
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.
In today's rapidly evolving SaaS landscape, pricing models significantly impact both customer acquisition and revenue growth. Among these models, usage-based pricing has emerged as a powerful strategy for aligning customer value with company revenue. But what exactly is usage-based pricing, and why are so many successful SaaS companies adopting this approach?
Usage-based pricing (UBP) is a pricing strategy where customers pay based on their actual consumption of a service rather than a flat recurring fee. Unlike traditional subscription models with fixed monthly or annual rates, usage-based pricing directly ties costs to the value customers extract from your product.
This consumption billing approach functions similarly to utility services like electricity or water—you pay for what you use, when you use it. The model creates a direct correlation between the value delivered and the price paid, often resulting in more equitable pricing for customers of all sizes.
To implement an effective usage-based pricing structure, companies must identify:
Value metrics: The specific units of consumption that correlate with customer value (API calls, storage used, transactions processed, etc.)
Pricing tiers: Different rates based on volume, often with discounts at higher usage levels
Minimum commitments: Optional floor spending requirements that provide predictable baseline revenue
Usage caps or guardrails: Protections that prevent unexpected billing spikes for customers
According to OpenView Partners' 2022 SaaS Benchmarks Report, companies with usage-based models grew at a 29% faster rate than those with traditional subscription models, highlighting the business impact of this pricing approach.
To better understand usage-based pricing, it helps to contrast it with other common SaaS pricing approaches:
| Model | How It Works | Example Companies |
|-------|-------------|-------------------|
| Usage-based | Pay only for what you consume | Twilio, AWS, Snowflake |
| Flat-rate subscription | Same price regardless of usage | Netflix, Adobe Creative Cloud |
| Tiered subscription | Fixed price based on feature sets | Salesforce, HubSpot |
| Freemium | Free basic version with paid upgrades | Slack, Dropbox |
The key difference is that usage-based pricing provides maximum flexibility while creating natural alignment between the vendor's success and the customer's success.
The shift toward consumption billing represents a fundamental change in how software is sold and purchased. Industry data from Paddle suggests that 45% of SaaS companies now incorporate some form of usage-based element in their pricing strategy, up from 34% in 2019.
This growth is driven by several factors:
As noted by Tomasz Tunguz of Redpoint Ventures, "Usage-based pricing transforms customer success from a department into the core business model."
For executives considering a transition to consumption billing, several critical elements require attention:
The most effective usage-based pricing models select metrics that:
For example, Twilio charges per message sent, Stripe charges per transaction processed, and Snowflake charges for compute time and storage used.
Usage-based pricing requires robust systems for:
According to a study by MGI Research, companies implementing usage-based models typically require 3-6 months to develop the necessary technical infrastructure.
One common concern with pay-as-you-go pricing is revenue predictability. Successful companies address this through:
The benefits of usage-based pricing extend beyond revenue alignment:
Market expansion: With lower entry barriers, companies can serve both small businesses and enterprise clients with the same product.
Product-led growth: Usage data provides direct feedback on which features deliver the most value.
Customer success alignment: When customers succeed and use more, the vendor succeeds accordingly.
Competitive advantage: According to Bessemer Venture Partners, public companies with usage-based pricing trade at 50% higher revenue multiples compared to their peers.
Despite its advantages, consumption billing isn't without challenges:
Revenue unpredictability: Usage fluctuations can create forecasting difficulties.
Customer bill shock: Unexpected usage spikes can lead to billing surprises.
Complex implementation: The technical requirements for tracking and billing can be substantial.
Educational burden: Customers accustomed to fixed subscriptions may need guidance on the new model.
Consider these questions when evaluating the fit for your company:
As the SaaS industry continues to mature, we're seeing increasing sophistication in pricing models. Many successful companies are now implementing hybrid approaches that combine elements of usage-based and subscription pricing.
According to Kyle Poyar of OpenView Partners, "The future isn't pure usage-based pricing versus pure subscription—it's finding the right mix that aligns value for both customer and vendor while maintaining predictability."
Usage-based pricing represents a significant shift in how SaaS companies monetize their products, creating stronger alignment between customer value and vendor revenue. While implementing consumption billing requires careful planning and robust systems, the potential benefits in terms of growth, market expansion, and customer satisfaction make it worth considering for many SaaS executives.
As you evaluate your pricing strategy, remember that the most successful approach often incorporates elements of multiple models tailored to your specific market, product, and customer needs. The companies that will thrive in the coming years will be those that continually refine their pricing to maintain that critical alignment between the value they deliver and the revenue they capture.

Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.