.png)
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
In the evolving landscape of SaaS solutions for third-party administrators (TPAs), selecting the right pricing strategy can make or break your business. Usage-based pricing has gained significant traction across the SaaS industry, but is it the right approach for TPA-focused solutions? Let's explore when this pricing model shines and when it might lead to unexpected challenges.
Understanding Usage-Based Pricing for Third-Party Administrators SaaS
Usage-based pricing (UBP) is a model where customers pay based on their actual consumption of a service rather than a flat subscription fee. For third-party administrators SaaS platforms, this might mean charging based on:
- Number of claims processed
- Volume of documentation managed
- Number of client accounts administered
- Data storage requirements
- Transaction volumes
According to OpenView Partners' 2022 SaaS Pricing Survey, companies with usage-based pricing models grew revenue nearly 38% faster than their counterparts with purely subscription-based models. But does this translate to the specialized world of TPA software?
When Usage-Based Pricing Works for TPA Software
1. When Consumption Directly Correlates with Value
Usage-based pricing excels when customers perceive a direct relationship between usage and value received. For TPA software that processes claims or manages benefits administration, charging per claim or per employee administered creates a clear value connection.
Research from Paddle found that 92% of SaaS businesses that implemented usage-based pricing saw improved customer satisfaction because customers felt they were paying for exactly what they used.
2. When TPAs Have Fluctuating Workloads
Third-party administrators often experience seasonal fluctuations or varying client loads. A benefits administration TPA might see higher volumes during open enrollment periods, while a claims processing TPA could experience varying demands throughout the year.
The flexibility of usage-based pricing allows TPAs to scale their costs with their business needs, avoiding overpayment during slower periods.
3. When Entering Competitive Markets
For SaaS providers entering the competitive TPA software market, usage-based pricing can lower the barrier to entry for potential customers. TPAs can start with minimal commitment and grow their usage as they gain confidence in the platform.
When Usage-Based Pricing Backfires for TPA Software
1. When Revenue Becomes Unpredictable
The flexibility that makes usage-based pricing attractive to customers creates the opposite effect for vendors: revenue unpredictability. A study by Chargebee revealed that 67% of SaaS companies with pure usage-based models struggle with revenue forecasting.
For TPA software providers, this unpredictability can complicate:
- Investment planning
- Resource allocation
- Growth projections
- Investor relations
2. When It Creates Budget Anxiety for Enterprise TPAs
Enterprise TPAs often operate with strict budgets and procurement processes. The unpredictability of usage-based costs can create significant anxiety and administrative burdens.
According to a Forrester report, 58% of enterprise software buyers prefer predictable pricing over potentially lower, but variable, usage-based costs.
3. When Usage Doesn't Align with Cost Structure
If your TPA software has high fixed costs and low marginal costs for additional usage, a usage-based model may not align with your business economics. This misalignment can lead to razor-thin margins during high-usage periods.
Hybrid Approaches: The Best of Both Worlds?
Many successful third-party administrators SaaS providers have found that hybrid pricing models offer the best solution:
- Base subscription fee + usage components
- Tiered usage pricing with predictable bands
- Usage-based pricing with caps and floors
Zuora's Subscription Economy Index found that companies implementing hybrid pricing models grew at an average of 22% annually, outperforming both pure subscription and pure usage-based models.
Implementing Value-Based Price Fences in Your Strategy
Regardless of your primary pricing approach, incorporating value-based price fences can significantly enhance your pricing strategy. Price fences are conditions that allow you to charge different prices to different segments based on their perceived value.
For TPA software, effective price fences might include:
- Enterprise pricing tiers based on company size
- Feature differentiation for specialized TPA types (healthcare, retirement, insurance)
- Performance guarantees with premium pricing
- Implementation and support packages
Best Practices for TPA SaaS Pricing Success
1. Understand Your Customers' Economic Model
Before settling on any pricing metric, deeply understand how your TPA customers make money and how your software contributes to their profitability.
2. Test Multiple Pricing Approaches
According to Price Intelligently, companies that test their pricing at least quarterly grow 2-4x faster than those that test less frequently.
3. Be Transparent About Discounting
If your sales team frequently offers discounts, consider formalizing these into clear volume-based tiers rather than case-by-case negotiations.
Conclusion: Finding Your Pricing Sweet Spot
Usage-based pricing isn't inherently superior or inferior for third-party administrators SaaS—it's about finding the right fit for your specific offering and customer base. The most successful TPA software providers closely align their pricing model with their customers' perception of value and their own internal cost structures.
By thoughtfully evaluating your options and potentially implementing hybrid approaches, you can create a pricing strategy that drives growth while maintaining predictable revenue streams.
Remember that pricing is not a set-it-and-forget-it decision. As the TPA landscape evolves and your product matures, your pricing strategy should evolve as well.