
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.
In the rapidly evolving AI agent ecosystem, two major players have released new tools that could reshape how developers build and monetize AI agents: Anthropic's Claude Agent SDK and OpenAI's AgentKit. Both platforms offer pay-as-you-go monetization options, but they differ in significant ways that matter to SaaS executives and AI product leaders.
If you're deciding which platform to build on, this comparison will help you understand the key differences between these two approaches to agent development and monetization.
Anthropic's Claude Agent SDK is a toolkit designed to help developers create and deploy agents powered by Claude, Anthropic's family of AI models. Released in April 2024, it emphasizes a structured approach to agent development with built-in capabilities for memory, tools, and conversation management.
OpenAI's AgentKit, also released in 2024, provides a framework for developing agents on top of OpenAI's models, particularly GPT-4. It focuses on offering developers a modular system to create customized agents with strong reasoning capabilities.
Both platforms aim to simplify the agent development process while providing mechanisms for builders to generate revenue.
Anthropic's approach centers around:
According to Anthropic's documentation, developers receive 50% of the API revenue generated by their agents, making the revenue split straightforward and transparent.
OpenAI's AgentKit takes a different approach:
OpenAI pays developers based on user engagement metrics, though the exact revenue split percentages aren't as clearly defined as Anthropic's 50/50 model.
The SDK is designed with enterprise use cases in mind, with strong documentation and emphasis on reliability.
OpenAI's platform benefits from being more established, with a larger developer community and more examples to draw from.
When evaluating these platforms for your team, consider these experience factors:
# Example Claude Agent SDK codefrom anthropic import Anthropicfrom anthropic.tools import Toolclient = Anthropic()tools = [Tool.from_object("calculator", calculator)]message = client.messages.create( model="claude-3-opus-20240229", max_tokens=1024, tools=tools, system="You are a helpful assistant that can use tools.", messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "What is 1337 * 42?"}])The Claude SDK provides a clean, Pythonic approach with strong typing and structured components.
# Example AgentKit codefrom agentkit import Agent, Toolagent = Agent( model="gpt-4o", tools=[calculator_tool])response = agent.run("What is 1337 * 42?")AgentKit offers a similarly clean interface but with more options for customization and control.
For SaaS executives, the choice between these platforms isn't just technical—it's strategic:
According to recent data from Similarweb, ChatGPT receives approximately 200 million visits monthly, while Claude's standalone website sees a fraction of that traffic—suggesting OpenAI's distribution advantage remains significant.
The right choice depends on your specific needs:
Choose Claude Agent SDK if:
Choose OpenAI AgentKit if:
Many developers are actually building with both platforms to hedge their bets and maximize potential revenue streams.
Both Anthropic's Claude Agent SDK and OpenAI's AgentKit represent significant steps forward in democratizing AI agent development and monetization. The pay-as-you-go models both platforms offer mean that developers can create valuable agents without worrying about complex billing systems or subscription management.
As the AI agent ecosystem matures, we'll likely see more sophisticated monetization options emerge. For now, SaaS executives should consider experimenting with both platforms to understand their relative strengths and which aligns better with their specific product vision and business model.
The agent economy is just getting started, and early builders have an opportunity to establish leadership positions by mastering these new development and monetization tools.

Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.