
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.
Yes, AI companies should consider different pricing approaches for training versus inference, as these represent distinct phases with different value propositions and cost structures.
Training and inference have fundamentally different resource consumption patterns. Training is compute-intensive, requiring significant processing power and time, while inference is typically lighter but may need to scale to handle many concurrent requests. These distinct cost profiles warrant different pricing structures.
The value derived from each phase differs significantly:
For training:
For inference:
Our pricing strategy approach for AI companies includes:
Many AI companies find that a hybrid approach works best, combining elements of subscription pricing for predictability with usage-based components that capture additional value from heavy users.
The right approach ultimately depends on your specific AI offering, target market segments, and overall business strategy. A tailored pricing model that reflects both your cost structure and the distinct value propositions of training versus inference will maximize both adoption and profitability.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.