.png)
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Introduction: The Strategic Imperative of MES Pricing
In today's competitive manufacturing technology landscape, how you price and package your Manufacturing Execution System (MES) SaaS offering can be as critical as the functionality itself. With the global MES market projected to reach $23.5 billion by 2027, according to Markets and Markets research, the opportunity is substantial—but so is the competition.
For SaaS executives serving the manufacturing sector, a well-crafted pricing and packaging strategy directly impacts market penetration, customer acquisition costs, revenue predictability, and ultimately, valuation multiples. Yet many MES providers continue to rely on outdated pricing approaches that fail to align with the actual value they deliver to manufacturers.
This comprehensive guide outlines a structured approach to developing and implementing a pricing and packaging strategy specifically tailored for MES SaaS solutions.
Phase 1: Market Assessment and Value Analysis
Understand the Manufacturing Value Chain
Before setting prices, you must thoroughly understand where and how your MES solution creates value within the manufacturing process:
- Map the manufacturing workflows your solution impacts (production scheduling, quality management, asset utilization, etc.)
- Quantify the economic benefits your solution delivers in terms of:
- Reduced downtime
- Improved quality/reduced scrap
- Labor efficiency gains
- Inventory optimization
- Compliance cost reduction
According to a recent McKinsey study, manufacturers implementing modern MES solutions typically see a 15-30% improvement in overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) and 20-50% reduction in quality-related costs.
Competitive Landscape Analysis
Catalog and analyze your competitors' pricing models, considering:
- Pricing structures (per-user, per-facility, production-volume based)
- Pricing tiers and feature differentiation
- Contract terms (monthly vs. annual commitments)
- Implementation and onboarding fees
For example, Plex Systems utilizes a per-user model with additional charges based on production volumes, while Tulip employs a more straightforward per-station pricing approach.
Phase 2: Segmentation and Willingness-to-Pay Research
Customer Segmentation
Develop segments based on factors truly relevant to pricing:
- Manufacturing sector (discrete vs. process, regulated vs. non-regulated)
- Production complexity (number of workstations, SKUs, etc.)
- Company size (revenue, production volume)
- Geographic region (affecting both ability to pay and competitive landscape)
Willingness-to-Pay Research
Deploy multiple research methodologies to determine pricing thresholds:
- Direct customer interviews with key decision-makers (operations leaders, CIOs, CTOs)
- Van Westendorp Price Sensitivity Analysis to identify optimal price points
- Conjoint analysis to understand feature value trade-offs
- Analysis of closed-won vs. closed-lost deals to identify price sensitivity patterns
According to Forrester Research, the most successful B2B SaaS companies conduct formal willingness-to-pay studies at least annually, with 76% reporting that these studies significantly improved pricing decisions.
Phase 3: Value-Based Pricing Framework Development
Define Value Metrics
Identify metrics that align pricing with customer value received:
- Production volume (units produced)
- Facilities/production lines covered
- Users/roles with system access
- Modules deployed (scheduling, quality, maintenance, etc.)
- Transactions processed
The key is selecting metrics that scale proportionally with the value customers receive. For example, Factry, a rising MES provider, prices based on the number of data points collected and processed rather than traditional user counts.
Develop Tiered Packaging Options
Build logical packages that address different market segments:
| Tier | Target Segment | Key Features | Value Metric Limits |
|------|----------------|--------------|---------------------|
| Starter | Small manufacturers, single facility | Core production tracking, basic quality | Limited users, single facility |
| Professional | Mid-sized manufacturers | + Advanced scheduling, maintenance, analytics | Expanded users, multi-facility |
| Enterprise | Large manufacturers | + Advanced integration, custom workflow, global reporting | Unlimited users, unlimited facilities |
According to OpenView Partners' SaaS Pricing Strategy survey, companies with three clearly-differentiated pricing tiers experienced 30% higher conversion rates than those with overly complex or single-tier offerings.
Phase 4: Pricing Structure and Implementation Strategy
Choose Your Pricing Model
Select a model that aligns with your customers' value perception:
- Subscription (monthly/annual fee based on selected tier)
- Consumption-based (pay for actual usage of defined metrics)
- Hybrid model (base subscription + variable usage components)
The manufacturing industry traditionally prefers predictable costs, making subscription models popular, but consumption-based elements can better align with cyclical production patterns.
Implementation and Communication Plan
- Internal alignment: Ensure sales, marketing, product, and customer success teams understand and can articulate the value proposition behind your pricing
- Customer communication: Develop clear messaging that focuses on ROI and value, not features
- Transition plan: For existing customers, consider grandfathering or phased migration paths
- Sales enablement: Create ROI calculators, battle cards, and objection handling guides
Phase 5: Continuous Optimization
Monitor Key Metrics
Track metrics that indicate pricing effectiveness:
- Win/loss rates by segment and competitor
- Discounting frequency and depth
- Customer acquisition cost (CAC)
- Customer lifetime value (LTV)
- Expansion revenue
Regular Pricing Reviews
Establish a formal pricing review process:
- Quarterly reviews of pricing performance metrics
- Annual competitive reassessment
- Bi-annual customer value analysis
According to Price Intelligently, SaaS companies that review pricing quarterly see 10-15% higher annual revenue growth compared to those conducting less frequent reviews.
Conclusion: Strategic Pricing as Competitive Advantage
A methodical approach to pricing and packaging your MES solution can transform it from an operational necessity to a strategic advantage. By aligning your pricing with the tangible value you provide to manufacturers, you not only improve near-term metrics like conversion rates and ASP but also build a foundation for sustainable growth and increased company valuation.
The most successful MES providers recognize that pricing isn't merely about setting dollar amounts—it's about articulating value in the language of manufacturing economics: efficiency, quality, compliance, and ultimately, profitability. As the manufacturing sector continues its digital transformation journey, those MES providers who master value-based pricing will be best positioned to capture their fair share of this expanding market.
Remember that pricing is never "set and forget"—it requires continuous iteration and optimization as both your solution and the manufacturing landscape evolve.