.png)
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
In the rapidly evolving diagnostics industry, laboratory information systems have transformed from simple data management tools to comprehensive SaaS solutions that drive operational efficiency and clinical effectiveness. For diagnostics labs SaaS providers, selecting the right pricing metric isn't just a business decision—it's a strategic choice that shapes customer relationships, market positioning, and long-term revenue growth.
With options ranging from traditional per-seat models to innovative outcome-based approaches, finding the pricing structure that aligns with both customer value perception and business objectives can be challenging. Let's explore which pricing metric best serves diagnostics labs SaaS solutions in today's healthcare ecosystem.
The Diagnostics Labs SaaS Landscape
Diagnostics labs SaaS platforms have become essential technology infrastructure, handling everything from test ordering and specimen tracking to results reporting and integration with electronic health records. These solutions must comply with regulatory standards like HIPAA for patient privacy and support interoperability through standards like HL7 FHIR.
The market includes diverse stakeholders:
- Small independent labs with limited test volumes
- Mid-sized regional labs serving multiple healthcare providers
- Large reference laboratories processing millions of tests annually
- Hospital-integrated labs with complex workflows
This diversity makes a one-size-fits-all pricing approach problematic.
Per-Seat Pricing: The Traditional Approach
Per-seat (or per-user) pricing has been the default model for many enterprise software solutions, including diagnostics labs SaaS.
Advantages:
- Predictability: Labs can easily budget based on their staff size
- Simplicity: Straightforward to understand and implement
- Scalability: Revenue grows with customer organization size
Limitations:
- Misaligned value: A small lab performing complex, high-value testing might generate more value from the software than a larger lab with simple tests, yet would pay less under a per-seat model
- Seat-sharing behavior: To minimize costs, labs might have multiple staff sharing login credentials, creating security risks
- Growth friction: Labs may resist adding necessary users due to cost concerns
According to a recent laboratory technology survey, only 28% of diagnostic labs SaaS providers now use per-seat as their primary pricing metric, down from 52% five years ago.
Per-Transaction Pricing: Usage-Based Value
Transaction-based pricing ties costs directly to testing volume, creating a usage-based pricing model that scales with lab activity.
Advantages:
- Value alignment: Labs pay based on business volume, creating a more direct relationship between cost and value
- Growth incentives: Smaller labs can start with lower costs and scale up as their business grows
- Resource utilization: Pricing reflects actual system utilization rather than potential use
Limitations:
- Unpredictable costs: Labs with fluctuating test volumes may struggle with budget planning
- Revenue variability: SaaS providers face less predictable revenue streams
- Definition challenges: What constitutes a "transaction" can become complex (Is it per test ordered? Per result? Per patient?)
A recent industry analysis by Laboratory Economics found that per-transaction pricing has gained significant traction, with 42% of diagnostics labs SaaS providers now implementing some form of usage-based pricing model.
Outcome-Based Pricing: The Value-Focused Future
Outcome-based pricing (also called value-based pricing) ties the cost of the software to measurable improvements in lab performance metrics or business outcomes.
Advantages:
- Perfect value alignment: Labs pay based on demonstrated value received
- Risk sharing: Vendor success is directly tied to customer success
- Strategic partnership: Fosters a collaborative relationship focused on improving lab performance
- Differentiation: Creates competitive advantage in a crowded market
Limitations:
- Measurement complexity: Defining and tracking meaningful outcomes can be challenging
- Attribution problems: Determining how much of an improvement came from software versus other factors
- Implementation hurdles: Requires sophisticated analytics and transparent reporting
- Revenue timing: May delay revenue recognition until outcomes are demonstrated
Though only about 15% of diagnostics labs SaaS providers have implemented true outcome-based pricing, this approach is gaining interest, particularly among innovative market entrants targeting enterprise customers.
Hybrid Approaches: The Best of All Worlds
Rather than choosing a single pricing metric, many successful diagnostics labs SaaS providers are implementing hybrid models with multiple components:
Tiered Base + Usage
A tiered subscription fee based on lab size or capabilities, plus variable fees based on testing volume. This provides revenue predictability while still scaling with customer usage.
Core + Premium Features
Core functionality priced per seat, with premium features (like advanced analytics) priced based on usage or outcomes. This approach uses price fences to segment the market effectively.
Outcome Guarantees
Traditional pricing models with refunds or discounts if agreed-upon performance improvements aren't met. This introduces outcome-based elements without completely restructuring pricing.
Selecting the Right Pricing Metric for Your Diagnostics SaaS
When determining which pricing model best fits your diagnostics labs SaaS offering, consider these factors:
Customer Segment Focus: Enterprise labs often prefer predictable subscription models, while smaller labs may favor usage-based approaches that minimize upfront costs.
Value Delivery Point: Does your solution primarily deliver value through individual user productivity (favoring per-seat), test processing efficiency (favoring per-transaction), or business improvements (favoring outcome-based)?
Competitive Landscape: How are competitors pricing similar solutions, and is there an opportunity to differentiate through innovative pricing?
Growth Strategy: Different pricing models can facilitate different types of growth—market penetration, expansion revenue, or enterprise account acquisition.
Implementation Practicality: Consider your ability to track and bill based on your chosen metric, including any technical requirements for usage or outcome measurement.
The Path Forward: Strategic Pricing Evolution
For most diagnostics labs SaaS providers, the optimal approach involves starting with a straightforward model that customers easily understand, then evolving toward more sophisticated approaches as the market matures and value measurement capabilities improve.
Many successful providers begin with a hybrid model featuring a modest per-seat component plus usage-based elements, with discounting strategies that reward commitment and growth. Over time, as they gather data on how their software drives customer outcomes, they can introduce outcome-based components that further align pricing with delivered value.
Conclusion: Aligning Pricing with Value in Diagnostics
The diagnostics labs SaaS market continues to mature, and pricing strategies must evolve accordingly. While per-seat pricing offers simplicity and per-transaction models provide better usage alignment, outcome-based approaches represent the future of value-based pricing in this sector.
The most successful providers will develop flexible pricing frameworks that can adapt to different customer segments and evolve as both the technology and market mature. By focusing on aligning cost with demonstrated value, diagnostics labs SaaS providers can build stronger customer relationships while capturing a fair share of the value they create.
Ultimately, the best pricing metric isn't about choosing between per-seat, per-transaction, or per-outcome models—it's about finding the right combination that reflects your solution's unique value proposition and supports your strategic business objectives in the diagnostics market.