.png)
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
In today's competitive SaaS landscape, open core has emerged as a powerful business model that combines the community-building advantages of open source with sustainable revenue generation. But perhaps the most challenging strategic decision facing open core companies is determining which features to keep free and which to place behind a paywall. Get this balance wrong, and you risk either leaving money on the table or stunting adoption and community growth.
Understanding the Open Core Model
Before diving into feature gating strategies, let's clarify what open core actually means. The open core model builds upon an open source foundation by offering proprietary features or extensions as paid offerings. Think of it as a freemium approach specifically designed for software products with open source roots.
Companies like GitLab, MongoDB, and Elastic have successfully implemented this model, maintaining vibrant open source communities while building substantial businesses around premium offerings.
The Balancing Act of Feature Gating
Effective feature gating requires walking a delicate line. Gate too many features or the wrong ones, and you'll struggle to build a community and generate adoption. Gate too few, and your monetization path becomes unclear.
According to OpenView Partners' 2022 SaaS Benchmarks report, companies with well-executed open core models can achieve 15-25% conversion rates from free to paid tiers, significantly higher than typical freemium conversion rates of 2-5%.
Core Features vs. Premium Features: Making the Right Call
What Should Remain Free?
1. Core Functionality
The free tier must deliver genuine value on its own. Users should be able to solve real problems with the open source version of your product. If your free tier feels like a mere demo, community adoption will suffer.
2. Developer Tools and APIs
Keeping basic developer tools, documentation, and essential APIs open helps foster a developer ecosystem around your product. This ecosystem becomes a powerful growth engine and innovation source.
3. Community-Driven Features
Features developed with significant community contribution should typically remain free. Gating these can create resentment and damage community relationships.
What Should Be Gated as Premium Features?
1. Enterprise-Grade Capabilities
Features that primarily benefit larger organizations make ideal candidates for your premium tier:
- Advanced security and compliance features
- SAML/SSO integration
- Role-based access controls
- Audit logging
- SLAs and dedicated support
According to a 2023 study by Redpoint Ventures, enterprise security features can increase willingness to pay by 30-40% among mid-market and enterprise customers.
2. Scale-Related Features
Features that become valuable as usage scales are natural premium offerings:
- High availability configurations
- Advanced performance optimizations
- Unlimited storage or processing capabilities
- Multi-region deployment options
3. Operational Tooling
Tools that make operations smoother for larger teams or deployments:
- Advanced monitoring and alerting
- Automated backup and disaster recovery
- Deployment automation
- Centralized management consoles
4. Advanced Analytics and Reporting
Sophisticated analytics capabilities typically appeal to business users rather than individual developers:
- Custom dashboards
- Advanced reporting
- Data export capabilities
- Integration with business intelligence tools
Strategic Frameworks for Feature Gating Decisions
Rather than making ad hoc decisions about your SaaS feature strategy, consider these frameworks:
The Value-Visibility Matrix
Plot features on two axes:
- Horizontal: User visibility (how apparent the value is)
- Vertical: Business value (how important it is to different segments)
Features with high business value but lower visibility often make ideal premium offerings, while highly visible features with broad appeal help drive adoption and should often remain free.
The Adoption-Monetization Spectrum
Think of your features along a spectrum:
- At one end: Features driving adoption and community growth
- At the other end: Features enabling monetization
Your open source offering should be weighted toward adoption features, while your premium tiers should concentrate on monetization features.
Common Feature Gating Pitfalls to Avoid
1. Gating Too Early
Rushing to gate features before establishing product-market fit can severely limit adoption. According to OpenCore Ventures, companies should typically focus on community growth for 12-18 months before implementing significant feature gating.
2. The "Bait and Switch"
Moving previously free features behind a paywall is perhaps the fastest way to damage community trust. Once a feature is free, consider it a commitment.
3. Complicated Pricing Tiers
Having too many tiers with complex feature distributions can confuse customers. Most successful open core companies maintain three clear tiers: free, team/pro, and enterprise.
4. Ignoring Community Feedback
Your community will have strong opinions about your feature gating decisions. While you can't please everyone, deliberately gathering and considering this feedback improves both your strategy and community relations.
Case Studies in Successful Open Core Feature Gating
GitLab
GitLab maintains a robust free Community Edition while reserving enterprise features for paid tiers. Their approach to open core features includes keeping developer-focused capabilities free while gating team collaboration and governance features.
HashiCorp
HashiCorp offers free versions of tools like Terraform and Vault but gates enterprise features like team management, governance policies, and advanced security behind their enterprise offerings.
Grafana
Grafana provides its core visualization capabilities as open source while monetizing through enterprise features like advanced authentication, reporting, and high availability.
Evolving Your Gating Strategy Over Time
Your feature gating approach shouldn't remain static. As your product and market mature, consider these evolution patterns:
1. Starting with Minimal Gating
In early stages, keep most features free to drive adoption, with only clear enterprise needs gated.
2. Progressive Feature Differentiation
As you grow, introduce clearer differentiation between free and paid tiers, carefully gating new enterprise-focused features.
3. Cloud vs. Self-Hosted Differentiation
Many open core companies now differentiate not just on features but on deployment models, offering enhanced capabilities in their cloud/SaaS offering.
Final Thoughts
Creating an effective feature gating strategy for your open core product requires balancing community growth with business sustainability. The most successful companies maintain genuinely valuable free offerings while creating clear incentives for organizations to upgrade.
Remember that your premium features should solve real problems for paying customers, not just remove artificial limitations. By focusing on value-based gating rather than restriction-based gating, you build both a thriving community and a sustainable business.
The right approach to feature gating transforms your open source foundation from a marketing cost into a strategic advantage, creating a virtuous cycle where community adoption feeds commercial growth, which in turn enables further investment in the open source core.