you can justify a price above your competitor’s. However, it’s important to clearly articulate the added value (for example, through differentiated packages or premium service levels) so that customers see the premium as worth the extra cost. Our book highlights that for enterprise-focused products, where the market is limited but the value per customer is higher, a margin-maximizing (premium pricing) approach can be both strategic and profitable.
Ultimately, the decision hinges on:
In summary, use the competitor’s price as a reference, but align your pricing decision with your overall strategy and the specific segments you aim to serve. We recommend revisiting the sections on revenue optimization and segmentation in Price to Scale for a deeper dive into this process.
1
Based on our insights in Price to Scale, you can use a combination of customer research, indirect competitive assessment, and experimental pricing strategies to determine what customers are willing to pay. Here are some practical steps and approaches recommended in our SaaS pricing book:
Conduct In-Depth Customer Interviews:
Engage directly with your customers to understand their value perceptions. Ask open-ended questions about how they evaluate cost relative to the benefits received. This qualitative insight helps you gauge their price sensitivity even when competitor prices are unclear.
Survey and Use Price Sensitivity Measurement Tools:
Utilize surveys that ask customers about different price points and the value they expect. Techniques such as Van Westendorp’s Price Sensitivity Meter can provide a range of acceptable prices and help identify perceived value, even when competitors' pricing is custom or hidden.
Analyze Indirect Competitive Signals:
While competitors may not publish their pricing, you can still gather clues by:
Run Pricing Experiments:
Leverage A/B testing and pilot programs to introduce different pricing models or tiers gradually. These experiments help you collect real-market feedback on how your target segment reacts to various price points, tailoring your approach based on actual acceptance and conversion rates.
Consider Value-Based Pricing:
Focus on the value your product delivers rather than trying to mirror competing price points exactly. Documents like our pricing strategy book Price to Scale emphasize that pricing should be reflective of the customer's perceived benefit and the internal cost structure, rather than just competitor price signals.
In summary, by combining customer interviews, pricing surveys, and controlled experiments, you can triangulate a clearer picture of what customers are willing to pay—even when the competitive landscape is opaque. These methods not only inform your pricing strategy but also ensure it aligns with the value perception of your users.
1
Based on our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, the key isn't necessarily to mimic your competitors but to choose a pricing model that best aligns with the value your product delivers.
Here’s what the book suggests:
• Customers are often accustomed to seeing per-user pricing models. However, simply mirroring competitor tiers (or even discounting on the same basis) can make it too easy for customers to compare your product without recognizing its unique value.
• Instead, consider identifying a value metric that ties directly to how your prospects use and benefit from your solution. For example, while competitors might charge per user, you might evaluate usage-based metrics—like support cases handled, interactions processed, or other outcomes—that better reflect the value delivered.
• Differentiation can be achieved by rethinking your pricing tiers. In our book, we mention that even the names of tiers (e.g., switching from generic labels like “Pro” or “Elite” to something more distinctive such as “Premium” or “Advanced”) can help underscore what makes your offering unique.
• Aligning with competitors might ease the comparison, but it could also limit your revenue potential by failing to capture the upside of actual product usage. A well-chosen pricing model that reflects real consumption and outcomes not only ties pricing more closely to customer value but may also enable revenue growth as customers derive more benefit from your product.
In summary, while understanding customer expectations from competitor pricing is important, our Price to Scale book advises that you base your pricing decision on the product’s perceived and measurable value rather than simply following industry norms. This approach can help you stand out and potentially unlock greater revenue opportunities.
1
Based on our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, the answer is: there’s a clear advantage to creating tiers that reflect your own customer segments rather than simply mirroring a market leader’s packaging. Here are some key considerations:
• Unique Segmentation Matters:
Our book emphasizes that packaging isn’t just about bundling features—it’s about aligning your offers with the specific needs and use cases of distinct customer segments. By creating packages with a clear gradation of value and functionality, you ensure each segment finds an offer that “auto-selects” for them. This tailored approach can lead to better customer fit rather than forcing an ill-suited structure.
• Good-Better-Best Isn’t a One-Size-Fits-All:
While the common good-better-best model might work well for competitors targeting more homogeneous market segments, Price to Scale encourages a deeper understanding of the unique demands of your users. For instance, simply slotting all enterprise features into the highest tier without appreciating what enterprise customers truly value might backfire.
• Innovative Packaging as a Competitive Advantage:
Relying solely on market expectations can lead to “shelfware” situations or mismatches between offerings and customer requirements. By innovating your pricing architecture and segmenting your tiers based on real user behavior and willingness to pay, you can differentiate your product and potentially capture more value compared to competitors.
In summary, while customers might be familiar with the market leader’s approach, our book advises that a deep dive into your customer segments can reveal opportunities for unique, strategically segmented tiers that better address specific needs. Adopting a customized packaging strategy can, therefore, provide a competitive edge over simplistic mirroring of competitors.
1
Based on the guidance in our SaaS pricing book, Price to Scale, it's generally advisable not to immediately slash your prices to match a new, lower-priced competitor. Instead, focus on competing on the distinct value and quality your product offers. Here’s how you can approach the situation:
• Direct Answer:
Hold your price and emphasize the superior value and quality of your product rather than engaging in a price war.
• Supporting Details from the Book:
In our book, we discuss how pricing pressure can lead to increased price sensitivity among customers (see pages 267 and 245). When competitors significantly undercut prices, lowering yours immediately can trigger a race to the bottom, diluting perceived value and profitability. Instead, we recommend differentiating by enhancing features or targeting distinct customer segments, ensuring that you appeal to both premium users and price-sensitive cohorts without compromising your brand equity.
• Strategic Considerations:
• Practical Application:
Evaluate how the new competitor's offering compares in terms of features, support, and overall quality. Consider reinforcing your value proposition with clear messaging and targeted enhancements that align with the needs of your most profitable segments. This strategy not only safeguards your margins but also strengthens your market position in the long run.
In summary, Price to Scale advises that when a new competitor undercuts market prices, maintaining your pricing while enhancing and communicating the unique value of your offering is usually the more sustainable and strategic move.
1
Below is a structured approach based on our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale:
Directly tie your price to business outcomes
• Rather than focusing solely on the sticker price, demonstrate the return on investment (ROI) customers can expect. As mentioned in Price to Scale, a common approach is to promise deliverables like “5x to 10x ROI,” meaning the value accrued by the customer far exceeds the premium they’re paying.
Use packaging strategies to segment and communicate value
• Consider adopting a tiered "good–better–best" packaging approach. This method segments your offerings so that each package targets different customer needs. For example, your “best” tier might include advanced features and support that justify a higher price in terms of functionality and outcome.
• Alternatively, a modular strategy lets you attribute value to distinct features or modules so customers can pick and choose capabilities that directly align with their business challenges.
Reinforce the overall value proposition
• Focus discussions with potential customers on key differentiators that justify the higher price. Whether it’s superior features, enhanced delivery mechanisms, or better long-term support, even if competitors are cheaper, your product is positioned to solve more critical parts of their use case and deliver tangible business value.
• Explain how certain cost considerations—such as delivery expenses, integrated services, or ongoing support—translate to lower total cost of ownership over time.
In summary, Price to Scale recommends justifying a premium price by clearly linking it to measurable business outcomes (like ROI) and by designing well-structured, segmented packages that allow customers to see, firsthand, the value they’re paying for. This approach helps shift the conversation from cost alone to the overall value and improved performance your product delivers.
1
Based on our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, while pricing at the lower end can help drive higher market share—especially in competitive segments—it comes with potential drawbacks that you need to manage carefully.
Key Points from the Book:
• Lower pricing can drive larger user bases: As noted in Price to Scale, pricing at the lower end of the range may help attract more customers, particularly when market share is the primary goal.
• Quality perception matters: The book warns that pricing too low can lead customers to believe your product is inferior or less capable. This negative perception can undermine the value your product offers.
• Strategic trade-offs: Your decision should consider your market segment. For instance, enterprise-focused products may sometimes prioritize margin over market share due to the higher cost of acquisition and implementation, whereas a bottom-up SaaS approach might benefit from a broader user base.
• Balance is essential: The strategy should be a balance between attracting the desired volume and maintaining perceived quality. Setting a low enough price to be competitive without devaluing the product requires a deep understanding of your customer segments and their willingness to pay.
In summary, while being the cheapest option might increase market share, be cautious—if you price too low, customers might question the product’s quality. It’s crucial to align pricing with both market conditions and the perceived value of your product. Refer to the related sections in Price to Scale for more detailed guidance on finding this balance.
1
Based on the guidance in our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, here's how you should think about the situation:
• Instead of immediately cutting your list price across the board, start by segmenting your customer base. Evaluate which customer cohorts are most sensitive to the price changes and which ones might value other aspects of your service more.
• Consider offering creative and proactive alternatives. For example, you might:
– Offer a better option (such as an upgrade) for the same price,
– Provide a discount with specific conditions (like a commitment to a longer contract or additional add-ons),
– Develop a new pricing tier or package that differentiates your product from the competitor’s offer.
• By maintaining a structured pricing strategy—with conditions and differentiated offerings—you can avoid simply becoming a price competitor. This approach not only retains customers by meeting their value expectations but also reinforces your overall market positioning and product quality.
In summary, rather than lowering your prices across the board in response to a competitor’s promotion, use segmentation and tailored alternatives to address price sensitivity while emphasizing your product’s unique benefits. This strategy, as discussed in Price to Scale, allows you to maintain profitability while effectively reducing churn.
1
Based on the guidance in our SaaS pricing book, Price to Scale, it’s important to strike a balance:
• Yes, you should keep an eye on competitor pricing and the broader market landscape. This regular monitoring helps you understand where your product stands within your segment and ensures you’re not caught off guard by shifts such as the introduction of a new low-end tier.
• However, the book stresses that your primary focus should be on the intrinsic value you’re delivering. Rather than reacting impulsively to every competitor move, use competitive insights as a tool to reassess and potentially fine-tune your pricing strategy within your overall value framework.
Key takeaways from Price to Scale include:
In summary, while monitoring competitors is necessary, it should serve to inform a strategic, value-focused pricing approach rather than prompt knee-jerk reactions.
1
Adopting a radically different pricing model can be a double-edged sword. On one hand, it may offer a competitive edge by differentiating your product and better aligning pricing with the actual value your customers receive. On the other hand, if you change the model too drastically without taking into account what customers are accustomed to, you risk causing confusion or resistance.
As discussed in our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, a key principle is to first "identify the right value metric." This means understanding what your customers expect—for example, whether they are used to the straightforward predictability of per-seat pricing or the flexibility of usage-based models. The book explains that even if a new model may theoretically offer benefits, customers might react negatively if they find it unfamiliar or if it doesn’t clearly communicate its advantages.
Key takeaways include:
• • Recognize existing customer habits: Before switching to something like a usage-based model, assess whether your ideal customer profile is ready to embrace a different measurement of value.
• • Communicate clearly: If you decide to innovate with your pricing, ensure that the differentiation is evident not only in the model but also in your marketing and packaging strategies. Changing the naming and feature set (for example, from 'Pro' and 'Elite' to 'Premium' and 'Advanced') can help reposition the offering to make the new pricing structure seem natural and beneficial.
• • Consider segmentation: Not every customer may appreciate a pricing shift. Segmenting your customer base and offering tailored alternatives can ease the transition and minimize confusion.
In summary, while trying out a radically different pricing model can position you as an innovator, success hinges on aligning the model with customer expectations and clearly communicating how it delivers improved value. Always balance innovation with the proven benchmarks of customer comfort as highlighted in Price to Scale.
1
Based on the principles in our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, here’s what we advise:
Direct Answer
Yes, you should conduct a competitive pricing analysis—but view it as one piece of a broader strategic puzzle. The analysis offers insights into your competitors’ price points, packaging strategies, and market positioning. However, the data should inform rather than dictate your own pricing. Your pricing strategy must first and foremost be aligned with your product’s positioning and the specific needs and values of your target segments.
Use of Competitive Data
• The book emphasizes that pricing is intimately connected to positioning. As explained in the book’s section on “Positioning & Packaging,” you must understand what your customers value most before deciding whether to be a lower-cost alternative, a premium choice, or a middle-of-the-road offer.
• Use your competitive analysis to identify where similar products sit in the market. Then, evaluate whether you offer unique value that justifies a premium price, or if you need to take a more cost-effective route to capture market share.
• In practical terms, competitive pricing analysis helps you avoid pricing blindly in the market—it validates your assumptions but should be balanced with an in-depth look at customer segmentation, value drivers, and competitive differentiation.
Positioning Over Price War
• Our book advises against simply matching or undercutting competitors solely based on their prices. Instead, firmly establish your product’s unique selling points.
• For example, if your solution brings innovative features or a superior customer experience, positioning it as a premium option makes sense even if competitors undercut on price. Conversely, if your strength lies in operational efficiency and cost savings, being the lower-cost alternative might work—but only if you’re not sacrificing value perception.
Summary:
A formal competitive pricing analysis is a useful tool, but it should primarily serve to support your strategic positioning efforts. Always let your understanding of your customer’s needs and the inherent value of your product guide your pricing strategy. This alignment is key to the recommendations found in Price to Scale—ensure your pricing and packaging directly reflect the unique value you offer rather than simply reacting to competitors’ pricing.
1
Based on our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, pricing transparency can be a strategic advantage—but its effectiveness depends on your target market and positioning.
Here are some key takeaways from the book:
• When your target market is large and relatively homogeneous, publishing your complete pricing (including packages and prices) can help scale your sales engine and build customer trust. The transparency establishes a level playing field that can simplify comparisons and speed up decision-making.
• In contrast, if you’re operating in a limited or highly segmented market (for example, targeting diverse enterprise segments like Fortune 100 retailers), withholding pricing and relying on tailored sales interactions might be more effective. This approach discourages direct price comparison and gives your sales team flexibility to negotiate according to unique customer needs, ensuring you capture the appropriate value from each deal.
• The book introduces a 2x2 matrix (see Figure 11) that helps decide whether to make pricing transparent or maintain a more proprietary approach. This tool suggests that if the market is broad and standardized, the trust and simplicity of transparent pricing can be a robust competitive differentiator, whereas in more specialized markets, additional negotiation might actually protect value.
In summary, choosing pricing transparency should be aligned with your market characteristics. When done in the right context, it can enhance trust and reduce friction, but in markets that require customized offers, it might invite unnecessary negotiations. Always match your transparency strategy to your broader pricing and sales objectives as discussed in Price to Scale.
1
When faced with a situation where a competitor charges separately for certain add-ons or services (like premium support or training) while you include them for free (or vice versa), our saas pricing book Price to Scale advises that you make the value proposition transparent by isolating the value of each component and then communicating the “apples to apples” pricing comparison to your prospects.
Below are some key points from our book to guide you:
• Use an Add-On Capability Pricing Approach:
Our book (see the discussion around Figure 17 in Price to Scale) emphasizes that while bundling services or features may offer simplicity, you should still think of add-on services in terms of their underlying value. Even if they’re included in one package and charged separately in another, it’s important to assign an intrinsic value to them. This way, you can show customers the net benefits they receive from your pricing.
