
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.
In today's rapidly evolving business landscape, procurement processes are undergoing a significant transformation through AI-driven automation. As organizations deploy multiple AI agents to handle different aspects of procurement, a critical question emerges: what credit model should be used to manage, track, and bill for these automated workflows? This article explores various credit models for multi-agent procurement systems and helps you determine which approach might work best for your organization.
Procurement departments are increasingly turning to agentic AI systems—collections of specialized AI agents that work together to handle complex procurement tasks. Unlike traditional automation, these AI agents can negotiate with vendors, compare pricing options, validate compliance requirements, and even make purchasing decisions within defined parameters.
According to a 2023 McKinsey report, organizations that have implemented agentic AI in procurement have seen cost reductions of 15-30% and processing time improvements of up to 85%. However, with this new technology comes the challenge of determining appropriate pricing and credit models.
Before diving into specific approaches for procurement systems, let's explore the primary credit models used for AI services:
Usage-based pricing ties costs directly to consumption metrics. For procurement AI, this might include:
This model provides transparency and allows organizations to scale costs with actual usage, but can be unpredictable when procurement demands fluctuate seasonally.
Outcome-based pricing links payment to the results achieved by the AI system, such as:
While this approach aligns incentives with business goals, it requires sophisticated tracking mechanisms and clear definitions of success metrics.
Credit-based pricing involves purchasing a pool of "credits" that are consumed as various AI agents within the procurement workflow perform different tasks. This model offers several advantages:
This approach has gained popularity for multi-agent systems because it provides both predictability for budgeting and flexibility for operations.
When multiple AI agents work together in a procurement workflow, the complexity of tracking usage and determining appropriate billing increases significantly. Here's how different credit models function in this context:
Different procurement tasks require vastly different computational resources. For example, a simple vendor validation might consume minimal resources, while an AI agent negotiating contract terms might require extensive processing power.
Solution with Credit-Based Pricing: Each agent can draw from a shared pool of credits, with more complex tasks consuming more credits. This allows for fair allocation based on the actual value and resource intensity of each task.
Multi-agent systems require robust orchestration—the coordination of different AI agents working together. This orchestration layer adds overhead that must be accounted for in pricing.
Solution with Credit-Based Pricing: Credits can be allocated not just for individual agent actions but also for the orchestration processes that coordinate them, providing a comprehensive view of system costs.
Based on our research and industry best practices, here's a framework for implementing an effective credit model for multi-agent procurement workflows:
Define what constitutes one "credit" in your system and how credits are consumed by different types of procurement tasks. For example:
Credit systems need appropriate guardrails to prevent unexpected resource consumption. These might include:
Users should have clear visibility into how credits are being consumed across the procurement workflow:
For organizations using Large Language Models (LLMs) in their procurement agents, integration with LLMOps (LLM Operations) platforms is crucial:
A global manufacturing company implemented a credit-based pricing model for their multi-agent procurement system with impressive results. Their system included:
By implementing a unified credit system across these agents, they achieved:
The company found that credit-based pricing provided the flexibility needed to handle their diverse procurement needs while maintaining cost control and predictability.
When deciding on a credit model for your multi-agent procurement system, consider these factors:
Usage-based pricing may be ideal if:
Outcome-based pricing might work best if:
Credit-based pricing is typically optimal if:
As agentic AI transforms procurement processes, choosing the right credit model becomes a strategic decision that impacts both operational effectiveness and financial outcomes. For most multi-agent procurement systems, a credit-based pricing model offers the ideal balance of flexibility, predictability, and control.
Regardless of which model you choose, ensure that your system includes proper guardrails, transparent reporting, and effective orchestration. With these elements in place, your organization can maximize the value of AI-driven procurement while maintaining appropriate cost controls.
When implemented correctly, the right credit model doesn't just facilitate billing—it becomes a strategic tool for optimizing your entire procurement automation ecosystem.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.