
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.
Feeling lost in the world of SaaS pricing models? You're not alone. Usage-based pricing has emerged as one of the most talked-about strategies in recent years, but many executives find themselves struggling to understand whether it's right for their business—and how to implement it effectively. This straightforward guide will walk you through creating your own simple battlecard for usage-based pricing strategy, helping you determine if this consumption model could be your ticket to improved revenue and customer satisfaction.
Usage-based pricing (sometimes called consumption-based pricing) is a model where customers pay based on their actual consumption of your product or service, rather than a flat subscription fee. Think of how you pay for electricity or water—you only pay for what you use.
According to OpenView Partners' 2022 SaaS Benchmarks report, companies with usage-based pricing models grow faster than their counterparts, with a median growth rate of 29% compared to 19% for pure subscription companies.
Before diving into the battlecard, let's understand the appeal:
Aligns value with cost: Customers only pay for what they use, creating a direct correlation between value received and price paid
Lower barrier to entry: New customers can start small without committing to expensive plans
Revenue expansion opportunity: As customers use more, they pay more—without requiring intervention from your sales team
Competitive advantage: According to Deloitte, 80% of SaaS companies believe that consumption-based models give them an edge in the market
A battlecard is essentially a cheat sheet that helps you quickly evaluate and communicate a strategy. Here's your beginner-friendly battlecard for usage-based pricing:
✅ Your product has clearly measurable usage metrics (API calls, storage, users, etc.)
✅ Customer usage varies significantly between segments
✅ You want to reduce friction in the sales process
✅ Your industry shows a trend toward usage-based models
✅ You have visibility into usage patterns and can predict revenue
❌ Your value proposition is difficult to tie to specific usage metrics
❌ Your customers strongly prefer predictable billing
❌ You lack the technical infrastructure to accurately measure usage
❌ Your company relies heavily on predictable, recurring revenue forecasts
Average Revenue Per User (ARPU): Does it increase over time?
Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC): Does lower entry pricing reduce acquisition costs?
Net Revenue Retention: Are customers naturally expanding their usage?
Churn Rate: Are customers more likely to stay when they only pay for what they use?
If your battlecard evaluation suggests usage-based pricing could work for your business, here's a simple step-by-step implementation strategy:
The foundation of any usage-based pricing strategy is choosing the right value metric—the unit of consumption you'll charge for.
"The ideal value metric scales with the value your customers receive," explains Patrick Campbell, founder of ProfitWell. "If customers get more value as they use more, that's what you should charge for."
Common examples include:
Before setting prices, collect data on how your customers currently use your product:
According to Kyle Poyar of OpenView Partners, "The most successful usage-based companies spend months analyzing usage data before setting their pricing."
Based on your analysis, determine your pricing approach:
Most beginners find that a hybrid model offers the best balance of predictability and alignment with value.
You'll need systems to:
The final step is often overlooked but critical: clearly explain the pricing model to customers, emphasizing:
Twilio built its business entirely on a usage-based model, charging for API calls. Their transparent pricing helped them grow to over $2.8 billion in revenue.
Snowflake revolutionized data warehousing with a consumption-based model that separates storage and compute costs, allowing customers to scale each independently.
AWS became the dominant cloud provider partly by pioneering the "pay for what you use" model in infrastructure services.
As you implement your usage-based pricing strategy, watch out for these common mistakes:
Choosing the wrong value metric—if it doesn't scale with customer value, the model breaks down
Unpredictable revenue forecasting—usage-based models can make financial planning more challenging
Sticker shock—customers may be surprised by high bills if they don't understand or monitor their usage
Complexity in communication—if customers don't understand how pricing works, they'll resist it
The battlecard outlined in this article gives you a starting point, but the decision ultimately depends on your specific business context. According to a 2023 Forrester study, companies that successfully implement usage-based pricing see an average 38% improvement in customer lifetime value.
Consider starting small—perhaps with a hybrid model or by offering usage-based pricing as an option alongside traditional subscriptions. This allows you to test the waters while minimizing risk.
Remember that pricing strategy isn't static. The best approach evolves with your business, your customers, and market conditions. Your simple battlecard is meant to be revisited and refined as you gain more experience with consumption-based models.
What's your next step? Consider analyzing your current customer usage patterns as a starting point. Even if you decide usage-based pricing isn't right for you now, understanding how customers use your product will provide valuable insights for future pricing decisions.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.