.png)
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
In the highly specialized world of oil and gas downstream operations, selecting the right pricing model for SaaS solutions can significantly impact both vendor success and customer satisfaction. With refining margins under constant pressure and digital transformation accelerating across the industry, the question of how to price downstream software has never been more relevant.
The Downstream Pricing Challenge
Oil and gas downstream operations—including refining, petrochemical production, and product distribution—face unique challenges that directly influence SaaS pricing decisions. These operations are characterized by:
- High-value, complex processes with significant safety implications
- Varying scales of operation from small regional refineries to multinational integrated systems
- Cyclical market conditions that affect investment priorities
- Legacy systems integration requirements
- Specialized user bases with different technical needs
"Choosing the wrong pricing metric can limit adoption, create friction during renewals, or leave significant value uncaptured," notes a McKinsey report on industrial software pricing.
Common Pricing Models in Oil and Gas Downstream SaaS
Per-Seat Pricing
Under this model, companies pay based on the number of users accessing the software.
Advantages for downstream applications:
- Simple to understand and budget for
- Works well for specialized applications with clearly defined user roles
- Easy to administer and scale gradually
Disadvantages:
- May discourage wide adoption across refinery operations
- Doesn't align with the value generated when software optimizes multi-billion-dollar processes
- Creates artificial barriers to collaboration between departments
Per-Transaction Pricing
This model bases costs on the volume of specific operations processed through the software.
Advantages:
- Scales with actual usage
- Can align with operational intensity
- Provides flexibility during downtime or turnarounds
Disadvantages:
- Transaction definitions can be complex in continuous processing environments
- May create unpredictable costs during high-activity periods
- Might discourage use during critical decision points if costs are a concern
Outcome-Based Pricing
This approach ties software costs to measurable business outcomes, such as improved yield, reduced energy consumption, or decreased maintenance costs.
Advantages:
- Directly aligns vendor and customer incentives
- Creates shared success models
- Potentially higher margins for vendors who deliver exceptional value
- Reduces upfront investment risk for refineries
Disadvantages:
- Requires sophisticated measurement and attribution
- More complex contracts and negotiations
- May involve sharing sensitive operational data
- Harder to predict revenue for the vendor
What Industry Data Reveals About Pricing Preferences
According to recent research by Gartner, industrial software applications are increasingly moving toward hybrid pricing models. In the oil and gas sector specifically:
- 48% of new SaaS deployments incorporate some form of value-based pricing component
- Per-seat models remain prevalent for engineering and design tools (62%)
- Operational technology applications increasingly favor outcome or usage-based models (57%)
Making the Right Choice for Your Downstream SaaS Solution
Evaluate the Nature of Your Software
The optimal pricing metric depends significantly on what your software actually does:
- Control and safety systems often work best with flat-rate or capacity-based pricing, as usage should never be discouraged
- Planning and optimization tools may align naturally with outcome-based models tied to improved margins
- Trading and risk management solutions might benefit from transaction-based approaches
- Enterprise asset management could use hybrid models combining base subscriptions with usage components
Consider Your Customer's Value Perception
Different stakeholders in downstream operations perceive value differently:
- Operations leaders typically focus on reliability and throughput improvements
- Financial executives prioritize ROI and predictable costs
- Technical specialists may value specific capabilities regardless of broader business outcomes
Your pricing strategy should reflect where your primary buying decision-maker sits in this spectrum.
Price Fencing Strategies for Downstream Applications
Effective price fencing—creating boundaries between different service tiers—can maximize revenue while accommodating diverse customer needs:
- Capacity-based fences: Pricing based on throughput capacity (barrels per day)
- Feature-based tiers: Basic operational features versus advanced optimization capabilities
- Service level differentiation: Various response times and support levels
- Geographic deployment restrictions: Single-site versus enterprise-wide access
Emerging Trend: Consumption-Based Pricing in Downstream SaaS
A growing trend worth noting is the rise of pure consumption-based pricing, where customers pay only for the computing resources or API calls they use. This model:
- Aligns naturally with cloud-native applications
- Provides maximum flexibility during refinery turnarounds or reduced operations
- Eliminates shelf-ware concerns
- May offer lower initial adoption barriers
According to Deloitte's Technology Industry Outlook, 72% of SaaS providers are incorporating some form of usage-based pricing elements into their models by 2023, even in traditionally enterprise-focused industries.
Enterprise Pricing Considerations for Integrated Oil Companies
For large multinational corporations with multiple refineries and integrated operations, pricing complexity increases. Successful enterprise pricing strategies typically include:
- Volume-based discounting tied to enterprise-wide deployment
- Multi-year agreements with predictable escalations
- Value-sharing models for flagship implementations
- Professional services components for integration and customization
The Verdict: Hybrid Models Lead the Way
For most oil and gas downstream SaaS applications, the evidence points toward hybrid pricing models as the most effective approach. These typically combine:
- A base subscription component (often seat-based for admin/configuration users)
- Usage or outcome-based components aligned with value delivery
- Tiered service levels with clear upgrading paths
This approach balances predictability with value alignment while providing multiple growth levers for vendors.
Key Takeaways for Downstream SaaS Pricing
- One-size-fits-all pricing rarely works in the complex downstream environment
- The most successful pricing strategies align with how value is actually created
- Clear communication of ROI remains essential regardless of pricing model
- Pricing should evolve as both the software and customer operations mature
- Flexible approaches that can adapt to industry cycles perform best over time
By carefully matching your pricing metric to both your software's value proposition and your customers' operational realities, you can create a sustainable model that supports growth while fostering long-term partnerships in the downstream sector.
What pricing models have you found most effective for industrial software? The conversation about optimal SaaS pricing in specialized industries continues to evolve, and real-world experiences often provide the most valuable insights.