• Communicate the Bundle’s Value Clearly:
When your product includes add-ons for free, consider quantifying the value of these add-ons. For instance, if competitive pricing shows a separate fee for premium support, indicate that this could represent an additional cost of X dollars per month—thus reinforcing the comparative advantage of your bundle.
• Ensure Transparency in Comparisons:
It’s important not to force a direct price–per feature comparison without context. Explain that while one vendor might list base pricing separate from extras, your bundled approach provides the full suite of capabilities at a single price point. This transparency helps prospects fairly assess the overall value rather than just the list price.
• Consider Modular vs. Packaged Approaches:
Alternatively, as discussed in our book’s sections on modular pricing, you might consider a modular pricing strategy where each add-on is priced individually. Then you can offer both a bundled option (with everything included) and a modular option. This dual strategy makes it easier for customers to compare options and can capture a wider range of market segments.
In summary, to ensure that customers make a fair comparison, clearly identify the individual values of separate add-ons, present an “apples to apples” cost comparison, and be transparent about how your bundle delivers additional value over a competitor’s segmented pricing. This method not only simplifies the buying process but also reinforces trust through clarity and fairness.
1
Below is a concise answer based on Price to Scale’s guidance:
Yes, you can use a competitor’s pricing as an anchor point—but it must be done carefully and factually. Here are some key points from our book, Price to Scale, and how to apply this strategy without resorting to negative comparisons:
• Direct comparison vs. value demonstration:
Rather than “bashing” the competitor, use their pricing as a benchmark to show that for a similar investment, your solution delivers additional features, superior performance, or better overall outcomes. Emphasize the extra value rather than simply critiquing their offer.
• Focus on your strength:
As discussed in Price to Scale, whenever prospects ask, “Why are you priced similarly when others offer similar promises?” it is crucial to have a clear, fact-based explanation of your superior product logic. For example, highlight your more robust client roster, success stories, or additional features that are uniquely beneficial for your segment of the market.
• Stay transparent and positive:
Avoid any remarks that could be perceived as disparaging. Instead, use factual, side-by-side comparisons that speak to the benefits your customers experience. This can be achieved by creating comparison tables or case studies that demonstrate the unique benefits you bring to the table without making direct negative comments about the competitor.
• Tailor your messaging for different segments:
As Price to Scale suggests, segment your customer base and adjust your messaging accordingly. This means for some prospects, you might stress that for nearly the same price, your plan includes upgrades or additional support features that cater to their specific needs. This stylistic framing keeps the conversation positive and customer-focused.
In summary, using a competitor’s pricing as an anchor is acceptable when approached as a value demonstration rather than a negative critique. Focus on showcasing the enhanced benefits you deliver, maintain a positive tone, and back up your claims with clear, factual comparisons. This respectful, transparent strategy aligns with the guidelines in our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale.
1
Based on the principles discussed in our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale, you can indeed justify a higher price if your product truly delivers significantly more value than Competitor X. However, there are important considerations to ensure customers recognize and are willing to pay for that added value:
• Value-Based Pricing:
Our book emphasizes that pricing can—and often should—reflect the value that customers receive. If the added features, performance, or efficiency you provide are clearly superior, a value-based pricing strategy can let you capture that premium. For example, if your product offers advanced functionalities or measurable benefits that save customers time or money, these advantages can justify a higher price point.
• Customer Perception and Market Comparisons:
Be aware that many customers compare products side-by-side. Even if you offer added value, if the benefits aren’t immediately obvious or easily quantifiable, customers might still anchor to the market standard established by competitors. It’s crucial to clearly communicate and demonstrate the value proposition to overcome any reluctance based on price comparisons.
• Strategic Positioning and Segmentation:
In our book, we discuss the importance of strategic segmentation. A higher price may best be applied to a segment of advanced users who require and value enhanced functionalities (similar to what we cover in our capability pricing discussion). For users who only need the basics, a lower, competitive price might be more appropriate. This could lead to a market bisection where you cater to different customer segments with tailored pricing tiers.
• Practical Application:
Before making any definitive pricing decision, validate the perceived value with your target customers. Consider pilot programs or customer interviews to ensure that the additional benefits are compelling enough to justify the premium. This helps mitigate the risk of pricing too high and pushing potential customers toward lower-priced alternatives.
In summary, while you can charge a higher price when you deliver substantially more value, it’s essential to clearly demonstrate that value and tailor your pricing strategy to the specific needs and perceptions of your target customers. This approach will help ensure that your premium pricing is both justified and sustainable.
1
Based on the principles outlined in our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale, the best pricing metric is one that is closely aligned with the value your product delivers and the way your customers consume that value. Here are some key considerations to help you determine the right metric:
• Value Alignment:
– The metric you choose should directly reflect the benefit your customers gain. For example, if your product’s value is driven by active engagement, a per active user model might be most appropriate. Similarly, if the value increases with the amount of data processed or projects managed, then a consumption-based metric (like per project or per unit of data) can be justified.
• Customer Usage Patterns:
– Understand how your customers interact with your product. Do they benefit more from additional users, or is their value contingent on actual usage intensity? Our book highlights the importance of mapping customer usage to perceived value. In some cases, a simple per user fee might overcharge or undercharge based on actual activity levels.
• Flexibility and Scalability:
– A flexible pricing metric that scales with usage or outcomes (rather than a flat rate per user) can better accommodate different customer segments and usage profiles. This not only makes your pricing more equitable but also aligns the cost with the growing value customers receive over time.
• Experimentation and Feedback:
– As discussed in Price to Scale, it’s crucial to test and iterate on your pricing model. Start with a metric that closely mirrors the value drivers and then use customer feedback and usage data to fine-tune it. This iterative process can help pinpoint whether a per user, per active user, per project, or per amount of data model best captures the value provided.
In summary, there is no one-size-fits-all answer—your pricing metric should reflect the core value your SaaS delivers. Start by analyzing how your customers use your product and what drives their success, then select a metric (or a combination of metrics) that aligns costs directly with these value drivers. This approach, as detailed in Price to Scale, ensures that your pricing model is both customer-centric and scalable.
1
Below is a structured approach based on the principles outlined in our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale:
Directly Define Your Model
• First, decide whether your pricing framework should follow a consumption-based model (where pricing scales with usage) or a capability (or capacity)-based model (where pricing is tied to the product or module). If the latter, metrics like per seat (or per named user) are more commonly used.
Determine the Tie to Client Value
• A key consideration is whether the metric you choose is proportional to the value the client derives from your product. For example, if a customer's success is more directly linked to the number of transactions processed or the data handled, a usage-based metric might be preferable. Conversely, if the value is more about access or capacity (such as the number of users or agents), then a per seat model can be more appropriate.
Evaluate How Your Metric Reflects Product Usage
• For usage-based models, assess if the metric is one that your customers routinely use to drive their business activities. Our book provides examples such as:
Analyze Tradeoffs and Revenue Potential
• Consider the scalability of your chosen metric. For instance, a per seat fee might limit revenue potential for companies with frequently changing or growing teams, whereas usage-based pricing inherently scales as the customer grows their engagement with your service.
• Look at the overall fit with your product’s value delivery. If the chosen metric is aligned with customer outcomes (results-based), it might help reinforce the promise of value delivery and improve customer satisfaction.
In summary, select the pricing metric by:
• First, deciding if your strategy is consumption-based or capability-based.
• Then, ensuring that the metric you choose is tightly tied to the client’s perceived value and the product’s key usage patterns.
This structured approach, as discussed in our book Price to Scale, will help you align your pricing with how customers actually experience value in your product.
1
Based on our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale, customers typically prefer a per-user model for company-wide deployments. Here’s why:
Simplicity and Familiarity:
Customers are accustomed to pricing by employee or user. Just as many organizations are used to subscribing to products like Microsoft Office 365, charging by the number of users is an intuitive metric that makes it easy for them to predict costs.
Ease of Adoption:
Using a per-user metric aligns with the natural way purchasing groups think. They understand the full scope of their employee base, making budgeting and forecasting more straightforward.
Predictability:
The per-user model provides predictability in expenses. It allows customers to scale usage directly with their workforce changes, which is less disruptive than switching to or managing an unfamiliar flat fee.
In summary, for company-wide deployments, our book Price to Scale shows that a per-user pricing model is often preferred by customers due to its simplicity, transparency, and alignment with existing purchasing models.
1
Based on the guidance in our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale, here’s how you can approach selecting a primary pricing metric without over-complicating your model:
In summary, begin by defining whether you’re leaning toward a consumption or capability model, then evaluate which usage metric best aligns with both customer value and your cost structures. Simplicity in measurement and clarity in value delivery are your key goals. This streamlined approach, as outlined in our book, helps ensure your pricing is efficient and aligned with market needs.
1
Based on our SaaS pricing strategy guidance in Price to Scale, it is absolutely feasible to use different pricing metrics for different customer profiles—but only if you approach this strategically. Here are some key points from our book:
• Tailor to Value: As discussed in the book, customers may derive value from different aspects of your product. By aligning pricing metrics with the specific value each segment receives, you can better capture willingness to pay. For example, if one customer type values usage frequency while another focuses on premium features, using separate metrics can more accurately reflect that value.
• Segment Clearly: The book advocates for clear segmentation. Whether through a Good–Better–Best model or a modular pricing approach (as illustrated with the Newco example), it's important to design distinct packages that cater to each customer’s unique needs. This avoids the chaos of a one-size-fits-all model and keeps the structure both transparent and manageable.
• Maintain Consistency and Simplicity: While different metrics can be introduced, the implementation should remain straightforward. The goal is not to confuse customers but to transparently tie price to the value they receive. Overcomplicating the pricing model can lead to integration challenges and misinterpretation of value.
In summary, offering differentiated pricing metrics is not inherently chaotic if executed with proper segmentation, clarity, and an unwavering focus on value. Our book emphasizes that aligning pricing metrics with customer-specific benefits is a powerful way to grow both adoption and revenue.
1
Based on our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, there are documented examples where companies shifted their pricing metrics—and the results highlight both the challenges and potential benefits of such changes. Here’s a concise overview:
• Direct Answer: Yes, some companies have switched their pricing metric (for example, from per-user to a usage-based model) after launching. When done correctly, the change has often been positive for the business, though it requires careful repositioning and communication to ensure customer acceptance.
• Detailed Insights from the Book:
• Practical Application:
• Takeaway:
Switching your pricing metric can be a powerful way to capture more value, but it must be managed carefully. As emphasized in Price to Scale, the key is aligning the pricing metric with how your customers perceive value and ensuring that the shift is supported by thoughtful marketing, internal sales readiness, and operational adjustments.
For further details, consider reviewing the case studies highlighted in our book, which provide a deeper look at the process and outcomes of such pricing transitions.
1
Below is an answer based on the insights from our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale:
While both strategies can work, the key is to design your pricing model so that it remains aligned with customer value and your revenue goals.
Building on Concepts from Price to Scale
Our book explains that a feature-based pricing model can help companies deliver continued value even when individual features become commoditized. In higher-tier plans, if you opt for unlimited usage, you shift the focus to the quality of features and the level of service. This means that, even though usage is “unlimited,” the real value (and justification for the higher price) comes from the richer capabilities or premium support levels provided.
Ensuring an “Unlimited” Plan Still Delivers Value
To keep any unlimited plan in line with providing value:
• Set Clear Value Drivers:
Focus on differentiating elements such as enhanced features, superior performance, or dedicated service levels. This approach ensures that customers are paying for a comprehensive, premium experience rather than solely for abundant usage.
• Monitor and Manage Usage:
Even without explicit caps, implement internal controls and periodic reviews to identify outlier usage patterns. This allows you to engage customers whose usage significantly deviates from expected norms – whether to offer a custom plan or discuss additional usage safeguards.
• Maintain Flexibility:
As discussed in Price to Scale, pricing models aren’t static. Regularly evaluating your pricing strategy in light of market and product evolution lets you adjust features, pricing tiers, or even introduce new usage measures over time. This adaptability ensures that an unlimited plan continues to capture value while protecting revenue integrity.
Balancing Fairness and Revenue Protection
If you decide on an unlimited usage plan, consider “soft” usage guidelines that empower your sales or customer success teams to address situations where usage might unexpectedly impact your cost structure. Such guidelines can act as a safeguard without compromising the simplicity and appeal of an unlimited offering.
Takeaway
Ultimately, whether to impose usage caps or offer unlimited usage for higher-tier plans depends on your market context and the predictability of usage metrics. If you’re confident that your high-tier customers will draw value primarily through advanced features and service levels, an unlimited plan can work well—provided you have mechanisms in place for monitoring, periodic review, and adaptability.
By focusing on value drivers and implementing internal checks, you can ensure that your unlimited plan remains both attractive to customers and sustainable for your business.
1
Based on our book Price to Scale, identifying the value metric that resonates best with your customers involves both qualitative and quantitative insights. Here’s an approach distilled from our methodology:
• Directly engage with customers:
Our book recommends asking targeted, survey-type questions to gauge customer preferences. For example, you can inquire whether a per-seat model or a usage-based model better reflects the value they receive from your product. These questions help you isolate which features matter most and steer you toward the metric that aligns best with the customer's value perception.
• Evaluate against specific criteria:
We advise subjecting each value metric candidate to clear criteria—ensuring it is:
Predictable: Can customers foresee their bills with consistency?
Acceptable: Will the billing model logically resonate with a diverse customer base?
Trackable: Is the underlying usage or value easily measurable?
Assessing metrics based on these factors ensures that you choose a billing method that’s both fair and sustainable for your business model.
• Recognize variability in preferences:
While surveying offers useful insights, our pricing strategy book also highlights that customer preferences may vary across different segments. Therefore, while the survey data illuminates general trends, complementing this approach with usage data and customer interviews can help capture the nuances across your market segments.
In summary, using customer surveys—as part of a broader framework of analysis—provides valuable insights into which value metric customers care about most. When combined with the criteria of predictability, acceptability, and trackability, you can better align your billing strategy with customer value, while accounting for any variability in preferences.
1
Based on our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, the concept of charging each customer based strictly on the ROI or outcome they receive is appealing in theory but hard to execute in practice. Here are some key points from the book:
• True value-based pricing tied directly to ROI sounds attractive because it suggests customers pay in proportion to the benefits they receive. In theory, if you could measure the ROI accurately, your pricing could reflect a fair share of that value.
• The book explains that in practice, measuring ROI accurately is challenging. Factors like switching costs, productivity improvements, and softer benefits often complicate the math. Even if you use a well-paid consultant to estimate an ideal ROI, the real-world numbers at the end of the year might not match those estimates.
• As discussed in the book, this is why nearly none of the companies use ROI as the core of their pricing strategy. They tend to rely on more straightforward, repeatable metrics that indirectly capture customer value without having to validate every element of an ROI calculation.
• Implementing a true value-based pricing model would require very robust data collection and clear, measurable performance indicators for each customer—features that are difficult to standardize and verify at scale.
In summary, while true value-based pricing based on each customer's ROI has its theoretical merits, Price to Scale suggests that its practical implementation is fraught with challenges. Most companies opt for pricing models that balance value reflection with measurability and ease of verification.
