
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.
In today's data-driven world, effective log management is crucial for maintaining system reliability, security compliance, and operational intelligence. However, when evaluating log management solutions, one question consistently arises: should you choose a tool that charges based on data volume or retention period? This decision can significantly impact your total cost of ownership and the value you derive from your observability strategy.
Log management tools typically follow one of two primary pricing approaches:
Volume-based pricing models charge according to the amount of data you ingest into the system, typically measured in gigabytes per day or month. This model is straightforward: the more data you send to the platform, the more you pay.
Key characteristics:
According to a 2023 industry report by GigaOm, volume-based pricing remains the most common model among major log management vendors, with rates ranging from $0.10 to $2.50 per GB ingested, depending on volume commitments and provider.
Retention-based pricing focuses on how long you need to keep your data accessible. With this model, you pay based on the storage duration rather than the initial ingestion volume.
Key characteristics:
Choosing between volume and retention-based pricing depends on several factors specific to your business needs:
Volume-based pricing often works well for organizations that:
Have predictable, moderate log volumes: If your log generation is stable and moderate, volume-based pricing can be cost-effective.
Need only short retention periods: If regulatory requirements or internal policies only demand short-term retention (7-30 days), volume-based models often include sufficient retention.
Want simple budgeting: Volume-based pricing can be easier to understand and budget for if your log volumes are consistent.
Retention-based pricing typically benefits organizations that:
Generate large volumes of logs: High-volume environments may find retention-based pricing more economical, especially if most logs are only needed for immediate troubleshooting.
Have variable ingestion needs: Organizations with unpredictable traffic spikes or seasonal variations may prefer the consistency of retention-based pricing.
Face stringent compliance requirements: If you need to retain certain logs for extended periods (months or years) for compliance purposes, retention-based pricing can offer significant savings.
To better understand these models, let's examine a hypothetical scenario:
Company A: E-commerce platform generating 500GB of logs daily
Company B: Healthcare provider generating 200GB of logs daily with 2-year retention requirements
As illustrated, Company A might benefit from retention-based pricing if they need standard retention, while Company B might find specialized retention-based pricing more advantageous for their compliance requirements.
When evaluating pricing models, be aware of these often-overlooked factors:
Some tools charge the same rate regardless of the data type, while others offer variable pricing:
This tiered approach to data ingestion can provide significant savings by allowing you to prioritize your most valuable data.
In some observability pricing models, particularly volume-based ones, there may be additional charges for:
According to Forrester Research, query costs can represent up to 30% of the total cost of ownership for some log management solutions.
Some logging tools charge extra for:
Regardless of which pricing model you choose, these strategies can help control costs:
Implement log filtering at the source: Only send relevant data to your log management platform.
Create tiered logging levels: Configure different retention periods for different data types based on their importance.
Regularly review usage patterns: Monitor which teams or applications are generating the most logs and work with them to optimize.
Negotiate custom terms: Many providers offer customized pricing for unique requirements - don't hesitate to negotiate.
Consider hybrid approaches: Some organizations maintain a short retention period in premium tools for operational issues while archiving historical data in lower-cost solutions.
The right pricing model ultimately depends on your specific needs. Consider these questions when making your decision:
By thoroughly assessing your requirements and understanding the nuances of different pricing models, you can select a log management solution that delivers optimal value without unexpected costs.
Remember that the best log management tool isn't necessarily the cheapest - it's the one that provides the right balance of capabilities, performance, and cost for your specific observability needs. The ideal solution should scale with your business while providing the insights necessary to maintain system reliability and security.

Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.