
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.
In the specialized world of orthodontics software, choosing the right pricing model can make or break your SaaS business. While usage-based pricing has gained popularity across many software categories, it presents unique challenges and opportunities within the orthodontics sector. This article explores when usage-based pricing makes sense for orthodontics SaaS providers—and when it might lead to adverse outcomes.
Usage-based pricing (UBP) links what customers pay directly to how much they use your software. Unlike flat subscription models, UBP charges based on specific metrics of consumption—whether that's the number of patients processed, images stored, or treatment plans created.
For orthodontics practices, this pricing approach can initially seem appealing because it aligns costs with actual software utilization. However, the unique characteristics of orthodontic practice workflows and business models require careful consideration before implementing this strategy.
Smaller orthodontic practices or those with seasonal fluctuations benefit from usage-based pricing because they only pay for what they use. According to a 2023 survey by the American Association of Orthodontists, practices experience an average of 22% variance in patient load throughout the year, making fixed pricing potentially inefficient.
These practices appreciate the flexibility of scaling costs up or down with their business cycles, avoiding the burden of paying full subscription fees during slower periods.
The most successful usage-based models in orthodontics SaaS tie pricing to metrics that directly correlate with practice revenue. For example:
Cloud-based imaging company OrthoVision found that practices were willing to pay per analysis when the software demonstrably reduced treatment planning time by 35%, creating a clear value connection.
Startup orthodontic practices often operate with tight budgets. Usage-based pricing can offer an accessible entry point, allowing these practices to adopt enterprise-grade software without substantial upfront investment. As these practices grow, their software spending naturally scales with their success.
Healthcare software, including orthodontics SaaS, must maintain strict HIPAA compliance. Usage-based models can create unexpected compliance challenges when they require detailed tracking of patient information to calculate billing.
A 2022 case study by Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS) found that 43% of medical SaaS providers cited compliance complexity as a significant challenge in implementing usage-based pricing models.
Many orthodontic practices operate with carefully planned annual budgets. The unpredictability inherent in usage-based pricing can disrupt financial planning and create anxiety among practice owners.
"Our practice switched back to a tiered subscription model after six months of usage-based billing because the month-to-month variance made financial forecasting nearly impossible," explains Dr. Sarah Chen, an orthodontist with a mid-sized practice in Denver.
Sometimes, usage-based pricing can inadvertently diminish the perceived value of your software. If orthodontists begin to view your solution as a commodity charged by volume rather than a valuable tool that transforms their practice, price sensitivity increases and customer loyalty decreases.
Research by Dental Economics found that orthodontic practices were 2.8 times more likely to switch software providers when on usage-based models compared to value-based subscription tiers.
Many successful orthodontics SaaS companies are implementing hybrid pricing models that capture the benefits of both usage-based and subscription approaches while mitigating their respective drawbacks.
This approach offers several usage tiers with clear price fences between them. For example:
This provides some cost predictability while still scaling with practice size. Each tier can include different feature sets appropriate to practice needs at different scales.
Another effective hybrid model includes a base subscription fee that covers core functionality, with usage-based charges only for specific high-value features or exceptional usage. This approach provides:
Regardless of which pricing model you choose, discounting practices require careful consideration in the orthodontics SaaS space. Excessive discounting can:
Instead of arbitrary discounts, consider creating transparent enterprise pricing agreements for larger practices or groups that offer additional value commensurate with commitment levels.
When evaluating whether usage-based pricing is right for your orthodontics software, consider these key questions:
The most successful orthodontics SaaS companies align their pricing strategy with customer success metrics. When practices grow and succeed using your software, your revenue should grow accordingly—creating a true partnership rather than just a vendor relationship.
Usage-based pricing can be a powerful approach for orthodontics SaaS when properly implemented with the right customers and value metrics. However, it's not a universal solution and must be thoughtfully designed to avoid potential pitfalls around compliance, predictability, and value perception.
By understanding your customers' workflows, financial considerations, and growth patterns, you can design a pricing strategy—whether pure usage-based, subscription, or hybrid—that aligns with the unique needs of orthodontic practices while supporting your own sustainable growth.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.