.png)
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
In the rapidly evolving world of cloud computing and DevOps, Infrastructure as Code (IaC) has become essential for managing complex environments at scale. As organizations evaluate IaC solutions, one question consistently emerges: is resource-based pricing the right model for these tools? With various pricing strategies available in the market—from flat fees to usage-based models—understanding the implications of resource-based pricing can significantly impact your budget and scaling strategy.
Understanding Resource-Based IaC Pricing Models
Resource-based pricing for IaC tools ties your costs directly to the number of infrastructure components you're managing through the platform. Under this model, you pay according to your infrastructure count—whether that's servers, containers, databases, or network components.
This approach differs significantly from flat-rate subscriptions or user-based licensing models that some vendors offer. With resource-based management pricing, your costs scale with your infrastructure footprint.
According to a 2023 Flexera report, 61% of enterprises cite cloud cost management as their top cloud challenge—making IaC pricing models increasingly important to understand.
The Case For Resource-Based Pricing
Alignment with Value Creation
Proponents argue that charging based on resources managed creates a natural alignment between cost and value. As your Director of Cloud Operations explained in a recent meeting: "If we're managing 50 servers this month and 500 next month, our tool costs should reflect that increased usage and value."
This pricing model acknowledges that managing more infrastructure generally creates more value for your business—and charges accordingly.
Predictable Scaling
For growing businesses, resource-based pricing can offer predictability when scaling infrastructure. Engineering leaders can forecast IaC tool costs by directly tying them to planned infrastructure growth. This clarity helps prevent unexpected budget overruns that might occur with consumption-based pricing (like charging by API calls or processing time).
Right-Sizing Incentives
Resource-based pricing can incentivize efficient infrastructure practices. When each managed component has a direct cost attached to it, teams are more motivated to decommission unused resources, consolidate where possible, and implement more efficient architectures.
The Case Against Resource-Based Pricing
Potential Cost Acceleration
The most significant concern with resource-based IaC pricing is cost acceleration during rapid growth. If your infrastructure scales quickly—whether through business expansion, microservice adoption, or migration to container-based architectures—costs can quickly multiply.
According to HashiCorp's 2023 State of Cloud Strategy Survey, organizations typically experience a 2-3x growth in infrastructure components when transitioning to container-based environments, which could translate directly to 2-3x higher IaC tool costs under resource-based models.
Barriers to Experimentation
Innovation often requires experimentation with new infrastructure approaches. Resource-based pricing may inadvertently create financial disincentives for teams to experiment with temporary environments or A/B testing infrastructure configurations.
"Our DevOps teams should feel empowered to spin up environments for testing without worrying about triggering higher license costs," notes a common sentiment among forward-thinking CIOs.
Microservice Penalty
Modern architectures trending toward smaller, more numerous services can face disproportionate increases in costs under resource-based pricing. A monolithic application might use fewer countable resources than its microservice equivalent, despite similar workloads.
Alternative IaC Pricing Models to Consider
Consumption-Based Pricing
Some IaC providers charge based on actual usage—API calls, compute time, or operations performed—rather than resources managed. This can better reflect the value derived from the platform for organizations that manage static infrastructure but perform frequent changes.
User-Based Licensing
Traditional per-user or per-developer licensing can provide cost predictability for organizations where a stable team manages infrastructure, regardless of the infrastructure's size.
Hybrid Models
Increasingly popular are hybrid approaches that combine elements of different models—for example, a base fee for core functionality with additional charges only for premium features or beyond certain resource thresholds.
How to Evaluate What's Right for Your Organization
When considering IaC pricing models, organizations should:
Audit current infrastructure footprint and growth patterns - Understanding your current resource count and projected growth will help forecast costs under various pricing models.
Analyze operational patterns - Do you maintain relatively static infrastructure or frequently provision and decommission environments? This pattern affects which pricing model offers better value.
Consider your architecture direction - Are you moving toward microservices or container-based deployments? These transitions typically increase resource counts dramatically.
Calculate total cost of ownership - Look beyond the immediate pricing to include implementation costs, training, and potential efficiency gains from better tooling.
Negotiation Strategies for Resource-Based IaC Pricing
If you're considering a tool with resource-based pricing, consider these negotiation approaches:
Request volume discounts - As resource counts increase, the marginal cost of managing each additional component decreases for vendors. Push for tiered pricing that reflects this reality.
Define resources narrowly - Ensure the contract clearly defines what constitutes a "managed resource" to avoid surprises.
Secure growth allowances - Negotiate grace periods for sudden infrastructure growth due to acquisitions or new product launches.
Consider annual commitments with flexibility - Some vendors offer discounted rates for annual commitments while allowing for periodic reassessment of resource counts.
Final Thoughts: Finding the Right Balance
The ideal IaC pricing model balances predictability, scalability, and alignment with the value you receive. Resource-based pricing works well for organizations with stable, well-understood infrastructure footprints and predictable growth. However, rapidly evolving businesses or those undergoing significant architectural transitions might benefit from alternative approaches.
As you evaluate IaC tools, remember that pricing models should support—not hinder—your infrastructure strategies. The right model encourages efficient resource usage while enabling the flexibility and experimentation needed for innovation in today's fast-moving technology landscape.
What's your experience with IaC pricing models? Has resource-based pricing helped or hindered your infrastructure management strategies? As the industry continues to evolve, sharing these experiences helps all of us build more effective, cost-efficient infrastructure practices.