
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.
Strategic pricing is the cornerstone of success in the rapidly evolving autonomous mobility sector, where traditional vehicle ownership models are being replaced by usage-based services and dynamic pricing mechanisms. The transition to autonomous technology fundamentally changes how mobility services create and capture value.
Autonomous mobility companies face unique challenges when determining their pricing architecture. Traditional transportation pricing models are often built around vehicle ownership or fixed subscription fees, which fail to capture the variable nature of autonomous services. These rigid approaches limit revenue potential and customer flexibility in a market that demands adaptability.
SaaS providers in this space must navigate the transition from fixed to usage-based pricing models. This shift requires sophisticated systems for tracking relevant metrics like distance traveled, passenger occupancy, time of day, and real-time demand patterns. According to recent research published in Networks and Spatial Economics, dynamic pricing models that account for demand-supply equilibrium can significantly increase both revenue and social welfare compared to static pricing.
Pricing strategies for autonomous mobility software must address the needs of multiple stakeholders within the ecosystem. Fleet operators require predictable costs to justify capital investments, while also desiring flexibility to capitalize on peak demand periods. End users expect transparent and fair pricing that competes with traditional transportation options.
This balancing act typically leads to hybrid pricing models combining subscription elements (for access to core platform features) with usage-based components (tied to specific value metrics). The difficulty lies in determining which features belong in the core platform fee versus which should be variable—a challenge that requires deep industry expertise and customer research.
Implementing usage-based or consumption-based pricing in autonomous mobility platforms presents technical challenges. Companies must develop reliable systems for:
These challenges are particularly acute for companies transitioning from traditional SaaS subscription pricing to more sophisticated usage-based models. According to industry analysts, organizations often underestimate the technical infrastructure required to support dynamic pricing mechanisms.
The autonomous mobility sector continues to experiment with appropriate value metrics for pricing. While traditional metrics like distance traveled remain relevant, emerging approaches include:
These evolving metrics require software pricing consultants to continually reassess and adapt pricing strategies as the market matures and customer expectations evolve.
Monetizely brings extensive expertise in developing and implementing strategic pricing models for technology companies transitioning to usage-based and dynamic pricing approaches. Our deep understanding of the autonomous mobility ecosystem enables us to help companies overcome the unique challenges of this rapidly evolving sector.
Our work with leading technology companies demonstrates our ability to successfully implement usage-based pricing models that align with business objectives while meeting customer expectations. In a notable case study, we helped a $3.95B digital communication SaaS leader (Twilio's Contact Center BU) successfully transition to usage-based pricing that:
This experience directly translates to the autonomous mobility sector, where similar transitions from fixed to usage-based pricing are becoming increasingly essential for competitiveness.
Monetizely employs a multi-faceted approach to pricing research that combines quantitative analysis with qualitative insights, ideal for the complex autonomous mobility market:
This comprehensive approach ensures that autonomous mobility companies develop pricing models that reflect real market conditions and customer preferences rather than theoretical constructs.
For autonomous mobility companies, aligning pricing strategy with go-to-market motion is critical. Monetizely specializes in this alignment, as demonstrated by our work with:
We apply these proven methodologies to autonomous mobility companies, helping them develop pricing structures that support their specific market position, whether targeting fleet operators, mobility service providers, or technology partners.
Our approach stands apart from other pricing consultants in several key ways that benefit autonomous mobility companies:
For autonomous mobility software providers, we offer specialized services addressing the unique challenges of this emerging sector:
By partnering with Monetizely, autonomous mobility companies gain access to pricing expertise that bridges technical understanding with market reality, enabling them to create sustainable competitive advantage through optimized pricing strategies.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.
1
None of the other premier consultants have actually implemented complex pricing within companies like Twilio and Zoom. This requires operational systems understanding, not just strategy.
In addition, other consultants often "over egg the pudding", they know customers will buy approaches as long as they look/feel scientific, yet we have multiple customers who have spent more >$100k each on conjoint analysis which did not help them at all. We are careful with where we ask you to spend your money.
2
Willingness to pay is context-dependent and works best when analyzed alongside packaging and pricing metrics. We use structured surveys like Van Westendorp, Max Diff, Conjoint Analysis as well as in-person research interviews to gather actionable data.
3
The cost of milk or a McDonald's burger inflates. However, SaaS prices almost always deflate and requires both adjustment of product packages as well as innovation to remain relevant.
Additionally, AI adoption will drive a shift from user-based pricing to more usage/consumption based models to accommodate the very high costs of serving these products. Expect to see deflation over time here as well as the the cost of serving AI products drops by multiples every month.
4
We want to monitor discounting % per package, usage of features within the packages, upsell rate of features to see whether we have a good pricing motion or whether it needs adjusting.
5
The Monetizely team has over 28 years of collective experience in software pricing, having previously worked with industry leaders like Twilio, Zoom and DocuSign, ensuring expert guidance in SaaS pricing strategies.
6
We recommend doing a better job on the pricing testing phase and to mitigate risk roll out the pricing in a phased manner.
For 80-90% of cases, we do not recommend A/B testing as that creates too much market confusion and overhead (in certain cases, doing an advance roll out in a different geo can work).
7
Competitive information is helpful but only a small piece of the picture. Competitors are in different stages of growth. Their product functionality is also different.
We recently had a client where sales teams pushed for lower pricing to compete with current rivals, but the company’s strategic vision aimed to evolve into a new category, making the competitive pricing data less relevant.
8
To kickstart your SaaS pricing optimization, consider consulting with the experts at Monetizely. You can also deepen your understanding by reading our book "Price to Scale" and enrolling in "The Art of SaaS Pricing and Monetization" course on Maven. These resources are crafted to equip you with the necessary skills and knowledge to refine your pricing strategy effectively.