
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.
In the competitive SaaS landscape, companies are constantly seeking innovative business models to drive growth while building robust user communities. One approach gaining traction is dual licensing—combining open source accessibility with commercial revenue streams. For SaaS executives contemplating this strategic pivot, understanding the nuances of dual licensing is crucial for making informed decisions that align with long-term business objectives.
Dual licensing is a business model where software is released under two different licenses simultaneously: an open source license and a commercial license. This approach allows companies to benefit from open source community engagement while maintaining revenue streams through commercial licensing options.
Under this model, the core software is typically available under an open source license (such as GPL, AGPL, or Mozilla Public License), allowing users to access, modify, and redistribute the code according to the license terms. Simultaneously, the same software is offered under a commercial license that provides additional rights, features, or services not available in the open source version.
Open source components of a dual licensing strategy create natural channels for community engagement. According to the 2023 Open Source Security and Risk Analysis report, 96% of commercial codebases now contain open source components, demonstrating widespread adoption.
This community involvement delivers multiple advantages:
A dual licensing approach can differentiate your SaaS offering in crowded markets. MongoDB's evolution from an exclusively open source model to a dual licensing strategy with its Server Side Public License (SSPL) demonstrates how this approach can protect intellectual property while maintaining community involvement.
The commercial licensing component provides clear revenue opportunities beyond the limitations of purely open source models:
The specific open source license you select significantly impacts your dual licensing strategy's effectiveness. Some considerations include:
Successfully maintaining an open source community requires dedicated resources and clear communication. According to GitHub's Open Source Survey, 93% of respondents cited incomplete or confusing documentation as a major problem with open source software.
A dual licensing strategy demands:
The commercial license must offer clear and compelling value beyond the open source version. Companies like Elastic have mastered this by reserving enterprise security features, advanced management capabilities, and premium support for their commercial offerings.
MySQL, acquired by Oracle in 2010, was an early adopter of dual licensing. Their approach included:
This strategy contributed to MySQL becoming one of the world's most widely used databases, with both a vibrant open source community and substantial commercial revenue.
Confluent, built around Apache Kafka, demonstrates how modern SaaS companies can implement dual licensing:
According to Confluent's financial reports, this approach helped them achieve 51% year-over-year revenue growth in 2022, demonstrating the commercial viability of dual licensing for modern SaaS businesses.
If you're considering a dual licensing strategy for your SaaS company, consider this phased approach:
Dual licensing creates additional legal considerations. According to the Linux Foundation, legal compliance is among the top challenges for organizations managing open source software. Mitigate this by:
Tension can arise between open source community expectations and commercial imperatives. Research by the Open Source Initiative found that 67% of contributors are motivated by giving back to the community, while companies are primarily motivated by commercial interests.
To address this balance:
A dual licensing strategy offers compelling advantages for SaaS companies seeking to balance community engagement with sustainable revenue models. However, success requires thoughtful implementation, clear value differentiation, and ongoing commitment to both open source and commercial components.
Before adopting this approach, evaluate:
For many SaaS companies, particularly those with technically sophisticated users who value transparency and customization, a well-executed dual licensing strategy can drive adoption, enhance product quality, and create sustainable competitive advantages in increasingly crowded markets.

Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.