.png)
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
In the rapidly evolving insurance technology landscape, SaaS providers face a critical strategic decision that directly impacts both their revenue potential and customer relationships: selecting the right pricing metric. For insurance carriers investing in SaaS solutions, the pricing structure is equally consequential, affecting their total cost of ownership, scalability, and return on technology investments.
Let's explore the three dominant pricing models in the insurance SaaS space—per seat, per transaction, and outcome-based—to determine which approach best aligns with the unique needs of insurance carriers.
The Current State of Insurance Carriers' SaaS Pricing
Insurance technology has moved decidedly toward cloud-based delivery models, with carriers increasingly replacing legacy systems with specialized SaaS platforms for underwriting, claims, policy administration, and customer engagement.
However, many insurance SaaS vendors continue to rely on traditional pricing metrics that may not optimally align with the value they deliver or how carriers actually utilize their services.
Per-Seat Pricing: The Traditional Approach
Per-seat (or per-user) pricing has long been the default for enterprise software, including solutions for insurance carriers.
Advantages for Insurance SaaS Vendors:
- Predictable recurring revenue
- Simplicity in explanation and implementation
- Clear expansion opportunity as client organizations grow
Disadvantages for Insurance Carriers:
- Penalizes companies for adding occasional users
- Creates "shelf-ware" situations where licenses are purchased but underutilized
- May discourage broader adoption across departments
- Often requires complex negotiations around user definitions and license types
According to a 2022 industry survey by Deloitte, 62% of insurance carriers expressed dissatisfaction with seat-based pricing models, citing poor alignment with actual value received as the primary concern.
Transaction-Based Pricing: Aligning with Insurance Operations
For many insurance software applications, transaction-based pricing offers better alignment with how carriers actually use SaaS platforms.
Advantages for Both Parties:
- Directly correlates to system usage and operational volume
- Scales naturally with the carrier's business
- Reduces upfront commitments for new carriers
- Provides clear usage metrics for both vendor and customer
Types of Transaction Metrics in Insurance SaaS:
- Per policy issued or managed
- Per claim processed
- Per quote generated
- Per document processed or stored
- Per API call or integration transaction
According to Gartner, transaction-based pricing has grown by 37% in insurance technology platforms over the past three years, making it the fastest-growing pricing model in the sector.
Outcome-Based Pricing: The Value-Centric Approach
The most advanced pricing approach, outcome-based or value-based pricing, directly ties costs to measurable business outcomes achieved through the software.
Examples in Insurance Technology:
- Percentage of premium processed
- Fee based on claims processing time reduction
- Cost tied to fraud detection savings
- Pricing aligned with customer satisfaction improvements
- Fees connected to regulatory compliance outcomes
Advantages:
- Creates true partnership between vendor and carrier
- Directly connects price to value received
- Aligns incentives for ongoing optimization
- Differentiates sophisticated vendors in the market
However, implementation challenges exist. "Establishing clear, measurable outcome metrics that both parties agree on is often the biggest hurdle to value-based pricing in insurance software," notes McKinsey's Financial Services Technology Review.
Enterprise Pricing Considerations for Insurance SaaS
Beyond the core pricing metric, several other factors influence effective pricing strategy for insurance carriers:
Tiered Structures
Enterprise-class insurance solutions often implement tiered pricing approaches that recognize different scales of operation. These tiers establish price fences that segment carriers by size or complexity, preventing revenue leakage while making solutions accessible to mid-market insurers.
Discounting Strategy
SOX compliance requirements demand transparent and consistent discounting practices. Leading insurance SaaS vendors establish formal discount approval matrices that satisfy both compliance needs and sales flexibility.
Implementation and Success Services
Unlike horizontal SaaS, insurance solutions typically require significant implementation assistance. Most vendors now separate implementation fees from subscription costs for accounting clarity and to manage customer expectations.
Which Approach Fits Best? A Decision Framework
The optimal pricing strategy depends on several factors specific to your SaaS offering:
Type of Solution: Policy administration systems align well with transaction pricing, while analytics platforms may benefit from outcome-based approaches.
Customer Maturity: Larger, more sophisticated carriers often prefer value-based models, while regional insurers may favor the predictability of seat-based pricing.
Measurability: Can you reliably track the outcomes and attribute them to your solution?
Sales Complexity: More sophisticated pricing models require more educated sales teams and longer sales cycles.
The Hybrid Approach: Best of All Worlds
Research suggests that nearly 70% of insurance SaaS providers are now implementing hybrid pricing models that combine elements of multiple approaches. For example:
- Base platform fee (enterprise pricing component) + per-policy transaction fee
- Per-seat pricing with outcome-based incentives or rebates
- Usage-based core with value-based premium features
This flexibility allows vendors to capture value appropriately while giving carriers options that match their preferences and usage patterns.
Conclusion: Moving Toward Value-Alignment
While each pricing metric offers distinct advantages, the industry trend clearly points toward transaction and outcome-based approaches that better align with how insurance carriers derive value from technology.
The most successful insurance technology providers are those who view pricing not merely as a revenue mechanism but as a strategic tool that shapes relationships with carriers and communicates their value proposition. They're also willing to evolve their pricing models as their solutions mature and market expectations change.
For insurance carriers evaluating SaaS solutions, understanding these pricing approaches helps ensure technology investments deliver appropriate value and align with operational realities. The right pricing metric isn't just a financial consideration—it fundamentally shapes how technology partners work together to drive insurance innovation forward.