.png)
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
In today's software development landscape, package registries have become essential infrastructure for organizations of all sizes. As a SaaS executive, you might be wondering whether your organization's package registry should charge for private packages, or if offering them for free makes more business sense. This decision carries significant implications for your revenue model, developer experience, and competitive positioning.
Understanding Package Registries and Private Packages
A package registry serves as a centralized repository where developers store and share software packages, modules, and dependencies. While public packages are openly available to everyone, private packages contain proprietary code that organizations want to keep confidential.
The most well-known example is npm (Node Package Manager), which hosts over 1.3 million packages and serves more than 75 billion downloads per month. Other popular registries include Maven Central for Java, PyPI for Python, and Docker Hub for container images.
The Current State of Package Registry Pricing
Looking at the market leaders provides valuable context for your decision:
npm (owned by GitHub/Microsoft):
- Free tier: Unlimited public packages
- Paid tier: Private packages starting at $7/month per user
GitHub Packages:
- Free tier: Includes limited storage for private packages
- Paid tiers: Scale storage and add advanced features
JFrog Artifactory:
- Commercial model: Tiered pricing based on storage, support, and features
- Enterprise focus: High-end artifact hosting with comprehensive features
GitLab Package Registry:
- Free tier: Limited private package storage
- Paid tiers: Increased storage and advanced security features
Arguments for Charging for Private Packages
1. Revenue Generation and Sustainability
Private packages represent actual business value. According to a 2022 study by SlashData, over 70% of professional developers use private package repositories at work. By charging for private package hosting, you create a direct revenue stream that helps sustain your registry's operations and fund ongoing development.
2. Enhanced Security and Compliance Features
Paid tiers typically include advanced security scanning, vulnerability detection, and compliance features that enterprises require. JFrog reports that companies using their premium artifact hosting detect 2.5× more security vulnerabilities before deployment.
3. Resource Consumption Management
Private packages consume storage, bandwidth, and computing resources. Charging for them helps manage these costs and prevents abuse. According to Cloudflare, package registry bandwidth costs can exceed $10,000 monthly for large-scale operations.
4. Value-Based Pricing Alignment
Organizations using private packages typically derive significant value from them in terms of IP protection, reusable code, and standardization. Charging based on this value aligns costs with benefits received.
Arguments Against Charging for Private Packages
1. Developer Experience and Adoption
Free private packages can significantly boost platform adoption. GitLab reported a 47% increase in active users after introducing free private packages in their basic tier. Lower friction to entry means more developers choose your platform.
2. Alternative Revenue Models
Instead of directly charging for private packages, you might monetize through:
- Usage-based pricing for bandwidth or storage beyond generous free limits
- Premium features like advanced security scanning or deployment controls
- Enterprise support packages
3. Competitive Differentiation
In a crowded market, free private packages can serve as a competitive differentiator. When GitHub acquired npm in 2020, they maintained free private packages for teams to compete against emerging alternatives.
4. Developer Goodwill
Developers often influence technology purchasing decisions. Building goodwill by offering free private packages can translate into broader adoption of your paid enterprise features.
Decision Framework for Your Package Registry
When deciding whether to charge for private packages, consider these factors:
1. Target Audience Assessment
Who are your primary users? Enterprise customers are typically accustomed to paying for private packages, while smaller teams and individual developers may be more price-sensitive.
2. Resource Cost Analysis
Calculate your actual costs for:
- Storage requirements per private package
- Bandwidth usage patterns
- Infrastructure and maintenance costs
- Security and compliance monitoring
3. Competitive Landscape Evaluation
Research what competitors in your specific niche charge. If you're targeting enterprise Java teams, JFrog Artifactory's pricing might be more relevant than npm's pricing model.
4. Value-Added Services Identification
Determine which premium features beyond basic storage would appeal to paying customers:
- Vulnerability scanning
- License compliance checking
- Retention policies
- Enhanced access controls
- Integration with CI/CD pipelines
Implementation Strategies
If you decide to charge for private packages, consider these approaches:
1. Freemium Model
Offer a limited number of private packages for free (e.g., 5-10 packages) with reasonable storage limits, then charge for additional packages or storage. This approach balances adoption with monetization.
2. Usage-Based Pricing
Instead of a flat fee, charge based on actual usage metrics like storage, bandwidth, or number of package downloads. This model scales with customer value received.
3. Team-Based Pricing
Charge per user or team size rather than per package. This approach simplifies budgeting for customers and can lead to higher average revenue per account as teams grow.
4. Enterprise Bundles
Package private repositories with other enterprise features like single sign-on, audit logs, and dedicated support. This positions private packages as part of a comprehensive solution rather than a standalone cost.
Real-World Success Stories
Cloudsmith successfully implemented a tiered model where they offer limited free private repositories but charge for additional storage and advanced features. They report that 30% of their free users eventually convert to paid plans.
Azure Artifacts integrated package hosting into broader DevOps subscriptions, finding that customers valued the seamless integration more than individual feature pricing.
Conclusion: Making Your Decision
The decision to charge for private packages ultimately depends on your business goals, target market, and competitive position. Consider starting with a generous free tier to drive adoption while implementing premium tiers for advanced features and higher usage limits.
Remember that package registries often serve as a gateway to your broader platform. A strategic pricing approach that prioritizes developer adoption while capturing enterprise value will position your registry for long-term success.
Whatever approach you choose, focus on delivering exceptional reliability, security, and user experience. In the infrastructure space, these fundamentals remain the most powerful drivers of customer loyalty and willingness to pay.