
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.
In today's competitive SaaS landscape, setting the right price isn't just about covering costs—it's a strategic art that can make or break your growth trajectory. Yet many SaaS executives continue to rely on gut feeling, competitor benchmarking, or simple cost-plus formulas when crafting their pricing strategy. Enter conjoint analysis: a sophisticated pricing research methodology that's transforming how forward-thinking SaaS companies determine what customers will actually pay for their offerings.
SaaS businesses face unique pricing complexities that traditional businesses don't encounter. With multiple subscription tiers, feature sets, and user-based pricing models, the number of potential pricing configurations can quickly become overwhelming. This complexity, combined with the subscription-based revenue model, means that pricing missteps can significantly impact customer acquisition, retention, and long-term revenue.
According to a study by Price Intelligently, a mere 1% improvement in pricing strategy can yield an 11% increase in profits—making it the most impactful lever for SaaS profitability. That's where conjoint analysis comes in.
Conjoint analysis is a statistical research methodology that determines how customers value different features within a product or service. Unlike direct questioning about willingness to pay (which often yields unreliable results), conjoint analysis presents customers with realistic trade-off scenarios that mirror actual purchasing decisions.
The name "conjoint" stems from the approach's focus on measuring the combined ("joint") value of different attributes and levels. By analyzing how respondents evaluate different product configurations, conjoint analysis reveals:
In a SaaS context, a typical conjoint study follows these steps:
Start by mapping out the attributes (features, service levels, contract terms) and their potential values or levels. For a project management SaaS, these might include:
Respondents are presented with a series of product configurations at different price points. Each scenario forces a trade-off decision—for example, choosing between a higher-priced option with premium support or a lower-priced option with more storage.
Participants make choices across multiple scenarios, typically ranking or selecting their preferred options. Modern conjoint tools automate this process through survey software that can be distributed to current customers, prospects, or market panels.
Advanced statistical modeling reveals:
Several conjoint methodologies exist, each with distinct advantages for SaaS pricing optimization:
The most common approach for SaaS pricing research, CBC mimics real-world purchasing decisions by asking respondents to choose between complete product profiles. It's particularly effective for evaluating different feature bundles and tier structures.
This interactive approach adapts questions based on previous responses, making it ideal for complex SaaS products with many features. ACA helps trim the evaluation process to the most relevant options for each respondent.
While not technically conjoint, MaxDiff (or best-worst scaling) complements conjoint studies by identifying the most and least valuable features from a larger set. This helps SaaS companies prioritize which features to highlight in marketing materials or which to include in different pricing tiers.
Conjoint analysis reveals the economic value of individual features, helping SaaS companies avoid the twin pitfalls of underpricing high-value features or overinvesting in capabilities customers don't value.
Rather than arbitrary tier divisions, conjoint analysis identifies natural feature groupings based on customer preferences, enabling logical progression between subscription levels.
By quantifying willingness-to-pay across different market segments, conjoint analysis supports value-based pricing approaches that maximize revenue while remaining competitive.
Market simulation tools help predict how changes to pricing structures might shift customers between tiers, reducing the risk of unintentional revenue cannibalization.
Conjoint studies can incorporate competitor offerings, providing clear insights into competitive advantages and optimal positioning strategies.
A mid-market CRM platform utilized conjoint analysis when redesigning their pricing structure. The research revealed that customers placed unexpected premium value on certain automation features that were previously included in lower tiers. By restructuring their tiers and adjusting pricing to reflect this value perception, they increased ARPU by 23% while maintaining customer acquisition rates.
The study also identified a specific market segment with dramatically different feature preferences, leading to the creation of a specialized vertical offering with pricing that reflected the higher willingness-to-pay from this segment.
Clarify what you're hoping to learn. Are you:
Based on your objectives, product complexity, and resources, choose the most appropriate conjoint methodology. For most SaaS companies, CBC offers the best balance of realistic insights and implementation simplicity.
Working with pricing experts or specialized software, design your conjoint exercises to cover the attributes and price ranges you're evaluating. A typical SaaS conjoint study might include 8-12 attributes with 3-5 levels each.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.