
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.
Enterprise customers often request self-hosted versions of SaaS solutions for security, compliance, or integration reasons. As a SaaS provider, deciding whether to offer self-hosting options—and at what price point—can significantly impact your revenue model and customer acquisition strategy. Is offering free enterprise self-hosting a viable approach, or should you maintain premium pricing for on-premise deployments?
The demand for self-hosted solutions has grown consistently over the past decade. According to a 2023 Forrester report, 67% of enterprises maintain some form of on-premise or private cloud deployments for mission-critical applications, despite the cloud-first movement.
Why? Enterprise customers have legitimate concerns:
Before deciding whether to offer free enterprise self-hosting, consider what you're actually giving away:
Self-hosted versions require specialized development efforts:
According to DevOps Research and Assessment (DORA), maintaining separate deployment models increases engineering overhead by 30-40% on average.
Self-hosted environments introduce significant support complexity:
This complexity directly translates to higher support costs per customer.
The market shows several approaches to enterprise self-hosting pricing:
According to a 2022 OpenView Partners survey, 72% of enterprise SaaS companies charge a premium of 15-30% for on-premise deployments compared to their cloud offerings.
Some compelling reasons exist to consider a free self-hosting option:
Free self-hosting can serve as a wedge into enterprise accounts:
When competing against other vendors, free self-hosting can be a powerful differentiator:
Gitlab is a notable example of this approach. They offer their self-managed Community Edition for free, with premium features available through paid tiers, which has helped them gain market share against GitHub.
Despite the potential benefits, there are significant arguments against giving away self-hosting capabilities:
Free on-premise deployment may:
The financial implications can be substantial:
According to Gartner, enterprise software vendors who discount on-premise licensing by more than 15% from standard pricing show 24% lower customer lifetime value on average.
Rather than making self-hosting entirely free, consider a hybrid deployment model:
HashiCorp exemplifies this approach with their product line, offering open-source core functionality with enterprise features, support, and services available at different price points.
To determine the right approach for your business, consider:
If you decide to offer free or discounted self-hosting, consider these best practices:
Whether to offer free enterprise self-hosting depends on your specific market position, competitive landscape, and business strategy. While free self-hosting can open doors to security-conscious enterprises and create competitive advantages, it also introduces significant costs and potential value perception issues.
The most successful approach for many SaaS providers is a tiered model that acknowledges the value of self-hosting options while ensuring the business can sustain the additional costs of supporting these deployments.
Rather than asking "should it be free?", consider asking "what value does self-hosting provide to our customers, and how can we price it to reflect that value while supporting our business goals?"
By approaching enterprise licensing and deployment options strategically, you can create pricing models that satisfy customer needs while building a sustainable business.

Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.