.png)
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
In the rapidly evolving world of agentic AI, businesses are increasingly turning to AI agents for inventory optimization automation. However, a critical question emerges for both vendors and clients: What's the most appropriate pricing model? Should companies pay for the tools and processes the AI uses, or only for measurable business outcomes? This question goes beyond mere accounting—it fundamentally impacts how businesses value and adopt AI solutions.
The Pricing Dilemma for AI-Powered Inventory Management
Inventory optimization represents a significant opportunity for AI application. According to McKinsey, businesses leveraging advanced AI for inventory management have reduced holding costs by 15-25% while simultaneously improving product availability. However, the pricing metric chosen for these solutions can dramatically affect adoption rates, perceived value, and ROI calculations.
There are two dominant approaches emerging in the market:
Usage-Based Pricing: Paying for the Journey
Under a usage-based pricing model, businesses pay for the computational resources, API calls, and tools that AI agents utilize in their operations. This model typically includes:
- Charges based on the number of SKUs managed
- Fees for specific forecasting algorithms deployed
- Costs associated with integrations to existing systems
- Charges for LLM tokens or API calls consumed
This approach resembles traditional SaaS pricing, where you pay for access to capabilities regardless of outcomes. For vendors, this creates predictable revenue streams and aligns with their cost structure. For customers, however, it shifts the risk of non-performance entirely to their side.
Outcome-Based Pricing: Paying for Results
Alternatively, outcome-based pricing ties compensation directly to measurable business improvements, such as:
- Percentage of inventory reduction achieved
- Decrease in stockouts
- Improvement in inventory turns
- Reduction in working capital requirements
According to Forrester Research, outcome-based pricing models are gaining traction, with 37% of enterprise AI implementations now incorporating some performance-based component in their contracts.
The Case for Tool Usage Pricing
Advocates for usage-based pricing highlight several advantages:
1. Clearer cost structures
With usage-based pricing, businesses know exactly what they're paying for—specific capabilities and computational resources. This transparency helps with budgeting and resource allocation.
2. Fairness for vendors
AI vendors incur costs regardless of outcomes. Cloud computing resources, API calls, and model training represent real expenses that exist independent of the final result.
3. Reduced implementation friction
Usage-based models often feature lower upfront costs, making it easier for companies to begin their AI journey without making outcome commitments that might be difficult to measure.
The Case for Outcome-Based Pricing
Proponents of outcome-based pricing offer compelling counterarguments:
1. Aligned incentives
When vendors only get paid for results, their interests align perfectly with their customers'. This creates a partnership rather than a vendor-client relationship.
2. Reduced adoption risk
For businesses hesitant about AI implementation, outcome-based pricing removes much of the financial risk, addressing a major barrier to adoption.
3. Focus on business impact
This model keeps everyone focused on what truly matters—business results rather than technological processes.
Hybrid Models: The Emerging Middle Ground
Many successful vendors are now implementing credit-based pricing models that blend elements of both approaches:
- A base subscription covering essential capabilities and support
- Performance bonuses tied to achieved outcomes
- Credits that can be allocated across different tools with varying values
This approach provides vendors with revenue stability while giving customers the confidence that they're paying for value.
Critical Guardrails for Any Pricing Model
Regardless of the pricing approach chosen, effective inventory optimization AI implementations require specific guardrails:
1. Clear measurement methodologies
Both parties must agree on how performance will be measured and what constitutes success.
2. Robust orchestration systems
Effective LLM ops and orchestration frameworks ensure that AI agents operate within defined parameters, preventing runaway costs in usage-based models.
3. Transparent reporting
Customers should have visibility into both the tools being used and the outcomes being achieved, regardless of pricing model.
4. Established baseline metrics
Before implementation, establishing clear baseline performance metrics ensures fair assessment of improvements.
Making the Right Choice for Your Business
When evaluating pricing models for inventory optimization agents, consider:
1. Your organization's risk tolerance
Companies with lower risk tolerance may prefer outcome-based pricing, while those comfortable with technology investments might accept usage-based models.
2. Measurement capabilities
Outcome-based models require robust measurement capabilities. If your organization struggles with attribution or lacks clear metrics, usage-based pricing might be more appropriate.
3. Implementation complexity
More complex implementations with many variables affecting outcomes might benefit from usage-based pricing to avoid disputes over cause and effect.
4. Budget structure
Consider whether your organization prefers predictable operational expenses (usage-based) or is comfortable with variable costs tied to outcomes.
The Future Points to Value
The trend in agentic AI pricing is clearly moving toward value-based models. As measurement capabilities improve and AI solutions mature, we're likely to see more sophisticated pricing structures that reflect the true business impact of these technologies.
For vendors developing inventory optimization automation solutions, designing your pricing strategy with flexibility will be key to market success. For businesses implementing these solutions, understanding the trade-offs between pricing models helps ensure that AI investments deliver the expected return.
The most successful implementations will likely combine elements of both approaches, creating accountability for results while acknowledging the real costs of the technological infrastructure required to deliver those outcomes.