.png)
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Introduction
In the competitive SaaS landscape, pricing is not just a number—it's a strategic lever that can dramatically impact growth, customer acquisition, and long-term revenue. Among the various pricing research methodologies available to SaaS executives, the Gabor-Granger method stands out as a particularly structured approach for determining price sensitivity and optimal price points. For subscription-based businesses seeking to optimize their pricing strategy, understanding this methodology—its strengths and limitations—can be invaluable.
What is the Gabor-Granger Method?
Named after economists Clive Gabor and John Granger who developed it in the 1960s, the Gabor-Granger method is a quantitative price testing approach that directly asks potential customers about their willingness to pay for a product or service. The methodology follows a specific structure:
- Respondents are shown a product or service description
- They are presented with a series of price points in either ascending or descending order
- At each price point, respondents indicate whether they would purchase at that price
- Data is collected to determine the optimal price that maximizes revenue
This direct questioning creates a demand curve that shows the relationship between price points and purchase probability, enabling SaaS companies to identify revenue-maximizing prices for their offerings.
Benefits of the Gabor-Granger Method for SaaS Companies
1. Simplicity and Cost-Effectiveness
The Gabor-Granger methodology is relatively straightforward to implement compared to more complex pricing research approaches. According to a study by ProfitWell, companies that implement structured pricing research see 10-15% higher revenue growth than those that don't, and Gabor-Granger offers an accessible entry point into such research.
2. Clear Revenue Optimization
By calculating the estimated revenue at each price point (price × percentage of respondents willing to pay), SaaS executives can visualize the price that maximizes revenue. This clarity helps in making data-driven pricing decisions rather than relying on industry norms or competitor benchmarking.
3. Segmentation Opportunities
The collected data can be analyzed across different customer segments, revealing how price sensitivity varies among different user groups. This insight is particularly valuable for SaaS companies with multiple buyer personas or considering tiered pricing models.
4. Quick Iteration for Subscription Tiers
For SaaS businesses with multiple subscription tiers, the Gabor-Granger method can be efficiently applied across different feature sets to optimize pricing for each tier. Research by Simon-Kucher & Partners indicates that companies with properly optimized tiered pricing can increase revenue by up to 25%.
Limitations and Drawbacks of the Methodology
1. Hypothetical Bias
Perhaps the most significant limitation is that Gabor-Granger relies on stated preferences rather than observed behavior. Respondents often overstate their willingness to pay in hypothetical scenarios compared to real purchasing situations. According to pricing expert Patrick Campbell, hypothetical bias can lead to price estimations that are 15-30% higher than actual market performance.
2. Single-Feature Focus
The method typically evaluates products as a whole, making it challenging to assess the value contribution of individual features. For feature-rich SaaS products, this can be particularly problematic when trying to determine which features should be included in which pricing tiers.
3. Competitive Context Limitations
Gabor-Granger testing occurs in isolation without competitive context. In the real SaaS marketplace, customers evaluate pricing relative to alternatives. A survey by Paddle found that 98% of SaaS buyers compare at least three options before making a purchase decision—a reality not captured in standard Gabor-Granger testing.
4. Static Nature vs. Dynamic Subscription Reality
The method provides a snapshot of pricing sensitivity at a specific moment, but SaaS subscription pricing operates in a dynamic environment where customer value perception evolves over time. The method doesn't account for value realization throughout the customer lifecycle.
Implementing Gabor-Granger Effectively in SaaS
To maximize the benefits while mitigating the drawbacks of this pricing methodology, SaaS executives should consider the following approaches:
Combine with Other Pricing Research Methods
Use Gabor-Granger alongside other pricing research techniques like Van Westendorp's Price Sensitivity Meter, conjoint analysis, or actual market testing. According to OpenView Partners' SaaS Pricing Survey, companies using multiple pricing research methodologies achieve 30% higher revenue growth than those relying on a single method.
Test with Actual Customers
While testing with prospects provides valuable data, including current customers in your pricing research can offer insights on perceived value based on actual experience with your product. Their feedback tends to be more grounded in reality.
Incorporate Competitive Context
Modify the standard approach by providing respondents with information about competitive alternatives to create a more realistic decision environment. This adaptation helps address one of the method's key limitations.
Use for Directional Guidance, Not Absolute Numbers
Treat Gabor-Granger results as directional insights rather than definitive pricing mandates. The method is more reliably used to understand relative price sensitivity than to set exact price points.
Conclusion
The Gabor-Granger method offers SaaS executives a structured approach to pricing optimization that balances simplicity with quantitative rigor. Its clear methodology for identifying revenue-maximizing price points provides valuable input for subscription pricing decisions. However, its limitations—particularly hypothetical bias and the absence of competitive context—make it most effective when used as part of a comprehensive pricing research strategy rather than in isolation.
For SaaS companies focused on pricing optimization, the Gabor-Granger method represents one important tool in a broader toolkit. By understanding both its benefits and drawbacks, executives can leverage this methodology appropriately within their pricing research efforts, ultimately developing more effective pricing strategies that balance customer acquisition, retention, and revenue optimization in the competitive SaaS marketplace.