
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.
Pricing strategy is the cornerstone of sustainable growth for manufacturing software providers, directly impacting profitability, market position, and customer acquisition costs. Effective pricing for manufacturing software solutions requires a strategic approach that balances value delivery with competitive positioning in an increasingly complex technology landscape.
Manufacturing software solutions face unique pricing challenges due to their deep integration requirements with production systems, ERPs, IoT devices, and other manufacturing technologies. These integrations create variable deployment costs and value realization timelines that must be reflected in pricing structures.
Traditional per-seat pricing models often fail in manufacturing environments where usage patterns vary dramatically across roles. Plant managers, line supervisors, and equipment operators all interact differently with the software, making user-based metrics inadequate for capturing the full value delivered.
The manufacturing sector spans from small specialized shops to massive global enterprises, each with distinct software needs and budget constraints. This diversity creates challenges for pricing strategies that must accommodate both ends of the spectrum while maintaining profitability.
Manufacturing software pricing must account for different operational models—discrete manufacturing, process manufacturing, hybrid manufacturing—each with distinct software utilization patterns and value drivers. According to Monetizely's research, rigid tiering structures often fail to address this heterogeneity, resulting in missed revenue opportunities and customer objections during the sales process.
The manufacturing software sector has been evolving away from simplistic subscription models toward more sophisticated approaches:
Outcome-based pricing has gained significant traction, linking software costs directly to measurable improvements in production metrics like yield rates, throughput, or downtime reduction. This approach requires sophisticated value measurement capabilities but creates powerful alignment between vendor and customer success.
Hybrid subscription-usage models have become increasingly prevalent, providing a baseline subscription with variable fees for intensive computational features like predictive maintenance analytics or AI-driven quality control. This balances predictable revenue with fair pricing based on actual value consumption.
Ecosystem-integrated pricing recognizes the interconnected nature of manufacturing software, with pricing structures that account for the breadth and depth of integrations with other systems in the customer's technology stack. This approach acknowledges that value increases with connectivity.
Vertical-specific tiering tailors packages specifically to manufacturing sub-segments (automotive, electronics, pharmaceuticals), recognizing their distinct requirements and value perceptions rather than using generic software tiers.
The incorporation of AI capabilities has created new pricing considerations for manufacturing software. AI features—particularly those focused on predictive maintenance, quality control, and production optimization—deliver substantial value but consume variable computing resources.
Manufacturing software vendors increasingly embed AI features into premium tiers or create usage-based pricing components specifically for AI functionality, recognizing both its high value and variable consumption patterns. According to recent industry analysis, this approach better aligns costs with value and accommodates the experimental adoption patterns many manufacturers exhibit with AI technologies.
Monetizely brings deep expertise in manufacturing software pricing strategy, having guided numerous SaaS providers through pricing transformations that drive revenue growth while reducing sales friction. Our approach combines rigorous research with practical implementation support tailored to the unique challenges of manufacturing software solutions.
A $10 million ARR manufacturing software company came to Monetizely with a critical pricing challenge. They were selling lump-sum subscriptions without specific packages or pricing metrics, resulting in inconsistent sales outcomes and significant customer objections during the sales process. Additionally, they had no way to monetize new strategic features being developed.
Monetizely guided the company from an ad-hoc pricing model to a structured approach that:
The result was the launch of the company's first consistent pricing model, dramatically reducing sales friction and improving revenue predictability.
Unlike traditional pricing consultants who rely exclusively on statistical methods, Monetizely employs a multi-faceted approach specifically designed for the manufacturing software sector:
Agile, In-Person Research: We conduct structured qualitative research with both customers and prospects to validate pricing and packaging approaches, providing insights that purely quantitative methods miss—particularly important in the heterogeneous manufacturing environment.
Statistical Validation: Our approach includes Price Point Measurement using Van Westendorp surveys and feature prioritization through Max Diff analysis to ensure pricing models are market-aligned.
