.png)
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
In today's competitive landscape, wealth management firms are increasingly turning to SaaS solutions to streamline operations, enhance client experiences, and drive growth. However, for vendors serving this market, selecting the right pricing metric isn't just a business decision—it's strategic positioning that can make or break market adoption. Should you charge per seat like traditional software, per transaction to align with usage, or per outcome to demonstrate value? Let's explore which approach best serves both wealth management firms and their SaaS providers.
Understanding the Wealth Management SaaS Ecosystem
Wealth management firms rely on sophisticated software platforms for portfolio management, client relationship management, financial planning, compliance, and reporting. These firms range from small independent advisories to massive enterprise operations managing billions in assets.
According to a recent Deloitte study, over 85% of wealth management executives consider technology adoption crucial to maintaining competitive advantage. This growing dependency creates both opportunity and responsibility for SaaS vendors to structure pricing that aligns with how value is created and perceived in this industry.
The Three Primary Pricing Approaches
Per-Seat Pricing
How it works: Firms pay based on the number of users (advisors, administrators, analysts) accessing the platform.
Advantages for wealth management:
- Predictable costs that scale with team size
- Simple to budget and forecast
- Clear enterprise pricing structure for procurement teams
Disadvantages:
- May create access barriers within the organization
- Doesn't necessarily align with value created
- Can lead to sharing credentials (violating compliance and SOX requirements)
Transaction-Based Pricing
How it works: Pricing is tied to usage metrics like number of client accounts managed, AUM (Assets Under Management), or number of trades/transactions processed.
Advantages for wealth management:
- Usage-based pricing aligns costs with actual platform utilization
- Scales naturally with business growth
- Lower barrier to entry for smaller firms
Disadvantages:
- Less predictable costs
- May create incentives to limit platform use
- Can become expensive as transaction volume grows
Outcome-Based Pricing
How it works: Pricing tied to measurable business outcomes such as client retention, growth in AUM, or investment performance.
Advantages for wealth management:
- Value-based pricing directly connects software expense to business outcomes
- Creates shared incentives between vendor and wealth management firm
- Demonstrates vendor confidence in their solution
Disadvantages:
- Complex to implement and measure
- Requires sophisticated reporting and attribution
- May introduce compliance considerations
What's Working Best in the Market Today
Research from consulting firm McKinsey reveals that SaaS companies serving financial services are increasingly adopting hybrid pricing models. The most successful combine a base subscription (often seat-based) with usage components that scale with value.
For wealth management specifically, industry trends suggest:
Enterprise-oriented firms (over $1B AUM) prefer predictable, seat-based pricing with volume discounts and custom price fences to accommodate their complex organizational structures.
Mid-sized firms ($100M-$1B AUM) gravitate toward tiered pricing models that combine seat licenses with usage-based components.
Smaller practices (under $100M AUM) respond best to simple usage-based pricing with clear tiers to prevent bill shock.
Selecting the Right Approach for Your SaaS Offering
When determining which pricing metric fits best, consider:
1. Value Attribution
Ask: "How do wealth management firms measure the value of our solution?"
If value comes primarily from:
- Team collaboration and workflow efficiency → Per-seat makes sense
- Processing volume or AUM → Transaction-based aligns better
- Direct business results → Outcome-based creates alignment
2. Customer Maturity
Newer wealth management customers often prefer simpler models with predictability. As they grow sophisticated in measuring ROI, they become more receptive to value-based approaches.
3. Competitive Landscape
According to a 2023 industry analysis, 58% of wealth management SaaS solutions still use seat-based pricing, though this percentage is declining as more innovative models emerge.
Building a Hybrid Model: The Emerging Best Practice
The most successful pricing strategies for wealth management SaaS today incorporate elements from multiple approaches:
Base platform fee (often per seat or per firm) that provides access to core functionality
Usage-based components tied to value metrics specific to wealth management:
- Number of client portfolios managed
- AUM tiers
- Advanced feature utilization
- Success fees that reward exceptional outcomes (optional but growing in popularity)
This approach allows for price fences that segment the market appropriately while maintaining alignment with how value is delivered.
Implementation Considerations for Wealth Management
When implementing your chosen pricing metric, consider industry-specific factors:
Compliance and SOX requirements may affect how usage can be tracked and reported
Budget cycles in wealth management typically align with calendar years, making timing of pricing changes critical
Integration with existing systems affects value perception and willingness to pay
Conclusion: Finding Your Optimal Pricing Model
There's no one-size-fits-all answer to which pricing metric works best for wealth management SaaS. The optimal approach depends on your specific offering, target customer segment, and how your solution delivers value.
That said, the industry is clearly moving toward more sophisticated, hybrid models that better align costs with value. As wealth management firms become increasingly technology-driven, they're growing more receptive to pricing models that reflect the true impact of software on their business outcomes.
The most successful SaaS providers serving this market will continue to evolve their pricing strategies, experimenting with combinations of seat-based, usage-based, and outcome-based components to find the perfect balance between predictability for customers and growth potential for vendors.
By deeply understanding how your solution creates value within wealth management workflows, you can develop a pricing strategy that not only drives adoption but builds lasting partnerships with your customers.