.png)
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Quick Answer: Underpricing SaaS products leads to unsustainable unit economics, attracts price-sensitive customers with high churn, signals low product value, starves innovation budgets, and creates a nearly impossible pricing correction path—making it more dangerous than overpricing for long-term business viability.
Every SaaS founder has lost sleep over pricing. But here's what most get wrong: they obsess over the fear of charging too much while ignoring the far more destructive risk of charging too little. The cost of cheap software extends far beyond immediate revenue loss—it fundamentally undermines your company's ability to survive and scale.
While overpricing delivers rapid, correctable feedback through lost deals, SaaS underpricing risks compound silently until they become existential threats. By the time most companies recognize they're underpriced, the damage has infiltrated their unit economics, customer base quality, and competitive positioning.
Why SaaS Companies Underprice (The Root Causes)
Fear of losing deals and competitive pressure
The most common driver of underpricing is visceral: founders and sales teams hate losing deals. When a prospect mentions a competitor's lower price, the instinct is to match or beat it. What they miss is counterintuitive but critical: losing deals to price objections can be healthy. It often signals you're attracting value-conscious buyers willing to pay for differentiated solutions rather than commodity seekers who'll churn at the next discount.
Misunderstanding customer value perception
Many SaaS companies price based on what they think customers will pay, not what customers actually value. This leads to systematic undervaluation. If your software saves a customer $500,000 annually, charging $5,000 isn't competitive—it's leaving $45,000 or more on the table while signaling that your solution isn't that valuable.
Cost-plus pricing instead of value-based models
Early-stage companies often set prices by calculating their costs and adding a margin. This approach ignores the fundamental economics of software: once built, the marginal cost of serving additional customers approaches zero. Cost-plus pricing in SaaS is a race to bottom pricing that competitors with lower cost structures will always win.
The True Cost of SaaS Underpricing
Unit economics that don't scale (CAC:LTV breakdown)
Healthy SaaS companies maintain a CAC:LTV ratio of at least 1:3. Underpricing compresses LTV directly—lower prices mean lower revenue per customer—while CAC often remains fixed or increases as you scale marketing efforts. A company with $50 ARPU needs three times the customers as one with $150 ARPU to achieve the same revenue, but rarely acquires them at one-third the cost.
Attracting the wrong customer segment (price buyers vs. value buyers)
Low prices attract price-sensitive customers. These buyers exhibit 2-3x higher churn rates than value-focused customers, demand more support per dollar spent, and resist any future price increases. You're not just earning less revenue—you're building a customer base that actively constrains your growth.
Starving product development and innovation budgets
Every dollar of underpriced revenue is a dollar unavailable for R&D. When competitors charging appropriate prices can invest 25% of revenue in product development while you struggle at 10%, the gap compounds. Within three years, their product surpasses yours, justifying their premium while your discounted positioning becomes self-fulfilling.
How Underpricing Signals Low Value
Price as a quality proxy in B2B software
In B2B software purchasing, price functions as a quality signal. Enterprise buyers evaluating solutions for critical workflows often eliminate the cheapest options first—not because they can't afford them, but because low prices suggest inadequate capability, questionable viability, or hidden costs. The underpricing consequences extend beyond revenue to credibility.
Difficulty commanding premium positioning later
Markets develop long memories. Once positioned as the budget option, repositioning as premium requires not just price increases but fundamental rebranding. Customers, analysts, and competitors have already categorized you—escaping that perception demands years of consistent execution and messaging.
The Underpricing Trap: Why It's Harder to Fix Than Overpricing
Customer expectations and price increase resistance
Overpricing provides immediate feedback: prospects don't convert, and you adjust. Underpricing feels successful initially—deals close, customers sign—but creates embedded expectations. When you eventually raise prices, every existing customer becomes a potential churn risk.
Churn risk during pricing corrections
Research shows that price increases of more than 20% trigger churn rates of 5-15% even among satisfied customers. If you're 50% underpriced, correcting in a single move could eliminate a quarter of your customer base. The correction must be gradual, extending your period of suppressed economics.
Competitive repositioning challenges
Competitors who've positioned above you have little incentive to cede that ground. They'll frame your price increase as desperation while emphasizing their consistent, predictable pricing. This is why underpricing is often irreversible without significant customer pain—and sometimes not even then.
Warning Signs Your SaaS Is Underpriced
High volume but low revenue metrics
If your conversion rates exceed industry benchmarks by 50%+ but your revenue trails competitors, you're likely underpriced. Healthy conversion rates typically range from 2-5% for self-serve and 15-25% for sales-assisted—significantly higher often indicates insufficient price friction.
Feature requests you can't afford to build
When customers consistently request capabilities you lack the resources to develop, your pricing may be the constraint. Appropriately priced products generate margins that fund the roadmap customers actually want.
Sales cycles that close "too easily"
B2B sales cycles exist partly because significant investments warrant careful evaluation. If enterprise deals close in days rather than weeks, buyers may not perceive enough value at stake to justify due diligence—or they're getting such obvious deals that hesitation seems unnecessary.
Strategic Framework: Escaping the Underpricing Trap
Value metric reassessment and packaging redesign
Rather than simply raising prices, reassess your value metric and packaging structure. A new pricing model (usage-based, outcome-based, or restructured tiers) gives existing customers a framework for understanding changes rather than perceiving arbitrary increases.
Grandfathering vs. forced migration strategies
Grandfathering existing customers preserves relationships but creates permanent revenue drag and operational complexity. Forced migration maximizes revenue correction but risks churn. Most successful corrections use time-limited grandfathering (12-24 months) that acknowledges loyalty while establishing clear transition timelines.
Building a pricing increase communication plan
Successful price increases require proactive communication emphasizing value delivered since original purchase, roadmap investments the increase enables, and the relative position versus market rates. Customers who understand the "why" accept increases 3x more readily than those who perceive arbitrary changes.
Real-World Examples and Recovery Paths
Case studies of successful pricing corrections
Slack's 2018 pricing restructure increased prices by 10-40% depending on tier while adding features, maintaining their growth trajectory. The key was bundling the increase with tangible new value.
Intercom successfully raised prices multiple times by consistently repositioning around expanded capabilities, using packaging changes to justify new price points rather than simple percentage increases.
Both companies shared common approaches: they led with value narratives, provided extended notice periods, and offered migration paths that gave customers agency in how they transitioned.
The SaaS pricing mistakes that kill companies aren't dramatic—they're quiet accumulations of foregone revenue, wrong-fit customers, and deferred investment that compound until correction becomes impossible. The epidemic of underpricing persists because it feels safe and generates short-term wins. Understanding its true costs is the first step toward building a sustainably profitable business.
Download our SaaS Pricing Health Assessment: 12 metrics to identify if you're leaving revenue on the table