.png)
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
In today's software-driven business landscape, error tracking tools have become essential for maintaining application quality and user experience. However, as development teams evaluate these solutions, one question consistently arises: "Should your error tracking tool charge by event volume?" This pricing model, where costs increase with the number of errors or exceptions tracked, has significant implications for your engineering budget and debugging strategy.
Understanding Event-Based Pricing in Error Tracking
Error tracking tools typically capture "events" - instances of errors, exceptions, or crashes in your application. Many providers structure their pricing tiers around the volume of these events, creating a direct relationship between how many issues your application generates and what you pay.
Under this model, you'll encounter several common approaches:
- Monthly event caps with overage charges
- Pay-as-you-go pricing per event
- Tiered pricing based on expected event volumes
- Unlimited events at premium price points
According to a recent Developer Survey by JetBrains, 72% of development teams report using dedicated exception monitoring tools, making this pricing question relevant to the majority of software organizations.
The Case For Event-Based Pricing
Proponents of event-based pricing point to several advantages:
1. Alignment with Usage
"Event-based pricing aligns costs with actual usage," explains Sarah Chen, CTO at CloudStack Solutions. "Teams only pay for what they use, creating natural cost efficiency."
For startups or applications with predictable, low error volumes, this can initially seem cost-effective. Your costs remain lower while your application remains stable and error-free.
2. Scalability
As your application grows, the pricing model scales alongside it. This creates a predictable cost structure that grows with your business, allowing finance teams to forecast expenses based on growth projections.
3. Incentivizing Quality
Some argue that event-based pricing creates financial incentives for writing better code. When errors directly impact costs, teams may prioritize quality and testing more aggressively.
The Case Against Event-Based Pricing
Despite these apparent benefits, there are significant drawbacks to consider:
1. Perverse Incentives in Debugging
Perhaps the most troubling aspect of event-based pricing is how it can discourage thorough error tracking. When each captured exception adds to your bill, teams face pressure to:
- Ignore certain classes of errors
- Implement aggressive sampling
- Delay fixing issues that generate multiple events
- Avoid instrumenting critical but potentially noisy parts of code
"We've seen teams actively reduce their error tracking coverage to manage costs," notes Michael Pryor, Engineering Director at DataViz Technologies. "That's exactly the opposite of what good debugging practices recommend."
2. Unpredictable Costs
Software errors rarely follow predictable patterns. A single production incident could generate thousands or millions of events in minutes, potentially causing:
- Sudden, unexpected charges
- Budget overruns
- Emergency decisions to disable tracking during critical incidents
According to a report by Forrester, 64% of organizations using event-based error tracking tools reported experiencing at least one unexpected billing surge annually due to error spikes.
3. Cost During Debugging Cycles
When actively debugging complex issues, engineers often need to reproduce errors repeatedly, instrument code more heavily, and capture more diagnostic information. Under event-based pricing, the cost increases precisely when you're investing engineering time to solve problems.
Alternative Pricing Models to Consider
If event-based pricing concerns you, several alternative models exist:
1. User-Based Pricing
Some error tracking tools charge based on the number of users or seats on your development team. This creates predictable costs regardless of error volume, allowing teams to use the tool as extensively as needed during debugging cycles.
2. Application-Based Pricing
Pricing based on the number of applications or projects monitored offers simplicity and predictability. Whether you're monitoring a stable production environment or a buggy development build, costs remain consistent.
3. Hybrid Models
More sophisticated options include hybrid approaches with reasonable event allowances per application and less aggressive overage charges. These balance predictability with usage-based scaling.
Making the Right Choice for Your Organization
When evaluating error tracking tools and their pricing models, consider these factors:
Error Volume Predictability: How consistent is your application's error volume? High variability makes event-based pricing riskier.
Development Stage: Early-stage products or those undergoing significant refactoring will naturally produce more errors.
Team Culture: Will financial pressure to reduce error counts create unhealthy incentives for your engineers?
Debugging Philosophy: Does your team believe in capturing everything for comprehensive analysis, or do you prefer targeted monitoring?
Budget Flexibility: Can your organization absorb occasional cost spikes, or is budget predictability critical?
Conclusion: Balancing Cost with Debugging Effectiveness
The ideal error tracking pricing model should never discourage you from monitoring critical parts of your application or force you to make engineering compromises based on cost concerns. While event-based pricing works for some scenarios, it often creates tension between thorough debugging practices and budget constraints.
As you evaluate exception monitoring tools, look beyond the per-event cost and consider how the pricing structure will influence your team's debugging behavior and application quality over time. The most cost-effective solution is ultimately the one that enables your team to quickly identify, diagnose, and resolve issues—regardless of how it calculates your monthly bill.
Consider starting a conversation with your engineering and finance leaders about how your current or prospective error tracking tool's pricing model impacts both your budget and your ability to deliver reliable software.