1
Based on our book, Price to Scale, outcome-based pricing is certainly an intriguing concept. In theory, pricing your product as a percentage of the revenue or savings you help create (for example, asking for 1% to 10% of the benefit) can seem attractive. It aligns your pricing with the value delivered to the customer. However, the book also highlights several practical challenges:
• Measurement Difficulties – As noted in Price to Scale, accurately measuring the true return on investment is very challenging. Soft costs, switching costs, and variability in ROI make it difficult to justify a percentage-based fee when year-end numbers don’t match the theoretical figures.
• Pricing Justification vs. Price Setting – Our book explains that while ROI is an effective tool for justifying value, it is rarely used as a direct pricing mechanism. The risk is that you—and your business—will bear the burden of reconciling these ROI calculations later.
• Customer Preferences – Experience suggests that despite a high ROI, customers tend to favor fixed pricing models. A set price provides clarity and predictability, reducing the potential friction that might arise from an outcome-based model where benefits are hard to quantify or dispute.
In summary, while outcome-based pricing can theoretically align your interests with those of your customer, most practical experiences—as discussed in Price to Scale—indicate that fixed pricing is generally preferable due to its simplicity and ease of justification. It may be more effective to use ROI as a communication tool rather than the basis for your pricing strategy.
1
Based on our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, you can implement performance-based pricing without jeopardizing revenue predictability by taking a structured, phased approach. Here are some key considerations drawn from the book’s methodologies:
• Begin with a Clear Metric Definition:
Establish objective, quantifiable performance metrics that directly correlate with customer value. In our book, we stress that pricing models work best when the usage and outcomes are measurable across customers. This allows you to tightly couple the customer’s success with the pricing trigger points while maintaining internal clarity on revenue drivers.
• Hybrid Models as a Safety Net:
Instead of relying solely on performance-based fees, consider combining a baseline fee with performance incentives. This ensures a predictable revenue floor even if performance targets are initially missed. In essence, you’re sharing the upside with your customers while safeguarding your cash flow, a balance echoed in several chapters focusing on mitigating risk.
• Invest in Robust Operationalization:
Operationalizing the pricing model is crucial. As described in the section on implementing pricing strategies, make sure you have the right systems in place – such as calculators, CPQ tools, and integrated ERP/billing systems – to accurately measure outcomes and trigger payments. This level of instrumentality not only lends transparency to the process but also allows for quick adjustments if market conditions or performance metrics evolve over time.
• Pilot and Iterate:
Our book recommends thorough testing before a full-scale launch. Run pilot programs with a subset of customers to validate that the performance metrics are fair, measurable, and truly reflective of value delivery. Use these experiments to refine both the baseline and variable components of your pricing mix.
In summary, by clearly defining success metrics, adopting a hybrid pricing model with a baseline fee, ensuring robust measurement systems, and piloting your approach, you can align performance-based pricing with revenue predictability. This structured, methodical approach from Price to Scale will help you share risk with your customers while ensuring your business’s financial sustainability.
1
Based on Price to Scale, the key to avoiding customer pushback when a pricing metric might feel mismatched is to carefully align your metric with the value that different types of users receive. Here are some actionable steps drawn from our pricing strategy book:
• Identify and test value metrics: Before locking in on a specific pricing model, measure how customers use your product. In our book, we emphasize the importance of picking metrics that are both predictable and trackable. Assessing usage patterns across your customer base helps reveal if a flat-rate model will unfairly burden one group (e.g., light users) compared to another (e.g., heavy users).
• Ensure customer acceptability: A central question we address is whether the chosen metric feels logical to potential buyers. For instance, if a flat fee makes light users feel they’re overpaying, you might consider a hybrid model—a base fee combined with a usage-based element—so that pricing better reflects the value each customer receives.
• Segment and tier your offerings: Rather than using a one-size-fits-all approach, consider segmenting your pricing. Different tiers or plans can be designed to match varying customer needs, ensuring that cost correlates more closely with usage, which reduces the perception of overpayment among lighter users.
• Iterate based on feedback: Our book suggests collecting unprompted feedback, conducting surveys, or using pilot programs to validate whether customers understand and accept the pricing metric. This practical testing helps refine the metric before wider implementation.
In summary, to avoid the situation where some customers feel they’re overpaying, ensure that your pricing metric is directly tied to the value delivered. By carefully choosing metrics that are predictable, acceptable, and trackable—and by considering tiered or hybrid pricing models—you can better align cost with customer usage and value. For more details, you might want to refer to the sections in our Price to Scale that focus on “Identifying the Right Value Metric” and “Is it Acceptable to customers.”
1
Based on the perspectives outlined in our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, it can make sense to use different pricing metrics for different customer segments—but only if the benefits outweigh the additional complexity.
Below are a few key points from the book:
• In some cases, like with Newco’s example, a single pricing metric (IP addresses) was chosen to maintain simplicity across products. The sales team and field leadership favored a unified approach because it streamlined their process, even if that metric wasn’t a natural fit for every offering.
• Conversely, companies can adopt a segmented approach—using one pricing metric for small businesses and a different one for enterprises—if each segment derives value differently from the product. For instance, within a Good–Better–Best framework, different packages might map to distinct metrics that better reflect each segment’s usage patterns and willingness to pay.
• The key trade-off is between aligning pricing with the customer’s perceived value (letting you capture more revenue based on differentiated needs) and keeping the pricing model simple enough for sales teams and customers to understand without confusion.
In summary, while it might seem appealing to tailor the pricing metric for each segment to more accurately reflect value, our book stresses that simplicity often wins, especially when it helps the sales organization close big deals. Consider your sales motion, product complexity, and customer behavior before pursuing multiple pricing metrics.
1
Based on our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, many successful SaaS companies choose metrics that align closely with the value their customers derive from the product. Here are some key takeaways from the book regarding pricing metrics:
• Direct Value Alignment:
– Metrics such as per seat, per host, or per data volume are selected based on how clearly they reflect the customer’s usage and the value they receive.
– The idea is to choose a metric that can be easily measured and directly tied to outcomes, whether that’s the number of active users (per seat), the number of servers or hosts (per host), or the volume of data processed (per data volume).
• Cost Considerations:
– The book explains that when there are underlying infrastructure costs, such as storage or compute power, it can justify a metric tied directly to those costs (see Chapter 2 and Chapter 7 of Price to Scale).
– This ensures that your pricing not only covers costs but also scales efficiently with customer usage.
• Simplicity, Measurability, and Scalability:
– As detailed on page 249, any chosen metric should be simple enough to explain quickly, measurable enough to account for usage accurately, and scalable over time as the customer grows.
– This principle is fundamental in avoiding overly complicated structures that can hinder both sales conversations and operational efficiency.
• Industry Norms vs. Differentiation:
– While industry norms (e.g., per seat pricing for user-centric applications or per data volume for analytics platforms) offer a familiar framework and can reduce customer friction, there is indeed an opportunity for differentiation.
– If your product’s usage patterns or cost structure differ from the norm, Price to Scale encourages exploring new or hybrid metrics that better capture customer value. For instance, combining elements of per seat and usage-based models could offer a more tailored pricing mechanism.
In summary, successful SaaS companies use a range of pricing metrics that reflect their underlying cost structures and customer value propositions. Our book, Price to Scale, suggests that whether you stick with a typical industry norm or innovate with a new metric depends on ensuring the metric is simple, measurable, and scalable—ultimately aligning with the value your customers receive.
1
Based on our book, Price to Scale, there isn’t a one‐size‐fits-all answer. Instead, the choice between modular pricing and a bundled suite depends largely on your product’s structure, the distinct value provided by each component, and the specific needs of your customer segments.
Here are some key points drawn from our book:
• Two Main Approaches:
– Our book outlines two primary ways to package your product. The Good-Better-Best approach bundles selected features into tiered packages aimed at different customer segments.
– Alternatively, the modular approach assigns a distinct price to each module or feature. This lets customers pick and pay for only the modules they need.
• Customer Segmentation & Value Propositions:
– If your target customers have diverse use cases or varying willingness to pay (for instance, larger enterprises versus SMBs), modular pricing allows you to cater precisely to their needs.
– However, if you’re targeting a segment where deal velocity and simplicity are key, a bundled offering may be more attractive and easier to understand.
• Testing Your Hypotheses:
– Regardless of the pricing structure you start with, our book emphasizes the importance of validating your packaging hypothesis with real customer segments. We discuss testing package-to-segment fit and iterating on both the product bundling and pricing based on market response.
• Transparency and Complexity:
– Modular pricing can provide clarity by letting buyers see exactly which features they’re paying for, but it can also introduce complexity in sales discussions and pricing communication.
– Bundling simplifies the decision, as customers evaluate one combined price, though they might end up paying for features they don’t fully use.
In summary, decide based on how well each approach aligns with your customers’ purchase behaviors and the perceived value of each module. If flexibility and granular value capture are critical, modular pricing might be the way to go. Otherwise, a well-structured bundled package can streamline the buying process. As discussed in our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, testing and validating your packaging with target segments is key to determining the optimal strategy for your product.
1
Based on the insights in our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale, the answer is yes—you can, and in many cases should, let heavy users pay more than light users by adopting usage-based charges or higher tiers. Here are some key points from our book that support this approach:
• Direct Alignment with Value:
The book highlights that pricing models tied to usage can more directly reflect the value that customers derive from your product. Heavy users typically gain more value and, in turn, can justify higher charges. This “pay for what you use” philosophy ensures that customers only pay in proportion to how much they benefit from your service.
• Cost-Reflective Pricing:
Usage-based pricing is particularly beneficial when there are inherent costs that scale with customer usage (for example, compute power or storage). By aligning pricing with these costs, you create a sustainable model where heavy usage is appropriately covered without penalizing light users.
• Flexibility in Structure:
Our book discusses different structures—from granular consumption-based models (with precise metrics) to more simplified tiered or “t-shirt sizing” models (M, L, XL, etc.). Whether you opt for strict metering or bundled tiers, both approaches allow you to capture value from heavy users while still keeping the barrier low for lighter users.
• Considerations for Implementation:
When implementing this approach, it’s important to ensure that the usage metric you choose is both predictable and measurable. This improves transparency and makes it easier for your customers to understand and trust the pricing model.
In summary, as discussed in Price to Scale, adopting a pricing strategy where heavy users pay more through usage-based charges or higher tiers can align closely with both the value delivered and the costs incurred by the provider. This model not only provides fairness but also allows for flexibility in pricing as your customers’ usage grows over time.
1
Using an unconventional pricing metric can indeed differentiate your offering, provided you clearly communicate its connection to the value your product delivers. In our book, Price to Scale, we emphasize that the choice of pricing metric should ideally be tied directly to the benefits or value a prospect receives. This direct connection not only makes the customer's decision easier but can also highlight your unique value proposition – setting you apart from competitors.
Here are a few key points drawn from Price to Scale:
• Value Connection: A well-chosen metric that reflects actual usage or benefits can lead to easier client adoption. If your non-standard metric aligns closely with how your customers consume value, it might actually enhance understanding rather than confuse them.
• Customer Familiarity: The book also stresses the importance of recognizing what your customers are accustomed to. If you’re moving away from a well-known standard, it’s crucial to educate potential customers on how this new metric better correlates with the value they receive.
• Clear Anchoring: When introducing any non-standard metric, anchoring it with industry-standard assumptions or benchmarks (as discussed in Price to Scale) can help bridge any initial comprehension gaps. This involves using relatable examples or logical conversions that help customers immediately grasp its relevance.
In summary, while there is a potential risk of confusion with any unconventional approach, if the metric is clearly tied to demonstrable value and is well-anchored to what your customers understand, it can serve as a powerful differentiator. The key is to ensure that your communications and onboarding strategies effectively educate your target market on why this metric matters to them.
1
Based on our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale, it can be viable to combine multiple pricing metrics in a single model—but only if you preserve the core attributes of a great pricing model: simplicity, measurability, and scalability.
Here’s how to think about it:
• Simplicity First:
As discussed in our book (see Chapter “Getting the Model Right”), your pricing model should be simple enough to explain in an elevator ride. Combining a base subscription fee with a usage-based component, for instance, is acceptable if customers can easily understand how these fees work together without confusion.
• Measurable and Scalable:
Make sure that each pricing metric is measurable and scales appropriately. For instance, if you charge per user plus a fee per transaction, you must be able to reliably track both user counts and transaction volumes. The book emphasizes that customers appreciate pricing they can quantify—it creates a direct link between the fee and the perceived value.
• Avoiding Complexity that Deters:
More complex pricing models risk confusing or deterring potential customers. This is why our book advises that any additional layer, like combining metrics, must add clear value or mirror a structure the customers are already accustomed to. A well-structured combination—such as a base fee for ongoing access and a usage-based fee for added value during peak use—can actually align your revenues more closely with customer usage, provided it is communicated clearly.
• Practical Application:
If you decide to implement multiple pricing metrics, pilot test your model with a subset of customers to ensure that the combined structure is both easily understood and fair in reflecting their usage. Feedback will help fine-tune the balance between a flexible pricing approach and the need for clarity.
In summary, our book Price to Scale supports combining pricing metrics as long as you maintain clarity, measurability, and scalability. The goal is to create a model that is straightforward for customers to grasp while still capturing the incremental value they receive.
1
Below are some key signs and considerations from our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, that indicate when it might be the right time to raise your prices:
• Slowing Growth or Plateauing Revenue:
If your overall growth has slowed—for example, if it’s around 20% instead of accelerating—raising prices for existing customers can be a quick way to bolster revenue without having to acquire entirely new users. As discussed in our book (see the section on annual price increases), many companies have successfully implemented modest annual price increases when faced with slowing growth.
• Enhanced Product Value through Feature Improvements:
When you’ve significantly improved your product’s features or added new functionalities, your product's value to customers increases. This can create an opportunity to justify a higher pricing tier. Your customers are likely to perceive greater value and may be more willing to pay if they see tangible enhancements.
• Sustained High Demand and Market Positioning:
Consistently high demand is another indicator that customers see your solution as a must-have. This can enable you to test and implement a price increase relatively smoothly, especially for new customer segments where you can let them “choose” the new higher price instead of retroactively altering terms for existing users.
• Competitive and Economic Factors:
Changes in economic conditions and competitor pricing can also signal the time for a price adjustment. If competitors are pricing higher or market conditions are shifting (for example, through increased cost of capital impacting overall SaaS valuations as mentioned in Price to Scale), you may find that aligning your pricing with market realities improves both your profitability and competitive positioning.
In summary, the right time to raise prices is when your product has clearly increased in value through improvements, when high demand supports your pricing strategy, and when market conditions—whether economic or competitive—justify an upward adjustment. By monitoring these signals and carefully testing your pricing strategy, you can successfully charge more while maintaining customer satisfaction.
1
According to the insights shared in our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, it's important to view pricing not as a set‐and‐forget exercise but as an evolving lever for growth. While there isn’t a one-size-fits-all answer, many successful SaaS companies tend to re-evaluate their pricing on an annual basis—sometimes even more frequently if there are significant market changes or product enhancements.
Key points to consider:
• Annual Reviews Are Common: A yearly deep dive into your pricing strategy allows you to stay aligned with your product’s evolution, customer behavior, and market dynamics.
