.png)
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
In today's healthcare technology landscape, imaging centers face critical decisions about which software solutions to adopt—and how they should pay for them. While subscription models have dominated the SaaS industry for years, usage-based pricing has emerged as an alternative that promises better alignment between costs and value. But is this pricing model right for imaging centers software? Let's explore when usage-based pricing works brilliantly for imaging centers SaaS—and when it can lead to unexpected challenges.
Understanding Usage-Based Pricing in Healthcare Software
Usage-based pricing (UBP) allows imaging centers to pay based on their actual consumption of software services rather than a flat monthly or annual fee. This could mean paying per scan processed, per radiologist user, per patient record accessed, or other metrics directly tied to utilization.
According to OpenView's 2022 SaaS Pricing Survey, companies with usage-based models grew revenue nearly 30% faster than those with purely subscription-based approaches. This growth potential has led many healthcare SaaS providers to consider this model—but implementation in imaging contexts requires careful consideration.
When Usage-Based Pricing Works Well for Imaging Centers
1. When Volume Fluctuates Seasonally or Unpredictably
For imaging centers with variable patient volume—perhaps due to seasonal illnesses, regional demographic shifts, or partnership changes with referring physicians—usage-based pricing can provide financial flexibility. Centers only pay more during high-volume periods and save during quieter times, creating a natural hedge against revenue fluctuations.
2. When Scaling Across Multiple Locations
Multi-location imaging practices benefit from usage-based models when expanding to new sites. Rather than committing to full licenses for facilities still building their patient base, they can start with minimal costs that grow proportionally with each location's utilization.
3. When Value Directly Correlates with Usage
For AI-assisted diagnostic tools or image enhancement software, the value provided often increases with each use. A usage-based pricing metric that charges per enhanced study or AI analysis aligns perfectly with the incremental value delivered, creating a natural value-based pricing approach that both parties can easily understand.
4. When Testing New Software Solutions
Imaging centers wanting to validate newer technologies (like AI-based triage tools) can benefit from usage pricing during pilot phases. This creates a lower-risk environment to test software effectiveness before committing to broader implementation.
When Usage-Based Pricing Can Backfire
1. When Predictability Matters More Than Flexibility
Imaging center administrators often prioritize budget predictability. According to a Black Book survey, 72% of healthcare IT buyers cite "predictable costs" as a critical factor in software purchasing decisions. In high-volume facilities where usage remains consistently high, unexpected pricing spikes can create budget challenges that outweigh the flexibility benefits.
2. When Integrating with Enterprise Systems
Many imaging centers operate within larger healthcare networks with enterprise pricing agreements. These organizations typically prefer fixed-cost arrangements that can be distributed across departments rather than variable costs that complicate internal accounting and resource allocation.
3. When Compliance Creates Usage Overhead
Healthcare's stringent regulatory environment creates unique challenges for usage-based models. HIPAA compliance and HL7 FHIR integration requirements mean that even "minimal" usage incurs significant overhead. When vendors must maintain full compliance infrastructure regardless of usage levels, pure consumption-based pricing becomes less economically viable.
A radiology practice in Colorado discovered this challenge when implementing a usage-based cloud storage solution. Despite low initial volume, compliance costs created a high effective per-scan price that only became reasonable at volumes they wouldn't reach for years.
4. When User Behavior Creates Budget Anxiety
Usage-based models can inadvertently create anxiety about using the software. Radiologists and technologists may hesitate to use advanced features or run additional analyses if they're concerned about triggering extra costs—potentially limiting the clinical value of the tool.
Finding the Middle Ground: Hybrid Models for Imaging SaaS
The most successful pricing approaches for imaging centers SaaS often combine elements of both subscription and usage-based models through thoughtful price fences and tiered structures:
Tiered Usage Bundles
Instead of charging for each individual action, successful vendors offer tiered bundles (e.g., up to 5,000 scans, 5,001-10,000 scans) with predictable pricing within each tier. This provides budget certainty while still scaling with overall usage.
Base Platform + Usage Components
A core platform subscription covers essential functionality, security, and compliance costs, while specialty modules or AI-based features follow usage-based pricing. This hybrid approach ensures vendors can sustainably deliver HIPAA-compliant infrastructure while aligning advanced feature costs with their utilization.
Volume Discounting with Minimums
Some vendors implement volume-based discounting that automatically reduces per-unit pricing as usage increases. Combined with reasonable minimum commitments, this approach protects vendors from unprofitable low-volume customers while rewarding high-volume centers with improved economics.
Implementing the Right Pricing Strategy for Your Imaging SaaS
Whether you're a SaaS provider serving imaging centers or a radiology practice evaluating software options, consider these factors when determining optimal pricing structures:
- Analyze actual usage patterns across different customer segments before committing to a pricing metric
- Consider value indicators beyond raw usage (outcomes improvement, time savings, reduced errors)
- Establish clear price fences that create predictability while maintaining usage alignment
- Communicate pricing clearly to avoid surprise bills that damage relationships
- Build safeguards against extreme usage fluctuations that could hurt either party
Conclusion: Alignment Over Formula
The ideal pricing model for imaging centers SaaS isn't about rigidly following industry trends toward usage-based pricing—it's about creating alignment between the software's value delivery and the payment structure.
The most successful vendors listen carefully to imaging centers' operational realities, financial constraints, and value perception. They then craft pricing approaches that respect budget predictability while ensuring that as centers derive more value from the platform, vendors participate appropriately in that success.
Whether through thoughtful hybrid models, tiered usage structures, or value-based approaches tied to outcomes rather than pure usage, the goal remains the same: creating a fair exchange that lets both imaging centers and their software partners thrive in an increasingly complex healthcare technology landscape.