
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.
Quick Answer: While pricing optimization matters, choosing a high-growth market with strong buying dynamics, urgent pain points, and favorable competitive conditions delivers 3-5x more impact on revenue growth than pricing tweaks—because you can't price your way into a market that doesn't value your solution.
Every quarter, SaaS leadership teams gather to analyze metrics, and inevitably, someone suggests adjusting pricing. Maybe a new tier, perhaps value-based packaging, or repositioning against competitors. It feels productive. It's measurable. And it's often the wrong priority.
Here's the uncomfortable truth about market selection strategy: the ceiling on your growth isn't set by your pricing page—it's set by the market you chose to serve. TAM-led growth beats pricing optimization because you're working with market pull rather than pricing push.
Pricing feels controllable. You can A/B test it, model scenarios, and see immediate revenue impact. This creates a dangerous comfort zone where teams perfect their pricing architecture while ignoring whether they're selling to the right buyers in the first place.
The diminishing returns are real. After initial price optimization (typically 10-20% improvement), each subsequent tweak yields smaller gains. Meanwhile, companies operating in high-growth markets with mediocre pricing consistently outperform those with sophisticated pricing in stagnant markets.
The core mistake? Optimizing pricing before validating that your market has the urgency, budget, and buying behavior to sustain growth. You're essentially perfecting the engine while ignoring that you're driving on the wrong road.
Most TAM analyses stop at market size. "It's a $50 billion market" sounds impressive in board decks but tells you nothing about whether you can capture meaningful share.
Effective market selection examines industry dynamics vs pricing considerations: How do buyers actually purchase? What triggers buying urgency? Where do budgets get allocated first during downturns? Are there regulatory or technological tailwinds creating momentum?
These dynamics determine whether your market will pull your product forward or whether you'll exhaust resources pushing against indifferent buyers.
A market growing 25% annually creates natural expansion opportunities. New budget gets allocated, new buyers enter, and competitive pressure decreases as demand outpaces supply. No pricing strategy replicates this effect.
Markets where your solution addresses compliance requirements, revenue generation, or cost reduction during economic pressure will always outperform "nice-to-have" categories. Urgency creates shortened sales cycles and reduced price sensitivity.
Some markets feature buyers who understand their problems, have budget authority, and purchase quarterly. Others require extensive education, committee approval, and annual budget cycles. Your market's buying behavior determines velocity regardless of price.
Entering markets with high switching costs and entrenched competitors requires massive resources. Markets with emerging categories or fragmented incumbents offer faster paths to meaningful share.
Move beyond total addressable market to serviceable obtainable market (SOM). This requires honest assessment:
Market Accessibility Score: Can you reach buyers through existing channels? What's the customer acquisition cost relative to lifetime value?
Solution Fit Assessment: Does your current product genuinely solve the market's primary pain point, or does it require significant adaptation?
Competitive Win Probability: Based on your differentiation, what's a realistic win rate against established players?
Expansion Potential: Do customers in this segment naturally expand usage, or is growth purely acquisition-dependent?
Scoring markets across these dimensions reveals where resources generate maximum return—information no pricing analysis provides.
Vertical SaaS Success: Toast focused exclusively on restaurants rather than competing as a generic POS system. The market's specific pain points (online ordering, delivery integration) created urgency that generic competitors couldn't match. Their pricing is straightforward; their market selection was precise.
Horizontal Repositioning: Slack initially targeted tech teams before expanding. By dominating a segment with high urgency and word-of-mouth behavior, they built momentum that pricing optimization alone couldn't generate.
Missed Market Dynamics: Countless SaaS companies with sophisticated pricing models have failed in markets experiencing consolidation, budget cuts, or shifting priorities. Great pricing cannot overcome market headwinds.
Pricing isn't irrelevant—it's sequential. Once you've validated market-driven growth, pricing optimization becomes an accelerator.
The correct sequence:
Pricing optimization assumes market fit exists. Without that foundation, you're optimizing an equation with a fundamental error.
Assess your current market with these five metrics:
Patterns in this data reveal whether you're operating in favorable market conditions or fighting against structural headwinds.
Days 1-30: Assessment
Days 31-60: Validation
Days 61-90: Alignment
The companies that dominate don't win on pricing. They win by choosing markets where demand pulls them forward, where buyers have urgency and budget, and where competitive dynamics favor growth. Pricing follows; market selection leads.
Download our Market Selection Scorecard: 15-minute assessment to determine if you're targeting the right segments for growth.

Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.