• Market & Customer Feedback: Beyond a fixed schedule, regularly monitoring performance metrics and gathering customer insights can signal when it's time to adjust your pricing or packaging.
• Incremental Adjustments: Instead of a dramatic overhaul, many SaaS companies make incremental updates. This helps in testing new pricing models and conducting experiments to optimize revenue without causing disruption.
• Flexibility Is Critical: As explained in our book, Price to Scale, viewing pricing as an adaptable component of your business strategy enables you to react promptly to opportunities or challenges in your market.
In summary, while the typical benchmark is to review pricing annually, you should also be open to updating your strategies sooner if your data and market conditions suggest it’s necessary. This flexible, data-driven approach is a central theme throughout our book, ensuring your pricing strategy evolves alongside your business.
1
Based on the principles outlined in our SaaS pricing book, Price to Scale, the best approach to announce a price increase to existing customers while minimizing backlash is to be transparent, proactive, and segmentation-focused. Here are the key guidelines:
• Provide Adequate Advance Notice:
Although the book doesn’t specify an exact number of days, the overall strategy is rooted in giving your customers enough time to digest the change—typically a notice period in the range of 60–90 days is advisable. This period allows customers to plan accordingly and reduces the element of surprise.
• Communicate the Added Value:
Explain clearly why the price increase is necessary. Tie it to improvements in your product, service, or overall value proposition. When customers understand that the increase reflects enhanced features or elevated service standards, the change feels more justified. Our book emphasizes that clear value communication is essential, especially if the product remains largely the same but the market dynamics have shifted.
• Segment Your Customer Base:
As discussed in Price to Scale, one size does not fit all. Different customers—whether high-value accounts using core features extensively or those who secured early discounts—might require tailored messaging. Some customer segments may even benefit from alternative options like a premium upgrade or a flexible discount plan, easing the transition and mitigating resistance.
• Offer Alternatives or Upgrades:
Instead of simply increasing prices across the board, consider providing alternatives. For example, you might offer a better plan for the same price or propose an incentive to commit to a longer-term contract in exchange for maintaining current pricing for a specified period. This proactive approach can soften the impact, making the change feel more like an upgrade rather than a penalty.
• Leverage Multiple Communication Channels:
Make sure the announcement reaches your customers through the channels they trust most—whether emails, in-app notifications, or even a conversation from their account manager. Consistent and empathetic communication builds trust and helps manage customer expectations.
In summary, our pricing strategy book recommends that you minimize backlash from existing customers by ensuring transparency, providing sufficient notice, clearly articulating the added value, and tailoring your approach to the different segments of your customer base. These steps help in turning a potential point of friction into an opportunity to reinforce customer loyalty.
1
Based on the guidance in Price to Scale, there isn’t a one‐size‐fits-all answer. The book emphasizes the importance of segmenting your customer base and tailoring your approach when rolling out pricing changes. Here are the key takeaways:
• Segment and Evaluate:
• Assess how different groups of customers received your original pricing. For instance, some customers received significant discounts or negotiated unique terms, while others pay closer to the list price.
• Use this segmentation to decide whether to grandfather specific cohorts or transition them to the new structure gradually.
• Offer Proactive Alternatives:
• Instead of outright forcing all existing accounts onto the new pricing, consider offering creative alternatives. For example, you might provide an upgrade option, a discount contingent upon additional commitments, or even a tailored package that reflects the additional value of the new plan.
• This approach helps manage customer expectations and retains trust.
• Manage Company-Wide Changes Carefully:
• If you’re compelled to implement a company-wide pricing change—where all customers must eventually migrate—treat this as a dedicated change management project. This ensures that the transition is communicated clearly and that you can address different customer scenarios proactively.
In summary, our book “Price to Scale” recommends being thoughtful and transparent. It suggests that while you might retain previous rates for some customers, doing so should be part of a broader strategy that includes clear segmentation and the offering of compelling alternatives. The key is to stay upfront about the rationale behind the changes and to tailor the approach based on specific customer value and usage patterns.
1
Based on the approach outlined in our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale, it’s generally advisable not to grandfather legacy customers indefinitely. Instead, consider a limited grace period that clearly defines the transition timeline and paves the way for eventual migration to your new pricing structure.
Here are some key takeaways from our book:
• Limited Time Grace Period: As discussed in the book, a common strategy is to allow existing customers to renew at their current (legacy) rates for a defined period—say, an additional year. This grace period gives them time to prepare for and adapt to the upcoming changes.
• Segment and Tailor the Transition: Recognize that not all legacy customers use your product in the same way. The book emphasizes segmenting your customer base, which enables you to craft specific, proactive offers for different customer cohorts. For instance, customers who derive high value from additional features might be more receptive to an upgrade option, while others could be enticed with a discounted rate if they commit to a longer-term arrangement.
• Gradual Price Adjustment with Ramp Deals: The book provides examples such as multi-year ramp deals (like GitLab’s approach) where customers start at their current rate and gradually move to the new pricing over a few years. This gradual adjustment helps mitigate the financial impact and eases the transition for budget planning.
• Enhanced Communication and Value-Framing: It’s crucial to be transparent about why these changes are necessary. Use the transition to highlight new features, improved value, or benefits associated with the new pricing tiers. This upfront communication helps manage expectations and facilitates acceptance.
In summary, our book recommends grandfathering legacy customers only for a limited period to ensure that pricing evolution aligns with the value delivered by the product. By setting a clear timeline, segmenting your customer base, and offering creative ramp or upgrade options, you encourage customers to migrate to the new pricing—safeguarding both customer satisfaction and overall revenue growth.
1
Below is a concise strategy drawn directly from our pricing philosophy in Price to Scale:
In summary, leveraging well-structured surveys with proper context, as well as controlled pricing experiments, can help you accurately determine if your customers are willing to pay more. This measured approach ensures you capture customer sentiment without the biases inherent in a singular direct question.
1
Based on the insights in our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale, a more gradual, incremental approach to price increases is generally preferable for both customer acceptance and long-term business impact. Here’s why:
• Incremental adjustments allow you to align pricing more closely with value delivered. As your product evolves and you add new features or improvements, small increases help ensure that customers feel the price growth is justified. In our book, we discuss how pricing and packaging must evolve together in response to market maturity, making it easier to manage customer expectations when changes are spread out over time.
• Smaller, more frequent increases tend to be less jarring to customers. They have time to adjust, and the incremental nature of the change can reduce the perception of a sudden “price shock,” thus lowering the risk of churn. In contrast, a large price jump after a long period—with the same product and feature set—can lead to resistance or dissatisfaction.
• Incremental pricing changes also allow you to test and refine your approach. By monitoring customer feedback and performance metrics at each step, you can fine-tune subsequent increases for optimal business impact, as noted in sections discussing the customer journey and pricing evolution in Price to Scale.
While there may be circumstances where a larger price adjustment is warranted (for instance, after significant product enhancements or market repositioning), the general recommendation is to use smaller, incremental moves. This method provides a smoother transition for your customer base while gradually increasing revenue in a way that reflects added value.
In summary, our book advocates for small, incremental price increases as a more customer-friendly and strategically sound approach, with any larger changes requiring clear, added value communication to mitigate pushback.
1
Based on the guidance in our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, the recommended approach is to avoid an abrupt, forced migration for existing customers on a legacy plan. Instead, you should consider a strategy that respects the historical value and negotiated terms with your current customers while moving the broader customer base toward the new pricing paradigm.
Here are key principles from Price to Scale to help you decide:
• Grandfathering: Instead of forcing customers into a new tier, grandfather those on legacy plans. This shows appreciation for their commitment and avoids sudden price shocks during renewal periods.
• Gradual Transition: For customers who may benefit from the new features and pricing structure, you could design an incentive-based migration plan. This could include offering a phased transition that allows for a smoother adoption of the new pricing model over time.
• Usage-Sensitive Approach: Recognize that different customers use your product in different ways. As discussed in our book, customers with significant functionality and usage might warrant a more tailored upgrade path, while lightweight users might be better served by maintaining a legacy-lite option or a new lower-tier package.
• Mitigating Churn: Forcing a migration without adequate support can lead to customer churn—something we detail in our discussion on price points and churn management. By providing legacy support or a considerate migration plan, you help maintain customer trust while still incentivizing transitions that benefit your overall pricing strategy.
In summary, the book advises that maintaining legacy support or a tailored grandfathering approach is preferable to a forceful migration. This not only respects your current customers’ expectations but also helps manage renewal conversations, reducing the risk of churn as you evolve your pricing strategy.
1
Based on our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale, transitioning existing customers when completely changing your pricing model calls for a thoughtful, segmented approach and proactive communication. Here’s how you can achieve it:
• Recognize Customer Segmentation:
As our book outlines, your existing customers are not homogeneous. Some may be heavy users while others might have negotiated deep discounts or use the platform less frequently. Segment your customer base into cohorts so that you can tailor the transition approach to each group. This ensures that your messaging and options are relevant to their specific usage and value perception.
• Offer Tailored Alternatives:
Rather than a one-size-fits-all announcement, offer alternatives that resonate with the needs of each segment. For instance, present an upgrade option that gives more value for the same spend, or provide a discount tied to a longer-term commitment. This proactive and creative approach helps mitigate confusion and prevents feelings of being shortchanged among existing customers.
• Develop a Distinct New Line-Up:
Avoid making direct comparisons between the old and new pricing tiers. As mentioned in Price to Scale, repackaging your offerings with new names (for example, changing ‘Pro’ to ‘Premium’) and varying the feature sets can help customers see the new options as a refreshed and enhanced value proposition.
• Transparent Communication and Internal Alignment:
Stay clear and upfront about the pricing changes. Ensure that all communication—both externally with customers and internally with teams like Customer Service Management—is aligned. Educate your internal teams so they can effectively articulate the benefits of the new model and guide customers through the transition.
In summary, transitioning to a new pricing model successfully involves careful customer segmentation, offering tailored alternatives, rebranding your tiers to signal fresh value, and maintaining transparent communication. These strategies, detailed in our pricing strategy book Price to Scale, are designed to minimize confusion and resistance while reinforcing the value of your product.
1
Below is an overview of common customer pushback scenarios along with strategies to manage them, as outlined in our saas pricing book, Price to Scale:
Potential Customer Pushback:
• Customers who’ve been enjoying lower introductory or discount rates may object to higher prices or more restrictive packaging changes.
• Users on customized or heavily discounted plans might feel sidelined or unfairly treated if new packages seem to favor newer customers.
• When the new pricing lineup closely resembles current ones—with only minor tweaks—customers may see little value in upgrading or fear losing benefits they once enjoyed.
Strategies to Manage the Pushback:
• Segment Your Customer Base:
As discussed in Price to Scale, segmenting your customer base is crucial. Tailoring different packages for heavy users versus light users ensures that each cohort receives a plan that reflects their usage and value perception. This segmentation helps preempt objections by addressing unique needs and mitigating blanket pushback.
• Be Transparent and Proactive:
Proactively communicate the reasons for your pricing changes. Explain the benefits, such as improved features or enhanced service quality, and remain upfront about any upcoming price adjustments. Clear communication minimizes surprise and builds trust.
• Offer Alternative Options:
Consider offering creative alternatives such as:
• Differentiate the New Lineup:
Price to Scale emphasizes that merely discounting your current tiers isn’t enough; creating a distinctly new lineup can help avoid direct comparisons with the old structure. A clear differentiation prevents customers from simply comparing the old and new packages on price alone.
In Summary:
Be prepared for pushback from customers who may be resistant to changes, especially if they feel they’re losing benefits or getting less value than before. By segmenting your customer base, communicating transparently, and offering tailored alternatives (such as grandfathering or upgrade incentives), you can smoothly manage the transition. These approaches not only ease customer concerns but also reinforce the overall value proposition, ultimately supporting smoother revenue and profit growth.
This strategy, outlined in our book Price to Scale, helps ensure that pricing changes are positioned as value-enhancing rather than merely cost-increasing for your customers.
1
Below is a summary of what our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale, shares on the topic:
• Yes, several SaaS companies have faced challenges and even regrets after making pricing changes that led to customer pushback or operational issues. For instance, companies have seen a backlash when:
- Changes were implemented too quickly without giving enough time for usage tracking and customer understanding, as noted in Price to Scale where a six‑month to one‑year ramp up is recommended for significant pricing updates.
- The revised pricing wasn’t properly aligned with contractual terms and revenue recognition rules, resulting in billing disputes or legal complications.
- The pricing structure became overly complex, leading to customer confusion and an increased volume of customer care inquiries.
• Lessons to avoid similar mistakes include:
- Thorough Preparation: As highlighted in our book, planning pricing changes over an extended period (6–12 months) helps manage the transition. This includes carefully tracking how customers use your product and feeding that feedback loop into improving the new pricing model.
- Cross-functional Alignment: Engage teams from legal, contracts, billing, and revenue recognition to ensure the entire structure—from quoting to invoicing—is synchronized and protected from operational strain.
- Customer Communication: Make sure that customers understand changes in pricing. Having clarity in the contract and providing resources to address their questions can help mitigate backlash.
- Internal Coordination: Bring together product, sales, and customer support teams early in the process since each group may have different perspectives on how changes will impact revenue and customer relationships. This alignment helps in anticipating and addressing concerns before they escalate.
In summary, our book Price to Scale emphasizes that the key to successfully changing pricing while avoiding regrets is a well-planned, cross-functional approach that carefully considers operational details, customer communication, and internal alignment. This methodical foundation minimizes the risk of backlash and sets your pricing strategy up for sustainable success.
1
Based on the insights from our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, the answer isn’t a binary yes-or-no. Instead, it calls for a nuanced, segmented approach:
• Early adopters and beta customers have rewards for supporting your product early on, and their special pricing is one way to recognize that value. However, as your product and market evolve, it may be appropriate—and even necessary—to recalibrate pricing.
• Rather than simply raising the price for these customers to match new customers, our book recommends segmenting your customer base. This means assessing how they use your product, the specific benefits they receive, and their overall value to your business.
• To transition beta or early-adopter customers to new pricing tiers, consider offering creative alternatives. For example, you might present them with an upgrade option that provides additional functionality or benefits, or offer a discount contingent on a longer-term commitment. This not only justifies the price alignment but also maintains a sense of fairness and transparency.
• Ultimately, it’s important to communicate openly about any changes while ensuring that these early supporters continue to see value. The key is to adjust pricing with clear rationale and by providing tailored, thoughtful options that reflect both market changes and their past support.
In summary, Price to Scale suggests balancing the reward for early support with a need to evolve pricing over time. Instead of a blunt price increase, blend market realities with segmented, customer-specific strategies to keep everyone aligned and satisfied.
1
Below is a concise answer based on our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale:
• It all comes down to segmentation. You want to identify which customers are already using the product extensively or are benefiting from more advanced features. These customers are a natural fit for a higher-priced tier because the new features align with the way they use the product.
• Look at historical pricing and usage patterns. Our book explains that customers who originally negotiated deep discounts or were sold on a basic package may balk at a sudden jump in list price—even if they could benefit from advanced features. In contrast, those who are already paying a reasonable average unit price and using lightweight features might be better suited to try the upgraded offering.
