.png)
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
In the world of API management, GraphQL has emerged as a powerful query language that offers flexibility and efficiency. As organizations adopt GraphQL gateways to manage their API ecosystem, one question frequently arises: should your GraphQL gateway provider charge based on schema size? This pricing model has become increasingly common, but is it actually aligned with the value you receive? Let's examine this critical question that affects your API strategy and bottom line.
The Rise of Schema-Based Pricing in GraphQL Gateways
Many GraphQL gateway providers have adopted pricing tiers based on the size and complexity of your schema. The logic seems straightforward: larger schemas require more resources to process and manage, so you pay more as your schema grows.
A typical schema-based pricing model might look like:
- Starter: Up to 50 types for $X/month
- Professional: Up to 200 types for $Y/month
- Enterprise: Up to 1000 types for $Z/month
According to a 2022 survey by The New Stack, approximately 45% of API gateway tools now incorporate some form of schema-based metrics in their pricing models. But this raises an important question: does schema size actually correlate with the value you're receiving?
Why Schema Size Might Be a Misleading Metric
1. Schema Size ≠ Usage
One of the most compelling arguments against schema-based pricing is that schema size doesn't necessarily reflect actual usage. You might have a large schema with hundreds of types, but only a small portion may be frequently accessed.
According to API management experts at Apollo GraphQL, "The true cost driver for a GraphQL service is query complexity and request volume, not the mere existence of types in a schema."
2. Penalizing Good API Design
A well-designed GraphQL schema should be comprehensive and granular, allowing clients to request exactly what they need. Schema-based pricing can inadvertently penalize good API design practices by making organizations hesitant to create detailed, well-structured schemas.
3. Misaligned Incentives
When you're charged by schema size, your team is incentivized to keep the schema as small as possible. This can lead to:
- Overly generic types
- Resistance to adding new capabilities
- Periodic "schema cleanups" that might disrupt clients
What Should GraphQL Gateway Pricing Be Based On?
If not schema size, what would be a more appropriate pricing model for GraphQL gateways?
Request Volume and Complexity
The most straightforward alternative is to charge based on actual usage: the number and complexity of queries being processed. This aligns the cost with the actual value and resources being consumed.
Value-Based Metrics
Some forward-thinking API gateway providers are moving toward value-based pricing that considers:
- Number of active clients using the gateway
- Business criticality of the API traffic
- Value of transactions facilitated
Hybrid Models
A balanced approach might include multiple factors:
- A base fee for gateway infrastructure
- Variable costs based on actual usage
- Optional add-ons for advanced features
Questions to Ask Your GraphQL Gateway Provider
Before committing to a GraphQL gateway with schema-based pricing, consider asking:
- How does the schema size limitation affect my ability to design an optimal API?
- What happens if I need to temporarily exceed my schema size limit?
- Do you offer alternative pricing models based on actual usage?
- How do you handle schema deprecations - do deprecated fields still count toward my quota?
Real-World Considerations
When Airbnb migrated to GraphQL, they created a schema with over 600 types to properly model their domain. Under a schema-based pricing model, they would have incurred significant costs regardless of actual traffic patterns. Instead, they opted for a gateway solution with usage-based pricing that better aligned with their actual needs and growth pattern.
Making the Right Choice for Your Organization
When evaluating GraphQL gateway options, consider:
- Growth trajectory: Will your schema grow significantly as your product evolves?
- Usage patterns: Do you have a large schema but focused usage patterns?
- Development practices: Does your team need the freedom to create an optimal schema?
- Budget predictability: Which pricing model gives you more predictable costs?
Conclusion
While schema-based pricing for GraphQL gateways may seem intuitive at first glance, it often fails to align with the actual value and resource consumption of your API infrastructure. As the GraphQL ecosystem matures, we're seeing more providers move toward usage-based and value-based pricing models that better reflect the actual benefits being delivered.
The right pricing model should enable rather than constrain your API strategy. Before choosing a GraphQL gateway provider, carefully evaluate whether their pricing approach incentivizes the right behaviors and properly reflects the value you receive. In many cases, looking beyond schema size to actual usage metrics will provide a more equitable and effective pricing structure for your organization's needs.