
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.
In today's complex commercial real estate landscape, enterprises are increasingly turning to specialized property management platforms to streamline operations, enhance tenant experiences, and drive financial performance. However, navigating the procurement process for these solutions can be challenging, particularly when it comes to understanding pricing structures.
As enterprise leaders evaluate their technology investments, having clarity on how these platforms are priced becomes crucial for making informed decisions that align with both operational requirements and budget constraints. This guide demystifies the pricing models of commercial real estate (CRE) property management platforms to help procurement teams and executives make strategic technology investments.
Commercial real estate property management platforms typically employ one of several primary pricing structures, each with distinct advantages and considerations for enterprise customers:
Many vendors price their solutions based on the number of units or properties being managed through the platform.
How it works: Enterprises pay a fee for each unit, whether that's individual apartments, office spaces, retail units, or entire buildings in a portfolio.
Enterprise consideration: This model scales with portfolio size but can become costly for organizations with large, diverse property holdings. According to a 2023 Deloitte Commercial Real Estate Outlook report, enterprises managing more than 500 units often negotiate volume discounts, reducing per-unit costs by 15-30%.
Some platforms determine costs based on the total square footage under management.
How it works: Pricing is calculated per square foot (or meter) of property space, with rates often decreasing as total area increases.
Enterprise consideration: This model benefits companies with fewer, larger properties rather than many small units. For industrial or warehouse-focused portfolios, this can be particularly cost-effective.
Enterprise software often employs user-based licensing models.
How it works: Pricing depends on the number of system users (property managers, accounting staff, maintenance personnel, executives) who need access.
Enterprise consideration: While this model provides predictability, costs can escalate quickly in organizations with large teams. According to JLL's Property Management Technology Survey, enterprises typically see 15-25 users per 1 million square feet managed.
Some vendors, particularly those offering leasing and marketing features, structure pricing as a percentage of revenue facilitated through the platform.
How it works: The vendor charges a small percentage (typically 0.5-3%) of rents or other revenue collected through the system.
Enterprise consideration: This model aligns vendor and client interests but may not be optimal for high-value portfolios where percentage-based fees become substantial.
The base pricing model is just the beginning. Enterprises should account for several other elements that influence the total cost of ownership:
Nearly all enterprise CRE platforms charge one-time implementation fees.
Industry benchmarks: According to research by Realcomm, implementation costs typically range from 50-200% of first-year subscription costs, depending on complexity and data migration requirements.
Enterprise tip: Negotiate for implementation costs to be amortized over the contract term rather than paid upfront.
Connecting property management platforms with existing enterprise systems (ERP, accounting, maintenance) often incurs additional fees.
Common integration points:
According to a 2022 PwC Digital Real Estate report, enterprises should budget for $5,000-$25,000 per major integration point, with API access sometimes requiring premium pricing tiers.
Most vendors offer tiered pricing with escalating feature sets.
Typical tiers:
Enterprise insight: According to Gartner, enterprises typically require the top-tier offering but can negotiate to exclude modules that overlap with existing systems.
Large organizations have unique leverage points and requirements that affect pricing:
Multi-year commitments typically yield significant savings.
Industry standard: Three-year contracts are becoming the norm, offering 15-20% savings over annual pricing.
Enterprises managing diverse portfolios can also secure portfolio-wide discounts that significantly reduce per-unit or per-square-foot costs compared to standard rates.
A critical but often overlooked pricing element involves data ownership and the costs associated with extracting your information.
Procurement warning: Some vendors charge substantial fees for data exports or API access when terminating service. According to KPMG's Digital Real Estate report, enterprises should ensure contracts specify data ownership rights and reasonable export costs.
Enterprise-grade support often comes at a premium.
Support tier pricing:
While specific pricing varies widely, enterprises can use these general guidelines for budgeting purposes:
According to BOMA's 2022 Office Experience Exchange Report, technology costs (including property management platforms) represent 2-5% of total property management expenses for most enterprise portfolios.
To optimize your investment in a property management platform, consider these procurement strategies:
Some enterprises achieve better economics by using best-in-breed solutions for specific functions rather than a single comprehensive platform.
Cost comparison: According to Verdantix research, modular approaches may cost 10-15% more initially but provide 20-30% greater functionality in specialized areas like energy management or tenant experience.
Many vendors offer reduced-rate pilot programs.
Enterprise strategy: Test platforms in a subset of your portfolio (perhaps 10-15% of properties) before committing to full-scale implementation. This approach allows for performance validation before major investment.
When creating RFPs for property management platforms, include specific pricing scenarios relevant to your portfolio.
Must-include elements:
The CRE property management platform market continues to evolve, with several emerging pricing trends:
Some innovative vendors are beginning to explore performance-based pricing models.
How it works: A portion of costs is tied to measurable outcomes like occupancy improvements, operational cost reductions, or tenant satisfaction scores.
Drawing inspiration from cloud services, some platforms are shifting toward usage-based pricing.
Enterprise implication: This model can benefit organizations with seasonal variations in activity or those seeking to align costs more directly with value received.
When procuring a commercial real estate property management platform for your enterprise, remember that the sticker price is just one component of the total investment. The most cost-effective solution will align with your operational model, integrate with existing systems, and scale appropriately with your portfolio.
Before finalizing any purchase decision:
By approaching the procurement process with a comprehensive understanding of how these platforms are priced, enterprise leaders can secure solutions that deliver sustainable value across their commercial real estate portfolios.

Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.