• Consider tailoring the upgrade process. For customers with a substantial usage history or those who use premium functionality, proactively offer an upsell that not only adds new value but also rationalizes a higher price point. For other segments, you might introduce incentives like a temporary discount or deferred payment options to soften the transition to the new tier.
• Overall, a careful review of each customer’s recent usage, price sensitivity, and contractual history will guide you on who to upgrade versus who to leave on their current plan. As discussed in our book Price to Scale (see sections on segmentation and customer migration), this kind of thoughtful, segmented approach helps maximize revenue without alienating existing customers.
In summary, by analyzing usage patterns and historical pricing, you can determine which existing customers are likely to benefit from—and be receptive to—the higher-priced tier while offering alternative incentives for those who might otherwise be resistant to change.
1
Below is a summary of effective ways to A/B test pricing and packaging experiments—and some important caveats—based on the recommendations in our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale:
Direct A/B testing of pricing pages can be an effective way to compare conversion rates between different structures or layouts. For example, you might run one version of your page with simplified pricing tiers (to reduce decision fatigue) and another with more detailed, segmented options.
Keep it simple. As discussed on page 243 of Price to Scale, using too many pricing tiers can confuse prospects, even if the intent is to better match varying customer needs. A simpler pricing structure, even if not as granular, can lead to higher conversion rates because it makes decision-making easier.
Test with the right audience. The book advises against testing exclusively on customers who already know your product. In other words, if you only run your tests on visitors already familiar with your offering (or pre-existing customers), you might only be measuring biased behavior, such as buying at a lower price. It’s important to have a broader demand-generation campaign so that the test includes prospects who are less familiar with your product. This ensures the results reflect the pricing strategy's impact on acquiring new customers.
Tailor your approach. There are several ways to handle pricing on your website (publishing full pricing, summarizing the pricing and deferring details to sales calls, etc.—see page 99). The method you choose should align with your overall strategy and be consistent with how you’re testing variations. For instance, if you’re using pricing as a lead source, then your A/B test might focus on how well each page drives quality leads in addition to conversion rates.
In summary, experimenting with pricing using A/B testing can be very valuable—provided you keep the experiment design simple, target the correct audience, and structure the tests to capture both direct and ancillary impacts (like lead quality). By following these guidelines from Price to Scale, you can confidently make data-driven decisions while avoiding common pitfalls.
1
Based on our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, after implementing a pricing change you should monitor a blend of quantitative and qualitative metrics to determine its impact. Here are the key areas to focus on:
• Churn and Churn Propensity
• Customer Behavior Metrics
• Revenue Predictability and Forecasting
• Customer Lifetime Value (LTV)
• Customer Satisfaction and Feedback
In summary, our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale, recommends a holistic approach—combining hard metrics (like churn, sign-up rates, and usage dollars) with customer feedback—to ensure that any pricing change is delivering the intended value without sacrificing long-term growth.
1
Based on our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, the recommended way to approach renegotiating with early customers who were promised “for life” or very low pricing is to be both strategic and transparent. Here are the key steps:
• Segment Your Customer Base:
Our book emphasizes that not all early customers are the same. Identify which cohorts benefit most from the current pricing and which might need to adjust for sustainability. Customers differ in usage levels, negotiated discounts, and contract sizes. Tailor your approach based on these differences.
• Craft Tailored Offers:
Instead of a one-size-fits-all change, offer creative alternatives. For example, you might provide an upgrade that delivers additional value for the same price, or a discount that comes with a commitment to a longer-term contract or an add-on feature. This not only softens the impact but also reinforces the value they receive for their loyalty.
• Communicate Proactively and Transparently:
As discussed in Price to Scale (see pages 245 and 287), it’s crucial to explain why the pricing must change. Emphasize the enhancements, improved service, or additional value the new structure brings. Open communication helps manage expectations and preserves trust.
• Introduce a New Pricing Line-up:
Rather than directly comparing the old and new pricing, develop a refreshed menu of options. By creating a distinct set of pricing packages (a “good-better-best” or modular approach), you can help customers see the upgraded value proposition without making them feel penalized for past agreements.
In summary, the key takeaway is to use segmentation and personalization to reframe the discussion around evolving value. A carefully crafted, transparent approach that offers genuine alternatives can help maintain customer trust while moving to a more sustainable pricing model.
1
Below is a direct answer based on insights from our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale:
• Yes, many SaaS companies have lowered their prices rather than raised them in response to evolving market conditions or strategic shifts. For example, as detailed in our book, when features that were once considered premium become standard (a situation of feature parity), customers begin to compare different providers more directly. This shift often forces established companies into a position where they must adjust pricing downward to remain competitive.
• In market segments like the SMB space, where price sensitivity is high, lowering prices can be a viable strategy. The book explains that when lower-cost alternatives enter the market, customers who originally valued a premium product begin to reassess its relative value. Companies might choose to lower prices to retain these price-sensitive segments instead of investing solely in product enhancements aimed at advanced users.
• Lowering prices may also be employed as a strategic move during a price war, where competing firms continuously trim prices to gain market share. While this approach can pressure margins, it may be the only way to prevent customer churn and keep up with competitors who are offering more cost-effective solutions.
In summary, our book, Price to Scale, outlines that lowering prices makes sense when:
– Price sensitivity increases among customers due to commoditization of features
– The competitive landscape features aggressive price wars
– The target market (like SMBs) demands more cost-effective offerings over premium pricing
These insights encourage SaaS companies to align their pricing strategies not only with internal metrics but also with market dynamics and customer behavior for sustained success.
1
Below is a consolidated answer based on the core tenets of our SaaS pricing book, Price to Scale:
Direct Answer
Yes, if you observe that some customers are paying more relative to their usage while heavy users may be underpaying, it’s worth considering adjustments or even introducing new pricing tiers. The goal is to ensure that the value provided is essentially aligned with the price paid.
A Data-Driven and Customer-Centric Approach
• Begin by analyzing customer usage patterns. Group customers based on their actual usage as well as the value they extract from your product.
• Identify where the discrepancies lie. This might involve running a simulation or scenario analysis comparing current revenues against projected value delivery and usage levels.
Adjusting Pricing Tiers Fairly
• Transparency and fairness in pricing are key. Clearly communicate to your customers why certain adjustments are being made.
• Consider incremental changes: rather than a steep adjustment, phase in new tiers gradually. This helps customers adapt and gives you room to assess the impact of your changes.
• If introducing new tiers, ensure that each tier is well-defined with specific usage thresholds or bundled features so that customers understand what they’re paying for at each level.
• In some cases, a hybrid model might work—combining fixed-base fees with usage-based fees—to balance the risk of under- or over-charging.
Practical Application
An effective tactic is to pilot these adjustments with a segment of your customer base. This approach helps you fine-tune the new model before a full rollout. It also lets you gather customer feedback and adjust on the fly to better align pricing with perceived and actual value.
Summary/Takeaway
Balancing price and usage is at the heart of a fair pricing strategy. By leveraging detailed usage data, segmenting customers, and introducing clearly defined pricing tiers or hybrid models, you can ensure that pricing remains both competitive and equitable. As emphasized in our pricing strategy book Price to Scale, the key is to maintain transparency, regularly assess customer value, and adjust gradually to perfectly balance pricing with usage.
These steps will help ensure that your pricing structure evolves with your customers’ usage, delivering value while also supporting your revenue growth objectives.
1
Based on the insights in our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale, getting targeted feedback from key customers can be very valuable—but it needs to be executed as a carefully managed, discreet project.
Here are a few key points to consider:
• When done correctly, a controlled beta test or private feedback round allows you to iterate on and fine-tune your pricing. In our book, we emphasize an iterative process where even modest price adjustments are validated with customer feedback and churn data, ensuring that changes support both growth and customer retention.
• The book also warns about the risks of alarming customers prematurely. If pricing trials are too public, you risk triggering demands for similar deals among your broader customer base or even cannibalizing higher-margin plans. Therefore, it’s vital to structure these tests as a limited, confidential initiative targeted at a select group.
• Finally, using this approach as an internal project—separate from broader market communications—helps you manage both internal and customer expectations. For example, when approaching key accounts, be sure to clearly communicate that these discussions are part of a controlled experiment aimed at continually optimizing your offerings.
In summary, as discussed in Price to Scale, involving key customers in a beta test of new pricing can be wise if it’s done confidentially, iteratively, and with a clear strategy to prevent broader market alarm. This approach not only helps refine your pricing model but also minimizes the risk of unintended customer churn.
1
Based on the guidance in our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale, the timing of introducing an enterprise pricing option depends primarily on your market segmentation and customer demand signals. Here are some key considerations:
• Direct Demand vs. Anticipation
Our book emphasizes that a “one-size-fits-all” approach rarely works. If you’re already seeing a clear, consistent interest from big companies with needs that differ significantly from your typical SMB or mid-market customers, then it makes sense to offer a tailored enterprise or “Contact Us” option. Otherwise, a more modest approach can save you from prematurely customizing a pricing model for a segment that isn’t yet proven.
• Validate with Early Data
Price to Scale underlines the importance of listening to the market and understanding what each segment truly values. For many companies, starting with a streamlined “good-better-best” strategy (that may simply include a Contact Us tier for the enterprise level) allows you to gather the crucial insights needed to eventually design a targeted, enterprise-specific offering. Waiting until you’ve accumulated early enterprise demand can help ensure that your pricing and packaging resonate well with that segment’s needs.
• Strategic Flexibility
The book also highlights that pricing is a unique decision for every company. While enterprises might eventually necessitate a margin-maximizing approach (given their particular purchasing power and demands), you should only commit to a full enterprise tier once you can clearly segment and tailor your offer. This ensures that you can effectively balance the revenue maximization for large deals without overcomplicating your base offerings.
In summary, if enterprise demand is evident and represents a critical strategic segment for your business, introducing a well-researched “Contact Us” or enterprise pricing option early on may be advantageous. However, if your current market data is predominantly from smaller customers, consider starting with a streamlined tiering system that includes a basic enterprise option, and refine it as usage patterns and demand evolve. This approach aligns with the actionable insights in Price to Scale: let the market guide you, and tailor your pricing strategy once you have enough data to do so confidently.
1
Based on our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale, there isn’t a one-size-fits-all answer. The book outlines several options, including:
• Full transparency: Publishing complete pricing and packaging details on your website
• A summarized approach: Clearly stating a “starting from” price with an outline of what’s included while leaving room for further discussion
• Custom quotes: Providing only a summary of packages on your website and then tailoring pricing during sales conversations
For enterprise pricing—which can often involve complex, value-driven negotiations—the book suggests that a summarized approach can be highly effective. By publishing a starting price or a range, you set the stage for prospects and manage expectations, while preserving the flexibility to tailor pricing to the customer’s specific needs during discussions.
Practical takeaways include:
– Using a published “entry point” (e.g., “starting from $xx,xxx”) to attract initial interest
– Leaving detailed, complex pricing discussions for later, where you can better match value delivered and customer specifics
– Ensuring that your website pricing page serves as a tool to educate prospects and streamline inquiries
In summary, for enterprise pricing, consider a hybrid approach: publish a summarized initial pricing point on your website to generate leads and align expectations, and then move to custom quotes via discussions to capture the true value for each client.
1
Based on our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, there are two primary strategies you can consider for very large clients:
• Volume Discounting:
When dealing with thousands of users, it’s common for larger deals to come with significant discounts—as noted in our book (see the discussion around page 83). The idea is that while smaller deals might only see discounting around 20%, enterprise deals can experience discounts up to 80%. This is because the unit economics change dramatically—larger clients may pay far less per unit (or per user) compared to smaller ones. By applying a volume discount, you make the pricing scale-friendly, aligning with the perceived value while keeping your margin in check.
• Flat-Rate Site License:
Alternatively, instead of sticking strictly to per-user pricing, you can offer a flat-rate or site license. This approach simplifies the pricing structure for your customer and circumvents the “sticker shock” that might come with multiplying a standard per-user rate by thousands of users. A site license can be designed to be attractive for enterprise customers who prefer a single predictable cost regardless of the number of users onboarded.
Both approaches are consistent with the principles in Price to Scale. The choice depends on your broader pricing strategy and the detailed analysis of unit economics:
In summary, for very large clients, it is perfectly acceptable—and often expected—to deviate from a strict per-user pricing model. You can either provide volume discounts that lower the per-unit price as volume increases or opt for a flat-rate site license that offers cost certainty for the client. Reviewing the specifics of their usage and internal cost structures will help you decide which model better aligns with both your revenue goals and the client's expectations.
1
Below is a concise answer based on Price to Scale’s guidance:
• Enterprise customers typically expect significant volume-based discounts—up to 80% off list pricing—while smaller deals might only see discounts of about 20%. In practice, this means that for large user counts or multi-year commitments, enterprise deals naturally secure lower per-unit prices (for example, around $0.60 per unit versus about $2.10 for smaller deals).
• In addition to volume discounts, these customers often negotiate custom contract terms. Examples include:
– Adjusted payment terms (e.g., moving from Net30 to Net60 or milestone-based payments)
– Specific service specifications (such as custom reporting tools or integrations)
– Enhanced indemnity clauses that protect them against potential risks
• To accommodate these requests without undermining your overall pricing model, Price to Scale recommends a structured approach:
– Segment your customer base and vary your offerings. This allows you to provide tailored discounts or contractual concessions to enterprise customers, while protecting the integrity of deals with smaller customers.
– Offer alternatives that add value instead of making unilateral concessions. For instance, rather than simply discounting, consider offering an upgrade or bundling services in a way that reinforces the product’s value.
– Consider revising your tier lineup so that discounts or alternative pricing for enterprise contracts don’t directly undercut what’s available to smaller segments.
In summary, by understanding that large users are expected to secure deeper discounts through both pricing and tailored contract terms, and by strategically segmenting your offerings, you can protect overall pricing discipline while still meeting enterprise demands. For additional insights, refer to our discussions in Price to Scale (see Chapters on discounting levers and customer segmentation).
1
Based on the insights provided in our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale, features like SSO, advanced security compliance, or a dedicated account manager should generally be reserved for an enterprise plan when they address the unique needs of large organizations. Here’s how to decide which features justify a separate enterprise tier:
• Directly Addressing Enterprise Needs:
In our book, we illustrate how certain functionalities—such as enhanced security protocols and dedicated service (like an account manager)—are tailored to the operational complexity and scale of enterprise customers. These features add tangible value to larger organizations that require robust integrations and compliance measures, much like Salesforce’s approach with its graded packages.
• Modular Packaging as a Guide:
We discuss an approach where products are modularly packaged, meaning some add-ons are designed specifically for enterprise segments. For instance, “Account Health Reporting” is an example of a modular feature reserved for the enterprise tier while other features might be offered as add-ons to smaller companies. This strategy helps in segmenting your market based on distinct needs and willingness to pay.
• Value and Willingness to Invest:
The decision also hinges on understanding your customer segments. If enterprise customers consistently show that they require and are willing to invest in these advanced features for improved operational efficiency and security, it makes sense to position them in a separate, premium tier. In contrast, if including such features in mid-range or startup-focused plans overcomplicates the product offering or inflates the cost for smaller users, then a separate enterprise plan is warranted.
