
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.
Your Ideal Customer Profile (ICP) matters for SaaS pricing because it defines who you are building and pricing for, which drives what value metrics to use, which features to bundle, how to set willingness-to-pay–based price points, and where to segment your offers. A clear ICP lets you align packaging and pricing with the specific pains, budgets, and buying processes of your best-fit customers—leading to higher win rates, better expansion, and less discounting.
In a SaaS context, your Ideal Customer Profile for SaaS is a concrete definition of the organizations that are the best fit for your product economically, operationally, and strategically—not just “people who could use it.”
For B2B SaaS, an ICP typically includes:
This is customer profiling for SaaS with a pricing lens: who derives outsized value, closes faster, expands more, and churns less.
Personas help with messaging. Target markets help with TAM decks.
Your ICP is what should drive your SaaS pricing.
Common failure patterns when pricing isn’t grounded in a shared ICP:
If you can’t answer “Who exactly are we pricing for?” in one specific paragraph, your pricing work will default to copying competitors or internal politics, not your market reality.
Once your ideal customer profile for SaaS is clear, the major pricing choices fall out more logically:
ICP → Value Proposition → Value Metric → Pricing Model
Example 1 – SMB Self-Serve ICP
Example 2 – Enterprise Sales-Led ICP
Same category of product. Very different SaaS ICP segmentation and therefore very different pricing norms, list levels, and discount strategies.
If your ICP is “a bit of both,” you’re forcing one model to do two jobs—and that’s when your pricing and packaging begin to break.
Even with one primary ICP, you almost always need sub-segments for pricing purposes. This is where SaaS ICP segmentation turns into a concrete pricing architecture.
Common pattern: one ICP, three economic segments within it:
Too many SaaS products segment purely by user count, even when:
Instead, segment around:
For most B2B SaaS, your ICP naturally maps to:
Good (Starter / Team)
Small teams within your ICP.
Core features for a narrow use case.
Lower price point, usage limits, minimal governance.
Better (Growth / Professional)
Standard deployment level for your primary ICP segment.
Full value for your core use cases.
Higher limits, key integrations, some admin control.
Best (Enterprise)
Large, complex accounts within your ICP.
Advanced security, compliance, customization.
Custom quotes, volume pricing, commercial flexibility.
The point: your pricing segmentation ICP should reflect how value and complexity scale inside your ICP—not random feature gating to hit three price points.
Your ICP is your best guide to what you charge for and how you bundle features.
Look at your ICP and ask:
Examples:
Dev tools ICP
ICP: Engineering orgs, technical buyers.
Value metric: API calls, build minutes, compute, error events—metrics they already track.
SaaS pricing model: usage-based with committed minimums for bigger teams.
Sales/RevOps ICP
ICP: B2B sales teams, CRO as buyer.
Value metric: sales seats or active reps.
SaaS pricing model: per-seat subscription, sometimes augmented with volume pricing on records or contacts.
Fintech/Payments ICP
ICP: merchants or platforms processing transactions.
Value metric: GMV processed, transactions, or accounts under management.
SaaS pricing model: % of volume + platform fee.
You want the value metric to track how your ICP actually experiences value, not just what’s easiest for your billing system.
Your ICP’s risk posture and budget process dictate how you handle overages and variability:
ICP that values predictability (e.g., finance, public sector, legacy enterprises):
Prefer flat per-seat or per-asset pricing, higher base with generous included usage.
Soft or capped overages, or automatic plan bumping after clear thresholds.
Annual true-ups instead of volatile monthly invoices.
ICP that values flexibility and experimentation (e.g., startups, product-led orgs, marketing agencies):
Comfortable with usage-based or hybrid models.
Lower base fees, clear overage rates.
Self-serve plan changes.
Pricing friction often appears when your value metric or overage structure doesn’t match your ICP’s mental model of SaaS cost.
Feature packaging should mirror your ICP’s pain and sophistication curve:
If your entry tier contains advanced compliance and custom reporting your ICP doesn’t yet value, you’re misallocating pricing power.
Once you know who you’re pricing for and how they get value, your ICP helps you estimate willingness-to-pay (WTP) and set rational price levels and guardrails.
For each major ICP segment, define:
Then calibrate:
Common mistake: staring at competitor pricing pages and then “anchoring slightly above or below.”
Better approach:
Start with ICP WTP from:
Customer interviews (“At what price would this feel expensive but still worth it?”).
Historical deal data (where did deals stall on price? where did you win easily?).
Expansion patterns (what do good-fit customers happily pay more for?).
Then use competitor pricing as:
A sanity check on market norms.
