
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.
In the rapidly evolving physical therapy SaaS landscape, choosing the right pricing metric can be the difference between sustainable growth and stalled adoption. With options ranging from traditional per-seat models to innovative outcome-based approaches, physical therapy practice owners and software vendors alike struggle to align pricing with both value delivery and business sustainability.
Physical therapy practices face unique challenges that specialized software aims to solve. From patient scheduling and documentation to billing and outcome tracking, physical therapy SaaS platforms have become essential operational tools. However, the industry's specific needs—including HIPAA compliance requirements and HL7 FHIR integration capabilities—create a complex environment for pricing decisions.
According to a recent report by Allied Market Research, the global physical therapy software market is projected to reach $790.9 million by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 13.3% from 2021 to 2030. This growth underscores the importance of getting pricing strategy right.
Per-seat pricing (sometimes called per-user pricing) charges based on the number of users accessing the software.
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
A 2023 OpenView Partners survey found that 38% of SaaS companies still primarily use per-seat pricing, but this percentage has been declining annually as more value-based models emerge.
This usage-based pricing model ties costs directly to the volume of key activities performed in the software, such as patient appointments scheduled, claims submitted, or documentation completed.
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
According to Profitwell research, SaaS companies with usage-based components in their pricing grow 38% faster than those with purely subscription-based pricing.
Perhaps the most innovative approach, outcome-based pricing (a form of value-based pricing) ties software costs to measurable practice outcomes like improved collections, reduced cancellations, or better patient outcomes.
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
While only about 15% of healthcare SaaS companies have fully implemented outcome-based pricing according to KLAS Research, those that have report higher customer satisfaction and retention rates.
Any physical therapy SaaS platform must maintain strict HIPAA compliance, which creates substantial development and maintenance costs. These requirements affect pricing strategy by necessitating:
The healthcare interoperability standard HL7 FHIR enables seamless data exchange between systems. Supporting this standard adds significant development costs that must be factored into pricing strategy, particularly as practices increasingly require integration with hospital systems and EHRs.
The ideal pricing approach for physical therapy SaaS often combines elements of multiple metrics within a tiered structure that incorporates strategic price fences. Here's how to determine which might work best for your specific situation:
Per-seat pricing tends to be most effective when:
Transaction-based models shine when:
Consider outcome-based models when:
Most successful physical therapy SaaS vendors implement tiered pricing structures that combine multiple metrics:
Discounting can be powerful when used strategically rather than reactively:
According to Price Intelligently, strategic discounting combined with value-based pricing can increase customer lifetime value by 25-45% compared to undifferentiated discounting.
Price fences—conditions that must be met to qualify for specific pricing—help maintain pricing integrity while accommodating different practice needs:
When selecting the optimal pricing metric for your physical therapy SaaS offering, consider these steps:
Analyze your cost structure: Where are your costs fixed vs. variable? What drives cost increases?
Survey your customers: What metrics do they use to evaluate software ROI internally?
Examine your value proposition: How specifically does your software create value, and can that value be quantified?
Consider hybrid approaches: Most successful physical therapy SaaS companies utilize elements of multiple pricing metrics.
The ideal pricing metric for physical therapy SaaS isn't a one-size-fits-all solution. The most effective approach typically combines elements of seat-based, transaction-based, and outcome-based models within a thoughtfully structured pricing framework.
As the industry continues to mature, we're seeing a general shift toward more sophisticated pricing models that better align software costs with delivered value. Physical therapy SaaS vendors who can clearly articulate their value proposition and match it with appropriate pricing metrics will be best positioned for sustainable growth.
The key is to ensure your pricing strategy reflects both the value you deliver and the way your customers measure success—whether that's through efficiency gains, cost reductions, revenue increases, or improved patient outcomes. With healthcare's continued digital transformation, those who get pricing right will gain significant competitive advantage in this growing market.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.