• Clear and Digestible Pricing:
Our book emphasizes the importance of simple metrics that customers understand. When enterprise buyers see clearly defined features in their package that directly map to their needs—such as advanced security and comprehensive support—they’re more likely to appreciate the pricing structure.
In summary, reserve features like SSO, advanced security compliance, and a dedicated account manager for an enterprise plan when:
• They specifically address the complex needs of large organizations.
• Modular packaging strategies demonstrate a clear segmentation between enterprise and smaller segments.
• There’s proven market consensus that these functionalities are essential and valued by enterprise customers.
This approach not only streamlines your product offering but also reinforces your market positioning, ensuring that each segment receives a tailored and understandable set of features.
1
Based on our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, the answer is that there isn’t a single numerical threshold (like a specific number of users or dollars), but rather a signal from the customer's evolving needs and the complexity of their requirements.
Key points from Price to Scale include:
• When customers start asking for more flexible, bundled offerings than what your self-serve plan provides (such as needing enterprise license agreements or a broader range of features), it’s a sign that they’ve outgrown the simple pricing model.
• If the cost structure begins to force a small or medium-sized customer into paying significantly more (for instance, paying 1.5–3 times as much) for features they don’t necessarily need, it creates inefficiencies and can negatively impact customer satisfaction and your net retention rate.
• The self-serve approach works best for transactional, high-velocity sales where customers can quickly sign up and play. Once a customer’s usage or strategic needs shift to require negotiated terms—whether that means volume discounts, customized product bundles, or additional legal and administrative support—the enterprise deal becomes the appropriate format.
In practical terms, you should consider moving a customer from self-serve to a negotiated enterprise contract when:
In summary, the decision to shift a customer to an enterprise deal should be less about hitting a strict numerical threshold and more about recognizing when their needs—and the value they extract—demand a more tailored, negotiated solution. As discussed in our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale, aligning your pricing architecture with customer demands ensures both operational efficiency and improved customer satisfaction.
1
Based on the principles outlined in our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale, the answer is that on-premise or private cloud deployments often require a mix of pricing elements tailored to the added complexity and value delivered. Here are some key considerations:
• Upfront Setup Fee: On-premise and private cloud solutions often involve additional integration, customization, and installation efforts. Charging a meaningful one-time setup fee helps cover these one-off costs and the associated implementation risks.
• Higher Ongoing Subscription: Since the support, maintenance, and operational overhead for on-premise solutions are usually higher than those for standard cloud offerings, it’s common to adjust the recurring subscription fee. This reflects the added value and cost to both your operations and the client’s more complex environment.
• Different Licensing Models: In some cases, a modular or custom enterprise licensing model might be appropriate. This can include a combination of capabilities (such as specialized security, advanced analytics, etc.) priced additively, rather than bundling everything into a single standard rate. Such a modular approach ensures you can tailor the pricing to the specific environment and needs of an enterprise client.
The book suggests that pricing should directly mirror the ways customers consume and derive value from your product. When a customer chooses a non-standard deployment (like on-premise or private cloud), you need to adjust the pricing structure—not just by scaling fees upward but by considering a hybrid model that addresses both the immediate setup costs and the ongoing operational expense.
In summary, while there isn’t a one-size-fits-all answer, our pricing strategy for these alternative deployment models typically involves a combination of an upfront fee to cover implementation and a higher recurring fee (or a modular licensing approach) to align with the added costs and value of a customized deployment. This balanced approach ensures you capture both the immediate and long-term value delivered to the enterprise client.
1
Based on the approaches outlined in Price to Scale, there isn’t a one‐size‐fits-all answer—instead, the best structure depends on your market dynamics, customer segmentation, and the overall pricing context. Here are some principles from our book that can help guide your decision:
• Incorporate Flexibility with Escalation Clauses:
While locking in pricing for an extended period might seem attractive to both you and your customer, it also poses a risk if market conditions or your cost base change. Our book leans toward including an annual price escalation clause. This option allows you to benefit from long-term commitments while maintaining the flexibility to adjust pricing for inflation, rising operational costs, or increased value delivered.
• Use Upfront Discounts Judiciously:
Offering a larger upfront discount for a longer commitment is commonly seen in enterprise deals and is aligned with the volume-discount principles discussed in Price to Scale. However, such discounts should be carefully calibrated. They should reward the customer’s commitment without compromising your long-term revenue model. The key is ensuring that any discount remains consistent with the degressivity in unit pricing that our book highlights for larger deals.
• Segment and Customize:
As emphasized in our book, understanding and segmenting your customer base is crucial. Some enterprise customers may value the certainty of fixed pricing, while others might appreciate the reassurance that pricing will evolve with incremental value. It can be effective to offer multiple options—perhaps standardizing an annual escalation plan while also allowing for upfront discounts with certain restrictions or additional service benchmarks. This approach helps prevent a “race to the bottom” in discounts while keeping your pricing strategy competitive.
In summary, our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale, typically recommends structuring multi-year enterprise deals with built-in price adjustments (like an annual escalation clause) rather than completely locking in rates. This structure strikes a balance between securing long-term commitments and maintaining a pricing strategy that can evolve, ensuring both parties share in future growth or cost increases. Consider supplementing these principles by tailoring your approach based on the specific needs and risk profiles of your enterprise customers.
1
Based on our approach in Price to Scale, the primary goal is to ensure that any feature or integration we develop—custom or not—fits into our broader product strategy. Here’s how you might tackle this situation:
• Evaluate Strategic Fit
– Before considering custom development, assess whether the requested feature aligns with the overall product roadmap. If it has broader appeal or strategic value, it might be worth incorporating into the product roadmap rather than treating it as a one-off.
– As discussed in our book, features that can scale across multiple customers should ideally become part of your core offering, leveraging your capability pricing approach.
• Pricing Custom Add-Ons
– For requests that are clearly one-off or specific to a single enterprise—even if there is significant value—consider a discrete “add-on” pricing model. Our book illustrates how add-on capability pricing can be implemented as either a fixed fee or a scalable percentage of the base subscription. This keeps your base product pricing robust and avoids complicating the pricing structure for the majority of your customers.
– A separate price for custom work can also be negotiated directly with the enterprise, reflecting the unique value while ensuring that it doesn’t erode the uniformity of your product’s pricing model.
• Consistency and Scalability
– Avoid the temptation to simply incorporate custom development costs into a higher subscription cost unless that feature is intended to be offered broadly. Keeping enterprise customizations separate (either as an add-on or via discrete pricing) preserves the simplicity and scalability of your main pricing model.
– This approach ensures that while you can respond to extraordinary requests, you also maintain a consistent, scalable pricing structure across customer segments.
In summary, if an enterprise customer asks for a feature or integration that’s not on your roadmap, first assess if it should be part of your future product vision. If it’s a one-off request, use add-on capability pricing or discrete pricing specifically for that customer, rather than altering your standard subscription model. This strategy aligns with the principles laid out in Price to Scale and helps maintain both product integrity and pricing simplicity.
1
Based on our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, a balanced approach works best when targeting both SMB and enterprise customers. Here are some best practices drawn from our discussions in the book:
• Segment your display:
– For SMB customers, present clear, fully detailed pricing tiers that speak directly to their use case and budget.
– For the enterprise segment, it is acceptable—and often preferable—to use a message like “Contact us for enterprise pricing.” This signals that custom, high-value solutions exist without scaring off smaller buyers with large numbers.
• Communicate value and differentiation:
– Use your pricing page and sales materials to highlight the unique benefits for each segment. Show explicit value for enterprise customers (which might include premium features, dedicated support, or customization) without muddling the straightforward SMB packages.
– Consider summarizing enterprise pricing with starting ranges or mentioning that pricing becomes more tailored at larger usage levels, allowing you to avoid overwhelming smaller prospects.
• Offer a guided path:
– You might include a call-to-action (CTA) for enterprise pricing that directs interested parties to a dedicated sales conversation where you can discuss detailed requirements and custom pricing solutions.
– As discussed in Price to Scale, even a summarized view on your public pricing page can serve as a lead source by prompting high-value prospects to reach out.
In summary, explicitly indicating “Contact us for enterprise pricing” is an effective way to signal a larger offering while keeping your main pricing page accessible to SMB customers. Your goal should be to segment the messaging so each customer feels like the pricing page speaks directly to their needs. This balanced approach can help you capture both market segments without risking confusion or overwhelming one group with information intended for the other.
1
Based on our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, the answer isn’t one-size-fits-all—it depends on both how predictable the client's usage is and their buying process. Here’s how you can think about it:
• Direct Answer
Enterprise clients might lean toward an all-inclusive, flat annual fee when they’re looking for predictable budgeting and simplicity. However, if their usage is more measurable and granular, a per-user or consumption-based model might be more attractive. In practice, many enterprises have a taste for both models when they can choose the one that best aligns with their operational needs and financial planning.
• Supporting Insights from Price to Scale
– Our book explains that pricing strategies fall on a spectrum: on one end, you have consumption-based or per-user pricing (“pay for what they use”), and on the other, a fixed-price model (often using t-shirt size buckets). In an enterprise context, the fixed-price (all-inclusive) option—often seen in Enterprise License Agreements—offers the flexibility to access all features and support without having to track individual usage or seats.
– The book also notes that if the metric is highly predictable and measurable, you can opt for granular pricing (like per-user). But when the measurement isn’t as clear or the usage less predictable, enterprises might prefer larger buckets or a flat fee to avoid fluctuations.
– Additionally, enterprise sales motions, which often involve more negotiation and customization, tend to favor models that provide certainty and simplicity during budgeting and contracting.
• How to Determine the Client’s Preference
• Evaluate Usage Predictability:
– If your usage metrics (e.g., user counts, transactions) are consistent and easily measurable, a per-user pricing model can work.
– If usage is more variable or hard to predict, a flat fee might simplify price setting and budgeting for the client.
• Understand Their Purchasing Process:
– Enterprise buying teams appreciate predictability. Ask directly how they approach budgeting: Do they prefer variable costs that scale with usage, or a fixed investment that covers all their needs?
– Consider running a pilot or engaging in client interviews to understand which model provides a clearer value proposition for their specific environment.
• Practical Application
– You could design dual pricing options during initial contract discussions and use feedback from early engagements to refine your offering.
– Analyze historical usage and purchasing behavior to better capture whether an all-inclusive option or granular consumption pricing meets your target clients’ needs.
• Summary
The key takeaway from our pricing strategy book is to align your pricing model with both the predictability of the usage metric and the client’s need for budgeting certainty. Whether to go with an all-inclusive flat fee or a per-user model should be determined by evaluating their usage patterns and direct feedback on buying preferences.
For further details, you might refer to the sections covering “Predictability” and “Selection of Key Pricing Variables” in Price to Scale.
1
Based on our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, procurement deals tend to involve a certain level of flexibility and negotiation. Here are some key points to consider:
• Payment Terms: As discussed on page 127 of Price to Scale, you'll often encounter negotiations over payment terms. For example, small businesses may negotiate a shift from Net-30 to Net-60 terms in order to better align payments with their cash flow cycles. You should be prepared to offer longer payment windows when needed – or even milestone-based payment options on longer-term deals.
• Customizing Contract Terms: In addition to payment terms, procurement departments may also require cost transparency. While the book does not detail "breaking out costs for compliance reasons" explicitly, it does emphasize the importance of clearly defining every aspect of the service delivery and pricing model (see pages 113 and 125). This means that if a procurement department requests more detailed cost breakdowns to satisfy internal compliance or budgeting protocols, you should be ready to provide them. This not only builds trust but also ensures alignment between your pricing structure and their requirements.
• Flexibility in Service Specifications: The book also points out that procurement discussions can extend to negotiating additional service features or customizations (as in healthcare or financial services examples). Although these negotiations do not strictly involve standard concessions like payment terms, they underscore the importance of being adaptable when meeting the procurement department’s specific needs.
In summary, when engaging with procurement departments, be prepared to adjust your payment terms (for instance, Net-30 to Net-60 or even milestone-based payments) and provide detailed breakdowns of costs if required for compliance purposes. This approach ensures that both sides have clear expectations and that your pricing strategy remains both competitive and aligned with the client’s internal processes.
1
Based on insights from our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale, a minimum annual fee for enterprise customers can be a sound approach—but it must be implemented thoughtfully to align with customer expectations and buying habits.
Here are some key points drawn from the book:
• Customers Are Trained on Familiar Metrics:
The book notes that many enterprise buyers are accustomed to straightforward pricing metrics, such as per-employee or per-seat pricing (see page 235). If you deviate too much from what they’re used to, you risk creating friction. A minimum fee should be positioned as part of an all-inclusive, easily digestible package that still feels familiar.
• Ensuring Baseline Revenue:
Implementing a minimum fee can help guarantee a baseline revenue even when usage or seat count is low. This protects your revenue structure against cases where enterprise customers might otherwise pay very low amounts relative to the costs of providing high-touch support and complex implementations.
• Balancing Value and Perception:
The key is to ensure that the minimum fee feels like a natural part of the overall value proposition. If customers see that enterprise-level service includes benefits such as dedicated support, custom features, or enhanced security, then a minimum fee can be justified. In other words, customers should perceive the minimum fee as ensuring they receive comprehensive, enterprise-grade value rather than as an arbitrary charge.
• Avoiding Disruption:
The book cautions against introducing radically different pricing metrics that may disrupt the customers’ buying process. Make sure that the minimum fee is clearly communicated and integrated into a pricing model that still emphasizes transparency and predictability.
In summary, setting a minimum annual fee for enterprise customers can serve the dual purpose of securing a baseline revenue and aligning with the customers’ accustomed pricing metrics. Just ensure the fee is well-justified by the added value of enterprise services and communicated in a way that feels consistent with familiar models. This approach, as recommended in Price to Scale, can help balance revenue assurance with customer adoption.
1
Below is a detailed answer based on the principles and strategies outlined in our saas pricing book, Price to Scale:
Direct Answer
For large organizations issuing RFPs and requesting detailed pricing breakdowns or guarantees on future cost increases, you can adapt your pricing approach by offering modular pricing components. This means keeping your core pricing standardized while carving out add-on capabilities or service levels that can be flexibly priced. Such an approach allows you to provide the necessary detail and guarantees in a controlled manner without revealing your entire pricing engine.
Supporting Book Concepts
In short, adaptable and transparent yet controlled pricing is key. For more in-depth strategies and real-world examples, please refer to the relevant sections in Price to Scale.
1
Based on our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, the recommended approach is to balance the attractiveness of a huge client’s volume and logo prestige with the importance of maintaining anchored list prices. Here are the key takeaways:
• Directly discounting your list price isn’t your only option. Instead, if you consider lowering the price per unit, be sure to do so with clear strings attached (for example, longer-term commitments, upsell opportunities, or bundled add-ons). This not only justifies the discount but also protects your overall profitability.
• Segment your customer base. Our book emphasizes that different cohorts (from high-usage enterprise clients to those on lower-end packages) may warrant different pricing approaches. This means that while a large client might justify a more favorable unit price because of sheer volume and strategic value, you should maintain consistency for other segments and avoid undermining your established list price.
• Be transparent about variations. When you intentionally offer different packages or alternative options, make sure the rationale is clear. For instance, you might create a new suite of pricing tiers for big accounts that explicitly includes the value-added elements tied to the discount. This approach prevents the confusion that could arise from simply discounting your traditional tiers.
