.png)
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Have you ever confidently predicted how customers would use your SaaS product, only to find reality wildly different? You're not alone. This disconnect between prediction and reality has a name: the planning fallacy. For SaaS executives, this cognitive bias can lead to serious pricing mistakes and revenue shortfalls.
What Is the Planning Fallacy?
The planning fallacy, first described by psychologists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky, is our tendency to underestimate the time, costs, and risks associated with future actions while overestimating the benefits. In the SaaS world, this manifests as overly optimistic usage forecasts that rarely align with actual customer behavior.
According to a study by Price Intelligently, 80% of SaaS companies acknowledge major flaws in their pricing strategy, with inaccurate usage forecasting being a primary culprit. This prediction bias doesn't just affect new startups – even established companies fall into this trap.
How the Planning Fallacy Undermines Your SaaS Business
Inaccurate Revenue Projections
When you base your financial models on optimistic usage forecasts, you're setting yourself up for disappointment. Research from OpenView Partners shows that SaaS companies typically overestimate year-one revenues by 30-50%. This optimistic usage forecasting creates a domino effect of missed targets and strategic adjustments.
Flawed Pricing Models
Perhaps the most significant impact comes in pricing strategy. When you don't correctly anticipate how customers will use your product, you'll likely:
- Undercharge power users (leaving money on the table)
- Overcharge light users (driving them away)
- Create pricing tiers that don't align with actual usage patterns
McKinsey research indicates that a 1% improvement in pricing can translate to an 11% increase in profits. Conversely, pricing mistakes stemming from the planning fallacy can silently erode your margins.
Resource Misallocation
When your usage forecasts are off, you'll likely misallocate resources:
- Over-provisioning infrastructure based on optimistic growth projections
- Under-staffing customer support when actual usage patterns create unexpected friction points
- Making product development decisions based on imagined rather than actual user behavior
Why We Fall for the Planning Fallacy in SaaS
The Inside View Dominates
When forecasting usage, SaaS executives typically adopt what Kahneman calls an "inside view" – focusing on the specifics of their product while ignoring broader statistical trends. This approach amplifies prediction bias.
Product teams think, "Our product is uniquely valuable, so users will engage with all these features," when statistics from similar products might tell a different story.
Cognitive Optimism
SaaS leaders are optimistic by nature – you have to be to build something new. This optimism bias, however, clouds objective usage forecasting. As LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman noted, "Entrepreneurs are optimists… this is both a blessing and a curse."
Pressure for Growth
The SaaS business model demands growth. When presenting to investors or boards, there's implicit pressure to show aggressive adoption curves. This pressure can contaminate honest usage forecasting with wishful thinking.
How to Overcome the Planning Fallacy in SaaS
Use Reference Class Forecasting
Instead of building forecasts from scratch, start with the results of similar SaaS products as your baseline. Daniel Kahneman recommends this "outside view" approach to combat the planning fallacy.
For example, if comparable SaaS products see 60% of users engaging with advanced features, adjust your projections accordingly – even if your instinct says your product is different.
Build Multiple Usage Scenarios
According to research by the Corporate Executive Board, companies that model multiple usage scenarios (conservative, expected, and optimistic) make better pricing decisions than those committed to a single forecast.
Implement Usage-Based Pricing Components
Companies like Twilio and Stripe have mitigated the planning fallacy by tying pricing directly to usage. This approach transforms forecast accuracy from a make-or-break factor into a less critical variable.
Research from OpenView's 2022 SaaS Benchmarks shows that companies with usage-based models grew 38% faster than those with purely subscription-based pricing, partly because they weren't constrained by inaccurate usage predictions.
Test Pricing with Real Users Before Scaling
Rather than relying solely on forecasts, progressive SaaS companies test pricing models with actual users. Experimentation provides data that counterbalances the planning fallacy's effects.
ProfitWell research indicates that companies that run structured pricing experiments achieve 30% higher revenue growth than those relying purely on forecasts.
Practical Steps to Improve Usage Forecasting
- Collect granular usage data from beta users or early adopters
- Segment usage patterns across different customer types
- Benchmark against industry standards for similar products
- Create probabilistic models rather than deterministic forecasts
- Regularly review forecasts against actuals to calibrate future predictions
The Path Forward
The planning fallacy in usage forecasting isn't going away – it's hardwired into human psychology. The SaaS executives who win will be those who recognize this bias and implement systematic approaches to counteract it.
By adopting reference class forecasting, building multiple scenarios, implementing usage-based components, and testing with real users, you can significantly improve the accuracy of your usage forecasts and the effectiveness of your pricing strategy.
Remember, the goal isn't perfect prediction – it's creating robust business models that perform well even when your forecasts inevitably miss the mark. As Jeff Bezos famously said, "Most decisions should probably be made with somewhere around 70% of the information you wish you had. If you wait for 90%, in most cases, you're probably being slow."
The same principle applies to usage forecasting – acknowledge the planning fallacy, use the best practices outlined here, and build pricing models that succeed even when predictions fail.