.png)
Estd 4.22.2023
Introduction
The Internet of Things (IoT) market is experiencing exponential growth, with connected device shipments projected to reach 41.6 billion units by 2025, according to IDC. For SaaS executives looking to capitalize on this explosive market, developing a sophisticated monetization strategy for IoT platforms is no longer optional—it's imperative for sustainable growth. Yet pricing IoT platforms presents unique challenges that extend far beyond traditional software pricing models. This article explores the complexities of IoT monetization and provides strategic frameworks for executives looking to maximize revenue while delivering customer value in the connected ecosystem.
The IoT Monetization Landscape: Beyond Traditional SaaS Models
IoT monetization differs fundamentally from traditional SaaS pricing in several key dimensions. While SaaS typically charges for access to software capabilities, IoT platforms must account for complex value delivery spanning hardware, connectivity, software, analytics, and ongoing services.
According to research from Bain & Company, companies with successful IoT monetization strategies generate 30% more revenue from their IoT initiatives than those using traditional pricing approaches. The most successful companies recognize that IoT value is created across a multidimensional ecosystem rather than through a single application.
Key Considerations for IoT Platform Pricing:
- Hardware-Software Bundling: Should equipment costs be capitalized upfront or amortized through subscription fees?
- Data Volume and Value: How should pricing reflect both the quantity and strategic value of data processed?
- Ecosystem Complexity: How do you price platforms that connect multiple stakeholders and create network effects?
- Vertical-Specific Considerations: How do industry-specific requirements impact monetization strategies?
Core IoT Monetization Models
1. Device-Based Pricing
The most straightforward approach involves charging per connected device. Microsoft Azure IoT Hub employs this model with tiered pricing based on the number of connected devices and messages per day. This model works well when:
- Device counts are relatively stable and predictable
- Device types and usage patterns are consistent
- Customers can easily understand the relationship between devices and costs
According to IoT Analytics, approximately 40% of industrial IoT platforms employ some form of device-based pricing, making it the most common approach in the market.
2. Consumption-Based Pricing
This model ties costs directly to platform usage metrics such as:
- Data ingestion volume
- API calls or transactions
- Storage consumption
- Computing resources utilized
Google Cloud IoT Core exemplifies this approach, charging primarily based on data volume processed. This model excels when:
- Usage patterns vary significantly across customers
- The platform processes widely varying data volumes
- Customers prefer pay-as-you-go flexibility
Research by OpenView Partners indicates that consumption-based pricing models have grown in popularity by 29% across B2B software over the past two years, with IoT platforms leading this trend.
3. Outcome-Based Pricing
Perhaps the most sophisticated approach, outcome-based pricing ties costs directly to business value created:
- Energy management platforms charging a percentage of verified energy savings
- Predictive maintenance platforms pricing based on downtime reduction
- Asset tracking solutions charging based on loss prevention metrics
GE's Predix platform pioneered this approach in industrial settings, tying costs to measurable operational improvements. According to Forrester Research, outcome-based pricing is employed by only about 15% of IoT platforms today, but adoption is growing at 35% annually as it most directly aligns vendor incentives with customer success.
4. Tiered/Feature-Based Pricing
This model segments offerings into packages with increasing capabilities:
- Basic tier: Core connectivity and data collection features
- Premium tiers: Advanced analytics, AI capabilities, and industry-specific features
This approach, used effectively by PTC's ThingWorx platform, works best when:
- Customer needs vary significantly by sophistication level
- The platform offers clear feature differentiation
- Customers have a clear upgrade path as their IoT maturity evolves
Strategic Pricing Considerations for IoT Executives
Value Metrics Selection
The foundation of effective IoT pricing is selecting the right value metrics. According to research from Simon-Kucher & Partners, 78% of IoT initiatives that fail to meet revenue targets selected inappropriate value metrics.
Key questions to consider:
- Does the metric scale with customer value creation?
- Is the metric easily measurable and verifiable?
- Can customers predict and budget for costs based on this metric?
- Does the metric create proper incentives for platform usage?
Multi-Dimensional Pricing
Most successful IoT platforms employ hybrid pricing models that combine several approaches. For example:
- Base subscription fee per connected asset type
- Data processing fees for volumes exceeding thresholds
- Premium charges for advanced analytics capabilities
- Professional services fees for implementation and optimization
According to McKinsey, IoT platforms with multi-dimensional pricing models generate 22% higher average revenue per customer than those employing single-dimension approaches.
Industry-Specific Considerations
IoT pricing must account for significant industry-specific factors:
Manufacturing: Pricing often ties to production efficiency gains, with Siemens MindSphere factoring in production volume and equipment complexity.
Healthcare: Pricing frequently incorporates regulatory compliance and patient outcome improvement metrics, with platforms like Philips HealthSuite charging differently for diagnostic versus treatment applications.
Smart Cities: Pricing models typically consider population served and service criticality, with Cisco's Smart+Connected Communities platform adjusting pricing based on urban density and service types.
Consumer IoT: Often employs "freemium" models with basic functionality free and premium features monetized, as seen with Samsung SmartThings platform.
Practical Implementation Strategies
1. Pilot with Value-Based Discovery
Before full-scale deployment, conduct targeted pilots to validate the relationship between your pricing metrics and customer value creation. According to Boston Consulting Group, IoT platforms that conduct formal value-discovery pilots achieve 40% faster time to market and 35% higher customer satisfaction scores.
2. Create Transparent Pricing Calculators
Develop tools that help prospects understand and predict their costs. Salesforce IoT Cloud's pricing calculator allows customers to estimate costs based on device count, data volume, and application complexity, significantly improving conversion rates.
3. Establish Value Governance
Create formal processes to track, measure, and communicate the value delivered to customers. According to Deloitte, IoT platforms with formal value governance processes achieve 27% higher renewal rates than those without such processes.
Looking Ahead: Future Trends in IoT Monetization
As the IoT ecosystem matures, several emerging pricing trends deserve attention:
1. Ecosystem Revenue Sharing
Platforms are increasingly creating marketplaces where third-party developers can monetize applications, with the platform taking a percentage of revenue. AWS IoT marketplace exemplifies this approach, creating additional revenue streams beyond direct platform fees.
2. Data Monetization Models
Beyond charging for platform usage, sophisticated vendors are helping customers monetize their anonymized and aggregated IoT data through data marketplaces. According to Gartner, by 2023, 35% of large organizations will be either buyers or sellers of data via formal online data marketplaces, up from 25% in 2020.
3. AI-Enhanced Dynamic Pricing
Machine learning is enabling more sophisticated pricing models that can dynamically adjust based on usage patterns, value created, and competitive factors. This approach is particularly common in energy management and smart grid applications where value fluctuates with market conditions.
Conclusion
Effective IoT platform monetization represents both a significant challenge and opportunity for SaaS executives. The most successful approaches balance simplicity with value alignment, recognize industry-specific requirements, and evolve alongside customer sophistication.
While there is no one-size-fits-all pricing model for IoT platforms, executives who approach pricing strategically—with clear value metrics and multi-dimensional models—position themselves to capture the maximum share of the rapidly expanding connected device economy.
As you develop your IoT monetization strategy, remember that pricing is not merely a revenue mechanism but a strategic tool that shapes customer behavior, platform adoption, and long-term competitive positioning in the connected future.