• Define “how low is too low.” Price to Scale stresses that discounts should be scenario-specific. Evaluate the discount in context: consider the cost structure, future upsell potential, and the impact on your average selling price (ASP). Too steep a discount risks setting a precedent that could affect renewals or undermining the value perception for both new and existing customers.
In summary, if a huge client presents a significant revenue opportunity, it’s wise to explore creative concessions—that is, discounts with value-added conditions—while preserving your list price expectations. Tailor your strategy by segmenting your customer base and ensuring transparency so that you protect both the unit economics and brand value of your product.
1
Based on the principles outlined in our SaaS pricing book, Price to Scale, enterprise clients generally gravitate toward more predictable pricing structures, such as standard licensing with volume or enterprise discounts, rather than complex outcome-based or risk-sharing models. Here are some key points to consider:
• Preferred Predictability: Enterprises typically appreciate pricing that clearly ties to usage or capacity—like sliding volume discounts—because it aligns with budgeting and forecasting. Our book highlights how larger clients often receive lower per-unit rates (for example, paying around $0.60 per unit compared to $2.10 for smaller deals) to reflect their volume, which reinforces predictability and clarity.
• Complexity of Outcome-Based Models: While outcome-based pricing (pay-for-results) can be attractive in theory, it brings additional layers of complexity in both risk identification and measurement. These models require well-defined outcomes and shared metrics, which may not always be straightforward with large-scale enterprise deployments. The administrative burden and potential for disputes often make this approach less appealing compared to traditional licensing.
• When to Consider Risk Sharing: There may be niche situations or highly differentiated solutions where outcome-based or risk-sharing models could align incentives between the provider and the customer. However, as a general rule—and as discussed in Price to Scale—most SaaS companies find that sticking to standard licensing models, even for big deals, offers a simpler and more scalable approach.
• Focus on Value-Based Segmentation: Our book also emphasizes packaging solutions (such as good–better–best models) to cater to various segments, including enterprise customers. This lets you tailor offerings and pricing in a way that maximizes perceived value without necessarily introducing the complexities of risk-sharing mechanisms.
In summary, while outcome-based pricing is not inherently off the table, the simplicity, predictability, and ease of scaling traditional licensing models generally make them the preferred choice for enterprise clients as described in Price to Scale. For most companies, particularly those scaling their offerings, adhering to standard models with well-calibrated volume discounts is advisable.
1
Enterprise clients typically expect a flexible, formalized approach to payments—one that includes traditional invoicing and the ability to handle purchase orders. As discussed in our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, these clients often negotiate specific payment terms (for example, moving from Net30 to Net60) to better align with their cash flow cycles. This means:
• They expect invoicing and purchase order processes that are robust and integrated, supporting the larger and more complex transaction cycles of enterprise deals.
• Extended payment terms, like net terms, can indeed have a direct impact on cash flow. Our book details how early payment discounts can serve as incentives to improve cash flow, while longer net terms might require companies to adjust their pricing strategy (often by increasing list prices or adjusting discount levers) to account for the delayed cash inflows.
• When negotiating contracts with enterprise clients, it’s important to factor in these terms—as they might offset some of the perceived discounting benefits by influencing overall unit pricing (as outlined in various examples in Price to Scale).
In summary, accommodating invoicing, purchase orders, and flexible payment terms is essential when dealing with enterprise clients. Adjusting your pricing strategy to reflect the impact of these terms on cash flow—whether by offering early payment discounts or adjusting net pricing—ensures that both parties achieve a balanced, value-driven deal.
1
Below is our answer based on the principles laid out in our SaaS pricing book, Price to Scale:
• When using channel partners or resellers for enterprise deals, you generally want to structure a pricing model that gives the partner an approved discount off your list price. This discount creates a “partner margin,” which then allows the reseller to add their own markup when selling to the end customer.
• The idea is not to simply lower your price indiscriminately but rather to create a clear, structured pricing framework. Our book highlights that enterprise deals often involve significant discounting (often in the 30–70% range for enterprise customers) while keeping consistent margins for each party. By setting a baseline list price and an agreed discount for your channel partners, you can ensure that both your revenue targets and the partner’s incentive to add their margin work in harmony.
• In practice, you would identify a discount rate for partners that falls within the broader enterprise discount guidelines. This means calculating your list price such that when the partner applies their discount, you still maintain the revenue and profit levels required, while also leaving enough room for the partner’s markup.
• This approach helps preserve pricing consistency, supports your overall revenue optimization strategy, and clearly delineates the roles of your company and the channel partner. As discussed in Price to Scale (see our sections on discounting and customer segmentation), carefully controlling discount authority is essential. With partners, it’s equally important to set these controls upfront to avoid price erosion and ensure both parties benefit.
In summary, our recommendation is to give channel partners a predetermined discounted rate off your list price – effectively creating a margin that they can mark up. This method aligns with our book’s broader strategy on managing discounting while optimizing revenue across diverse customer segments.
1
Based on our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale, it’s generally advisable to price professional services—like onboarding, training, and custom work—as distinct, one-time fees rather than bundling them into the subscription. Here’s why:
• Clear Value Attribution: Our book emphasizes capability pricing, where each component of your offering (the core software and any add-ons) has its own value. Charging separately for professional services helps you clearly communicate the added value of those services.
• Flexibility for Scaling: When you separate one-time fees from the recurring subscription, you give your pricing structure the agility to scale. For enterprise customers, whose needs often vary – especially in implementation and customization – having distinct fee lines allows pricing to adjust based on the scope or size of the professional services required.
• Simplified Sales and Negotiations: Having a clear separation between subscription and service fees can make discussions with enterprise buyers more transparent. Our book discusses that clients often expect to pay fees for these services, which streamlines the negotiation process and sets proper expectations from the outset.
• Revenue Recognition Clarity: Separating the fees also helps with revenue recognition and internal financial planning. It avoids potential confusion about what portion of the total deal reflects recurring value versus one-off investments.
In summary, our SaaS pricing book, Price to Scale, supports the idea that charging for professional services separately (as add-ons) can be a smart approach. This strategy not only acknowledges the distinct value of those services but also provides flexibility and clarity across the sales process and revenue management.
1
Based on the discussions in our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale, using a “9” at the end of a price (such as charging $99 instead of $100) is generally seen as a tactic more aligned with consumer psychology rather than a best practice in B2B or enterprise contexts.
Here are some key takeaways from the book:
• In our analysis (see the discussion on capability pricing in Price to Scale), flat pricing such as a $99/month model can work well as an add-on or to simplify billing for smaller deals. However, when it comes to the base software—especially for enterprise customers—this approach can sometimes leave money on the table and even send signals that dissuade enterprise adoption.
• Enterprise pricing tends to be less about psychological cues and more about demonstrating tangible value, ROI, and setting a premium for scalable, robust solutions. Customers in the B2B space are usually more analytical in their decision-making, weighing factors like implementation cost, support, and integration.
• While ending prices with a “9” may work in certain low-cost tiers or SMB-focused contexts (where conversion rates might benefit from a perceived bargain), for higher-value software and enterprise deals the focus should be on transparent, value-based pricing that aligns with long-term growth and market positioning.
In summary, though psychological pricing can sometimes have a marginal impact in specific scenarios, our book recommends being cautious about applying these tactics wholesale in B2B environments. It is often more effective to focus on pricing strategies that communicate value and foster enterprise confidence rather than relying on price endings to drive conversion rates.
1
Below is a summary answer based on the insights from our pricing strategy book, Price to Scale:
• Direct Answer:
Both approaches have merits—but the best choice depends on your customer segment and pricing strategy. Displaying per user/per month pricing can make costs seem more affordable at first glance, while showing the total monthly or annual cost provides transparency and helps customers budget accurately. In many cases, a hybrid approach that clarifies both the individual cost and the total cost resonates best with buyers.
• Book Insights & Rationale:
Our book discusses the importance of pricing transparency and offers a 2×2 matrix (see Fig. 11 in Price to Scale) to help companies decide when to publish their complete pricing online. Key takeaways include:
- In large, homogeneous markets, publishing full pricing details (including total costs) can help scale sales and build trust.
- In more heterogeneous or limited markets (like enterprise segments with tailored requirements), companies might opt for more discretion—allowing sales teams to adapt the offer and extract value based on the specific needs of the client.
Additionally, Price to Scale emphasizes that any pricing presentation should meet critical criteria such as predictability (avoiding surprise costs), acceptability (making sure the pricing seems logical to prospects), and trackability. Displaying total cost helps ensure buyers see the realistic financial commitment, while per-user pricing can simplify initial comparisons.
• Practical Application:
• Final Takeaway:
Ultimately, being transparent helps build trust. Use a pricing display format that aligns with your market and overall strategy. For a self-serve SaaS model, showing both per-user metrics and an illustrative total cost ultimately provides clarity and helps customers make informed decisions.
This balanced approach—making the cost appear affordable while being transparent about total spend—is what tends to resonate best with buyers, as outlined in Price to Scale.
1
Based on our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, the three-tier pricing model (or Goldilocks principle) is a strong starting point because it naturally creates a “sweet spot” that drives most customers toward the middle option. However, it isn’t a one-size-fits-all solution. Here are a few key points to consider:
• The three-tier model works well when you have a clear stratification of customer needs and usage. It simplifies decision-making and helps steer customers toward the plan that best maximizes both value and revenue predictability.
• For products in the early stages or when customers are less accustomed to tiered pricing, a simpler three-part model may reduce friction. In our book, we note that if your product is newer, customers might favor a linear model rather than multiple tiers.
• If your customer base is highly segmented—where different cohorts use your product in varied ways—offering more than three plans could allow you to tailor features and price points more precisely. However, it’s important to avoid simply adding tiers that are minor variations. Instead, consider distinct packages (for example, renaming certain tiers or adjusting the feature set) so that customers clearly see the differences and value in upgrading.
• The decision to add additional plans should come from a deep understanding of your customer’s behaviors, usage patterns, and value perceptions. As discussed in Price to Scale, it is important to proactively and creatively offer alternatives that align with both customer needs and your revenue goals.
In summary, while the three-tier pricing approach is a robust framework, offering more than three plans can work—if and only if you use customer segmentation and feature differentiation to create clearly distinct, valuable offerings. This nuanced approach ensures that your pricing strategy supports both market adoption and revenue optimization.
1
Based on our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, introducing a very high-priced “enterprise” or “platinum” tier can indeed serve as an anchoring tool. Here’s how it works and what to consider:
• Direct Answer:
Yes, introducing a high-priced tier can help anchor the perceived value of your product. By offering an option that is significantly more expensive, the other pricing tiers can appear more attractive, making them seem reasonably priced by comparison.
• How It Works (Concepts from Price to Scale):
• Practical Considerations:
• Key Takeaway:
Introducing a high-priced tier can effectively reposition the overall pricing structure by creating an anchor point. However, successful implementation depends on ensuring that the new tier delivers genuine value to those who need it and that it’s aligned with the broader pricing strategy outlined in Price to Scale.
In summary, a very high-priced “enterprise” or “platinum” tier can provide a valuable anchor for customers, enhancing the attractiveness of your other offerings when executed with a clear understanding of customer segments and value delivery.
1
Based on the principles outlined in our pricing strategy book Price to Scale, it’s generally most effective to break down annual pricing into an equivalent monthly cost (e.g., “$100/month, billed annually”). Here’s why and how you can apply this approach:
• Directly digestible cost:
Presenting the monthly equivalent helps potential customers more easily grasp the ongoing commitment. Instead of seeing a large lump sum (for example, $1,200/year), customers perceive a smaller, familiar monthly fee.
• Psychological impact:
As detailed in our book, making the cost feel less daunting is key. By communicating the price as “$100/month, billed annually,” you minimize the shock of a high upfront annual payment while still clarifying the overall commitment.
• Transparency and clarity:
Always ensure you include “billed annually” so there’s no ambiguity about payment structure. This strikes the right balance between digestibility and transparency—a major theme in Price to Scale when designing effective pricing pages.
In summary, breaking down the annual price into a monthly equivalent on your website not only makes the cost more approachable for customers but also aligns with the strategic guidance provided in our book Price to Scale.
1
Labeling a plan as “Most Popular” or “Best Value” can indeed have a significant influence on what customers choose. These labels act as social proof and guide customers toward the option that appears to be the favorite or the best deal, which is a key behavioral insight emphasized in our SaaS pricing book, Price to Scale.
Below are some of the key points from Price to Scale related to this strategy:
• Impact on Customer Choice:
– Customers often feel more confident opting for a plan that is highlighted as a preferred or “best” option.
– The label provides a shortcut for decision-making, especially for buyers who may be unsure about which plan best suits their needs.
• Determining Which Plan to Highlight:
– The decision should be based on a thorough segmentation of your customer base. Consider factors such as usage patterns, price sensitivity, and the specific needs of different cohorts.
– Analyze the revenue optimization trade-offs of each plan. Our book discusses how balancing customer acquisition with the price customers are willing to pay is crucial, and the highlighted plan should be the one that best achieves this balance.
– It is also important to ensure that the plan you label aligns with your company’s overall strategic goals, whether that is maximizing market share, driving higher usage, or generating a predictable revenue stream.
• Practical Application:
– Look at your data to determine how customers are interacting with your current plans.
– Identify which plan has a combination of features and pricing that meets both customer needs and your financial objectives.
– Once identified, using labels such as “Most Popular” or “Best Value” reinforces that analysis and helps steer new prospects toward that plan.
In summary, as Price to Scale outlines, using a “best value” or “most popular” label isn’t just a marketing tactic—it’s a strategic decision that should be grounded in customer segmentation, revenue optimization analysis, and the overall value delivered by that plan. This approach ensures that the label not only attracts attention but also supports your broader pricing strategy.
1
Based on the guidance in Price to Scale, the answer depends on your overall strategy and market target. Here are some key points from our book to consider:
• The free tier (or free trial) is generally used to capture a broad market or to undercut competitors. Our book notes that companies like Amplitude use free offerings to cast a wide net, even though free plans often have lower conversion rates to paid plans.
• Because free users typically convert at lower rates, if your strategic focus is on revenue generation through paid plans, you need to be careful not to let the free option steal too much attention. A prominent placement might attract a lot of visitors, but it could also inadvertently shift focus away from your paid offerings.
• The recommended approach is to balance visibility. You might consider designing the pricing page so that while the free tier is clearly available (to capture interest from a larger total addressable market), it doesn’t overshadow the value or benefits of your paid plans. This might involve subtle design choices or positioning that emphasize the advantages of upgrading.
• Testing is critical. As discussed in our book, simplicity often leads to higher conversion rates, so it’s essential to experiment with the design of your pricing page to find the right balance for your specific audience.
In summary, if your free tier is a strategic tool to attract a large user base or to discourage competitors, it should be visible—but without compromising the spotlight on your paid plans. Tailor the balance based on your market, and use testing to optimize your design for maximum conversion.
