.png)
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
In the evolving landscape of financial technology, wealth management firms are increasingly adopting SaaS solutions to streamline operations, enhance client services, and maintain competitive advantage. One critical decision these firms face is selecting the right pricing model for their SaaS investments. Usage-based pricing (UBP) has emerged as a popular alternative to traditional subscription models, but is it always the right choice? Let's explore when UBP works effectively for wealth management firms and when it might lead to unexpected challenges.
Understanding Usage-Based Pricing in Wealth Management SaaS
Usage-based pricing allows wealth management firms to pay for SaaS solutions based on actual consumption rather than a flat fee. This consumption could be measured through various pricing metrics, including:
- Number of client accounts managed
- Assets under management (AUM)
- Number of transactions processed
- API calls or computational resources used
- Reports generated or accessed
According to OpenView's 2022 SaaS Benchmarks report, companies with usage-based pricing models grew revenue 38% faster than their counterparts with pure subscription models, making this approach increasingly attractive to both vendors and clients.
When Usage-Based Pricing Works for Wealth Management Firms
1. Alignment with Business Growth
Usage-based pricing creates a natural alignment between costs and your firm's growth trajectory. As your client base expands or assets under management increase, your technology expenses scale proportionally. This creates a pricing framework that grows with your business success.
Gareth Jones, CTO at BlueLeaf Wealth Platform, notes, "We implemented usage-based pricing because it allows our wealth management clients to start small and expand their technology investment as they grow their client base, creating a true partnership model."
2. Value-Based Pricing Alignment
When usage metrics directly correlate with the value derived from the software, UBP becomes a form of value-based pricing. For example, if a portfolio management system charges based on AUM, this typically aligns with the wealth management firm's own revenue model.
This alignment helps justify technology expenses to stakeholders since costs evolve in tandem with business outcomes.
3. Predictable Scaling for Enterprise Clients
For larger enterprise wealth management firms with predictable growth patterns, usage-based pricing can offer greater transparency and fair cost allocation across different business units. This allows for more accurate budgeting and expense attribution.
According to a Deloitte financial services technology survey, 67% of wealth management enterprises prefer pricing models that allow internal cost allocation based on actual usage by different divisions or teams.
When Usage-Based Pricing Backfires for Wealth Management Firms
1. Unpredictable Costs and Budget Overruns
Perhaps the most significant risk with UBP is cost unpredictability. Wealth management firms operating under strict budgetary constraints may face challenges when usage spikes unexpectedly.
A 2021 study by Gartner revealed that 47% of financial services companies experienced budget overruns with usage-based SaaS models during market volatility periods, particularly during the pandemic when client engagement significantly increased.
2. SOX Compliance Complications
For publicly traded wealth management firms subject to Sarbanes-Oxley requirements, variable cost structures can create additional compliance challenges. SOX regulations demand high levels of financial reporting accuracy and predictability, which can be complicated by fluctuating UBP expenses.
"Variable technology costs require more robust controls and documentation to satisfy SOX auditors," explains Maria Chen, compliance director at a major wealth management firm. "We need to demonstrate we have appropriate oversight mechanisms for expenses that can change month to month."
3. Discounting and Negotiation Challenges
Usage-based models often limit the effectiveness of traditional enterprise discounting strategies. With subscription models, wealth management firms can negotiate significant long-term commitments in exchange for pricing concessions.
In UBP models, vendors typically embed discounting through tiered structures rather than direct price reductions, which can be less favorable for large enterprises with significant bargaining power.
4. The "Success Tax" Problem
When usage metrics are directly tied to business success (like AUM), wealth management firms may feel they're being penalized for their growth. As one wealth management executive told Financial Planning magazine, "It feels like we're paying a success tax when our software costs increase just because we brought on more client assets."
Finding the Right Balance: Hybrid Approaches
Many wealth management firms are finding success with hybrid pricing approaches that incorporate:
- Base subscription fee for core functionality
- Usage-based components for specific high-value features
- Price fences that prevent cost explosions during usage spikes
- Tiered pricing that rewards scale with lower marginal costs
Morgan Stanley's technology procurement guidelines, shared at a recent fintech conference, recommend: "The ideal pricing structure for enterprise wealth management technology combines predictable base costs with usage components that include volume discounts reflecting economies of scale."
Key Questions to Ask Before Adopting Usage-Based Pricing
If your wealth management firm is considering a UBP model for SaaS solutions, ask:
- How closely does the pricing metric correlate with the value we receive?
- Can we accurately forecast usage to avoid budget surprises?
- How will costs scale as our business grows?
- Are there appropriate tiers or caps to protect against runaway expenses?
- How will this model impact our SOX compliance requirements?
- Does the model include sufficient transparency for internal cost allocation?
Conclusion: Strategic Considerations for Wealth Management Firms
Usage-based pricing works best for wealth management SaaS when there's clear alignment between consumption metrics and business value. It's particularly effective for firms in growth mode with flexible budgets and those seeking to minimize upfront technology investments.
However, UBP can backfire when budget predictability is paramount, when compliance requirements demand stable cost structures, or when the chosen usage metrics don't truly reflect the value delivered to your business.
The most successful wealth management firms typically negotiate hybrid models that provide baseline predictability with some usage components, ensuring technology costs remain proportional to business value while avoiding unexpected financial surprises.
By carefully evaluating how pricing aligns with your firm's specific needs, growth trajectory, and compliance requirements, you can select a SaaS pricing approach that truly supports your strategic objectives rather than creating unexpected challenges.