A positioning tool (“We’re premium because…”, “We’re simpler because…”).
Your ICP—not your competitor’s pricing team—should set your SaaS cost logic.
ICP summary
Seed–Series C SaaS companies, 10–100 engineers, using modern CI/CD and cloud-native stacks.
Buyer: VP Eng or CTO. Primary value: faster deployments, fewer incidents.
Pricing model
Hybrid subscription + usage: base platform fee + metered usage (build minutes, test runs).
Tiers
Starter: limited projects, no SSO, community support.
Growth: more projects, priority support, parallel builds.
Enterprise: SSO, audit logs, custom SLAs, on-prem runners.
Value metric
Usage units (build minutes / pipelines) tied to team size; higher tiers include committed usage.
Same product could look wrong for a different ICP (e.g., solo devs or hobby projects) because their willingness-to-pay and use cases are totally different.
ICP summary
200–2,000 employee companies, multi-location, HR team of 3–10, global payroll complexity.
Buyer: Head of People / HR, sometimes CFO.
Pricing model
Per-employee-per-month (PEPM) subscription.
Tiers
Core HR: employee records, basic workflows.
Plus: performance, engagement, integrations with payroll and ATS.
Enterprise: custom workflows, advanced analytics, data residency, SSO.
Value metric
Active employees, with volume discounts at scale.
This would fail for an ICP of 20-person agencies; they’d see it as bloated and overpriced. An “SMB CRM ICP” would need much lower PEPM, lighter features, and maybe a freemium motion.
ICP summary
Retail chains with 10–500 stores, fragmented operations, and compliance reporting needs.
Buyer: VP Operations or COO.
Pricing model
Per-location-per-month with a minimum platform fee.
Tiers
Basic: store task management, basic reporting.
Pro: compliance workflows, photo capture, integrations with POS.
Enterprise: multi-region governance, custom reporting, white-labeling, dedicated CSM.
Value metric
Number of locations (tracks nicely with complexity and value), not number of users.
Try to sell the same product per-seat and you’d misalign pricing with how Ops leaders think about their business (they manage stores, not usernames).
If your ICP was originally created for marketing, it’s usually not pricing-ready. You need to add economic and behavioral detail.
You should be able to answer for each primary ICP segment:
If you can’t fill this in, your customer profiling for SaaS isn’t ready to drive pricing decisions yet.
Defining an ICP isn’t the win; operationalizing it across sales, product, and finance is.
Custom quotes
Use ICP segment (size, use case, compliance needs) to select baseline tier and pricing metric.
Only deviate when there’s a concrete, documented reason aligned with long-term value.
Discount decisions
Follow discount bands by ICP segment and deal size.
Flag deals where discounting exceeds band as “out-of-ICP” or “strategic exception” with explicit approval.
New plan design
Validate new tiers against ICP segments and use cases (does this match a real pattern, or is it for an edge case?).
Prioritize features into tiers based on where your primary ICP truly starts to value them.
Value metric evolution
Watch how your ICP uses the product and what they complain about in billing.
Adjust limits, bundles, and overage rules to match real-world value and predictability needs.
Forecasting & planning
Build models around your core ICP segments: close rates, ACV, expansion potential, discount averages.
Track margins by segment (some ICP-adjacent customers might look attractive on ACV but destroy support margins).
Guardrails & governance
Set floor prices, standard deal structures, and discount approvals by ICP segment.
Regularly review “exception” deals to avoid quiet ICP drift.
Watch for these signals:
Heavy, inconsistent discounting
Reps discount wildly to close deals because list prices don’t match what your real ICP will pay.
Attracting wrong-fit customers
Many tiny accounts that churn quickly or are product-misaligned → pricing too low or entry tier trying to serve a non-ICP.
Churn concentrated in specific segments
Particularly in segments outside your defined ICP, or at smaller ACV bands.
Pipeline full but close rates poor on core segment
Indicates your target market is broad but your ICP is unclear—or your pricing is optimized for an ICP you no longer truly serve.
Sales constantly asking for new SKUs or one-off contracts
Sign of a fragmented ICP or pricing architecture that doesn’t reflect real segments.
When you see these patterns, the fix is rarely “tweak the price by 10%.” It’s typically revisit your SaaS ICP segmentation and pricing architecture.
Treating your ICP as the foundation of your SaaS pricing (instead of just a marketing exercise) leads to:
For the next 7 days, focus on three actions:
Then, iterate your pricing and packaging with that ICP front and center.
Download our ICP-to-Pricing Worksheet to map your best-fit customers directly to your current plans and price points.

Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.