1
Below is a direct answer drawing on principles from our SaaS pricing book, Price to Scale:
• The key is to use anchoring transparently so that the comparison serves to showcase real value rather than simply to exaggerate a discount. In our book, we explain that anchors work best when they’re based on real, verifiable data or industry standard assumptions (as discussed around page 147). For instance, if you show a slashed-out “original” price, ensure it reflects a historical or market reality. This keeps the offer honest and relatable.
• When using comparisons, whether that means showing a higher crossed-out price or referencing a competitor’s cost, it must be something your customers recognize as a valid benchmark. For example, illustrating the cost of alternatives works well when those alternatives are widely acknowledged. The aim is to help your audience frame your offer realistically within their purchasing context.
• Another effective approach mentioned in our book is to design pricing pages that balance clarity and segmentation. By tailoring comparisons or highlighting differentiated packages, you not only anchor the price but also illustrate the spectrum of value your product offers. This method reduces the risk of oversimplification that could be perceived as deceptive.
In summary, effective anchoring on your pricing page comes down to:
– Using authentic, evidence-backed anchor values.
– Ensuring any “discounted” prices or comparisons are both transparent and relevant.
– Aligning your anchor with the genuine value delivered by your product.
By following these principles, you build trust with your customers while effectively framing the value of your offer.
1
Based on our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, providing a detailed feature comparison grid is highly effective—but it must balance clarity with simplicity.
Here are some key takeaways from our book regarding the use of a feature comparison table:
• Direct Differentiation: As discussed in the book (see page 97), a well-constructed grid clearly outlines the features included in each tier, along with constraints, geographic availability, and implementation notes. This helps in reducing confusion during sales motions by answering common queries such as “what can we sell?” or “what’s in the elite plan?”
• Avoid Overwhelm: Although details are important, too much complexity can create anxiety. The book emphasizes using a simplified version that highlights essential differences without getting bogged down by every intricate detail. The goal is to empower customers to quickly compare the offerings rather than feeling lost in minutiae.
• Maintain Relevance and Currency: Our book notes that the effort taken to update the table regularly (typically quarterly) is worthwhile because it serves as a single source of truth. This ensures that the information remains useful and avoids overwhelming users with outdated or irrelevant details.
• Suggested Level of Detail: Include enough information so that users understand key differentiators. Features that are critical to their decision-making should be clearly highlighted. Supplement this grid with more detailed analyses when necessary (such as a higher granularity breakdown for specific benefits), but keep the grid itself focused on the most relevant points.
In summary, a detailed feature comparison table is a valuable tool in your pricing and product communication strategy. Just ensure it is maintained with the right balance of detail—enough to clearly differentiate plans without overwhelming potential customers.
1
Based on Price to Scale, psychological pricing tactics—such as offering a limited-time introductory price or framing costs in daily terms—can indeed be beneficial when they complement your overall value-based pricing strategy. Here’s how these tactics fit into a well-rounded pricing approach:
• Direct Impact on Perceived Value
When you frame a subscription cost as “less than $3 a day,” you make the expense feel more manageable, which can reduce the psychological barrier to adoption. Similarly, a limited-time introductory price can create urgency and lower initial resistance. The book emphasizes that pricing should always be closely tied to the value your product delivers, so these tactics can be particularly effective if they help illustrate that value in a relatable and accessible way.
• Role within a Broader Strategy
Price to Scale advocates for a pricing approach that supports both customer acquisition and long-term revenue growth. While tactics like a limited-time offer are useful for driving early adoption, it’s important that they are integrated into a broader strategy that doesn’t undercut your positioning or long-term pricing plans. For example, the book discusses the use of lower-cost tiers as a method to boost user acquisition—when employed thoughtfully, psychological strategies can work in tandem with such tiered models.
• Practical Considerations
Before implementing these tactics, consider:
– Whether the introductory pricing aligns with the perceived value of your software.
– How the temporary nature of the offer will be communicated to prevent future pricing resistance.
– That framing the cost in daily terms does not oversimplify the pricing structure and obscure the true value you are delivering.
In summary, our SaaS pricing book, Price to Scale, recommends any pricing tactic—including psychological ones—be used to reinforce the clear, value-driven narrative of your product. When executed carefully, tactics like daily pricing or time-bound offers can enhance the appeal to potential customers while remaining consistent with a sustainable long-term pricing strategy.
1
Including a short FAQ section on your pricing page can be very beneficial. It helps to proactively address common concerns such as cancellation policies, upgrade/downgrade processes, and hidden fees—thereby reducing friction and streamlining the sign-up process.
In our SaaS pricing book, Price to Scale, we emphasize the importance of clarity and transparency in your pricing communications. For example:
• Our book highlights the usefulness of a detailed pricing grid that not only lists features and tier options but also serves to answer basic common questions like “what can we sell?” and clarifies details that might otherwise require separate inquiries.
• By providing clear answers up front, you’re pre-empting objections and creating a smoother customer journey. This approach can help reduce repetitive queries (often addressed during sales or on RFP responses) and build trust with potential customers.
In practical terms, including a FAQ section that is concise yet informative gives customers a self-serve experience, potentially speeding up decision-making while also reducing the burden on your support teams.
Summary: Including a FAQ on your pricing page is a strategic move that aligns with the principles outlined in Price to Scale—enhancing transparency, lowering friction during sign-ups, and ultimately contributing to a more effective pricing strategy.
1
Based on the principles in our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, adding social proof around your pricing can be a useful tactic to enhance trust and convey value. While our book primarily focuses on structuring pricing around value metrics and ensuring customers understand the benefits they receive, the idea behind social proof complements these themes by subtly confirming that others are willing to pay for your solution.
Key points include:
• Social proof (such as customer logos, testimonials, or highlighting the number of users) helps validate your offering by demonstrating that real customers see enough value to invest in your product.
• It reinforces the perception that your price is not arbitrary but is backed by market acceptance, which can reduce the hesitation prospects might have when faced with a new pricing structure.
• When combined with clear value metrics and transparent pricing information, social proof adds another layer of credibility—essential for encouraging sign-ups and converting hesitant prospects.
In summary, while our book focuses on clearly communicating value through tailored pricing strategies, incorporating social proof near your pricing can further boost confidence, making potential customers more comfortable with the cost as they see that others are also benefiting from the service.
1
Based on our book, Price to Scale, our approach to pricing a SaaS product starts by balancing competitive market realities with an honest assessment of internal costs and operational capabilities. Here’s how we set the initial price point and the factors we consider:
• Direct Costs & Implementation:
We begin by understanding the actual cost of implementing the software. For example, if it costs around $3000 per mid-sized customer (covering labor and other direct expenses), this baseline helps anchor the pricing discussion and ensures that the product isn’t priced below sustainable levels.
• Competitive Positioning:
Market demands and competitive pressure play a crucial role. In our book (see the discussion around “Sanity Check Your Strategy” on page 91), we highlight scenarios where competitive pressures can limit deal sizes (e.g., from $1000 to $10,000 per year). This means pricing must not only cover costs but also be positioned to thrive against competitors in segments like SMB or enterprise.
• Customer Acquisition & Sales Costs:
The cost to acquire a customer isn’t just the product implementation—it also includes sales and marketing efforts, which in some SaaS environments can range from $1000 to $3000. This factor ensures that the pricing strategy sustains growth while factoring in the investment made by SDRs and sales teams.
• Team Alignment and Operational Considerations:
As detailed in our book’s section on the role of the Pricing and Monetization Team, pricing isn’t merely a number-setting exercise. It requires input from product, sales, and finance teams to reconcile different biases (for instance, the product team’s view on feature value versus the sales team’s focus on customer acquisition speed). This collective alignment helps to operationalize the strategy effectively.
In summary, our initial pricing strategy is designed to cover our costs, support sustainable growth, and remain competitive. By evaluating implementation costs, market pressures, customer acquisition expenses, and aligning team perspectives, we ensure that the pricing delivers value both to our customers and our business. For further details, you may refer to Chapters on “Sanity Check Your Strategy” and “The Role of the Pricing and Monetization Team” in Price to Scale.
1
Based on our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, the best approach depends on your product’s nature and how the value is delivered to your customers. Here are some key considerations:
• Usage (Consumption) Pricing
• Flat Monthly (Capability) Pricing
Overall, the book recommends deciding on your primary pricing metric by first analyzing whether your product fits better with a consumption-based model or a capability (flat fee) model. If your product’s costs and customer value scale with usage, a usage-based pricing model could be more appropriate. Conversely, if the product is best perceived as a complete package, a flat monthly fee might better communicate its value.
In summary, evaluate how closely your pricing should mirror the real use of your product and the corresponding costs you incur. This strategic decision, as advised in Price to Scale, will help you maximize both customer value and revenue.
1
Based on our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, there isn’t a one‐size‑fits‑all answer; the best approach depends on your market, customer segmentation, and strategic focus. Here are some key points to consider:
• Instead of simply starting too low or too high in isolation, our book recommends designing your pricing and packaging around the value the customer receives. For example, the Good–Better–Best model (discussed early in Price to Scale) allows you to serve multiple segments at different price points simultaneously. This structured approach means you’re not locked into a single price that later needs to be “adjusted.”
• If you price initially low to build broad adoption, you run the risk of limiting your ability to capture the full value as your product evolves. On the other hand, starting with a high price might align well with a premium, enterprise focus but could slow down early adoption if customers are hesitant to commit without seeing proven value.
• The book also emphasizes that your pricing decision should balance revenue optimization with market share targets. For example, if your strategy is to maximize market share, your pricing might naturally be set at the lower end of what customers are willing to pay. Conversely, if you’re targeting a niche market where customers value exclusivity or enhanced features, a higher price point might be appropriate—even if it means you'll need to adjust your offer over time as the market evolves.
In summary, our pricing strategy book advises that you focus on capturing customer value from the start by carefully segmenting your market and designing the right tiered packages. This way, whether you choose to start high or low, your initial pricing is closely aligned with customer needs and justified by the value provided—reducing the need for significant later price shifts.
1
Based on our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, here’s how to approach finding the right price for a brand new SaaS product when market data is scarce:
• Begin with exploratory market research
Since you’re launching a nascent product, rely on qualitative and beta testing methods. Talk to potential customers, run pilot programs, and collect early feedback. As noted in our assessment section (see Price to Scale, Chapter on “Early Product Launch”), you won’t have precise empirical data; hence, your goal should be to be directionally accurate rather than pinpoint perfect pricing from the outset.
• Understand your cost structure
The book emphasizes analyzing the difference between average and marginal cost. For a new SaaS product, your marginal cost (the cost of adding an extra user) is considerably lower than your average cost. This insight helps you define price floors and avoid overestimating costs, which could otherwise make you reluctant to explore lower-cost or freemium pricing models.
• Adopt a value‐based pricing mindset
Even with limited data, focus on the value your product delivers. Instead of basing your decision solely on what competitors might be doing or what your cost suggests, anchor your pricing on the tangible benefits and improvements your solution provides to customers.
• Be prepared to iterate
Recognize that early pricing is an evolving process. Use early customer interactions to refine your pricing strategy. Small-scale experiments and adjustments can help you hone in on the optimal price point as more data becomes available.
In summary, when launching a new SaaS product with little market data, Price to Scale recommends conducting robust market research, understanding your cost components, leveraging a value-based pricing perspective, and remaining agile. This approach ensures that you set a pricing strategy that is both directionally sound and adaptable as real market feedback rolls in.
1
Below are some key tips from our SaaS pricing book, Price to Scale, on implementing value-based pricing and quantifying the delivered value:
Directly Tie Price to Value Drivers
As discussed in Price to Scale, one effective approach is to identify the business outcomes your product delivers and then tie pricing to the metrics that reflect those outcomes. For example, rather than just basing fees on the number of users, focus on metrics like the number of customers reached or processed—especially if your module is more aligned with customer outcomes (see the modular pricing discussion on page 193).
Use the Good-Better-Best Framework
In our book (page 29), we detail a popular strategy of creating tiered packages—Good, Better, and Best. This approach segments your market by offering packages with varying features and associated value, ensuring that each segment pays a price that aligns with their realized value. This method is particularly useful when serving markets with relatively consistent purchasing capacity, such as SMB or Mid-Market segments.
Ensure Your Pricing Model is Simple, Measurable, and Scalable
A robust value-based pricing model should:
In summary, implementing value-based pricing in SaaS means aligning your pricing strategy with the outcomes that matter to your customers and ensuring that your model is simple to explain, measurable in its metrics, and scalable as your customer base grows. By leveraging frameworks like the Good-Better-Best packaging and by focusing on relevant, quantifiable metrics, you can better capture and align with the value you deliver.
1
Based on our SaaS pricing strategy book, Price to Scale, you should begin by aligning your pricing model with the way your product delivers value:
• First, ask whether your product is best viewed through the lens of being a capability (i.e., the set of features or modules provided) or if the key value comes from ongoing consumption. For example, if you’re offering a core set of functionalities that solve specific problems without dynamically scaling with use, a per-feature (capability) or tiered “Good-Better-Best” approach might be ideal. On the other hand, if your product’s value truly scales with how much customers use it, then a usage-based or even per-user model can be more apt.
• Next, consider the measurement:
– If you choose a consumption model, you need to determine what the key metric of usage is. This might involve deciding if usage is measured per seat, per API call, per data volume, or another unit that's directly tied to value.
– If you choose the capability model, you’re pricing based on distinct features or product modules. This approach can simplify decision-making for customers, as they see clear packages mapped to their needs and budget.
• Remember, our book emphasizes the importance of regularly evaluating and adjusting your pricing strategy to remain competitive as the market evolves. Whether you choose per-user, per-feature, or usage-based pricing, the key is to ensure that the pricing metric directly correlates with the value delivered to your customers.
In summary, decide on your pricing model by assessing whether your product primarily delivers value through its inherent capabilities or its scalable use, then select the model (per-user, per feature, or usage-based) that most closely aligns with that value proposition. This strategic alignment is crucial for creating a pricing structure that not only attracts the right customer segments but also allows your revenue to scale over time.
1
Based on our book, Price to Scale, the optimal pricing models for B2B SaaS can indeed differ significantly between small businesses and enterprise customers:
• For small businesses, our book recommends models that emphasize simplicity and ease of adoption. This generally means using value-based tiered pricing (or even usage-based pricing) where plans are standardized and self-service. This approach minimizes friction, makes the purchase decision more straightforward, and allows customers to grow into higher tiers as they need more advanced capabilities.
• For enterprise customers, the book advocates for a more customized, consultative pricing strategy. Enterprises typically have complex needs and may require tailored value propositions. Here, pricing should account for enterprise-specific requirements such as scalability, security, integration, and dedicated support. In many cases, a custom, negotiated contract with volume discounts and service-level guarantees is recommended.
• Using different strategies for each segment is strongly supported. The value delivered to small businesses often rests on low-touch acquisition and ease-of-use, while enterprise pricing centers on strategic relationships and sophisticated, scalable solutions. Customizing pricing to address these differences can optimize revenue capture and customer satisfaction across both segments.
In summary, our saas pricing book, Price to Scale, stresses that aligning your pricing model with the distinct value drivers of small businesses versus enterprises is key. For small businesses, a tiered or usage-based model is typically most effective, while enterprises benefit from a more tailored, negotiated approach. This segmentation helps ensure that each customer type perceives the value matching their specific needs and usage patterns.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.