
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.
The pricing strategy you select for your no-code platform directly impacts not only your revenue growth but also your market position and customer adoption trajectory. A well-crafted pricing model aligns with your target customers' value perception while supporting your platform's long-term business objectives.
The no-code platform market presents unique pricing challenges that require specialized expertise to navigate effectively. Unlike traditional SaaS products, no-code platforms must balance multiple value dimensions and diverse customer usage patterns.
No-code platforms face a fundamental decision between usage-based metrics (API calls, app capacity, compute resources) and user-based pricing. Bubble's approach of charging based on application capacity and API calls contrasts with Retool's user-count pricing model, each reflecting different underlying value propositions and customer expectations. This choice impacts everything from revenue predictability to customer scaling behavior.
The vast feature set of modern no-code platforms creates significant challenges in tier design. Deciding which AI capabilities, integration options, or deployment features belong in which tier requires deep understanding of customer willingness to pay. According to research, misalignment between feature value and pricing tier placement is among the most common causes of customer confusion and adoption friction in the no-code space.
As customer applications built on no-code platforms grow, the pricing model must scale appropriately without creating unexpected cost spikes. Implementing effective guardrails while maintaining profitability represents a significant challenge, particularly when applications transition from development to production environments with dramatically different resource consumption patterns.
The broad appeal of no-code platforms to both individual makers and enterprise teams creates tension in pricing design. Enterprise requirements for compliance, security, and governance justify premium pricing, but platforms must simultaneously remain accessible to smaller customers who often become advocates driving enterprise adoption.
As AI capabilities become increasingly central to no-code platforms, determining how to price these high-value but resource-intensive features presents a significant challenge. Platforms must develop models that reflect the value delivered while accounting for the variable computational costs of AI implementations.
Monetizely brings specialized expertise to the unique pricing challenges facing no-code platform providers. Our approach combines deep SaaS pricing experience with a focus on the specific usage patterns and value metrics that drive success in the no-code sector.
Our comprehensive pricing services help no-code platforms develop optimized pricing strategies that accelerate growth and maximize customer lifetime value:
Usage-Based Pricing Implementation: Drawing on our experience implementing successful usage-based models for companies like Twilio, we help no-code platforms develop metrics that accurately reflect value delivery while protecting revenue. Our approach includes designing platform fee guardrails that prevent revenue drawdowns during model transitions while enabling new use cases.
Tiered Packaging Optimization: We help no-code platforms rationalize complex feature sets into clear, compelling packages that customers easily understand. For example, we guided an IT infrastructure management company in streamlining from four inconsistent packages to two clearly differentiated tiers with remapped feature sets, creating their first consistent pricing model.
Feature Prioritization & Monetization: Using our proprietary Max Diff analysis and qualitative research methods, we identify which no-code platform capabilities drive the highest willingness to pay, ensuring premium features like AI tools are positioned in tiers that maximize both adoption and revenue.
Pricing Research & Testing: Our approach combines statistical methodologies like Van Westendorp surveys with in-person qualitative validation to ensure pricing strategies resonate with your specific audience segments, from individual makers to enterprise clients.
Metric Selection & Calibration: We help no-code platforms identify the optimal combination of pricing metrics (users, usage, company size) to align pricing with value delivery. Our expertise includes developing hybrid models that balance predictability with growth potential.
Monetizely's approach has delivered measurable results for SaaS companies facing pricing challenges similar to those in the no-code space:
Revenue Protection During Model Transition: For a major digital communications platform, we implemented usage-based pricing while preventing a potential 50% revenue reduction, successfully integrating the new model with existing GTM systems.
Increased Deal Sizes: Our package rationalization and pricing alignment work helped an eCommerce SaaS provider increase deal sizes by 15-30% while achieving 100% sales team adoption of the new model.
Strategic Alignment: We've helped multiple SaaS companies align their pricing strategy with their go-to-market approach, creating coherent models that support specific business objectives whether targeting enterprise or self-service customers.
Monetizely stands apart from other pricing consultants through our operational background and tailored methodologies:
Product-First Perspective: Our team brings over 16 years of product marketing experience, ensuring pricing strategies that align with the agile development cycles common in no-code platforms.
Agile Research Methods: Rather than relying on costly, lengthy traditional research, we use structured in-person research that delivers actionable insights quickly, matching the pace of no-code platform evolution.
Capital Efficiency: Our customized research approach delivers high-impact insights at significantly lower costs than traditional methods, making comprehensive pricing strategy accessible to no-code platforms at all growth stages.
Deep SaaS Expertise: With 28+ years of operational experience in software pricing, we understand the nuances of subscription, usage-based, and consumption pricing models that drive success in the no-code space.
Ready to optimize your no-code platform's pricing strategy? Contact Monetizely today to discuss how our specialized pricing expertise can help you increase revenue, accelerate growth, and strengthen your competitive position.
[1] UserGuiding. (2025). 120+ No-Code/Low-Code Statistics and Trends. https://userguiding.com/blog/no-code-low-code-statistics
[2] Blaze.tech. (2025). 15 Best No-Code/Low-Code Platforms (2025): Features & Analysis. https://www.blaze.tech/post/no-code-low-code-platform
[3] Monetizely. (2025). Which No-Code Application Builder Offers Better Pricing? https://www.getmonetizely.com/articles/retool-vs-bubble-which-no-code-application-builder-offers-better-pricing
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.
1
None of the other premier consultants have actually implemented complex pricing within companies like Twilio and Zoom. This requires operational systems understanding, not just strategy.
In addition, other consultants often "over egg the pudding", they know customers will buy approaches as long as they look/feel scientific, yet we have multiple customers who have spent more >$100k each on conjoint analysis which did not help them at all. We are careful with where we ask you to spend your money.
2
Willingness to pay is context-dependent and works best when analyzed alongside packaging and pricing metrics. We use structured surveys like Van Westendorp, Max Diff, Conjoint Analysis as well as in-person research interviews to gather actionable data.
3
The cost of milk or a McDonald's burger inflates. However, SaaS prices almost always deflate and requires both adjustment of product packages as well as innovation to remain relevant.
Additionally, AI adoption will drive a shift from user-based pricing to more usage/consumption based models to accommodate the very high costs of serving these products. Expect to see deflation over time here as well as the the cost of serving AI products drops by multiples every month.
4
We want to monitor discounting % per package, usage of features within the packages, upsell rate of features to see whether we have a good pricing motion or whether it needs adjusting.
5
The Monetizely team has over 28 years of collective experience in software pricing, having previously worked with industry leaders like Twilio, Zoom and DocuSign, ensuring expert guidance in SaaS pricing strategies.
6
We recommend doing a better job on the pricing testing phase and to mitigate risk roll out the pricing in a phased manner.
For 80-90% of cases, we do not recommend A/B testing as that creates too much market confusion and overhead (in certain cases, doing an advance roll out in a different geo can work).
7
Competitive information is helpful but only a small piece of the picture. Competitors are in different stages of growth. Their product functionality is also different.
We recently had a client where sales teams pushed for lower pricing to compete with current rivals, but the company’s strategic vision aimed to evolve into a new category, making the competitive pricing data less relevant.
8
To kickstart your SaaS pricing optimization, consider consulting with the experts at Monetizely. You can also deepen your understanding by reading our book "Price to Scale" and enrolling in "The Art of SaaS Pricing and Monetization" course on Maven. These resources are crafted to equip you with the necessary skills and knowledge to refine your pricing strategy effectively.