
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.
In today's complex financial landscape, effective treasury and cash management is crucial for corporate success. As organizations seek to optimize their financial operations, many turn to specialized platforms to streamline processes, enhance visibility, and improve decision-making. However, understanding the pricing models of these solutions can be challenging, making it difficult to accurately budget for implementation and ongoing costs.
This procurement guide aims to demystify how treasury and cash management platforms are priced, helping finance leaders and procurement teams make informed decisions that align with both operational needs and financial constraints.
Treasury and cash management platforms typically employ several distinct pricing structures, each with unique implications for your total cost of ownership:
The most prevalent model in the market today follows the Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) approach:
Some platforms, particularly those handling payment processing or focused on bank connectivity, charge based on volume:
According to Treasury Today's 2023 Technology Survey, 37% of corporations report that transaction-based components represent between 15-40% of their total treasury technology costs.
Many vendors combine multiple approaches:
The sticker price rarely tells the complete story. Consider these additional factors that impact total cost:
Implementation fees can represent a significant upfront investment:
According to Strategic Treasurer's 2023 Technology Analyst Report, implementation costs for enterprise treasury systems average 1.5x to 2x the annual subscription cost.
A critical but often overlooked component:
Ongoing service expenses include:
The treasury platform market continues to evolve, with several emerging trends affecting pricing:
As open banking initiatives expand globally, API-based connectivity is becoming more standardized and potentially less expensive. According to Deloitte's 2023 Treasury Technology Outlook, 58% of corporations expect open banking to reduce their connectivity costs over the next three years.
Advanced platforms incorporating AI for cash forecasting, anomaly detection, and decision support typically command premium pricing—often 30-40% higher than standard solutions. However, they may deliver greater ROI through improved working capital management and risk mitigation.
Some ERP and financial management platforms now offer embedded treasury functionality, potentially reducing costs for organizations already using these systems. The integration benefits can outweigh pure feature comparison in many cases.
Armed with pricing knowledge, procurement teams can employ these tactics to optimize value:
Look beyond the subscription cost to evaluate the complete financial picture over a 3-5 year horizon, including:
While multi-year contracts typically offer discounts (15-25% is common), balance these savings against the risk of being locked into a suboptimal solution. Consider negotiating:
Start with essential functionality and expand gradually:
Treasury and cash management platforms represent a significant investment, but the potential returns are substantial:
As you navigate the procurement process for treasury and cash management solutions:
Treasury and cash management platforms deliver significant value when properly selected and implemented. By understanding the nuances of pricing models and total cost components, finance leaders can make informed decisions that balance functionality, cost, and organizational needs—ultimately transforming their treasury operations from cost centers to strategic value drivers.

Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.