.png)
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
In the rapidly evolving financial technology landscape, banks are increasingly adopting Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) solutions to modernize their operations, enhance customer experiences, and maintain competitive edges. However, one critical decision banks face when selecting these solutions is understanding the pricing model that best aligns with their specific needs and usage patterns. Usage-based pricing has emerged as a popular option for banks SaaS providers, but is it always the right choice?
Understanding Usage-Based Pricing in Banking SaaS
Usage-based pricing (UBP) is a pricing strategy where customers pay based on their actual consumption of a service rather than a flat fee. For banking technology solutions, this might mean paying per transaction processed, per API call, or per user accessing the system.
This model stands in contrast to traditional subscription pricing, where banks pay a fixed monthly or annual fee regardless of their actual usage levels. The appeal of UBP lies in its apparent alignment with value received—banks only pay for what they use.
When Usage-Based Pricing Works Well for Banking SaaS
1. For Solutions with Predictable, Scalable Metrics
Usage-based pricing works best when the pricing metric directly correlates with the value the bank receives. For example:
- Payment processing platforms charging per transaction
- Data analytics tools pricing based on volume of data analyzed
- Customer authentication services billing per verification
According to a 2023 report by OpenView Partners, SaaS companies with usage-based models grew at a 29% higher rate than their counterparts with traditional subscription models, demonstrating the potential effectiveness of this approach.
2. For Banks with Variable or Seasonal Usage Patterns
For banks with fluctuating transaction volumes or seasonal peaks, usage-based pricing can provide significant cost efficiencies. Community banks or those with highly variable processing needs can avoid paying for capacity they don't consistently use.
JPMorgan Chase reported saving approximately 15% on their cloud infrastructure costs by switching to consumption-based models that allowed them to scale up during high-volume periods and scale down during quieter times.
3. When Aligned with Regulatory Compliance Requirements
Banking is heavily regulated, with requirements like PCI DSS (Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard) and SOX (Sarbanes-Oxley) compliance. When usage-based pricing is structured to include compliance costs proportionally, it can more accurately reflect the true cost of service provision.
When Usage-Based Pricing Backfires for Banking SaaS
1. Unpredictable Budgeting and Cost Control Challenges
The primary drawback of usage-based models is budget unpredictability. Banking executives often prefer fixed costs for financial planning and risk management. A survey by Deloitte found that 67% of financial institutions cited "unpredictable costs" as their top concern with usage-based models.
For core banking platforms or mission-critical systems, sudden spikes in usage can lead to unexpected expenses that disrupt quarterly financial projections. This unpredictability can be particularly problematic for smaller banks with tighter operating margins.
2. Misalignment with Enterprise Banking Needs
Enterprise pricing for large banks often requires customization that goes beyond simple usage metrics. When usage-based models are implemented without considering the complex needs of enterprise banks, they can lead to:
- Overly complex billing structures that require dedicated resources to monitor
- Inadequate service levels during peak usage periods
- Cost disincentives for innovation and experimentation
3. Inappropriate Usage Metrics That Don't Reflect Value
Not all usage metrics accurately reflect the value delivered to banks. For example:
- A fraud detection system priced per scan might disincentivize thorough security practices
- A customer service platform charging per ticket might discourage proper customer support
- A data storage solution charging per GB might penalize banks for regulatory compliance requirements
In these cases, value-based pricing approaches might better align with the actual benefits received by the bank.
Finding the Middle Ground: Hybrid Pricing Models
Many successful banking SaaS providers are moving toward hybrid models that combine elements of both usage-based and subscription pricing:
Tiered Usage with Predictable Caps
Implementing tiers provides banks with more predictable costs while still allowing for some usage flexibility. For example, a core banking platform might offer tiers based on transaction volumes:
- Tier 1: Up to 1 million transactions/month for $10,000
- Tier 2: Up to 5 million transactions/month for $35,000
- Tier 3: Custom enterprise pricing for unlimited transactions
Strategic Price Fencing
Effective price fences can help banking SaaS providers segment their market while ensuring cost predictability. These might include:
- Feature-based limitations (basic vs. premium security features)
- Time-based restrictions (business hours vs. 24/7 support)
- Volume-based discounting that rewards higher usage without punishing it
Best Practices for Banks Evaluating SaaS Pricing Models
When evaluating SaaS solutions with usage-based pricing elements, banks should:
- Analyze historical usage patterns to predict costs under different models
- Negotiate caps or maximum fees to prevent budgetary surprises
- Request clear visibility tools to monitor usage in real-time
- Consider the total cost of ownership, including implementation, training, and compliance costs
- Evaluate exit costs if usage dramatically increases making the model unsustainable
Conclusion: The Right Pricing Model Depends on Your Banking Context
There's no one-size-fits-all answer to whether usage-based pricing is right for banking SaaS. The decision should be based on:
- The nature of the technology solution and its value metrics
- Your bank's size, usage patterns, and budget predictability requirements
- Regulatory compliance needs and risk management approach
- Growth projections and scalability requirements
The most successful banking SaaS relationships occur when pricing models align incentives between the provider and the bank, creating partnerships where both parties benefit from increased usage, enhanced capabilities, and ultimately, better customer outcomes.
By carefully evaluating how usage-based elements intersect with your bank's specific needs, you can ensure your technology investments deliver maximum value without unexpected costs or misaligned incentives.