.png)
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
In today's complex financial landscape, enterprises seeking wealth and asset management platforms face a critical procurement challenge: understanding the pricing structures that determine both immediate costs and long-term value. With investments ranging from six to seven figures, decision-makers need clarity on how these sophisticated platforms are priced before committing significant resources.
This guide unpacks the pricing frameworks of enterprise-grade wealth and asset management platforms, helping procurement teams and financial executives navigate the evaluation process with confidence.
Core Pricing Models for Enterprise Wealth & Asset Management Platforms
Enterprise wealth and asset management solutions typically follow several distinct pricing structures, each with implications for budgeting, scalability, and return on investment.
AUM-Based Pricing
Assets Under Management (AUM) pricing remains one of the most common models in the wealth management technology space.
How it works: Vendors charge a percentage fee based on the total assets managed through their platform. This percentage typically follows a tiered structure that decreases as asset volumes increase.
Typical enterprise rates: According to a 2023 industry analysis by Kitces Research, enterprise clients can expect rates ranging from:
- 0.05% to 0.15% for the first $500 million in assets
- 0.03% to 0.08% for assets between $500 million and $2 billion
- 0.01% to 0.04% for assets exceeding $2 billion
Procurement consideration: This model aligns vendor compensation with your growth, but can create unpredictable costs as your assets increase. Negotiate caps or maximum fee thresholds for large-scale implementations.
User-Based Licensing
User-based pricing structures charge per seat or active user within your organization.
How it works: A fixed fee is assessed per advisor, portfolio manager, or administrator with platform access.
Typical enterprise rates:
- Core users (advisors/managers): $200-$800 per user monthly
- Limited access users (support staff): $50-$200 per user monthly
- Enterprise license agreements often include volume discounts of 20-50% for organizations with 100+ users
Procurement consideration: This model provides predictable costs but requires careful user access planning. Seek tiered user rights options to avoid paying full licenses for occasional users.
Module-Based Pricing
Enterprise wealth platforms often offer modular functionality that can be licensed separately.
How it works: Core platform functionality comes at a base price, with additional modules (portfolio analytics, tax optimization, alternative investment support, etc.) priced separately.
Typical components and relative cost impact:
- Core portfolio management: Base price
- Financial planning tools: +15-30%
- Client portal/digital experience: +10-25%
- Advanced analytics and reporting: +20-40%
- API access and custom integrations: +25-50%
- Alternative investment support: +15-35%
Procurement consideration: This approach allows customization but can lead to "pricing creep" as additional modules are added. Negotiate enterprise bundles that include anticipated future needs.
Implementation and Integration Costs
Beyond the core licensing fees, enterprises must budget for significant implementation costs that can substantially impact the total cost of ownership.
Implementation Fee Structures
According to a 2022 report by Deloitte on wealth management technology adoption, implementation fees typically range from 50% to 200% of the first year's licensing costs. These costs cover:
- Data migration and cleansing
- Integration with existing enterprise systems
- Customization and configuration
- User training and change management
Enterprise implementations typically take 6-18 months, with costs structured as either:
- Fixed-fee implementation packages
- Time and materials billing based on hourly professional services rates
Procurement tip: Request detailed implementation timelines with milestone-based payment schedules tied to successful delivery rather than calendar dates.
Ongoing Integration and Maintenance
Wealth management platforms require continuous integration maintenance, especially as they connect with other enterprise systems:
- Core banking and accounting systems
- CRM platforms
- Market data providers
- Document management systems
- Compliance and risk management tools
Industry benchmarks from Celent research suggest budgeting 15-25% of annual licensing costs for ongoing integration and maintenance expenses.
Hidden Cost Factors to Consider
Several less obvious factors can significantly impact the total cost of wealth management platforms:
Data Storage and Processing Fees
Enterprises with complex investment portfolios often face additional charges for:
- Historical data storage beyond standard retention periods
- High-frequency data processing for active trading environments
- Large-scale batch reporting requirements
- Market data feed licensing pass-through costs
Procurement guidance: Request detailed data volume pricing tiers and understand how costs scale with increasing data requirements.
Customization Economics
While most vendors advertise "configurable" platforms, true enterprise-grade customizations often trigger additional costs:
- Custom report development: $5,000-$25,000 per report template
- Custom workflow development: $10,000-$100,000+ depending on complexity
- API development for proprietary integrations: $20,000-$250,000 for complex integrations
According to a 2023 PwC Financial Services Technology Survey, enterprises typically spend 30-45% above base licensing fees on customization during the first three years of platform adoption.
Upgrade and Enhancement Costs
As wealth management technology evolves rapidly, understand how platform upgrades are priced:
- Are major version upgrades included in maintenance fees?
- Do customizations require expensive rework during upgrades?
- What is the typical upgrade cadence and resource requirement?
Negotiation Strategies for Enterprise Procurement
When negotiating with wealth management platform providers, several strategies can help secure more favorable terms:
Multi-Year Commitments and Their Economics
Most enterprise vendors offer significant discounts for multi-year commitments:
- 3-year agreements typically yield 10-15% discount
- 5-year agreements can reach 15-25% discount
- 7+ year agreements may reach 25-35% discount
Procurement consideration: Balance discount benefits against technology obsolescence risk and changing business needs.
Performance-Based Pricing Components
Progressive vendors may consider performance-based pricing elements:
- Success-based implementation payments
- Service level agreement (SLA) credits for performance failures
- Adoption-based scaling to reduce costs during gradual rollouts
Negotiation tip: Request case studies of similar enterprise implementations and use these as benchmarks for performance metrics.
Enterprise-Wide Platform Economics
For financial enterprises managing multiple business lines, explore:
- Cross-division platform licensing to leverage volume discounts
- Unified data models across wealth, asset management, and banking
- Enterprise licensing frameworks that accommodate business fluctuations
Evaluating Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)
To accurately compare wealth management platform options, develop a comprehensive 5-year TCO model that includes:
- Base licensing/subscription fees (factoring in growth projections)
- Implementation and integration costs
- Ongoing maintenance and support
- Internal staffing requirements
- Hardware/infrastructure costs (even for cloud solutions)
- Customization and enhancement budgets
- Training and change management expenses
- Expected efficiency gains and ROI metrics
According to research by Aite Group, enterprises frequently underestimate total platform costs by 40-60% when failing to account for all these factors.
Conclusion: Strategic Procurement Approaches
Enterprise wealth and asset management platforms represent significant investments that impact both operational efficiency and client experience. Rather than focusing solely on minimizing costs, procurement teams should evaluate pricing in the context of:
- Alignment with business growth strategy
- Flexibility to adapt to changing market conditions
- Total impact on advisor productivity and client retention
- Regulatory compliance capabilities and cost avoidance
- Competitive differentiation in wealth management offerings
By understanding these nuanced pricing structures and considering both direct and indirect costs, enterprises can make more informed procurement decisions that balance immediate budget concerns with long-term strategic value.
When evaluating potential platforms, request detailed pricing breakdowns that address each of the components outlined in this guide, and develop standardized comparison frameworks that reflect your organization's specific priorities and constraints.