.png)
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
In today's complex threat landscape, many enterprises are turning to external security partners rather than building comprehensive in-house security operations centers (SOCs). As cyber threats evolve in sophistication, the decision to leverage Managed Security Services (MSS) or SOC-as-a-Service has become increasingly strategic rather than merely operational.
However, understanding the pricing models for these services remains challenging for many procurement and security leaders. This guide unpacks the various pricing structures, helping you navigate procurement decisions with greater confidence.
The Evolution of Security Service Pricing Models
Historically, security services followed straightforward pricing models based on devices monitored or hours of service. Today's pricing structures have evolved to accommodate the complexity of modern enterprise environments, with several predominant models emerging.
Per-User Pricing
Many SOC-as-a-Service providers have adopted per-user pricing models, particularly when protecting identity-focused environments.
Typical range: $15-50 per user per month
This model works well for organizations with:
- Clear user counts and controlled access systems
- Predominantly SaaS-based infrastructure
- Predictable scaling needs
According to Gartner's 2022 Market Guide for Managed Security Services, approximately 38% of MSS providers now offer some form of per-user pricing option, up from just 22% in 2019.
Per-Asset Pricing
Traditional and still common, this model bases fees on the number of devices, servers, and other assets monitored.
Typical range: $10-100 per asset per month
The wide variation reflects differences in:
- Asset complexity (servers vs. endpoints)
- Monitoring depth
- Response capabilities included
A Forrester analysis found that enterprises with complex infrastructure may see better value from asset-based pricing when their user-to-device ratio exceeds 1:3.
Data Volume-Based Pricing
As security operations become more data-centric, some providers base pricing on the volume of data ingested, processed, and stored.
Typical range: $200-500 per GB of log data processed monthly
This model often includes tiered pricing with:
- Volume discounts at scale
- Retention period options
- Different rates for hot vs. cold storage
Tiered Service Packages
Many providers offer bundled service tiers that include progressively more comprehensive security coverage.
Common tiers include:
- Basic monitoring and alerting (typically $5,000-15,000/month for mid-sized enterprises)
- Standard monitoring with limited response ($15,000-30,000/month)
- Premium full-service detection and response ($30,000-100,000+/month)
According to IDC's Worldwide Managed Security Services forecast, 67% of enterprises prefer tiered service models for their clarity in service scope and predictability in budgeting.
Hidden Costs and Pricing Considerations
When evaluating MSS and SOC-as-a-Service options, several factors beyond the base pricing model can significantly impact total cost:
Implementation and Onboarding Fees
Most providers charge initial setup fees that may include:
- Connector deployment
- Initial configuration
- Baseline establishment
- Rule customization
These fees typically range from $5,000 to $50,000 depending on environment complexity and service scope.
Service Level Agreement (SLA) Premiums
Higher service levels command premium pricing:
- Faster response times (15-minute vs. 1-hour response)
- 24/7 vs. business hours coverage
- Dedicated vs. shared analysts
Enterprise-grade SLAs with guaranteed response times under 15 minutes can increase base pricing by 30-50%, according to a recent Ponemon Institute study.
Customization and Special Requirements
Standard pricing models often assume baseline configurations, with additional costs for:
- Custom compliance reporting
- Integration with proprietary systems
- Industry-specific threat intelligence
- Custom playbook development
Minimum Commitments
Most enterprise-focused providers require minimum commitments that can significantly affect total cost:
- Minimum user/asset counts (often 100+ users or 25+ assets)
- Minimum contract terms (typically 12-36 months)
- Minimum monthly spend ($5,000-$10,000 for mid-tier services)
Pricing Model Comparison: Finding Your Best Fit
Each pricing model aligns better with different organizational profiles:
| Pricing Model | Best For | Caution For |
|---------------|----------|-------------|
| Per-User | User-centric environments, predictable growth | Hardware-heavy infrastructure, IoT environments |
| Per-Asset | Complex networks, IoT-heavy environments | Rapidly changing infrastructure, cloud migration phases |
| Data Volume | Companies with mature logging, selective monitoring needs | Organizations early in security maturity with unpredictable log volumes |
| Tiered Packages | Organizations seeking predictable costs and clear scope definition | Unique environments requiring significant customization |
Cost Optimization Strategies
When negotiating MSS and SOC-as-a-Service contracts, consider these approaches to optimize value:
Selective Coverage
Not all assets require the same level of monitoring and response. Consider:
- Tiered protection based on asset criticality
- Focused protection on crown jewel systems
- Hybrid models combining in-house and outsourced security operations
A recent Enterprise Strategy Group survey found that organizations using selective coverage strategies reduced their overall security monitoring costs by 22-31%.
Contract Term Leverage
Longer commitments typically yield better rates:
- Annual contracts often receive 10-15% discounts over monthly terms
- Multi-year contracts can reduce rates by 20-40%
- Pre-payment options may unlock additional savings
Growth Planning
Building anticipated growth into initial contracts often yields better long-term rates:
- Establishing growth bands with predetermined pricing
- Negotiating volume discount thresholds
- Setting price protection for expansion
Evaluating ROI Beyond Price
While procurement discussions naturally focus on pricing, evaluating the total value requires considering several additional factors:
True Cost Comparison
When comparing MSS/SOCaaS to in-house operations, account for:
- Staff recruitment, training, and retention costs
- Technology acquisition and maintenance
- Facility and infrastructure costs
- Opportunity costs of security leadership time
According to Deloitte's Cyber Security Operations Cost Survey, enterprises typically underestimate in-house SOC costs by 40-60% when making build vs. buy comparisons.
Risk Reduction Value
Premium services may deliver superior risk reduction through:
- Advanced detection capabilities
- Faster incident response
- Threat intelligence integration
- Expert-led investigations
Organizations should assess providers based on mean time to detect (MTTD) and mean time to respond (MTTR) metrics, as these directly impact breach costs. IBM's Cost of a Data Breach Report indicates that breaches identified and contained within 200 days cost an average of $1.1 million less than those with longer lifecycles.
Conclusion: Creating an Effective Procurement Strategy
Procurement of MSS and SOC-as-a-Service solutions requires balancing cost considerations with security effectiveness. To develop an effective strategy:
- Identify your security priorities and requirements before exploring pricing models
- Understand your environment's specific characteristics (user counts, asset types, data volumes)
- Request detailed breakdowns of what's included in each service tier
- Model different growth scenarios to understand future cost implications
- Consider the complete financial picture, including risk reduction and internal cost avoidance
By approaching MSS and SOC-as-a-Service procurement with this comprehensive understanding of pricing models and value considerations, enterprises can secure appropriate protection while managing costs effectively. The optimal solution balances security effectiveness, operational efficiency, and financial sustainability—recognizing that the cheapest option rarely delivers the best value in cybersecurity services.