
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.
Pricing strategy in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) is not merely about setting rates—it's about capturing the transformative value that automation delivers to enterprises while positioning for sustainable growth in a rapidly evolving market.
RPA vendors face distinct challenges when pricing their automation solutions due to the diverse spectrum of bot capabilities and deployment models. Attended bots (requiring human intervention) and unattended bots (fully autonomous) deliver different value propositions and require differentiated pricing approaches.
The complexity increases with AI integration—intelligent automation commands premium pricing but requires clear demonstration of additional value. According to industry research, AI-enhanced RPA bots typically command 30-45% higher pricing than standard automation bots due to their advanced capabilities in process intelligence and decision-making. (Radium AI)
The RPA market exhibits a fundamental tension between straightforward per-bot licensing models and more complex enterprise agreements. Major vendors like UiPath, Blue Prism, and Automation Anywhere employ different approaches—from consumption-based pricing tied to automation hours to fixed enterprise licensing with tiered feature sets.
This tension creates both challenges and opportunities: enterprises want predictable costs for budgeting purposes, but also flexibility to scale automation initiatives without prohibitive costs. RPA vendors must navigate this balance carefully, as pricing structures that work for initial implementation may create friction during expansion phases.
Perhaps the most significant pricing challenge in RPA revolves around connecting automation capabilities to measurable business outcomes. As automation increasingly drives procurement optimization, operational efficiency, and error reduction, customers expect pricing models that correlate with realized value.
This has accelerated the shift toward outcome-based and hybrid pricing models in the RPA space. According to industry projections, approximately 30% of enterprise SaaS offerings, including RPA solutions, will incorporate outcome-based components by 2025, reflecting growing customer demand for alignment between costs and value realization. (Monetizely)
The integration of artificial intelligence capabilities into RPA platforms creates additional pricing complexity. Traditional rule-based automation is giving way to intelligent process automation that can handle unstructured data, make decisions, and continuously improve performance through machine learning.
This evolution requires sophisticated approaches to feature valuation and pricing tier design. RPA vendors must clearly articulate the incremental value of AI capabilities while avoiding pricing structures that could limit adoption of these advanced features. The industry is still experimenting with optimal approaches to pricing AI-enhanced automation features—from premium tier placement to usage-based models tied to AI processing metrics.
Monetizely brings specialized expertise to RPA companies struggling with pricing strategy challenges. Our approach combines deep SaaS pricing knowledge with agile, research-driven methodologies tailored to the unique demands of automation software.
Our consulting team applies 28+ years of operational experience to help RPA providers develop pricing models that capture value while accelerating market adoption. We offer:
Pricing Strategy Alignment - We help RPA companies align pricing with their go-to-market strategy, especially for enterprise-focused automation solutions requiring high-ASP approaches.
Package Optimization - Our specialists have successfully rationalized complex product lines, reducing friction in the sales process while maintaining revenue integrity. For example, we helped an IT infrastructure management software company streamline from four packages to two with remapped feature-sets, creating a consistent pricing model that better monetized strategic features.
Usage-Based Pricing Implementation - Monetizely has direct experience implementing usage-based pricing models for digital communication platforms, incorporating platform fees and usage metrics that capture value without revenue reduction. This expertise is directly applicable to RPA companies shifting toward consumption-based pricing for bot utilization.
Metric Selection and Calibration - We guide RPA companies in selecting and calibrating the right pricing metrics—whether bot-based, process-based, or outcome-based—to match your technology and market position. In one case study, we helped establish a combination pricing metric based on users and customer revenue that significantly improved pricing alignment.
Monetizely employs a multi-faceted research approach to develop and validate RPA pricing strategies:
Quantitative Analysis - We employ Van Westendorp price sensitivity measurement and conjoint analysis to identify optimal price points and package configurations for RPA offerings.
Empirical Research - Our team analyzes pricing power across segments, evaluating $/metric performance to determine where automation value is best captured.
Qualitative Validation - We conduct in-person studies with potential customers to validate pricing and packaging decisions, ensuring market acceptance before full deployment.
