.png)
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
In today's complex technology landscape, choosing the right application monitoring and observability platform has become a critical decision for engineering teams and IT leaders. As organizations increasingly rely on cloud-native architectures and microservices, the need for robust monitoring solutions has never been greater. Three major players dominate this space: New Relic, Datadog, and Splunk. But with their constantly evolving pricing models and feature sets, determining which offers the best value has become increasingly challenging.
Let's dive into the current state of the application monitoring pricing wars and help you navigate this complicated landscape.
The Shifting Landscape of Observability Pricing
The observability market has undergone significant transformation in recent years. What began as simple application performance monitoring (APM) has evolved into comprehensive observability platforms that encompass infrastructure monitoring, log management, real user monitoring, and more.
According to Gartner, the global observability market is expected to reach $9.3 billion by 2025, growing at a CAGR of 15.2%. This explosive growth has intensified competition among vendors, resulting in frequent pricing strategy adjustments as each tries to capture market share.
New Relic: The Pricing Disruptor
New Relic fundamentally changed its pricing approach in 2020 by introducing a consumption-based model centered around "data ingest." This shift represented a significant departure from their previous user-based pricing.
Current Pricing Structure:
- Pay-per-GB of data ingested ($0.25/GB as of this writing)
- Simplified product offering with bundled capabilities
- Free tier with generous limits (100GB/month free data ingest)
- Perpetual free tier for small users
New Relic's CEO, Lew Cirne, explained the rationale: "We want to align our success with our customers' success. The more value they get from our platform, the more they'll use it."
This approach has paid dividends. According to New Relic's financial reports, their customer retention rates have improved since implementing this model, though they faced initial revenue challenges during the transition.
Datadog: The Premium Comprehensive Option
Datadog has positioned itself as the premium, comprehensive observability solution, maintaining a hybrid pricing model.
Current Pricing Approach:
- Host-based pricing for infrastructure monitoring
- Custom pricing for APM and other services
- Volume-based pricing for logs
- Tiered plans with increasing capabilities
Datadog's pricing structure is more complex but offers tremendous flexibility. Organizations can select precisely the components they need, though this can lead to what some customers describe as "price unpredictability" as environments scale.
Datadog's recent financial results suggest this strategy is working well—they've consistently reported strong revenue growth and customer expansion rates exceeding 130%.
Splunk: The Enterprise Heavyweight
Splunk, traditionally known for its logging capabilities, has expanded into full observability but maintains its volume-based pricing approach.
Current Pricing Model:
- Data volume-based pricing
- Perpetual licenses or subscription options
- Premium pricing reflecting enterprise focus
- Substantial discounts for committed volumes
Splunk's pricing has historically been considered premium, though recent adjustments have made them more competitive. According to their financial reports, Splunk has been successfully transitioning to cloud-based subscription models, with annual recurring revenue growth exceeding 40% for cloud offerings.
Direct Pricing Comparisons
Making direct comparisons is challenging due to the different pricing metrics used:
| Vendor | Primary Pricing Model | Entry-Level Cost | Enterprise Costs |
|--------|------------------------|------------------|------------------|
| New Relic | Data ingest | $0 (Free tier) | Variable based on data volume |
| Datadog | Host-based + Services | ~$15/host/month | Often $100+ per host with full services |
| Splunk | Data volume | Starts at ~$2k/year | Can exceed $1M for large deployments |
Hidden Costs and Considerations
Beyond the advertised pricing, several factors can significantly impact total cost:
Data Growth Concerns
New Relic's and Splunk's data-based pricing models can lead to cost surprises as applications generate increasing telemetry data. According to a DevOps.com survey, 62% of organizations reported unexpected cost increases with consumption-based monitoring tools.
Integration Capabilities
Datadog generally scores highest for out-of-the-box integrations, potentially reducing implementation costs. A recent study by Enterprise Strategy Group found that Datadog customers spent 35% less time on integration and configuration compared to other platforms.
DevOps Tools Ecosystem
All three platforms offer varying levels of integration with popular DevOps tools. Splunk's recent acquisitions have strengthened their position in the security space, while Datadog has focused on expanding their infrastructure monitoring capabilities.
Strategic Considerations for Selection
When evaluating these performance monitoring solutions, consider:
Data Volume vs. Host Count: Organizations with high data volume but fewer hosts may find New Relic's model advantageous. Conversely, those with many hosts but moderate data needs might prefer Datadog.
Growth Trajectory: How will your monitoring needs scale? Datadog might offer more predictable costs for rapidly expanding infrastructure, while New Relic could be better for stable environments with predictable data volumes.
Required Features: While all three offer comprehensive observability platforms, their strengths differ:
- Splunk excels in log analytics and security use cases
- Datadog offers superior infrastructure monitoring and visualization
- New Relic provides exceptional application performance insights
- Long-term Commitments: All vendors offer substantial discounts for annual commitments, often 20-30% less than month-to-month pricing.
Real-World Cost Examples
A mid-sized SaaS company with approximately 500 hosts and 2TB daily data ingest shared their comparative costs:
- New Relic: ~$15,000/month (after negotiated rates)
- Datadog: ~$22,000/month (full-stack implementation)
- Splunk: ~$28,000/month (including security components)
However, their engineering team reported that Datadog's superior visualization capabilities and integrated infrastructure monitoring saved approximately 15-20 hours of engineering time weekly, offsetting the higher cost.
The Future of Observability Pricing
The application monitoring market continues to evolve rapidly. Several trends appear likely:
Convergence toward consumption-based models: All three vendors are gradually shifting toward usage-based components in their pricing.
AI-driven monitoring premiums: Enhanced AI capabilities will likely command premium pricing tiers.
Bundle discounting: Expect increased incentives for adopting full-platform solutions rather than point products.
According to Forrester Research, the observability platforms that provide the clearest cost predictability while maintaining innovation will likely gain market share over the next 2-3 years.
Conclusion: Making Your Decision
There's no universal "best choice" among these logging solutions and performance monitoring tools—each offers distinct advantages depending on your specific needs.
For organizations just beginning their observability journey, New Relic's transparent pricing and free tier provide an accessible entry point. Companies with complex infrastructure might find Datadog's comprehensive capabilities justify its premium pricing. Enterprises with substantial security and compliance needs often find Splunk's depth worth the investment.
The most effective approach is to conduct a proof-of-concept with each platform, evaluating not just the direct costs but also the productivity impacts, integration requirements, and alignment with your long-term technology strategy. Remember that the true cost extends beyond the monthly invoice—it includes implementation effort, training requirements, and the operational efficiency gained from your observability tooling.
As the application monitoring pricing wars continue, one thing remains clear: organizations that strategically select and optimize their observability platforms will be better positioned to deliver reliable, high-performing digital experiences to their customers.