
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Our exclusive survey reveals what Americans really think about humanoid companions—and the price is shocking
Per Monetizely's Van Westendorp survey technique the Optimal Price Point (OPP) is ~$15,000. A price acceptable to the most number of people.
18-24 year olds are willing to pay higher than other ages for robot love with a $33k max avg price point. $3k higher than other brackets!
Average "too cheap" threshold at $7.9K (median $3K) shows Americans fear bargain-bin robots. If it's under $3K, it's probably junk.
Men: $33,616 average "too expensive" threshold
Women: $27,841 average threshold
Men show higher willingness to pay for robot companionship by nearly $6K on average.
Higher income brackets show both higher price tolerance AND more openness to robot relationships. $100K+ Earners: $34,503 average threshold. When you can afford premium companions, the taboo factor decreases.
Survey shows Master education people start to question the quality of a robot below $13k, the number for other groups is $3k! Indicating the robots may face a Veblen goods phenomenon with certain segments - i.e. more expensive may be percieved better amongst some segments. Where are the designer robots?
40% would sometimes use AI relationship coaching, but 27% say conflict needs to be real. The future of marriage counseling might be silicon-based, but humans still crave authentic struggle.
41% rarely use fantasy features because "fantasies are meant to be shared in human connection." But 13% would go daily to "unlock hidden desires"—a clear split between connection seekers and solo explorers.
39% would miss "messy, human post-intimacy moments" while 16% think they'd "feel more emotionally seen than ever before." The uncanny valley of artificial empathy—too perfect becomes unsettling.