.png)
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
In the competitive SaaS landscape, pricing strategy can make or break your growth trajectory. With subscription models becoming increasingly complex, more companies are turning to structured pricing research to gain an edge. Two methodologies stand out in this arena: conjoint analysis and direct price testing. But which approach delivers the most reliable insights for SaaS businesses? This article explores both methodologies, their strengths, limitations, and how to determine which is right for your pricing optimization needs.
Understanding the Fundamentals of Pricing Research Methods
What is Conjoint Analysis?
Conjoint analysis is a statistical technique that measures how consumers value different features that make up a product or service. In SaaS contexts, it simulates purchase decisions by presenting respondents with various product configurations (including different pricing levels) and asking them to make trade-off decisions between these options.
For example, a B2B software company might test combinations of:
- Three pricing tiers ($49, $99, $199 per month)
- Feature set A, B, or C
- Monthly vs. annual billing
- Different levels of customer support
The analysis reveals which features drive the most value and the price sensitivity around different offering combinations, providing a mathematical model of customer preferences.
What is Direct Price Testing?
Direct price testing, as the name suggests, involves experimenting with actual prices in the market. This can take several forms:
- A/B testing different price points to real website visitors
- Sequential price testing (changing prices over time and measuring response)
- Regional or segment-based price variations
- Time-limited promotional pricing with careful measurement
Unlike conjoint analysis, direct testing observes actual purchase behavior rather than stated preferences in a survey environment.
Key Differences in Methodology and Application
Research Context vs. Real-World Data
Conjoint analysis operates in a research context, asking customers what they would hypothetically choose. Direct price testing captures actual purchasing decisions with real money on the line. This fundamental difference has cascading implications for both approaches.
According to research from Price Intelligently, there can be up to a 20% discrepancy between what customers say they would pay in surveys versus what they actually pay in real-world situations.
Risk Profile and Implementation Complexity
Direct price testing carries inherent business risks. Testing higher prices could alienate potential customers, while testing lower prices might leave revenue on the table or create awkward situations when prices eventually increase.
Conjoint analysis, being conducted in a controlled research environment, eliminates these risks but introduces methodological challenges. The quality of results depends heavily on survey design, sample selection, and analytical expertise.
Time to Insights
A comprehensive conjoint analysis study typically requires:
- 2-3 weeks for design and setup
- 1-2 weeks for data collection
- 1-2 weeks for analysis and recommendations
In contrast, direct price testing might require:
- 1 week for setup
- 4+ weeks of testing to reach statistical significance
- 1 week for analysis
The timeline advantage varies based on your customer volume and purchase frequency.
When to Use Conjoint Analysis for SaaS Pricing
Conjoint analysis shines in specific SaaS pricing scenarios:
1. New Product Launches
When launching a new SaaS product, you have no existing customers to test with. Conjoint analysis allows you to simulate market reactions before writing a single line of code.
2. Complex Multi-Attribute Offerings
Many SaaS products offer numerous features across different pricing tiers. Conjoint analysis excels at determining which features should live in which tiers and how much value customers place on each element.
A study by ProfitWell found that SaaS companies with more than 4 feature tiers benefited most from conjoint-based pricing research, achieving 13% higher average revenue per user compared to companies using simpler pricing research methods.
3. Understanding Willingness to Pay Across Segments
Conjoint analysis can reveal how willingness to pay varies across different customer segments. This information helps create targeted pricing strategies for different market segments or even personalized pricing approaches.
When to Use Direct Price Testing for SaaS Products
Direct price testing delivers greatest value in these scenarios:
1. Established Products with Sufficient Traffic
For SaaS products with substantial monthly visitor numbers, direct testing can deliver statistically significant results in reasonable timeframes.
2. Testing Small Pricing Changes
If you're considering a modest price increase (e.g., 10-15%) on an existing product, direct testing can validate whether the market will accept this change with minimal disruption.
3. Promotional Pricing Effectiveness
For SaaS companies that run occasional promotions, direct testing helps optimize discount levels, timing, and messaging to maximize both conversion and revenue.
Practical Implementation Considerations
Conjoint Analysis Best Practices for SaaS
Limit attributes and levels: Test no more than 6-7 attributes with 3-4 levels each to prevent respondent fatigue.
Include competitive context: Frame choices in relation to competitive alternatives for more realistic responses.
Sample carefully: Ensure respondents represent your target customers, not just any available survey participants.
Validate with existing data: Cross-check findings against any historical pricing data you may have.
Direct Price Testing Best Practices for SaaS
Test one variable at a time: Changing multiple elements simultaneously makes it difficult to determine what drove results.
Ensure statistical significance: Don't draw conclusions from tests with insufficient data.
Consider cohort impacts: SaaS businesses should analyze how pricing changes affect long-term metrics like retention, not just initial conversion.
Plan for grandfathering: Determine in advance how existing customers will be treated if price tests lead to permanent changes.
Combining Approaches for Maximum Impact
Many successful SaaS companies use both methodologies in a complementary fashion:
Begin with conjoint analysis to establish baseline understanding of pricing structure, feature bundling, and segment-specific willingness to pay.