.png)
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
In today's software landscape, determining the optimal balance between open source and proprietary features represents a critical strategic decision for SaaS companies. This "open core ratio" directly impacts your market adoption, revenue potential, and community engagement. But how do you determine what percentage of your product should be freely available versus locked behind a paywall?
Understanding the Open Core Model
The open core model combines open source foundations with proprietary premium features. At its essence, companies maintain an open source core product while offering proprietary extensions, advanced features, or enterprise capabilities for paying customers.
This model has gained significant traction because it balances the benefits of open source development (community contributions, rapid innovation, broader adoption) with sustainable revenue generation. Companies like Elastic, MongoDB, GitLab, and Automattic (WordPress) have successfully implemented variations of this approach.
The Strategic Importance of Feature Distribution
Your feature distribution strategy directly impacts several critical business outcomes:
- User adoption and growth velocity: Too many features behind a paywall can limit initial adoption and community building
- Conversion rates: Too few proprietary features may result in low conversion from free to paid users
- Community engagement: The wrong balance may diminish open source contributions or fragment your user base
- Competitive positioning: Your open/closed ratio helps differentiate your offering in the market
According to OpenLogic's 2023 State of Open Source Report, 65% of organizations consider the balance between open source and proprietary components when evaluating software solutions, highlighting the strategic importance of this decision.
Guidelines for Determining Your Open Core Ratio
While there's no universal formula for the perfect open source strategy, several patterns have emerged across successful companies:
1. The 80/20 Rule for Core Functionality
Many successful open core companies follow a rough 80/20 split: approximately 80% of core functionality is open source, while 20% represents premium capabilities. According to a 2022 analysis by OpenView Partners, companies that maintained this ratio showed 37% higher user growth compared to those with more restrictive models.
GitLab exemplifies this approach. Their open source Community Edition contains robust core functionality, while their Enterprise Edition offers advanced security, compliance, and collaboration features targeting larger organizations.
2. Value-Based Feature Segmentation
Rather than focusing on percentages alone, consider segmenting features based on:
- User personas: Which features matter to individual developers versus enterprise buyers?
- Usage frequency: Daily-use features often work better in the open source tier
- Deployment complexity: Features requiring significant operational expertise may be better as proprietary offerings
- Value perception: Features with clearly demonstrable ROI can justify premium positioning
Hashicorp's approach to their product suite exemplifies this strategy. Their tools provide substantial value in open source form, while enterprise features focus on governance, security, and team collaboration needs of larger organizations.
3. The Strategic "Free Line"
The most critical decision is determining where to draw the "free line" between open and proprietary features. According to Joseph Jacks, founder of OSS Capital, the most successful open core companies place this line to ensure:
- The open source version provides standalone value and solves real problems
- Proprietary features align with enterprise needs and willingness to pay
- The gap between tiers creates natural upgrade paths as users scale
Finding Your Optimal Balance: A Framework
To determine your ideal open core ratio and feature distribution, consider this framework:
- Analyze your value creation: Map all features against the value they deliver to different user segments
- Consider adoption drivers: Which features drive initial adoption versus long-term stickiness?
- Evaluate monetization potential: Which capabilities align with customer willingness to pay?
- Assess competitive landscape: What's the standard feature distribution in your category?
- Consider development economics: Which features benefit most from community contributions?
MongoDB offers an instructive example of evolving this balance over time. While their core database remains open source, they've gradually shifted certain cloud features, security controls, and enterprise integrations to their proprietary offerings based on customer needs and market feedback.
Common Patterns in Proprietary Features
Across successful open core companies, certain types of features consistently appear in the proprietary tier:
- Enterprise administration: User management, role-based access controls, SSO integration
- Compliance and security: Advanced audit logs, compliance certifications, enhanced security
- Scalability features: High-availability configurations, advanced performance optimizations
- Integration capabilities: Enterprise system connectors, advanced API capabilities
- Support and SLAs: Guaranteed response times, dedicated support channels
According to Andreessen Horowitz's analysis of open core businesses, these categories consistently demonstrate higher willingness-to-pay among enterprise customers, making them natural candidates for the proprietary tier.
Evolving Your Open Core Ratio Over Time
Your optimal feature distribution isn't static. As your product and market evolve, continuously reassess your approach:
- Early-stage focus: Initially emphasize open source to drive adoption and community building
- Growth-stage adjustment: Introduce proprietary features aligned with emerging enterprise needs
- Mature-stage refinement: Fine-tune based on usage patterns and conversion analytics
Elastic's journey illustrates this evolution. They began with a highly open approach, but gradually adjusted their licensing and feature distribution as they scaled and faced competitive pressure from cloud providers.
Conclusion: Balance Business Sustainability with Community Engagement
The ideal percentage of open source versus proprietary features isn't universal—it depends on your specific market, user base, and business model. However, successful companies typically maintain enough open source functionality to drive adoption while reserving high-value, enterprise-focused capabilities for their commercial offerings.
Remember that your open core ratio represents more than a technical decision—it's a fundamental strategic choice that shapes your community relationship, go-to-market approach, and long-term business sustainability. By thoughtfully analyzing your specific context and continuously refining your approach, you can find the balance that maximizes both community engagement and business growth.
The most successful companies don't view this as a zero-sum decision between open and closed models, but rather as an opportunity to create a virtuous cycle where open source adoption drives commercial success, which in turn enables greater investment in the open source core.