In the competitive SaaS landscape, your pricing strategy can make or break your business growth. While seat-based pricing has long been the default option for many software companies, forward-thinking executives are discovering that this traditional model often creates friction as organizations scale. When every new team member requires another license, companies face difficult decisions about who gets access to critical tools—ultimately limiting software adoption and your revenue potential.
According to OpenView Partners' 2023 SaaS Benchmarks report, companies that have moved beyond pure seat-based pricing show 25% higher net revenue retention compared to those exclusively using per-user models. Let's explore five alternative pricing frameworks that can align better with the value your customers receive and fuel more predictable growth.
1. Usage-Based Pricing: Pay for What You Consume
Usage-based pricing ties costs directly to consumption metrics that matter to your business. Unlike seat-based models that charge the same regardless of activity level, usage-based pricing scales with actual value delivery.
How it works: Customers pay based on API calls, storage used, transactions processed, or other consumption metrics.
Why it scales better: This model removes the penalty for adding new users, allowing for broader adoption throughout customer organizations. According to a study by Paddle, companies with usage-based pricing grew revenue 38% faster than those with seat-based models during 2020-2022.
Best for: Data processing platforms, infrastructure tools, and services with measurable consumption patterns.
Real-world example: Twilio charges based on API calls and messages sent rather than per user. This approach has allowed them to grow alongside their customers, with revenue increasing as customer businesses expand their communication needs.
2. Value Metric Pricing: Align Fees with Business Outcomes
Value metric pricing connects your cost structure directly to the business outcomes your software delivers.
How it works: Identify a metric that grows in proportion to the value customers receive, such as revenue processed, leads generated, or projects managed.
Why it scales better: By tying pricing to business results, customers perceive your solution as an investment rather than an expense. According to Patrick Campbell of ProfitWell, "Companies using value metrics in their pricing saw 2x more expansion revenue and 50% better retention rates."
Best for: Marketing platforms, sales tools, finance software, and any application where value can be clearly measured.
Real-world example: HubSpot prices based on contact database size rather than solely on users, recognizing that the value of their marketing platform increases with the size of a customer's addressable audience.
3. Tiered Feature Pricing: Segment by Capability Access
Tiered feature pricing focuses on unlocking additional capabilities rather than charging for each seat.
How it works: Customers select from packages with progressively more sophisticated features, with unlimited or generous user allowances at each tier.
Why it scales better: This model encourages broad deployment within customer organizations without penalizing user growth. It also creates natural upgrade paths as customers mature.
Best for: Team collaboration tools, business intelligence platforms, and complex applications with a range of use cases.
Real-world example: Slack offers tiered plans with features like single sign-on, compliance exports, and advanced security in higher tiers while providing generous user allowances. According to their public reporting before being acquired, this approach helped them achieve over 95% revenue retention.
4. Hybrid Pricing: Combine Core Access with Usage Components
Hybrid models combine a base subscription with variable consumption charges, offering the predictability of subscriptions with the upside of usage growth.
How it works: Charge a baseline subscription fee for core access and capabilities, then add usage components for specific high-value activities or resources.
Why it scales better: This model provides predictable base revenue while allowing you to capture additional value from power users and growing accounts. Research from SaaS Capital found that companies with hybrid pricing models experienced 30% higher growth rates than those with pure subscription models.
Best for: Enterprise software with varying intensity of use, platforms with premium features, and tools where some resources are significantly more valuable than others.
Real-world example: Snowflake charges for computing resources consumed and data storage rather than per user, allowing customers to scale their data operations without worrying about user license constraints.
5. Outcome-Based Pricing: Guarantee Results
Perhaps the most advanced approach, outcome-based pricing directly ties fees to customer success metrics.
How it works: Set pricing based on agreed-upon business outcomes, often with performance guarantees or risk-sharing components.
Why it scales better: By explicitly connecting your fees to measurable results, you demonstrate supreme confidence in your solution while aligning perfectly with customer success. According to TSIA's research, companies using outcome-based models achieved 17% higher customer satisfaction scores.
Best for: Enterprise solutions with measurable ROI, optimization platforms, and services where results can be clearly defined and measured.
Real-world example: Optimizely's "Pay for Results" program for enterprise customers ties fees to measurable conversion improvements, guaranteeing a minimum ROI and charging more when results exceed expectations.
Selecting the Right Alternative for Your SaaS
When evaluating which pricing model might work best for your business, consider these factors:
- Value alignment: Which model most closely tracks the value customers receive?
- Customer preference: How do your customers prefer to budget and pay?
- Market expectations: What pricing approaches are becoming standard in your segment?
- Implementation feasibility: Can your systems handle the billing and measurement requirements?
According to a 2022 KeyBanc Capital Markets survey, 45% of SaaS companies now employ some form of usage or value-based pricing component, up from just 34% in 2019.
The Path Forward
Moving beyond seat-based pricing doesn't have to happen overnight. Many successful SaaS companies begin by introducing alternative models alongside traditional options, allowing them to test market reception and refine their approach.
The most important step is recognizing when per-user pricing has become a barrier to adoption rather than an enabler of growth. By aligning your pricing with the value your solution delivers rather than simple user counts, you remove artificial barriers to deployment while creating more predictable expansion opportunities.
As software continues to permeate every aspect of business operations, the companies that thrive will be those whose pricing encourages broad adoption rather than artificially limiting it. Consider which of these models might help your solution become more deeply embedded in your customers' operations—and watch your revenue scale accordingly.