.png)
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Introduction
The marketing technology (MarTech) landscape has exploded over the past decade, with over 11,000 solutions available to modern marketing teams, according to the latest MarTech Landscape report. As marketing leaders evaluate these solutions, one critical decision stands out beyond features and capabilities: the pricing model. Today, two dominant approaches have emerged in the MarTech ecosystem: performance-based and access-based pricing. The structure you choose can significantly impact your marketing ROI, budget predictability, and alignment with business objectives. This article explores both models, helping SaaS executives make more informed decisions when investing in marketing technology.
Understanding the Two Pricing Models
Access-Based Pricing
Access-based pricing (sometimes called subscription or license-based pricing) represents the traditional SaaS model. Under this approach, customers pay a recurring fee—typically monthly or annually—for access to the software platform, regardless of outcomes achieved.
Key characteristics include:
- Fixed recurring costs (usually based on users, features, or usage limits)
- Predictable expenses for budgeting purposes
- Unlimited use within defined parameters
- Costs remain constant regardless of performance or ROI
Examples include platforms like HubSpot, which charges based on contacts and features accessed, or Salesforce, which prices primarily on a per-user basis with feature-based tiers.
Performance-Based Pricing
Performance-based pricing ties costs directly to measurable business outcomes. Rather than charging for access to the technology, vendors charge based on the results the technology helps achieve.
Key characteristics include:
- Variable costs linked to specific metrics (conversions, revenue, etc.)
- Costs scale with success (pay more when achieving more)
- Shared risk between vendor and customer
- Direct alignment between spending and results
Common examples include digital advertising platforms that charge per click or acquisition, affiliate marketing tools that take a percentage of sales, or certain email marketing platforms that charge per successful delivery or open.
The Business Case For Each Model
When Access-Based Makes Sense
Access-based models tend to work best in several scenarios:
1. When utilization is high and consistent
For technologies that serve as foundational infrastructure used daily across teams (like CRMs, marketing automation platforms, or content management systems), access-based pricing often delivers better value. According to Forrester Research, marketing teams that heavily utilize their core platforms can achieve up to 40% better ROI with fixed subscription models compared to variable performance pricing.
2. When budget predictability is critical
Enterprise organizations with complex budgeting processes often prefer the predictability of access-based pricing. A 2022 Gartner survey found that 67% of CMOs cite budget predictability as a top-three factor when selecting MarTech vendors.
3. For broad platforms with diverse use cases
Platforms that serve multiple functions across the marketing organization (like comprehensive marketing suites) typically operate on access models because measuring performance across diverse use cases becomes prohibitively complex.
4. When in-house expertise drives performance
When results depend heavily on how skillfully your team uses the platform, access models allow you to benefit from your internal expertise without paying premium rates for success you've engineered.
When Performance-Based Makes Sense
Performance-based models excel in different circumstances:
1. For point solutions with clear attribution
Technologies focused on specific, measurable outcomes (like conversion rate optimization tools or customer acquisition platforms) can effectively employ performance pricing. The attribution is straightforward, with a clear line between the technology and the result.
2. When testing new channels or approaches
Performance pricing reduces risk when exploring unproven tactics. According to a McKinsey study, companies using performance-based vendor relationships for new marketing initiatives report 35% higher satisfaction with ROI compared to those using fixed-price agreements.
3. For cash-constrained organizations
Startups and growth-stage companies often prefer performance pricing to conserve capital. You pay more as you succeed, effectively letting future revenue fund your marketing technology.
4. When vendor expertise significantly impacts results
If the vendor's ongoing optimization and expertise directly drive outcomes (as with many managed service platforms), performance pricing aligns incentives for continued improvement.
Real-World Impact: A Tale of Two Companies
Consider two B2B SaaS companies that took different approaches to their marketing technology stack:
Company A: The Access Approach
A mid-market HR software provider invested $240,000 annually in an access-based marketing automation platform. Despite the significant fixed cost, they built a high-performing demand generation engine that delivered 4,200 qualified leads in the first year—at an effective cost of $57 per lead. As their team became more proficient with the platform, their second year yielded 7,500 leads without increasing technology costs, dropping their effective cost to $32 per lead.
Company B: The Performance Approach
A competing HR software startup opted for a performance-based lead generation platform, paying $85 per qualified lead. In their first year, they generated 2,800 leads for a total technology spend of $238,000. As their campaign performance improved in year two, they generated 6,500 leads at the same rate, with technology costs scaling proportionally to $552,500.
The different outcomes highlight a critical insight: while Company B initially enjoyed lower risk and minimal upfront investment, Company A's approach delivered substantially better economics at scale once they optimized their usage of the platform.
Hybrid Models: The Emerging Middle Ground
Recognizing the limitations of pure models, many vendors now offer hybrid approaches. According to research from Deloitte, 43% of SaaS companies now offer some form of hybrid pricing option, up from just 26% in 2018.
These hybrid models typically include:
- Baseline access fee + performance component: A reduced subscription fee combined with performance-based charges
- Outcome-based tiers: Fixed subscription pricing that varies based on achieved results
- Success-based contracts: Fixed pricing with refunds or credits if agreed-upon outcomes aren't achieved
- Consumption-based pricing: Charges based on actual usage rather than pure outcomes or access
These nuanced approaches often represent the best of both worlds, providing some budget predictability while maintaining alignment between costs and results.
Making Your Decision: Five Key Questions
When evaluating pricing models for marketing technology, ask these critical questions:
How consistently will we use this technology? Technologies used daily often provide better value under access models; occasional-use tools may be more economical with performance pricing.
How predictable are the outcomes? If results vary significantly month to month, performance pricing may create budget volatility.
Who controls the variables that drive success? If your team primarily drives outcomes, access models let you benefit from your expertise; if the vendor plays the crucial role, performance models better align incentives.
What's our cash position? Resource-constrained organizations may prefer performance models to reduce upfront costs and risk.
How will our needs scale? Consider not just current requirements but how costs will evolve as your organization grows and succeeds.
Conclusion
The choice between performance-based and access-based pricing models goes beyond simple cost comparisons—it affects how you budget, scale, and align technology expenses with business outcomes. While access models provide predictability and often better long-term economics for heavily utilized platforms, performance models reduce risk and create stronger vendor alignment for outcome-specific tools.
Most sophisticated marketing organizations ultimately adopt a hybrid approach, using access-based models for core infrastructure and performance-based models for specialized, outcome-focused applications. The key is understanding which model best serves each specific part of your marketing technology stack and aligns with your organization's financial strategy and operational approach.
As you evaluate MarTech solutions, look beyond the headline price to understand the true economics of each pricing model at your expected scale and utilization. The right pricing alignment not only impacts your marketing budget but can fundamentally change how technology partners contribute to your business success.