Unlike traditional pricing consultants using rigid waterfall methods, Monetizely employs an agile, capital-efficient approach aligned with modern SaaS product development cycles. This ensures pricing strategies can evolve alongside rapidly advancing RPA technology.
Monetizely provides comprehensive implementation support to ensure successful pricing transitions:
Sales Enablement - We develop materials and training to help your sales team confidently communicate new RPA pricing models, achieving high adoption rates. In one case, we achieved 100% sales team adoption for a revamped pricing structure, resulting in 15-30% increases in average deal size.
Systems Integration - We guide implementation of usage-based pricing across product metering, billing, CPQ, and sales compensation systems—critical for RPA platforms transitioning to consumption models.
Customer Acceptance Testing - Our methodical approach includes customer acceptance testing to validate new pricing structures before full market rollout, reducing implementation risk.
RPA companies face unique pricing challenges as the industry evolves from simple automation to AI-enhanced intelligent process automation. Monetizely's product-first approach provides distinct advantages:
Product Management Expertise - Unlike pricing-only consultants, our team brings deep product management and marketing experience (16+ years), essential for understanding the nuances of RPA feature valuation.
Agile Methodology - Our research approach aligns with agile product development, enabling pricing strategy to evolve alongside rapidly changing automation technology.
Capital Efficiency - We deliver customized, impactful pricing research at significantly lower costs compared to traditional consulting approaches.
Implementation Focus - Beyond theoretical pricing models, we ensure successful real-world implementation with high sales team adoption and customer acceptance.
As the RPA industry continues its dramatic growth and evolution toward intelligent automation, having the right pricing strategy isn't just about maximizing revenue—it's about positioning for sustainable competitive advantage in a transformative market.
Contact Monetizely today to discuss how our specialized pricing expertise can help your RPA company capture the full value of your automation technology while accelerating market adoption and growth.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.
1
None of the other premier consultants have actually implemented complex pricing within companies like Twilio and Zoom. This requires operational systems understanding, not just strategy.
In addition, other consultants often "over egg the pudding", they know customers will buy approaches as long as they look/feel scientific, yet we have multiple customers who have spent more >$100k each on conjoint analysis which did not help them at all. We are careful with where we ask you to spend your money.
2
Willingness to pay is context-dependent and works best when analyzed alongside packaging and pricing metrics. We use structured surveys like Van Westendorp, Max Diff, Conjoint Analysis as well as in-person research interviews to gather actionable data.
3
The cost of milk or a McDonald's burger inflates. However, SaaS prices almost always deflate and requires both adjustment of product packages as well as innovation to remain relevant.
Additionally, AI adoption will drive a shift from user-based pricing to more usage/consumption based models to accommodate the very high costs of serving these products. Expect to see deflation over time here as well as the the cost of serving AI products drops by multiples every month.
4
We want to monitor discounting % per package, usage of features within the packages, upsell rate of features to see whether we have a good pricing motion or whether it needs adjusting.
5
The Monetizely team has over 28 years of collective experience in software pricing, having previously worked with industry leaders like Twilio, Zoom and DocuSign, ensuring expert guidance in SaaS pricing strategies.
6
We recommend doing a better job on the pricing testing phase and to mitigate risk roll out the pricing in a phased manner.
For 80-90% of cases, we do not recommend A/B testing as that creates too much market confusion and overhead (in certain cases, doing an advance roll out in a different geo can work).
7
Competitive information is helpful but only a small piece of the picture. Competitors are in different stages of growth. Their product functionality is also different.
We recently had a client where sales teams pushed for lower pricing to compete with current rivals, but the company’s strategic vision aimed to evolve into a new category, making the competitive pricing data less relevant.
8
To kickstart your SaaS pricing optimization, consider consulting with the experts at Monetizely. You can also deepen your understanding by reading our book "Price to Scale" and enrolling in "The Art of SaaS Pricing and Monetization" course on Maven. These resources are crafted to equip you with the necessary skills and knowledge to refine your pricing strategy effectively.