Empirical Analysis: We examine tier/package performance, discount patterns, and usage analytics to identify opportunities for optimizing existing pricing structures and detecting undermonetized value.
Monetizely stands apart from other pricing consultants in several critical ways that benefit manufacturing software providers:
Product and Market Expertise: Our team brings over 16 years of product management and marketing experience, providing deep understanding of agile product launches and manufacturing market needs—not just pricing theory.
Capital Efficiency: We deliver customized, impactful research at significantly lower costs compared to traditional pricing consultants who rely on expensive conjoint analysis that often proves difficult to apply in manufacturing B2B settings.
Implementation Focus: Beyond strategy, we support the practical implementation of new pricing models, ensuring sales team adoption and customer transition management—critical factors in the success of pricing changes.
Monetizely offers a comprehensive suite of pricing services tailored to manufacturing software providers:
Pricing Strategy Consulting: End-to-end development of pricing models aligned with your manufacturing software's value proposition and go-to-market strategy.
Package Optimization: Rationalization of feature sets into coherent, value-based tiers that resonate with different manufacturing customer segments.
Pricing Metric Selection: Identification and validation of the right usage metrics that fairly capture value delivered to manufacturing operations.
Sales Enablement: Training and tools to help your sales team confidently articulate value and navigate pricing discussions with manufacturing prospects.
Usage-Based Pricing Implementation: Specialized guidance for transitioning from traditional subscription models to usage-based or hybrid approaches better suited to manufacturing software consumption patterns.
By partnering with Monetizely, manufacturing software companies gain a strategic advantage through pricing structures that maximize revenue while creating transparent value alignment with customers. Our proven methodology has helped SaaS providers achieve 15-30% increases in average deal size while reducing sales objections and accelerating the sales cycle.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.
1
None of the other premier consultants have actually implemented complex pricing within companies like Twilio and Zoom. This requires operational systems understanding, not just strategy.
In addition, other consultants often "over egg the pudding", they know customers will buy approaches as long as they look/feel scientific, yet we have multiple customers who have spent more >$100k each on conjoint analysis which did not help them at all. We are careful with where we ask you to spend your money.
2
Willingness to pay is context-dependent and works best when analyzed alongside packaging and pricing metrics. We use structured surveys like Van Westendorp, Max Diff, Conjoint Analysis as well as in-person research interviews to gather actionable data.
3
The cost of milk or a McDonald's burger inflates. However, SaaS prices almost always deflate and requires both adjustment of product packages as well as innovation to remain relevant.
Additionally, AI adoption will drive a shift from user-based pricing to more usage/consumption based models to accommodate the very high costs of serving these products. Expect to see deflation over time here as well as the the cost of serving AI products drops by multiples every month.
4
We want to monitor discounting % per package, usage of features within the packages, upsell rate of features to see whether we have a good pricing motion or whether it needs adjusting.
5
The Monetizely team has over 28 years of collective experience in software pricing, having previously worked with industry leaders like Twilio, Zoom and DocuSign, ensuring expert guidance in SaaS pricing strategies.
6
We recommend doing a better job on the pricing testing phase and to mitigate risk roll out the pricing in a phased manner.
For 80-90% of cases, we do not recommend A/B testing as that creates too much market confusion and overhead (in certain cases, doing an advance roll out in a different geo can work).
7
Competitive information is helpful but only a small piece of the picture. Competitors are in different stages of growth. Their product functionality is also different.
We recently had a client where sales teams pushed for lower pricing to compete with current rivals, but the company’s strategic vision aimed to evolve into a new category, making the competitive pricing data less relevant.
8
To kickstart your SaaS pricing optimization, consider consulting with the experts at Monetizely. You can also deepen your understanding by reading our book "Price to Scale" and enrolling in "The Art of SaaS Pricing and Monetization" course on Maven. These resources are crafted to equip you with the necessary skills and knowledge to refine your pricing strategy effectively.