
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.
This article expands on a question originally shared by NotedisApp on Reddit - enhanced with additional analysis and frameworks.
Pricing a SaaS product for freelancers and small agencies is one of the most challenging strategic decisions founders face. When you're positioned below enterprise competitors but above free alternatives, finding that perfect price point becomes critical for both acquisition and long-term sustainability.
For a visual feedback and annotation tool targeting freelancers and small agencies, $20/month is often an appropriate entry point when positioned correctly. The key lies not in simply being cheaper than enterprise alternatives like Marker.io at $59/month, but in crafting a value proposition that resonates specifically with your target audience's needs and purchasing patterns.
When positioning a tool for freelancers and small agencies, understanding their purchasing psychology is more important than simply undercutting competitors. Freelancers don't necessarily want the cheapest option—they want the right option for their specific needs.
Analysis of B2B SaaS buying patterns shows that freelancers evaluate tools against three primary criteria:
The $15-25 monthly price range has emerged as a psychological sweet spot for freelancer-focused tools. At this level, the decision typically doesn't require significant deliberation or approval processes while still signaling professional-grade quality.
Starting with artificially low pricing to gain traction is a common but potentially damaging strategy. Industry experience shows three major risks with this approach:
When you anchor your product at a very low price point (say $5-10/month), you train early customers to value your product at that level. Data from SaaS pricing transitions shows that existing customers typically resist price increases of more than 15-20%, with churn rates doubling or tripling during significant repricing events.
Lower prices disproportionately attract customers who make decisions primarily based on cost rather than value. These customers typically:
If your core product is priced too low, the perceived value gap between tiers becomes more difficult to justify. Case studies of pricing structures show that successful tiered pricing typically maintains a 2x-3x multiple between levels—starting too low can make this progression mathematically challenging.
Your price is a positioning statement. At $20/month for unlimited usage, you're making a specific statement about your product's value and target audience. The key is ensuring your broader positioning aligns with this price point.
Consider these positioning frameworks that support a $20/month price:
This positioning should be reflected in your messaging. Rather than highlighting being "cheaper than Marker.io," emphasize being "designed specifically for freelancer workflows" or "the straightforward alternative to overcomplicated feedback tools."
While $20/month is an appropriate base price, your pricing structure deserves deeper consideration:
Unlimited offerings sound appealing but can leave money on the table from power users. Analysis of SaaS pricing models shows that providing 2-3 tiers based on meaningful usage limits often maximizes revenue while still appearing simple:
| Tier | Price | Usage Limit | Best For |
|------|-------|------------|----------|
| Starter | $15/mo | 50 feedback items/mo | Solo freelancers |
| Professional | $29/mo | 200 feedback items/mo | Small agencies |
| Agency | $49/mo | 500 feedback items/mo | Growing teams |
The key is setting the limits high enough that most users won't hit them while capturing additional value from those who will benefit most.
Your current annual pricing ($192, saving $48) represents a 20% discount, which aligns with industry standards. Data shows that annual plans typically:
Rather than comparing solely to direct competitors like Marker.io, analyze what your target customers are already paying for other tools in their stack. Freelancers who pay $19/month for Laravel Forge or similar development tools have already established a mental price anchor for professional tools.
When launching a new product, focus first on validating product-market fit rather than optimizing price for maximum revenue. Consider this framework for approaching pricing:
Many successful bootstrapped SaaS companies maintain a single, straightforward price point for years before implementing more complex structures. This simplicity allows focus on product quality and customer acquisition rather than pricing optimization.
For a quality visual feedback tool targeting freelancers and small agencies, $20/month strikes an appropriate balance between value perception and business sustainability when positioned correctly.
Rather than focusing on being cheaper than enterprise alternatives, emphasize the specific value your product delivers to freelancers:
With this positioning, $20/month positions your product as a professional tool that serious freelancers and small agencies will readily incorporate into their workflow—not because it's cheap, but because it's right-sized for their specific needs.

Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.