
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.
In the competitive landscape of SaaS, finding the right balance between your open-source offering and premium enterprise features can make or break your business model. Open core has emerged as a popular strategy, but the question remains: how do you effectively package enterprise features to maximize both adoption and revenue? This challenge affects pricing strategy, product development, and ultimately your company's growth trajectory.
Open core is a business model where companies offer a free, open-source version of their product while selling proprietary features aimed at enterprise customers. This approach has gained traction because it combines the community benefits of open source with the revenue potential of premium offerings.
The model works particularly well for developer-focused tools and infrastructure software. Companies like GitLab, Elastic, and HashiCorp have successfully implemented variations of open core, demonstrating its viability when executed thoughtfully.
Determining which features belong in the open-source core versus the premium enterprise tiers creates a fundamental tension. Package too many features in your free offering, and you risk undermining your revenue potential. Include too few, and you may struggle with adoption and community engagement.
According to a 2022 OpenView Partners survey, 72% of successful open core companies report that finding this balance was their biggest challenge in the early stages of establishing their enterprise packaging strategy.
Rather than making arbitrary distinctions, segment features based on the value they deliver to different customer profiles:
MongoDB's approach illustrates this well. Their community edition provides the core database functionality, while enterprise tiers offer advanced security controls, backup solutions, and enterprise integrations that larger organizations require.
A useful framework is to consider the "complexity line" in your SaaS packaging strategy. Features that help manage complexity at scale are typically perfect candidates for enterprise tiers:
According to Tomasz Tunguz of Redpoint Ventures, enterprise features that reduce organizational complexity can command 3-5x higher pricing compared to productivity-enhancing features.
Rather than creating a single "enterprise tier," consider multiple enterprise tiers to capture different segments of the market:
This approach allows you to create natural upgrade paths as customer needs evolve.
Think of your product as an onion with layers of functionality:
Gitlab exemplifies this approach with their tiered model that progresses from Free to Premium to Ultimate, with each tier adding features that address increasingly complex organizational needs.
Another effective enterprise packaging approach treats your core product as a platform and offers enterprise extensions:
HashiCorp follows this pattern with their suite of products, offering open-source versions alongside enterprise extensions that provide advanced features and unified management.
Avoid making arbitrary decisions about which features go into which tier. Each feature should be placed according to the value it delivers to specific customer segments.
A severely limited open-source offering undermines the benefits of open core. According to a report by Bessemer Venture Partners, companies that maintain robust open-source versions see 30% higher adoption rates and more sustainable growth.
Package features along natural usage boundaries. Features that work together should generally live in the same tier to avoid frustrating user experiences.
Implementing effective analytics is crucial for optimizing your enterprise feature bundling:
According to OpenView's SaaS Benchmarks, companies that regularly optimize their packaging strategy (at least twice yearly) show 15-20% higher annual growth rates than those that rarely revisit their approach.
Elastic provides a compelling case study in open core enterprise packaging evolution. They started with a completely open Elasticsearch product, then introduced X-Pack as a separate commercial extension. After customer feedback, they restructured their approach to include features in the open core but with "basic" functionality, while reserving "advanced" versions for paid tiers.
This evolution shows how packaging strategies can and should adapt as companies mature and market conditions change. Their current enterprise tiers align closely with organizational value, offering features like security, monitoring, and machine learning capabilities in progressively more powerful implementations.
There is no one-size-fits-all approach to packaging enterprise features in an open core SaaS model. The optimal strategy depends on your specific product, market positioning, and customer segments. However, by following the principles outlined above, you can create a packaging structure that balances community growth with revenue potential.
The most successful open core companies continuously refine their approach based on customer feedback, usage data, and market evolution. They maintain a generous open-source offering while creating clear value differentiation for enterprise customers willing to pay for additional capabilities.
Remember that your packaging strategy should evolve with your company. What works at one stage of growth may need adjustment as you scale. The key is to maintain alignment between your feature bundling decisions and the actual value those features deliver to different customer segments.
By thoughtfully implementing a value-based enterprise packaging strategy, you can create a sustainable open core business that serves both community users and enterprise customers effectively.

Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.